Zealand Pharma submits Marketing Authorization Application to the European Medicines Agency for glepaglutide in short bowel syndrome
Press release – No. 10 / 2025
Zealand Pharma submits Marketing Authorization Application to the European Medicines Agency for glepaglutide in short bowel syndrome
Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2, 2025 – Zealand Pharma A/S (Nasdaq: ZEAL) ('Zealand') (CVR-no. 20045078), a biotechnology company focused on the discovery and development of innovative peptide-based medicines, today announced the submission of a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for glepaglutide, a long-acting GLP-2 analog, for the treatment of adult patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS).
The submission of the MAA to the EMA for glepaglutide administered twice weekly for the treatment of SBS is based on results from a pivotal Phase 3 trial (EASE-1), supported by interim results from two ongoing long-term extension trials (EASE-2 and EASE-3) and results from a mechanistic trial (EASE-4).
'We are pleased to bring our potential best-in-class GLP-2 analog, glepaglutide, one step closer to patients in Europe living with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure, who urgently need more effective and more convenient treatment options,' said David Kendall, MD, Chief Medical Officer of Zealand Pharma. 'We believe that glepaglutide, administered twice weekly, offers meaningful potential to reduce both the burden of parenteral support and the inconvenience of daily dosing required with the only currently available GLP-2 therapy. Looking ahead, we expect to initiate the EASE-5 Phase 3 trial in the second half of the year to obtain further confirmatory safety and efficacy data on the twice weekly dosing regimen, supporting regulatory submission in the U.S.'
About glepaglutideGlepaglutide is a long-acting GLP-2 analog in development as a potential treatment option for short bowel syndrome (SBS). Glepaglutide is developed as a liquid product in an autoinjector designed for subcutaneous administration by twice weekly dosing, aimed to reduce, or eliminate, the need for parenteral support in people living with SBS. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted orphan drug designation for glepaglutide for the treatment of SBS.
About the EASE Clinical Trial ProgramThe Phase 3 program, named EASE, is designed to evaluate the potential for glepaglutide to reduce or eliminate the need for parenteral support in SBS patients with intestinal failure.
EASE-1 (NCT03690206) was a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 trial that enrolled a total of 106 SBS patients with intestinal failure who were dependent on parenteral support for at least three days per week. Patients were evenly randomized to receive treatment with 10 mg glepaglutide administered either once or twice weekly, or placebo. The primary endpoint in the trial was the absolute change in weekly parenteral support volume from baseline at 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, glepaglutide administered twice weekly significantly reduced the total weekly volume of PS by 5.13 liters/week, compared to a reduction of 2.85 liters/week in the placebo group (p=0.0039). When administered once weekly, glepaglutide treatment resulted in a reduction in weekly PS of 3.13 liters/week, however this did not achieve statistical significance. A total of 9 patients treated with glepaglutide were completely weaned off PS (achieving enteral autonomy), while no placebo-treated patients were able to discontinue PS. For patients treated with glepaglutide twice weekly, 14% of patients (n=5) achieved enteral autonomy.
In total, 102 of 106 participating patients completed EASE-1, of which 96 continued into the ongoing two-year, long-term safety and efficacy extension trial, EASE-2.
EASE-2 (NCT03905707) is a randomized, double-blind trial in which SBS patients continued their randomly assigned treatment from EASE-1 with glepaglutide 10 mg once- or twice-weekly. Patients who received placebo in EASE-1 were re-randomized to treatment with either glepaglutide 10 mg once- or twice-weekly. In an interim analysis conducted after at least six months of treatment, clinical response to glepaglutide across the key efficacy endpoints was generally maintained or showed continued improvement, including additional patients on both doses weaning off PS.
Patients who complete EASE-2 are eligible to participate in EASE-3 (NCT04881825), evaluating glepaglutide administered once weekly using an autoinjector. An interim analysis of EASE-3, conducted with the first 57 patients rolled over from EASE 2, showed that the reduction in prescribed PS was generally maintained.
EASE-4 (NCT04991311) was a Phase 3b trial to assess mechanistic effects of glepaglutide on intestinal fluid and energy uptake. The trial provides evidence of the pharmacodynamic effects of glepaglutide in improving intestinal absorption.
In the second half of 2025, Zealand Pharma expects to initiate EASE-5, a single Phase 3 clinical trial that is anticipated to provide further confirmatory evidence for a regulatory submission in the U.S.
About Zealand Pharma A/SZealand Pharma A/S (Nasdaq: ZEAL) ("Zealand") is a biotechnology company focused on the discovery and development of peptide-based medicines. More than 10 drug candidates invented by Zealand have advanced into clinical development, of which two have reached the market and three candidates are in late-stage development. The company has development partnerships with a number of pharma companies as well as commercial partnerships for its marketed products.
Zealand was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Copenhagen, Denmark, with a presence in the United States. For more information about Zealand's business and activities, please visit www.zealandpharma.com.
