Federal judge extends block on Florida immigration law that led to arrest of a U.S. citizen
Sebastiana Gomez-Perez puts her arm around her son, Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, after his release from Leon County Jail on April 17, 2025. (Photo by Jackie Llanos/Florida Phoenix)
A federal judge brought up the arrest in Leon County of Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, a U.S. citizen born in Georgia, during a hearing Friday in which she extended her block of the new Florida immigration law until April 29.
U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams expressed frustration about the arrests of Lopez-Gomez and others, said an attorney representing the immigrants and groups suing the state.
At issue is Williams' April 4 order temporarily barring enforcement of a law passed during a special session earlier this year making it a first-degree misdemeanor to illegally enter the state as an 'unauthorized alien.'
A Florida Highway Patrol trooper's arrest of Lopez-Gomez on Wednesday prompted national attention following Florida Phoenix's reports that he was set to remain in jail because U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had placed a 48-hour hold on him — even after a Leon County judge determined there had been no probable cause for the arrest.
Lopez-Gomez was released from Leon County jail on Thursday evening. The 20-year-old held his mother in a tight embrace and wept when they reunited.
'We appreciate that the federal courts have seen through this blatantly unconstitutional law, but the reality is that, without enforcement, it seems that local law enforcement and Florida Highway Patrol are continuing to ignore the judge and order,' said Miriam Fahsi Haskell, an attorney for Community Justice Project representing the plaintiffs, in a phone interview with the Phoenix. 'The reality is that once a person is arrested under SB 4C and booked into jail, that person risks then having an ICE hold on them.'
Community Justice Project, the ACLU of Florida, Americans for Immigrant Justice, and Florida Legal Services attorneys are representing the plaintiffs: the Florida Immigrant Coalition, Farmworker Association of Florida Inc., and two women without permanent legal status.
David Matthew Costello, lead attorney representing Attorney General James Uthmeier, declined to comment, and a spokesperson for the attorney general's office did not respond to the Phoenix's questions. The other defendants are the statewide prosecutor and state attorneys.
During the hearing at the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida in Miami, attorneys representing the state argued that law enforcement is not bound by Williams' order, Fahsi Haskell said. Another hearing is set for April 29.
'The Court enters a [temporary restraining order] prohibiting Defendants and their officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and any person who are in active concert or participation with them from enforcing SB 4-C,' Williams' order states.
Two other men were with Lopez-Gomez when the trooper stopped the car because the driver was going 78 mph in a 65 mph zone, according to the arrest report. The driver, Estiven Sales-Perez, and another passenger, Ismael Sales-Luis, were also charged with illegal entry as 'unauthorized aliens.' The driver was also charged with driving without a license.
ICE has taken custody of Sales-Perez and is holding him in a Tallahassee field office, according to the online detainee locator system.
'Florida Highway Patrol will continue to work willingly with our federal partners to engage in interior enforcement of immigration law,' a spokesperson for the agency wrote in a statement to the Phoenix.
Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried called the arrest a kidnapping.
'Where does the lawlessness of this administration stop? If this can happen to an American-born citizen, it can happen to any of us,' she said in a statement.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Deland man accused of strangling, holding ex-girlfriend captive in Palm Coast
The Brief A Deland man was arrested after allegedly strangling and holding his ex-girlfriend captive for two hours during a domestic dispute in Palm Coast. Edgar Lopez, 26, faces multiple charges including false imprisonment and battery by strangulation. ORLANDO, Fla. - A Deland man is facing multiple charges after allegedly strangling and falsely imprisoning his ex-girlfriend during a domestic disturbance in Palm Coast, according to the Flagler County Sheriff's Office. What we know Deputies responded late Friday night to a residence on Reybury Lane after a concerned citizen reported a possible domestic disturbance. Investigators said Edgar Lopez, 26, arrived at his ex-girlfriend's home with flowers and asked to come inside. Once inside, he refused to leave and became violent when the victim tried to call 911. Lopez allegedly grabbed the phone, blocked the front door, and used a towel to muffle the victim's screams, authorities said. The victim told deputies she was held against her will and battered for about two hours before managing to escape and call for help. Lopez fled before deputies arrived. A warrant was issued for his arrest, and he was later taken into custody by the DeLand Police Department. Lopez was charged with false imprisonment, tampering with a witness, battery by strangulation, and domestic violence battery. He was booked into the Volusia County Branch Jail and later released on a $10,000 bond. STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO: Download the FOX Local app for breaking news alerts, the latest news headlines Download the FOX 35 Storm Team Weather app for weather alerts & radar Sign up for FOX 35's daily newsletter for the latest morning headlines FOX Local: Stream FOX 35 newscasts, FOX 35 News+, Central Florida Eats on your smart TV The Source The information in this article comes from a report shared by the Flagler County Sheriff's Office.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
16 states sue to block Trump administration plan to distribute machine-gun conversion devices
Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown (D) at a July 2024 news conference. Brown on Monday joined 15 other attorneys general suing the Trump administration over its plan to distribute thousands of machine-gun conversion devices. (Photo by Elijah Pittman/Maryland Matters) Attorneys general in 16 jurisdictions sued Monday to block a Trump administration plan to redistribute thousands of devices that convert guns to machine guns, including distribution in states where such devices are banned by state law. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Maryland, said the plan would not only expose residents of those states to greater amounts of deadly violence, but it would be contrary to federal law that calls for the seizure of machine-gun conversion devices. And it would cause federal officials to 'aid and abet violations of state law' by distributing the devices in states where they are outlawed, the suit said. The decision to return almost 12,000 forced reset triggers — which allow shooters to fire hundreds of rounds a minute with one pull of the trigger — was announced in a settlement last month between the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and gun manufacturers and gun-rights groups. 'These devices enable firearms to fire up to 900 bullets per minute. The increased rate of fire allows carnage and chaos to reign on the streets,' said Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown (D) in a virtual press briefing Monday with New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin (D) and Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings (D). 'Everyone nearby becomes vulnerable to serious injury or death. These are battlefield weapons that have no place in our communities,' Brown said. Under the Biden administration, ATF classified forced reset triggers as 'prohibited machine guns under federal law … and conducted extensive retrieval operations, seizing nearly 12,000 FRTs from the field,' according to the lawsuit. Maryland Supreme Court upholds gun possession ban in some non-felony cases But the new administration reversed course after a Feb. 7 executive order from President Donald Trump (R) on 'Protecting Second Amendment Rights.' On May 16, the Justice Department announced a settlement with Rare Breed Triggers, a manufacturer of the devices based in Wichita City, Texas. Under the deal, the company agreed not to develop or design such triggers for handguns, to promote safe and responsible use of its products, and to enforce its patents to 'prevent infringement that could threaten public safety.' In exchange, the government agreed not to enforce any policy where an FRT is 'contended to be' a machine gun, and to return by Sept. 30 any reset triggers seized or 'taken as a result of a voluntary surrender.' 'We won,' Lawrence DeMonico, president of Rare Breed Triggers, said in a video posted online the day settlement was announced. 'With the Trump administration's renewed focused on justice and their commitment to correcting the weaponization of the DOJ under the Biden administration, we were finally able to secure a deal that brought this fight to a close.' Representatives with Rare Breed Triggers and the Justice Department did not respond to email requests for comment Monday. The National Association of Gun Rights, which was also a party to the settlement, said it a statement that the deal will survive any challenge from the 'anti-gun attorneys general.' 'A federal court already ruled the government unlawfully seized thousands of legal triggers from law-abiding Americans — a decision that the ATF now acknowledges and accepts,' said Hannah Hill, vice president for the association. 'These states lack standing to file this lawsuit, and they know it. This suit is just reckless political lawfare.' But the states' lawsuit highlights the impact of gun violence in their jurisdictions, where it said there were nearly 47,000 gun-related deaths in 2023. Illinois had the most such deaths that year, at 1,691. Of the states represented at Mondays briefing, Maryland recorded 737 gun-related deaths in 2023, New Jersey had 430 and Delaware had 124, according to the suit. The suit also spells out the financial burden that comes with gun violence, for medical bills, police, court and prison costs. It said one fatal shooting in Baltimore can cost $2.4 million and a nonfatal shooting costs $1.5 million. In Newark, New Jersey, the cost is nearly $2.2 million for a fatal shooting and $1 million for a nonfatal shooting. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE 'This is not a partisan issue. It is a public safety issue,' Delaware's Jennings said. 'The Trump administration's deal to redistribute these deadly devices violates the law, full stop. It undermines public safety and ties the hand of law enforcement.' Platkin recalled the shooting death in March 2022, just two months after he took office, of SeQuoya Bacon-Jones, who was a bystander to a shooting when she was struck and killed. Platkin said SeQuoya would have celebrated her 13th birthday last Saturday. 'She had dreamed of becoming a law enforcement officer, but instead she was killed by a single stray bullet while she was playing hide-and-seek in the courtyard of her apartment complex,' Platkin said. 'I wish the Trump administration … would put little kids like Sequoya's interests ahead of the gun lobby's. But since they don't seem to care, we're going to make them care.' Besides Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey, other jurisdictions on the suit are the District of Columbia and the states of Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. All but Maine and Vermont currently have state laws prohibiting forced reset triggers or guns modified with them.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
After Dream Act reversal, undocumented students in Texas face tuition uncertainty
