Uruguay's mourning for a rebel-turned-president brings decades of upheaval into perspective
He usually arrived the minute the ballot boxes opened, surrounded by the press, voting credentials in hand. But on this crisp election Sunday in a working-class neighbourhood of Montevideo, Uruguay's most famous and modest man was conspicuously absent.
There was a presence to that void, a solemn understanding of what it all meant.
'As if the old man's not going to vote. Nothing stops him,' one voter called out.
Indeed, not much could stop José (Pepe) Mujica, former president of Uruguay, a political lion of Latin America's left, with a life that has marked seismic shifts in his tiny nation, and across the continent.
He died Tuesday, on the simple ranch where he and his wife, Lucía Topolansky, tended to flowers, after a year-long battle against cancer of the esophagus. He was days shy of turning 90.
Up until his death, he remained a unique force in Uruguay, a country of some 3.4 million that has adopted some of the most socially progressive policies in the region, many of them shaped by him.
He was famously dubbed the world's most humble president for his austere life, shunning the presidential palace for the rustic homestead that he loved to roam with his three-legged dog, Manuela, donating most of his salary to build housing for the poor. Graced with a philosopher's tongue, he sunk his hands into the earth and retrieved lessons on living.
'Every day, if I can, I ride my tractor for an hour because I find myself that way,' he said in an interview last year.
Mr. Mujica considered that tendency to converse alone his salvation, a sort of fingerprint left by years spent in solitary confinement, as a hostage of the military dictatorship that ruled Uruguay in the 1970s and 80s. It's a fact that belies an extraordinary life, punctuated by dreams of revolution, prison breakouts, and a mission focused on the most marginalized.
'The problem is that the world is run by old people,' he said last year, 'who forget what they were like when they were young.'
Mr. Mujica was a descendant of Basque and Italian immigrants. His father died when he was a child and he cultivated a close relationship with his mother, who sold flowers in Montevideo. As a young man, Mr. Mujica joined the urban guerrilla group Movimiento de Liberación Nacional-Tupamaros (Movement for National Liberation-Tupamaros) in the 1960s, inspired by the Cuban revolution. He took up arms as Latin America was rife with military coups and upheaval. In one confrontation with police, Mr. Mujica took six bullets to the body.
He was captured multiple times, and on two occasions escaped from jail, including alongside more than 100 other prisoners who dug a tunnel out of a city prison. His last capture was in 1973, when he and eight other Tupamaros were held alone in squalid conditions and tortured. He wouldn't be freed until 1985, with the fall of the dictatorship. He was pardoned, renounced violence, and reunited with his long-time partner, Ms. Topolansky, another member of Tupamaros who had also been imprisoned by the dictatorship. The pair were never separated again, becoming Uruguay's most prominent political couple.
'Poor me if I didn't have her,' Mr. Mujica said of his partner. 'When you are young, love is stormy, full of fire and explosive. When you enter into older age, it is a refuge. A sweet custom.'
The couple formed a party called Movimiento de Participación Popular (Movement of Popular Participation), which in 1989 joined the Frente Amplio (Broad Front), a unique coalition stretching from the centre to the far left in Uruguay. Mr. Mujica was elected president of Uruguay with the Frente Amplio in 2010. During his five-year term, the country legalized same-sex marriage, marijuana and abortion. He turned Uruguay into a renewable-energy powerhouse, and drove down unemployment, poverty and infant mortality.
When he bid farewell as president in 2015, he told the masses: 'I'm not leaving, I'm arriving,' a reference to his continuing commitment to politics. He grew older, but no less influential. His ranch became a sort of headquarters for Latin America's left, welcoming everyone from students to the region's most prominent leaders. Well into his 80s, he and Ms. Topolansky, who was a senator and served as vice-president in a subsequent administration, would hold large public chats on the country's future.
After he was diagnosed with cancer, a parade of dignitaries, journalists and stars came to pay their respects, and hear one more morsel of wisdom from 'el viejo,' the old man, as he was affectionately known. Chilean President Gabriel Boric planted an olive tree with Mr. Mujica. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio (Lula) da Silva bestowed upon him his country's highest award to a foreigner. 'We cannot choose a brother. We cannot even choose a mother. But we can choose a comrade,' Lula said in an emotive visit to Mr. Mujica's farm in December.
I also went looking for Pepe. My earlier attempts at an interview had failed. In January, he told a radio station that he was, understandably, done with journalists: 'This warrior has the right to rest.'
But the truth is that I did find Pepe this weekend. He was in the Frente Amplio flags that draped out of balconies in Montevideo, outnumbering the Uruguay ones. He was in posters that hung in the neighbourhood hubs where residents meet every week to debate political ideas, T-shirts that bore his face, and a memorial outside the former prison from which he escaped, which is now a shopping mall. But mostly, he was in people's stories.
'We still don't realize the impact that he had,' said Esther Chalá, a retired teacher and Frente Amplio volunteer.
