Israeli attacks kill at least 51 as Trump signals progress in Gaza talks
Israeli attacks have killed at least 51 people in the Gaza Strip, including 14 Palestinians who were waiting near aid distribution centres, medical sources told Al Jazeera, even as United States President Donald Trump said 'great progress' was being made to bring an end to the war.
Sources at al-Awda and Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospitals in Gaza told Al Jazeera that at least nine Palestinians were killed and several others injured by Israeli fire early on Wednesday while waiting for aid near the Netzarim Junction in central Gaza.
The deaths are the latest in a wave of violence near aid distribution points established late last month by the controversial Israel- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
The GHF has come under fierce criticism from aid agencies and the United Nations, which says the group is not able to meet the population's needs and turns food into a weapon for Israel to carry out its military operations.
Reporting from Gaza City, Al Jazeera's Hani Mahmoud said aid distribution centres run by GHF are typically established very close to where Israeli forces are stationed, with their tanks, armoured vehicles and surrounding snipers.
'So when large crowds gather, they are vulnerable to Israeli fire,' he said.
'Disturbingly, people are given just 20-minute windows at the aid centres to get their hands on whatever is available, such as food parcels. Once that 20-minute period ends, shooting often starts. That is one of the reasons we're seeing large numbers of people dying at these centres,' he added.
There is growing pressure on the GHF, which was brought into the Palestinian territory at the end of May, to look into the attacks. But the organisation has denied responsibility.
Israel has said previous shootings near GHF aid sites have been provoked by the approach of 'suspects' towards soldiers.
Deir el-Balah home hit 'without warning'
In addition to the killings near aid distribution points, Al Jazeera's Mahmoud said five people were killed in the bombing of a home in Deir el-Balah in central Gaza.
'Five family members were killed instantly by a bomb dropped there. Three other family members were killed in the Nuseirat refugee camp,' he said.
Ramzi Khaled, a Gaza City resident who was close to a building sheltering displaced people when Israeli forces attacked it overnight told the Reuters news agency: 'Suddenly, without any previous warning, people who are staying and living in a shelter that is al-Shawwa [fuel] station … Without any previous warning, the place was hit.'
'The ceiling was toppled to the ground. They are all in pieces. Approximately 12 people [were] present in this building; they are all in pieces. We retrieved what we could, three people in pieces, and here we are trying to retrieve some, a martyr and the rest who are under the rubble,' he added.
Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 56,077 people and wounded 131,848, according to Gaza's Ministry of Health.
An estimated 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the October 7 attacks, and more than 200 were taken captive.
Israeli soldiers killed
As Israel continues with its assault, its military said seven soldiers were killed in combat in Gaza on Tuesday.
The military released the names of six of them, but withheld one as the seventh soldier's family was yet to be notified of his death.
Those killed were aged between 19 and 21, according to the military. They were all members of the 605th Combat Engineering Battalion.
An eighth soldier from the same unit was severely wounded and was medically evacuated to Israel, the military said.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said it was 'a very difficult day for the people of Israel'.
Trump notes 'great progress'
As the fighting in Gaza continues, there have been signs that diplomatic efforts to end the war are gaining momentum.
Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani said on Tuesday that indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas could begin in the next two days.
A senior Hamas official told the AFP news agency on Wednesday that talks had 'intensified in recent hours' with mediator countries.
'Our communications with the brother mediators in Egypt and Qatar have not stopped and have intensified in recent hours,' Taher al-Nunu said, adding that the group had 'not yet received any new proposals' to bring an end to the war now in its 21st month.
Trump, who is currently in The Hague for a NATO summit, also told reporters that 'great progress' was being made to bring an end to the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.
'I think great progress is being made on Gaza, I think because of this attack that we made,' said Trump, suggesting the US strikes on Iran could have a positive effect on the Middle East, adding that his special envoy to the region, Steve Witkoff, had told him 'Gaza is very close' to a peace deal.
Yossi Mekelberg, a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House in London, told Al Jazeera that many Israelis are also questioning the wisdom of continuing the war in Gaza.
