logo
Father-and-son vigilante murderers David and Edward King see appeal bids dismissed

Father-and-son vigilante murderers David and Edward King see appeal bids dismissed

ITV News08-05-2025

Police body cam footage released after sentence shows the moment David King tries to explain how he stabbed a suspected thief seen trying door handles
A father and son who murdered a thief who had been trying car doors near their home have lost bids to appeal against their convictions.
David and Edward King were jailed for life for the murder of Neil Charles, whom they attacked in the early hours of 20 June 2021, in Bury St Edmunds in Suffolk.
Ipswich Crown Court heard that Mr Charles, 47, was stabbed with a dagger and died in hospital two days later.
David King was jailed for a minimum of 21 years in April 2023, with Edward King sentenced to at least 19 years behind bars, less time already spent in custody.
The pair sought to challenge their convictions at the Court of Appeal earlier this month, claiming they were unsafe, but three senior judges dismissed the appeal bids in a ruling on Thursday.
Lord Justice Warby, sitting with Mr Justice Goose and Judge Dennis Watson KC, said they were 'satisfied that the convictions are not arguably unsafe'.
In their judgment, Lord Justice Warby said that on the night of the murder, David and Edward King twice left their home in Radnor Close, Bury St Edmunds, to search for someone they had seen trying car doors, including those of a vehicle they owned, on CCTV.
He added that the pair eventually found and attacked Mr Charles, with Edward King – who was 18 at the time of the killing and 20 when he was sentenced – slicing Mr Charles' knee with a '27-inch Samurai sword', and David King, aged 56 at the time of sentence, stabbing Mr Charles in the chest with a 'bayonet-style' dagger.
At a hearing at the Court of Appeal on 2 May, Kieran Vaughan KC, for both men, said that the convictions were unsafe due to 'bad character' evidence wrongly being admitted at trial.
Lord Justice Warby said this included text messages between Edward and David King, which 'expressed hostility and violent thoughts towards thieves and burglars', and that 'numerous knives and other weapons had been acquired and kept at the family home', including machetes.
In the ruling, the judge said that the evidence concerning weapons 'was capable of demonstrating an obsessive and unhealthy interest in weapons', and dismissed the appeal bids.
Edward King also sought to challenge the length of his sentence, with Mr Vaughan arguing that his 'age and lack of maturity' were not properly taken into account, and that he played a 'secondary role' in the killing.
But this appeal bid was also dismissed, with Lord Justice Warby stating that the sentencing judge had not 'arguably erred'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Moment ‘killer' brands samurai sword ‘freaking sexy' before he ‘murdered boy, 14, in rampage'
Moment ‘killer' brands samurai sword ‘freaking sexy' before he ‘murdered boy, 14, in rampage'

Scottish Sun

time16 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Moment ‘killer' brands samurai sword ‘freaking sexy' before he ‘murdered boy, 14, in rampage'