Lilian Flores, 60, remembered the first time she heard Mr. Mujica speak. It was 2002 and Uruguay was in the middle of an economic crisis. The pain of the dictatorship and those who were murdered or disappeared still echoed in its streets. She saw this man, at a local outpost for his party, speaking to the crowd with a 'freshness' that struck her. 'His message was, if we unite, we can get out of this. There wasn't one drop of hate there,' she said. 'He never used us to try to silence his possible, and justifiable, resentments.'
'For me, Pepe is su pueblo,' said Luciana Claveri, 44, using a term that does not have a perfect translation in English, meaning literally village, but mostly a people. Selling clothes at a vintage fair, Ms. Claveri recalled the 'asado de Pepe' – a scheme he came up with while in government to ensure that beef remained affordable for Uruguayans in the cattle- and beef-exporting country. 'Who would have thought that a revolutionary would be president?' she said.
Outside the small school where Mr. Mujica was supposed to vote, Ruben Picochet said the same thing. 'I am lucky the dictatorship didn't get me,' said the 77-year-old, with yerba mate, the popular South American infusion, in hand. 'I might have been doing the same things as Pepe. I was more of a union man than a politician. They caught him, because he gambled more.'
For Mr. Mujica, it was not so much about gambling, but about living. Any chance he got, he would talk about the beauty and essential preciousness of life, reminding young people especially to cradle it, find meaning in the doing – not the having – and love, always love. He was militant in his critique of capitalist, consumer-driven society. His austerity, he explained as freedom.
'I dedicated myself to changing the world, and I didn't change a damn thing! But I was entertained. And I've made many friends and many allies in that madness of changing the world to improve it. And I gave meaning to my life,' he said. 'I didn't have a wasted life, because I didn't spend my life just consuming things. I spent it dreaming, fighting, struggling.'
Even after his diagnosis, he remained committed to his political cause, campaigning to secure victory for Frente Amplio in last year's presidential elections. He paid homage to the particular joy he found 'with my vegetables, with my chickens, because you don't change your horse at the end of the river.'
'Life is beautiful, and it wears thin and goes,' he said at the press conference he gave announcing his illness. 'The crux of the matter is to start over every time you fall, and if there's anger, transform it into hope and fight for love, don't let yourself be fooled by hate. No one is saved alone.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
2 days ago
- CBC
Newfoundland voters concerned after apparent voter mistakes void hundreds of ballots
Two voters in Newfoundland say they hope Elections Canada can learn from a dramatic judicial recount that revealed hundreds of people in their riding may have marked their ballots in the wrong spot. Jennifer Barnett says she didn't receive instructions about how to mark her ballot when she voted for Conservative candidate Jonathan Rowe in an advance poll ahead of the April 28 federal election. The rural Newfoundland riding of Terra Nova-The Peninsulas is home to many seniors and others who may have needed more instruction than she received to properly fill in a ballot, Barnett said. "Being able to vote is such a privilege, and if your vote is spoiled because of a simple error, I think it's very sad," the 43-year-old said. "I think it's very important, going forward, that we take a page from this." Elections Canada said it has several measures in place to ensure voters have the correct instructions for filling in their ballot, including visual instructions posted on the back of voting screens. "As we do after each election, we will look back at what went well and where we could improve things so that we can adjust our efforts to better serve electors, including the ways we communicate about how to properly mark ballots," spokesperson Matthew McKenna said in an email. A judicial recount in the eastern Newfoundland riding last month resulted in an "unprecedented" 1,041 disputed ballots, according to a report last week from provincial Supreme Court Justice Garrett Handrigan, who oversaw the process. On many of the disputed ballots — "maybe as many as half," Handrigan's report said — the voter had placed their mark in the rectangular boxes containing a candidate's name. In some of those so-called "rectangle votes," the elector had also made a mark in the circle to the right of the candidate's name. The Canada Elections Act is clear: any ballot "that has not been marked in a circle at the right of the candidates' names" should be rejected. Accordingly, the judge rejected the "rectangle votes," his report said. In all, 819 ballots were rejected in the recount. Rowe was declared the winner, defeating Liberal Anthony Germain by 12 votes. The Liberal Party said last week that it accepts the results. The average age in Terra Nova-The Peninsulas is 50, the highest among the seven ridings in the province — though not by much. In the ridings of Central Newfoundland and Long Range Mountains, the average is age 49, according to Elections Canada. There were fewer rejected ballots in both ridings — 492 and 452, respectively. Amanda Bittner, a political science professor at Memorial University in St. John's, said anything Elections Canada can do to decrease the confusion around voting is good. "Clearly, there were a lot of voters who wanted to have their voice heard in this election, if there were that many 'confused but clear' ballots," Bittner said in an email. "That speaks to a gap between voter understanding of what to do and Elections Canada processes." "Fortunately, Elections Canada takes voter turnout very seriously, and I am sure they have already made note of this issue and are working on tweaking their processes for next time," she added. Liberal volunteer Sheilagh Crombie-Brown said she didn't receive instructions when she cast a ballot at an advance poll in Bonavista, a community in the Terra Nova-The Peninsulas riding. She believes her 83-year-old husband would have mistakenly spoiled his ballot if she hadn't been there to help him. The 62-year-old also hopes Elections Canada will try to figure out why so many ballots were cast incorrectly. The federal elections agency does provide instructions, she said, but if people can't read or understand them, they won't be of much use. Meanwhile, Barnett is pleased that Rowe won and she doesn't question the results of the recount. However, she hopes Elections Canada will take note of what happened and ensure it won't happen again. "I think if they don't, they'd be doing an injustice to the whole system," she said. "Because when you see something of this magnitude happen, to not talk about it is just wrong."