'Trump is more popular in Israel right now than Netanyahu … and especially on the Iran issue,' he said, referring to the US president's involvement in brokering a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
He noted that Israelis want the remaining captives in Gaza released and are holding on to hope that Trump can achieve that faster than Netanyahu.
'They know that Netanyahu is … trying to continue the war in Gaza to maintain his coalition,' he said.
'Trump has a different agenda that might actually, in this case, match what Israelis want to see.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Did the US and Israel really obliterate Iran's nuclear facilities?
Did the US and Israel really obliterate Iran's nuclear facilities? NewsFeed A leaked intelligence report has cast doubt on Trump and Netanyahu's claims that their attacks on Iran destroyed its nuclear programme. Analysts say some facilities weren't even hit, while 400kg of uranium is unaccounted for. Soraya Lennie takes a look. Video Duration 02 minutes 23 seconds 02:23 Video Duration 02 minutes 56 seconds 02:56 Video Duration 02 minutes 22 seconds 02:22 Video Duration 02 minutes 02 seconds 02:02 Video Duration 00 minutes 44 seconds 00:44 Video Duration 00 minutes 18 seconds 00:18 Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Palestine Action are not terrorists. Israel is
The generation that marched in record numbers against the Iraq war learned one thing clearly: respectable protest alone does not work. On the issue of Palestine, too, the power elite has repeatedly ignored the popular will. The media pays little attention to hundreds of thousands marching, and the government remains unmoved despite public polls showing a majority support for an arms embargo on Israel. This democratic deficit in Britain makes direct action seem the only powerful way to oppose Western war‑mongering in the Middle East. And Britain's ongoing military support for Israel's genocide in Gaza is why I support Palestine Action – the group the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, is planning to proscribe as a terrorist organisation after its activists vandalised a Ministry of Defence aircraft. I, too, have felt morally compelled to take direct action. In summer 2014, when Israel bombed Gaza for 51 days – killing more than 2,200 Palestinians – I was a member of the original London Palestine Action group. We occupied the roof of a drone‑engine factory owned by Elbit Systems, halting production for two days. It remains one of my proudest moments. But our group burned out and became dormant until relaunching under a different name in 2023. By contrast, the nationwide Palestine Action, founded in 2020, has mounted a sustained campaign against Elbit Systems, taking far greater personal risks. Inspired by Smash EDO, the Raytheon Nine, and the 1996 action that decommissioned Hawk jets to stop Suharto's bombing of East Timor, Palestine Action has destroyed millions of pounds' worth of military equipment. They have become a serious thorn in the side of the military–industrial complex. Many – often young women, queer people and people of colour – have been imprisoned, sacrificing their freedom as political prisoners. Crucially, Palestine Action has never harmed a human being. Their actions – non‑violent yet disruptive – have saved lives. By contrast, Israel's genocide in Gaza has killed or maimed at least 200,000 people, including tens of thousands of children. This constitutes state terror by any standard. These brave activists are acting to prevent it because their government refuses to. If the British government had never armed Israel, or had stopped doing so at any time in the past decade, Palestine Action would have had no target and might not have existed. Perhaps then, as I write, Israel would not be committing genocide in Gaza either. But Britain's attitude towards Palestinians has been rooted in colonial arrogance for over a century, originating with the Balfour Declaration. Palestine Action's direct intervention has exposed the contradictions in Britain's position on Israel. The Home Secretary's plan to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation reveals the authoritarian nature of the current Labour government and the racialised social control underpinning the 'war on terror'. By branding non‑violent resisters as 'terrorists', the UK has taken a leaf directly from Israel's playbook. Just this month, Israel did the same to the Palestinian rights group Addameer. This tactic is increasingly used by authoritarian states around the world. It is the road to fascism – and it threatens to further erode the democratic freedoms we still have in Britain. But this tactic will not work. You can ban a group, but not a movement or an idea. Palestine Action has engaged acclaimed lawyer Gareth Pierce to challenge the proscription in court. And even if the ban stays in place, direct action will persist as long as Britain supports Israel's genocide. Yet direct action alone cannot end this atrocity. It will take all of us, from within and beyond institutional politics, pressuring Britain from every angle. It won't happen overnight, but it can happen. And when Palestine is free, history will remember clearly: Keir Starmer and his government as enablers of genocide, and Palestine Action as heroic peace activists who laid down their liberty – and their bodies – to oppose state terror. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran passes bill to halt IAEA cooperation as fragile Israel ceasefire holds