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the moment an alleged killer branded a samurai sword "freaking sexy" before he murdered a 14-year-old boy in a rampage, a court heard. Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, ambushed Daniel Anjorin, 14, as he made his way to school in Hainault, East London. 7 Marcus Arduini Monzo filmed himself unboxing a samurai sword, jurors heard Credit: Central News 7 He then allegedly went on to kill Daniel Anjorin Credit: Central News Jurors heard Monzo also tried to kill female cop Yasim Mechem-Whitfield, Henry De Los Rios Polina, Sindy Arias and Donato Iwule in the horror. Police today released footage shown to the court of the so-called "mystic" unboxing a Katana sword he had bought online. The Spanish-Brazilian national can be heard saying "wow" as he explains the weapon was "handmade in Japan". Monzo can be seen standing on a black mat with a ginger cat he calls the "Wizard" by his side. He tells the camera: "This just came through… Ninja stuff. So I'm sort of obliged to do some ninja stuff with the Wizard." Monzo then brands the sword "freaking sexy" and exclaims "ooh" as he lunges around holding the weapon. The court heard the martial artist spent nearly £1,000 on swords in December 2023 before cancelling the order. He then bought two handmade Katana swords for £427.80 on February 21, 2024, with delivery coming through to his home in early April. Jurors heard Monzo killed and skinned his own cat at home before setting off on the rampage after believing he was in the "Hunger Games". He carried out the attack with "murderous intent" over a 20-minute period on April 30, it was said. The Old Bailey heard Donato was the first to be attacked when Monzo "deliberately" drove into him in his van. As he was knocked into a garden, Monzo allegedly got out the van and slashed his neck with the Samurai sword. 7 Monzo filmed the unboxing video on his iPhone Credit: PA 7 He called the sword 'freaking sexy' 7 Monzo could be seen practising his martial arts in the video Donato managed to escape as emergency crews were scrambled to the residential street. Meanwhile, Daniel was walking to school "minding his own business" when his life was "snuffed out in an instant". The court heard PC Mechem-Whitfield arrived at the scene of the horror and "bravely pursued" Monzo through alleyways after he tried to flee. The officer was "struck three times" and suffered significant injuries in the horror. Monzo then burst into a house to attack a couple in their bedroom as their child slept next to them, it was said. He shouted out 'do you believe in God?' about four times then began to attack Henry De Los Rios Polania with the sword before attempting to stab his wife. Jurors were told their lives were only spared because the youngster woke up and started to cry. Monzo was taken to hospital by police before going to Romford police station. NHS systems were checked and showed there were no documented mental health concerns or access to mental health services by Monzo. The court heard Monzo does not dispute he carried out the attacks. But the jury will have decide "why he did so and what his state of mind was" at the time. Prosecutor Tom Little KC said: "The prosecution case is that this is a clear case of murder and that it is also a clear case of four attempted murders. "We say that the defendant's conduct was brought about by self-induced intoxication in the form of drugs. "This, we say, led to a psychotic disorder but not one meeting the requirements to make out the partial defence to murder of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility." Monzo, of West Beckton, Newham, denies murder, four counts of attempted murder and one of wounding with intent. The trial continues. 7 Monzo is accused of injuring four others in the horror Credit: Central News

'El Chapo' brother of ex-Liverpool player disputes sentence for £26m drug empire
'El Chapo' brother of ex-Liverpool player disputes sentence for £26m drug empire