CTV News
3 days ago
- CTV News
Up to 10k fine for individuals guilty of electoral misinformation
A woman casts her ballot at an advance polling station in the town of Hudson, Quebec, on Monday, March 31, 2014. (The Canadian Press/Graham Hughes) Faced with the problem of misinformation on social media, Elections Québec is cracking down. Starting in July 2026, anyone who impersonates an election candidate or spreads false information about the electoral process with the intent to deceive will be liable to a fine of up to $10,000. 'This offence could apply to a person who intends to influence the results of an election or undermine public confidence in the electoral process,' according to a press release from Élections Québec. It targets individuals who spread misinformation about how to vote, the counting of ballots, election results or a candidate. A person guilty of spreading misinformation will also be prohibited from voting and running for election for a period of five years. An organization or company that spreads misinformation could be fined up to $30,000. 'Higher fines are planned for any repeat offences within the next 10 years,' says Elections Québec. This new offence stems from the adoption of Bill 98 last Friday. The next provincial elections will take place in October 2026. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French June 2, 2025.

Globe and Mail
4 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Mexico votes in first judicial election amid concerns over rule of law
Mexicans vote on Sunday in the country's first ever judicial elections, part of an overhaul of the nation's judiciary that critics warn could jeopardize the rule of law. The vote will elect 2,600 judges and magistrates, including all Supreme Court justices, and is part of a reform pushed by former president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and his protégé and successor President Claudia Sheinbaum. Lopez Obrador and Sheinbaum say the election will root out corruption in a flawed judiciary dominated by an out-of-touch elite and instead allow people to decide who should be a judge. But the run-up to the vote has been dominated by a scandal over some of the candidates, including a convicted drug smuggler and a former lawyer of drug kingpin Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman. Opponents say the overhaul risks removing checks and balances on the ruling Morena party, by appointing judges friendly to their cause, and also allowing organized crime groups greater influence over the judicial system by running their own candidates. Mexico joins Bolivia as the only countries worldwide to conduct judicial elections at the national level, though state-level judicial elections are common in the United States and some local Swiss judges are also elected. Voters on Sunday will cast ballots for Mexico's nine Supreme Court judges, as well as for judges and magistrates across 19 of Mexico's 32 administrative divisions. More than 7,700 candidates are running for judicial posts. Pollsters expect a poor turnout, in part due to opposition calls to boycott the vote, but also because of the complexity of the process and vast number of candidates to consider. 'In Mexico City we are going to vote for 50 candidates. If even discerning people with access to social media aren't checking the candidates, imagine the people who don't have this access,' 22-year-old accounting student Maria Alejandra Mares told Reuters. 'They're going to vote blind.' Voting is not mandatory in Mexico and there is no minimum turnout required to legitimize an election. Just 37% of 1,000 people polled by Buendia & Marquez said they would come out to vote, compared to 61% who participated in the vote last June that elected President Sheinbaum. The right-wing PAN opposition party has called on supporters to boycott the election, branding it a 'vulgar fraud,' but Sheinbaum has vigorously defended her predecessor's reform and her party has sought to mobilize the grassroots vote. 'We call on you to participate, participate, participate,' Sheinbaum told a news conference on Friday, saying this would help significantly improve the current judiciary. 'Participating is the best way to transform a country.' Besides mandating the popular election of judges, the judicial reform, promoted last year by former President Lopez Obrador, also reduced the number of Supreme Court judges, shortened terms and eased some requirements such as minimum age and work experience. The reform's approval by lawmakers last year knocked financial markets, sparked the United States to express concern about a weaker judicial system, and sparked a strike by the country's judicial workers. 'Mexico's justice system was far from perfect, and this new judicial system will not address its shortcomings,' said Rodolfo Ramos, an analyst at Brazilian bank Bradesco BBI. Ramos said 'the real litmus test' would come when cases against a government action reach the Supreme Court. Counting is expected to take two weeks, with the results out on June 15. In 2027, another vote is scheduled to fill over 1,000 more judicial positions.