Iran's parliament has passed a bill that would effectively suspend the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), as Iran insists it will not give up its civilian nuclear programme in the wake of massive attacks on the country by Israel and the United States. The move on Wednesday comes after a US and Qatar-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel ended 12 days of fierce hostilities – including an intensive US military intervention that struck three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told Al Jazeera in an exclusive interview on Wednesday that parliament voted to suspend – but not end – cooperation with the IAEA, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. He said the US had 'torpedoed diplomacy' and could no longer be trusted, citing extensive damage to nuclear infrastructure. He reaffirmed Iran's right to pursue peaceful nuclear energy under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Addressing the parliamentary bill, Baghaei said it sets conditions for Iran's future engagement with the IAEA, including guarantees for the safety and security of Iranian scientists and nuclear facilities. Ahead of Wednesday's vote, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf criticised the IAEA for having 'refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities' that the US carried out. 'For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran will suspend cooperation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear programme will move forward at a faster pace,' Ghalibaf told lawmakers. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme was peaceful, and both US intelligence agencies and the IAEA had concluded that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of the country's nuclear facilities. Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the US strikes, and Grossi said his inspectors need to reassess the country's stockpiles. 'We need to return,' he said. 'We need to engage.' But given that Tehran has castigated Grossi for the IAEA's censure of Iran the day before Israel attacked on June 13, and his subsequent comments during the conflict, that seems unlikely to happen anytime soon. Al Jazeera's Ali Hashem, reporting from Tehran, said it is 'clear that Iran's nuclear programme will continue despite everything that has happened'. Hashem said the bill will now go to the Guardian Council, which will study it 'legally and religiously'. 'If there is consensus in the body, the bill will go to the Supreme National Security Council to be approved and finally to the government to become policy,' he added. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described Iran's decision as a direct consequence of the US and Israeli attacks on its nuclear sites. 'Disgraceful, despicable' US intelligence officials have assessed the strikes as a targeted operation with limited effectiveness, saying the US bombings had only set Tehran's nuclear programme back by a few months. The findings are at odds with US President Donald Trump's claims about the strikes. Trump has insisted that the nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were 'obliterated' by a combination of bunker-busting and conventional bombs. Meanwhile, the fragile truce between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday following a rocky start. Trump told reporters at a NATO summit that it was going 'very well', insisting that Iran was 'not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich'. An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the ceasefire agreement with Iran amounted to 'quiet for quiet', with no further understandings about Iran's nuclear programme going ahead. In Iran, health officials said the number of Iranians killed in Israeli strikes has risen to 627, while the number of those wounded stood at 4,870. Other signs of life returning to relative normality in Iran came as officials said they will ease internet restrictions that were put in place since the conflict began nearly two weeks ago. 'The communication network is gradually returning to its previous state,' said the cybersecurity command of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in a statement carried by state media. A spokesperson for the Iranian Ministry of Roads and Urban Development said that Iran's airspace will reopen at 2pm local time (10:30 GMT) on Thursday. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the NATO summit, Trump said US and Iranian officials are due to speak next week, continuing a dialogue that was interrupted by Israel's attack and the subsequent conflict. 'I'll tell you what, we're going to talk with them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement, I don't know,' Trump told reporters. Separately, Iran slammed NATO chief Mark Rutte's praise of Trump for the attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'It is disgraceful, despicable and irresponsible for [NATO's secretary-general] to congratulate a 'truly extraordinary' criminal act of aggression against a sovereign state,' Baghaei wrote on the X platform. Separately, Iranian state media reported on Wednesday that the head of the IRGC command centre, Ali Shadmani, died of wounds sustained during Israel's military strikes on the country. The command centre vowed 'harsh revenge' for his killing, state media added. Israel had said on June 17 that it killed Shadmani, who it says it ascertained was Iran's wartime chief of staff and most senior military commander.
