‘Just another nothing burger:' Internet sleuths blast JFK files as some label it a ‘distraction'
As the Trump administration pushes out controversial policy changes, thousands of declassified files concerning the 1963 assassination of former President John F. Kennedy have been released.
While historians, journalists and amateur sleuths pour over the files looking for a scrap of anything new, many have speculated that their release is a 'distraction' tactic by the administration. The 2,200 files containing approximately 63,000 pages were posted by the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration Tuesday evening after President Donald Trump ordered their release.
'People have been waiting for decades for this,' Trump declared at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts during a visit Monday. 'We have a tremendous amount of paper. You've got a lot of reading. I don't believe we're going to redact anything.'
That didn't stop the internet's anger.
'The JFK Files are just another nothing burger—a distraction meant to divert attention from the real damage Trump and Musk are doing to this country,' political strategist Chris D. Jackson said in a post on X. 'Stay focused.'
The latest Trump release comes after he promised to declassify documents related to the country's most infamous crimes. Weeks ago, he released files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation - which were largely panned for their redactions and scant information. Now, a similar sentiment was appearing online related to the JFK files.
In 2023, the National Archives estimated that 99 percent of the government's documents related to JFK's assassination had been made public, leading many to question the motive and timing of the Trump release.
'DISTRACTION: Trump's release of JFK files is likely to cover a very non productive call with Putin,' former U.S. Navy officer and Kyiv Post journalist Chuck Pfarrer said. 'Despite forcing UKR into negotiations Putin's demands remain maximalist.'
'One of the frustrating things about this whole JFK Files talk is the fact that nothing new needs to be released and the truth can already be found in what we have,' another person commented in a post on X. 'And again, there is no smoking gun in there. It's another distraction and a crass and despicable one at that.'
Another wrote: 'Seriously, MAGA. How many more times before you realize you're being played? Epstein files? Nothingburger. JFK files? Mostly the same s*** Biden released.'
'Trump's JFK file release is just a rehash of Biden's 2023 drop, with minor tweaks. More hype than substance, classic distraction tactic to fool people into thinking he's delivering big. Yawn,' someone else said.
'18,000 pages of JFK files, in an unsearchable format, released on the eve of escalation in the Middle East,' another noted. 'Talk about a distraction.'
Jefferson Morley, vice president of the Mary Ferrell Foundation, a nonprofit that operates a database of government records on the event, contested Tuesday that only 'two-thirds' of the promised documents had been made public.
The ex- Washington Post reporter added that the release also didn't include any of the recently discovered FBI files – after the bureau said it had discovered 2,400 new records related to the assassination last month – nor any of the 500-plus Internal Revenue Service records.
'Nonetheless, this is most positive news on the declassification of JFK files since the 1990s,' he added in his statement.
At home, meanwhile, the administration is battling federal judges after they 'ignored' court orders blocking their efforts to carry out mass deportations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Why the Israel-Iran war could raise your taxes
If Rachel Reeves is to have any chance of making it to her autumn budget without U-turns or raising taxes, the improved economic forecasts of recent months need to come true. Missiles flying between Israel and Iran may destroy that hope. Things had been getting better for the Chancellor. Look at economic forecasts from the aftermath of Trump's 'liberation day', and there was a common theme when it came to Britain. Because of the nature of our economic relationship with America – as a massive exporter in services (we're their call centre) and with more or less balanced trade in goods – we would be shielded against the worst impacts of a trade slowdown. Global GDP growth would suffer, but the effects would not come to Britain. The real boon, if one was being positive, though was what effect these tariffs might have on inflation. While raising prices in the shops for American consumers, the view of the economic world was that for the UK they may in fact be disinflationary. That's because, as the consultancy firm Oxford Economics explained to their clients last month, dampening demand for commodities such as oil and gas would reduce the cost of products consumed in Britain. But all that was before the first Israeli missiles landed in Iran. A barrel of Brent crude now goes for over $70. On Monday it went for $65 – so there has been a 9 per cent in just five days. On Friday morning, it briefly spiked to nearly $80 in what was the sharpest price spike since Russia invaded Ukraine three years ago. Within hours of Reeves delivering what director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies Paul Johnson yesterday called an 'incomprehensible' spending review speech, economists were warning that tax rises in the autumn were becoming likely. Just a day later, a worse-than-expected GDP contraction turned likely into very likely. If oil prices continue climbing as the war escalates, tax rises could become certain. Some 20 billion barrels of oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz, or about 30 per cent of total global trade. So it's easy to see how if Tehran tried to attempt to close the Strait – as Iranian news reports it is considering – or even attacked a few tankers, the oil price would quickly head northwards again. Indeed the FT reported yesterday that the world's largest oil tanker company has stopped accepting new contracts to sail through the Strait. If oil prices do continue to rise – and some say disruption in the Strait could send the price over $100 a barrel – it would be mere days before Brits start paying the cost at the petrol forecourt. But oil supplies are crucial to much more than petrol and diesel and taken together, it's easy to see how the rate of inflation remains sticky or even begins to rise again. Given that the bond markets are keeping the cost of UK debt far higher than the Treasury has been used to – much more because of inflation worries and the after effects of money printing than is understood in Westminster – any signal that prices were rising again are not going to give them faith in Britain as a debtor. If that were to happen and gilt yields remain high, or even climb further, then Reeves could find herself in heaps of trouble. It surprises many City economists just how unequivocal the government has been about sticking to fiscal rules and indeed keeping Labour's manifesto promise not to 'raise taxes on working people' given how hard that is when Reeves only has £9.9 billion of headroom. Before her Spring Statement the chancellor talked of the economic challenges posed by a 'changing world'. Things in the middle east have a habit of spilling over and the world seems to be changing again. Could this once more be the excuse the chancellor has to reach for?