Daily Record

time16 hours ago

  • Daily Record

'El Chapo' brother of ex-Liverpool player disputes sentence for £26m drug empire

Jonathan Cassidy imported hundreds of kilos of cocaine into the UK in modified vehicles before it was distributed by his younger brother Jamie. An ex-builder who ran a £26m drug empire with his former Liverpool FC wonderkid brother has failed in his bid to challenge his EncroChat sentence. Jonathan Cassidy imported hundreds of kilos of cocaine from South America in an international drugs racket with his younger brother Jamie and business partner Nasar Ahmed, reports the Liverpool Echo. Cassidy, 50, boasted on Encrochat messages that his criminal enterprise was reminiscent of Mexican drug lord Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán under the name "WhiskyWasp. However, following the hack of the EncroChat network by European law enforcement, Cassidy fled to Dubai. He was arrested upon his return to the UK in October 2020. Following over three years of legal challenges where the brothers and Ahmed fought the admissibility of the EncroChat data, the defendants pleaded guilty in February 2024. Cassidy was sentenced to 21 years, nine months for conspiracy to import cocaine; conspiracy to supply cocaine; and conspiracy to conceal, transfer and disguise criminal proceeds. Cassidy appeared before London's Court of Appeal on May 20 this year in a renewed application for leave to appeal against his sentence. His challenge, brought before the high court by counsel Michael Bromley-Martin KC, said too low a discount was applied as credit for his guilty plea and the sentencing judge failed to consider exceptional mitigating factors. But dismissing his case, the Court of Appeal bench of Lord Justice Fraser, Mr Justice Hilliard and Mr Justice Constable said they were "not persuaded that the resulting sentences are manifestly excessive or reached after an error in principle". 'Instrumental in organising significant quantities of drugs' The high court heard that EncroChat data showed Cassidy's first importation occurred in early March 2020, when 194 kilograms of cocaine, which was in blocks embossed with snowmen, was imported into the country. The payments for the consignment were arranged by Ahmed, with the two men sharing the profits, which amounted to between £2,000 and £10,000 per kilo. The ECHO previously reported how the gang brought the drugs into the UK via Amsterdam hidden in vehicles with modified hides. Cassidy exchanged messages with a Dutch contact on April 2 of the same year to arrange 90 kilos of cocaine and Ahmed arranged a Hawala banker in Amsterdam to release payment. Arrangements continued until police arrested a courier and found €800,000 and nine-and-a-half kilos of cocaine. But despite the dent in operations Cassidy exchanged messages with an associate in the Netherlands about a contact who claimed to be able to source 1,200 kilos of the class A drug. Discussions were had about purchasing 10 kilos as a test run with it arriving a few days later between April 14-15. At the same time Cassidy directed his brother Jamie to oversee the distribution of 162 kilos of cocaine, with the younger man providing a list of who had been given what. By this time EncroChat had been hacked and law enforcement had access to messages. An associate of the three men called Leon Atkinson was supplied cocaine sourced from and supplied by Ahmed, with payments nearing £500,000 in Bitcoin to a wallet controlled by a contact. The Court of Appeal heard that although details varied, "both Cassidy and instrumental in organising significant quantities of drugs, arrangements payment, instructing couriers and so on". Panadol box led police to Cassidy Message analysis showed the men not only conducted business on their Encro phones, but they began to use them for everyday conversations, sharing photos of their families and special occasions. On one occasion, Cassidy referred to plain clothed police officers as "quick scruffy c**** with rucksacks", while in a different message he shared a picture of a box of Panadol. Both of these messages, paired with cell site and fingerprint analysis, helped create a detailed timeline of events for detectives. Another message showed how highly Cassidy thought of himself. When watching an episode of Narcos, he sent an image to a friend joking that he and drug lord El Chapo, who had an estimated net worth of $1bn, shared the same birthday. His friend responded: "Coincidence, I think f***ing not". The administrators of EncroChat warned users on June 13 2020 that government entities had gained access to the domain and security was no longer guaranteed. Ahmed searched online for travel updates to the UAE on July 13, but was arrested at his house in Bury two days later. Cassidy used his iPad to read an article on the ECHO about a fugitive who had been on the run for 16 years but was arrested from Portugal on his return. He left the country on a flight to Dubai that evening, but perhaps emboldened by the fact his brother had been able to return to the country without being stopped, he flew back in October, where he was arrested. Cassidy, his brother and Ahmed were all sentenced in February 2024. The judge drew attention to the scale of the operation, the amount of drugs imported, the size of the transactions and the highly organised nature of the operation. He sentenced Cassidy to 27 years, but then reduced the sentence due to conditions in prison due to covid, as well as an additional discount of 15% for the defendant's guilty plea. ‌ Cassidy's brother Jamie, a youth star at Liverpool who was top scorer for England u16s before injuries blighted his promising career, was sentenced to 13 years and three months, while Ahmed received a custodial sentence of 21 years and nine months. 'Not persuaded sentence was manifestly excessive' The Court of Appeal heard Cassidy's sentence was reduced by four months to take into account him serving a period of imprisonment during covid conditions while on remand. The judges found the sentencing judge's adjustment was sufficient and not outside the range that could properly be granted. Ahmed also appeared during the same hearing at the Court of Appeal to challenge his sentence on the same grounds as Cassidy, in particular that he was awarded an insufficient reduction for his guilty plea. The judges confirmed they dismissed Ahmed's appeal and refused a renewed application. In May 2022, four associates linked to the Cassidys and Ahmed were jailed for almost 40 years after a selfie of Atkinson led to their downfall. Liverpool man Joshua Avis is wanted by Greater Manchester Police in connection with their investigation. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Mum of serial killer nurse hopes 'nightmare' is ending
Mum of serial killer nurse hopes 'nightmare' is ending