Forward looking statementsThis press release contains 'forward-looking statements', as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in the United States, as amended, even though no longer listed in the United States this is used as a definition to provide Zealand Pharma's expectations or forecasts of future events regarding the research, development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products, the timing of the company's pre-clinical and clinical trials and the reporting of data therefrom. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as 'aim,' 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'forecast,' 'goal,' 'intend,' 'may,' 'plan,' 'possible,' 'potential,' 'will,' 'would' and other words and terms of similar meaning. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, or the scientific data presented. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions, which may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations set forth herein and may cause any or all of such forward-looking statements to be incorrect, and which include, but are not limited to, unexpected costs or delays in clinical trials and other development activities due to adverse safety events, patient recruitment or otherwise; unexpected concerns that may arise from additional data, analysis or results obtained during clinical trials; our ability to successfully market both new and existing products; changes in reimbursement rules and governmental laws and related interpretation thereof; government-mandated or market-driven price decreases for our products; introduction of competing products; production problems at third party manufacturers; dependency on third parties, for instance contract research or development organizations; unexpected growth in costs and expenses; our ability to affect the strategic reorganization of our businesses in the manner planned; failure to protect and enforce our data, intellectual property and other proprietary rights and uncertainties relating to intellectual property claims and challenges; regulatory authorities may require additional information or further studies, or may reject, fail to approve or may delay approval of our drug candidates or expansion of product labeling; failure to obtain regulatory approvals in other jurisdictions; exposure to product liability and other claims; interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations; unexpected contract breaches or terminations; inflationary pressures on the global economy; and political uncertainty. If any or all of such forward-looking statements prove to be incorrect, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied by such statements. The foregoing sets forth many, but not all, of the factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations in any forward-looking statement. All such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this company announcement and are based on information available to Zealand Pharma as of the date of this announcement. We do not undertake to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date hereof. Information concerning pharmaceuticals (including compounds under development) contained within this material is not intended as advertising or medical advice.
ContactsAdam Lange (Investors)Vice President, Investor Relationsalange@zealandpharma.com
Neshat Ahmadi (Investors)Investor Relations Managerneahmadi@zealandpharma.com
Anna Krassowska, PhD (Investors and Media)Vice President, Investor Relations & Corporate Communicationsakrassowska@zealandpharma.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Nottingham Forest hope Nicolas Dominguez will recover from knee injury before start of new season
Nottingham Forest hope that Nico Dominguez will recover for the start of the new Premier League season after the midfielder suffered a knee injury. Dominguez has had to withdraw from international duty with Argentina because of the problem, which has seen him require treatment to repair a meniscus issue. Advertisement The 26-year-old established himself as a regular under Nuno Espirito Santo in the final stages of the campaign, as Forest secured European football for the first time in three decades. His form was enough to earn him a call-up for the World Cup qualifiers in Chile on June 6 and at home to Colombia on June 11. Dominguez last played for his country in a 0-0 draw with Brazil in November 2021, but will have to wait a little while longer for his next cap. Dominguez, who signed from Bologna in September 2023, made 23 starts and 11 substitute appearances in the top flight for Forest last season, as Forest pushed for a top-five finish – before ultimately finishing seventh, to secure a place in the Conference League next season. The player, who began his career at Velez Sarsfield in his home country, will be assessed in the coming weeks and throughout pre-season. But there is a hope that he could yet return for the start of the new campaign in August, if his recovery timeline goes positively.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The Best Rubber-Strap Watches for Summer
In T's column 1 Piece, 10 Budgets, we share 10 perfect versions of an item in a range of prices. Typically lighter and sportier than leather- or steel-bracelet models, rubber-strap watches are an ideal match for the warmer months, especially when they come in vibrant candylike colors. Here are the T fashion assistant Jameson Montgomery's favorites. 1. Swatch, $195 The Swiss brand Swatch has been making relatively affordable, brightly hued watches since the 1980s. This model's vivid green dial is a generous 47 millimeters wide for optimal legibility. 2. Timex, $229 The dial of Timex's Deepwater Reef 200 is embossed with a subtle wave pattern, nodding to the fact that the watch is water-resistant up to 200 meters. 3. Tissot, $595 The displays on Tissot's T-Race Quartz Chronograph were inspired by those found on motorcycles. Its hour and minute hands are coated in SuperLuminova, a phosphorescent, nonradioactive pigment that glows in the dark. 4. Movado, $695 The Bold TR90, by the Swiss American watchmaker Movado, is named after the strong, lightweight nylon compound (TR90) used to make its case. Its matching bright red dial and silicone strap make it an instantly noticeable accent. 5. Hamilton, $895 The Khaki Navy Scuba is water-resistant up to 100 meters and comes with a timer function, making it perfect for lap swimmers and beach runners. 6. TAG Heuer, $2,050 Like many of TAG Heuer's watches, the Formula 1 Chronograph has displays that resemble those on the dashboard of a racecar. It's offered with straps in a few bright shades, but none is as striking as this vibrant green. 7. Rado, $2,600 As its name suggests, the True Square Automatic Skeleton features a skeletonized movement — one that's visible to its wearer through a transparent dial — which is rare for a watch on a rubber strap. 8. Bell & Ross, $5,000 This version of the French company Bell & Ross's BR-05 GMT watch has a sky blue sun ray dial that strikes a playful note along with its grooved rubber strap. 9. Hublot, $6,200 The Swiss watchmaker Hublot uses the highest grade of titanium in its 33-millimeter Classic Fusion. Prized by the aeronautics industry for its lightness and durability, the metal has a natural bluish tone that complements this watch's strap and dial. 10. Hermès, $6,650 Customers of the French fashion house Hermès are easy to spot, thanks to the brand's signature orange shopping bags. This version of the company's H08 watch features the shade on its textured rubber strap and second hand, which pop against the black nickel-treated dial.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
How Should Businesses Be Approaching Sustainability Now?