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Nearly a week has passed since the Texas Dream Act was struck down, and schools still do not have clear answers about changes to undocumented student tuition rates. Undocumented students lost the ability to receive in-state tuition Wednesday after the Trump administration sued Texas, accusing it of violating federal law. The administration said the Dream Act, which passed the Texas legislature with bipartisan support in 2001, was in violation of a 1996 federal law. Because Texas agreed, the suit was settled within hours, and it is unclear if the decision will be appealed. For some undocumented students, the difference between in-state and out-of-state tuition at Texas public universities may be the difference between receiving a college education or not being able to afford one. Edilsa Lopez is a recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and attended the University of Texas at Austin for her undergraduate degree. She said that because noncitizens are not eligible for federal aid, the Dream Act was essential for her ability to afford college. State of Texas: Abbott approves billions for schools, but is it enough? 'Having in-state tuition for us was such a blessing, because we didn't have to pay three times the in-state tuition rate,' Lopez said. 'Even then, we had a situation that was still very difficult for us, just because of the limited amount of financial aid available to us, undocumented students.' The out-of-state tuition rate ranges from double to nearly quadruple that of in-state tuition, depending on the school. Out-of-state students at UT and Texas A&M University pay the highest amounts, over $40,000 per year. Lopez was brought to the United States from Guatemala at age 12, fleeing poverty and homelessness. Even after arriving in the U.S., she said, she experienced homelessness after her mother had to leave the U.S., leaving Lopez to care for herself and her sister. Lopez said going to college was transformative for her life, as she now works for a Fortune 500 company as an accountant. 'I was brought here [at a] very young age … and so education for me was very important, and I only had one thing in mind, which is to graduate from college,' Lopez said. 'And so it was difficult in itself, but having in-state tuition and then graduating from college changed my life completely. I am now a professional financial accountant.' While in high school, Lopez said she didn't know about college, but her educators urged her to pursue it. She ended up in the top 10% of her class, making her eligible for automatic admission to most public universities in the state. Now, Lopez worries for the undocumented students following in her footsteps. She said that even before the Dream Act was reversed, she at times struggled to pay for her education. 'At the very end, I wasn't able to get all the money that I needed to graduate from college, and I almost dropped out,' Lopez said. 'But it was thanks to my high school teachers who really supported me, and they always believed in my potential, that they sort of helped me and did a fundraiser for me.' State Rep. Roman Romero, D-Fort Worth, shares Lopez's concerns about the future for undocumented students — especially those who are currently in the middle of their college education. Romero, who chairs the Mexican American Legislative Caucus in the Texas House, worries that Texas may lose good students to other states if they can no longer afford a college education in Texas. 'How would we not continue to support those that we have invested, likely over $100,000 into that child, if they were with us through K through 12,' Romero said. 'It's a lot of money to invest and then see them walk away and go to a different state. So we don't want this talent to leave.' State Sen. Carol Alvarado, D-Houston, pointed out the economic impact that allowing undocumented students to pay in-state tuition generates for Texas. She said in 2021 alone, 20,000 undocumented students paid about $80 million in tuition to state universities. 'I think … we're going to take a financial hit from this, because these are students that may choose not to go to school,' Alvarado said. One temporary solution, proposed by State Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, is for the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to give undocumented students a temporary designation that allows them to receive in-state tuition until the legislature can address the matter in its next session. Romero said he agrees with Howard. In a statement, THECB Spokesperson Mike Eddleman said the agency does not have an update to share, but is looking into the matter. 'Currently, we are evaluating the scope of the ruling and are actively working to ensure that any THECB rules, policies, and programs comply with the law,' Eddleman said. In the meantime, universities in Texas have to decide how to proceed with billing students for the fall semester. So far, most do not have updates to share. University of Texas Rio Grande Valley spokesperson Melissa Vasquez said, in a statement, that the university understands the decision may affect students' existing financial plans. 'As UTRGV continues its review of the impact of the consent judgment, students who may be affected will be notified directly,' Vasquez said. A spokesperson for Midwestern State University said that MSU is currently reviewing the impact of the decision. A spokesperson for UT Austin said it did not have updates to share. The Texas A&M University System will hold a meeting Friday to discuss the change, according to a spokesperson from West Texas A&M University. Other public universities around the state did not respond to requests for comment. The sudden nature of the decision not only complicates the path forward for universities and students, but it also raises eyebrows at the prospect of collusion between the federal government and the state. Alvarado was frustrated by the timing of the decision, right after the legislative session concluded. 'It's kind of like a boyfriend that cheated on you,' Alvarado said. 'Everybody was recognizing the importance of keeping the in-state tuition for these students, and then as soon as we turn our backs and go home, then they circumvented the legislative process.' Romero called the whole process 'shady,' but said the path forward has to involve more than talking about the issue. 'We're at a time when President Trump is really using every single lawyer at his disposal … to go around and circumvent the priorities of the state of Texas,' Romero said. 'Am I upset? Yes, but we can't just stay upset. We have to do something about it.' Undocumented students will be faced with the reality of being charged significantly more for higher education, and possibly not being able to afford it, if lawmakers or THECB are unable to find a solution before the fall semester. For Lopez, who said she learned English specifically so that she would be able to get an education, that would have made a difference in her life trajectory. 'I mean, the only thing we want in this country is literally opportunity for an education,' Lopez said. 'We want to be able to contribute back to the state we have lived here our entire lives.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