Glasgow Times

time3 days ago

  • Glasgow Times

Mum of serial killer nurse hopes 'nightmare' is ending

Glaswegian Colin Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was convicted in 2008 of murdering four elderly women and attempting to murder a fifth while working as a nurse at hospitals in Leeds. But the Court of Appeal has heard that new expert knowledge may mean the former nurse's conviction is unsafe. READ MORE: Two people rushed to hospital after bus mounted the pavement He was accused of injecting the patients with insulin, causing sudden and severe hypoglycaemia. The victims—Doris Ludlam, Bridget Bourke, Irene Crookes, and Ethel Hall—were all patients in orthopaedic wards at Leeds General Infirmary and St James' Hospital in 2002. Vera Wilby, who survived, was the subject of the attempted murder charge. Despite the conviction and a minimum 30-year life sentence handed down after a five-month trial involving 20 expert witnesses, new evidence has prompted the Court of Appeal to re-examine the safety of the verdict. Speaking to STV News, Campbell's mother, June Morrison, reiterated her belief in her son's innocence. She said: 'We have never believed that he is guilty of any of this,' she said. 'We have always believed these women were not murdered. There were other things going on with their health. They had a lot of underlying conditions. 'Whatever decision is made about Colin, it affects the whole of our family. It affects the rest of our lives. If it does not go the way we want it to, we are going to have to start thinking about another campaign because we cannot just stop there. 'We need to keep fighting. I think we can appeal against this appeal, but again, you have to go through the process of having new evidence or new arguments. 'I have not been able to sleep because of the stress. I am not eating properly. He is on my mind constantly. When I do sleep, I wake up thinking about Colin.' The judges – Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken – will now retire to consider their verdict on whether the evidence that led to Colin's conviction was unsafe. June said: 'It still doesn't feel as if it's real. It is a scary time. We are hopeful as well, but it has been quite frightening at times. You are left feeling, is this finally it? 'Is this nightmare that we have been going through for over 17 years finally ending? It has been going on for longer than that, but Colin has been in prison for 17 years." Colin has been serving life imprisonment at HMP Frankland in County Durham since an investigation concluded that the women in his care developed unexplained severe hypoglycaemia while in hospital. June added: 'A lot of these families they believed that their loved ones died naturally, and then they were told there was a nurse who had murdered them. 'Me as a mother, I know my son is not capable of anything at that. It breaks my heart to think of these families and what they are going through. 'There are no winners. Because at the end of the day, if and when my son gets released, they are going to have to go through the process again, of if my mother wasn't murdered, what are they to believe? I can't think for other families but for myself; no one wins.' 'I do think nurses need better protection in court. Some kind of expert who can represent them in court because they don't have anything at the moment. 'They do have professional bodies, but practising nurses on wards need something more to help, to ensure that no other nurse or family has to go through this again.' READ MORE: Teen charged with 'attempted murder' after boy rushed to hospital While the court was off, June went down to Durham to see Colin in prison. She said: 'I think he is just taking things day by day and hoping. 'What is it they say? Prepare for the worst and hope for the best. This is what we're hoping for. 'I know the trial and a hearing are totally different, but being down in London, sitting on the court benches, it brings it all back. Colin is not there. He is on a TV screen, so it is just a small picture that I can see. 'During the trial, I couldn't see Colin either because there was a screen between us. If I looked up, I could just see him. When you hear from the prosecution experts and they start saying 'my opinion is', it does take you right back. 'I have allowed myself to have thoughts of 'when he gets out, what we could do?' That is all a challenge. I have also had thoughts of 'what if he doesn't get out?' How do we start campaigning again? Who do we get on board? What happens with the legal team? 'All that goes through your mind, but at the moment, I just get through the day. Coming into this, as a family, we had never been in trouble with the police. 'We never had any dealings with courts or anything like that, so it was hard to accept this was what was going to be happening for the next few years.' Campbell has consistently denied any wrongdoing and maintains he never administered insulin to any patient. His first appeal in 2009 was unsuccessful, and he applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in 2011. In February 2021, the CCRC referred his conviction to the Court of Appeal, citing new medical evidence that presents a "real possibility" that the verdicts are unsafe. The review concluded that natural causes could explain the hypoglycaemia in all four deceased patients, with the possible exception of Ethel Hall. READ MORE: Urgent search launched for missing teen who may have travelled to Birmingham In written submissions, James Curtis KC said the jury in Campbell's trial had the 'exceptional assistance of a meticulous, systematic and detailed summing up' from the judge. He added: 'They were provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses. 'The judge carefully summarised and explained these, and accurately directed the jury as to how to approach them.' Michael Mansfield KC told the court on Thursday that Campbell's appeal is a 'straightforward case', and that judges 'must conclude that these convictions are unsafe."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store