There is a palpable air of uncertainty among many multinational corporate sustainability, ESG and risk management teams these days as everyone tries to anticipate the future of sustainability regulation. I've written quite a bit about the mixed messages companies are receiving from regulators in Europe as the EU Member States continue to debate the details of the Omnibus Simplification Package, and in the U.S., where it's still unclear exactly how this historic period of environmental deregulation will affect companies. The fact is that many businesses have invested significant time and resources into sustainability compliance and reporting initiatives while operating under the impression that major reforms like the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) would be hitting their stride right now. Instead, they're living through a period of regulatory limbo in which it's not clear what exactly their future sustainability compliance obligations entail. So, what should they be doing in the meantime? The short answer is: now is the time to be reviewing the steps they have made so far, and the most obvious place to start is with is their materiality assessments. In the world of financial reporting, materiality is defined as information that can influence and ultimately inform the financial decision making of an entity. When applied to sustainability reporting, a materiality assessment is a company's foundational definition of the core sustainability issues that matter most to their businesses and their stakeholders. These guide the way they will report and integrate them into overall business strategy and investment. In short, these materiality assessments shine a light on the foundational truths that define a company's values and goals and determine whether or not they are aligned with their strategic objectives. The identification of these material matters is also the starting point to determine the information that should be disclosed in the sustainability statement, which identifies the impacts, risks and opportunities confronting a company and its upstream and downstream value chain. At a time when the rules of the game keep changing and where corporate positions on sustainability can easily become politicized, a well-thought-out and delivered materiality assessment is an important way for a company to assert the business case for its sustainability strategy. Importantly, it is a way for companies to take the emotion out of sustainability and instead focus on the facts and the financial rationale behind their actions, while ensuring their sustainability strategy is dynamic and meets the changing needs of their businesses. Even during this period of regulatory flux, the market drivers behind sustainability have not changed , and in some cases they have even increased in significance. Now is the time for businesses to really look at what other companies in their space are doing when it comes to sustainability reporting. This peer comparison will soon become a key benchmark against which other companies will measure themselves and will also be measured. While sustainability disclosure reporting regulators have been debating the best path forward, many leading companies have already started reporting in compliance with the CSRD. In fact, some 500 companies have already published sustainability reports under the CSRD. The full library of reports can be found here, courtesy of ESG data management software company KEY ESG, which has been cataloging them all. One of the first things that stands out when reviewing these reports is that many of them come from companies in jurisdictions where the CSRD has yet to be fully implemented. In fact, according to a detailed PwC analysis of 100 CSRD reports, about 90% of them came from five European countries, three of which (Germany, Spain and the Netherlands) have not yet transposed the CSRD into national law. Another key finding of the analysis was that these reports are not very standardized. Some are 30 pages; others are 300 and they each focus on different aspects of sustainability-related risks. However, the important takeaway for business leaders who are still refining their approaches to sustainability reporting is that hundreds of manufacturers, technology companies, financial services firms, retailers, utilities and others are already out there walking the walk on sustainability reporting. These early standard bearers will not only have a jump on the intricacies of the reporting process once the mandate is finalized; they will also help establish industry best practices and position themselves as leaders to investors, customers and other stakeholders who increasingly want to know about business risks linked to sustainability. It's easy for business leaders to become distracted in a news cycle like the one we find ourselves in today that seems to be consumed with the idea of delayed implementation and political infighting. The big picture is that, delayed or not, sustainability reporting mandates of some type are coming, whether directly from regulators, or as is currently the case, from other stakeholders such as investors and customers. The sooner companies get themselves aligned with those standards, the better off they will be when the time comes to comply with the law. Moreover, with so many companies already reporting in line with the CSRD, and the informed view is that more and more will do so voluntarily, the prevailing market forces are creating some pressure on businesses that have not yet shared their sustainability reports. Now is not the time to delay. It is the time to refine and hone sustainability practices to focus on what matters most to the business and its stakeholders.