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
What the army parade says about America
So the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the US Army will not be a day that will live infamy. Nor will it be one many Americans will recall with pleasure, in part because it coincided with the birthday of President Trump, a man who generates some sort of veneration from his MAGA supporters and a reaction known as TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome, from others. No vaccination is known that will prevent the onset of either disease, leaving those immune to both looking for a candidate. The President's decision to order out this parade enabled him to join the rather exclusive club of Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, men he says he 'respects', 'likes' and calls 'a great leader', respectively. His initiation fee to become a member of this club comes to up to $45 million, with $16 million to be used to repair streets damaged by tanks. But, hey, it's a business expense, and so is charged off to the taxpayers. The significance of the event tells us a great deal about what is going on in America today. It has changed. This was not the first show of military hardware at parades in the nation's capital. It was not unusual for the military to be featured at Presidential inaugurations, and the parade ordered by President H.W. Bush in 1991 to celebrate the success of the war to drive Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait drew no protests, Arizona State University history professor Brooks Simpson told CBS News. Those days are gone, probably forever. But plus ça change, as they say. Some 34 years ago the New York Times's Anthony Lewis was not pleased by George H.W. Bush's decision to celebrate the success in driving Hussein from Kuwait, '… A celebratory parade would be inappropriate. Fireworks while Kurdish babies die?' Today's mainstream media are largely disapproving. The New York Times finds the event particularly inappropriate at a time when the President has taken charge of California's national guard, without the approval of Gavin Newsom, its governor and a leading candidate for the approbation of those Democrats who will nominate the party's candidate for the presidency in 2028. The differences between the American event and those in China, Russia and North Korea are more profound than the similarities. Whereas Trump faced a nationwide protest by millions of Americans free to make their voices heard, neither Xi, nor Putin, nor Kim were troubled by protesters, that being an occupation with lethal results in those countries. And the marchers were dissimilar in a way that speaks volumes about the difference between America and despotic regimes. The soldiers marching in Washington were volunteers, those participating in parades in China, Russia and North Korea are largely conscripts, with Russia's treatment of its soldiers made clear every day in Ukraine. The Americans interviewed on television, and some that I know, expressed pride in participating in the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the US Army that has kept us free after removing the British yoke in what we call our War for Independence.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Donald Trump hails US Army as historic parade takes over DC while violent clashes erupt at ‘No Kings' march in LA
DONALD Trump hailed the historic US military parade in Washington DC as elsewhere in the country there were violent clashes at protests. Trump posted "what a GREAT parade" on his Truth Social page after a day of stark contrasts across the US - as thousands also took part in "No Kings" marches against the president's adminstration. 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Washington DC welcomed a full-throated celebration of the US Army & American history with fireworks and the incredible scenes of troops and tanks rumbling through the streets. Trump addressed the military and gathered crowds in DC - warning those who threaten the US amid the looming threat of new war in the Middle East between Israel and Iran. He said: "Time and again America's enemies have learned that if you threaten the American people, our soldiers are coming for you. "Your defeat will be certain. Your demise will be final, and your downfall will be total and complete. "Because our soldiers never give up. Never surrender and never, ever quit. They fight, fight, fight. And they win, win, win." While elsewhere large protests gathered in many cities - with organisers saying 60,000 turned out in LA and another 75,000 showed up in New York. Peaceful marches were marred once again by violent scenes. last weekend's of anti-ICE raid riots. LA police said they used batons to disperse the crowd after people began hurling "rocks, bricks, bottles and fireworks" at them. And meanwhile there was a shooting during a 10,000 strong protest in Salt Lake City, with police saying it was "possibly associated" with the march. 21 21 21 21 21 21 Northern Virginia also saw an SUV driven into a crowd of protesters hitting at least one person. And in Minnesota many rallies were cancelled after the fatal shooting of a state lawmaker and the wounding of another by an on-the-run gunman who had "No Kings" fliers in his car. Meanwhile, patriotic tunes filled the air in Washington DC as Trump turned 79, with his grand military spectacle commemorating the US Army's 250th anniversary. The grandiose military parade showcased soldiers, sailors, airmen and US Marines with them all marching in their uniforms in front of thousands of excited spectators. As many as 7,000 troops and seven band contingents participated in the show. They were accompanied by at least 150 military vehicles and some 50 aircraft. 21 21 21 21 21 21 Some 2,000 civilians also marched alongside the US military. The Army said as many as 200,000 people were in attendance at the festival and parade. For years, the president is said to have had his eyes on a full-blown military show, but has failed to put up a working plan - until now. Plans were to roll out battle tanks, massive military equipment, and aircraft and missiles, just as Trump first envisioned the parade during his first term. Among the military equipment flaunted was M1A1 Abrams tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, World War II Sherman tanks and four WWII-era P-51 aircraft. The whole celebration was enclosed with an 18-mile ring of steel to protect the parade. Trump said: "Thanks to their extraordinary service and devotion, 250 years later, America stands tall." "America stands proud, and America stands free. We're the hottest country in the world right now. "And our country will soon be greater and stronger than ever before." Scroll down to read through our day's coverage on the parade with The Sun's live blog below... 14th Jun 2025, 14:43 By Sayan Bose Crowds begin to come in for the parade
