US House speaker Johnson will travel to Israel June 22
(Reuters) -U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson will travel to Israel to address the parliament on June 22, he said on Wednesday.
"Our ties run deeper than military partnerships and trade agreements," Johnson said in an emailed statement.
Punchbowl News, which first reported Johnson's plan, said the House Speaker was expected to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem during the trip.
Johnson did not provide further details on the planned trip.
Johnson announced the visit as Israel presses on with its military campaign in the Gaza Strip, more than 20 months after it launched its offensive there in response to a deadly incursion into Israel led by Palestinian militant group Hamas.
On Tuesday, Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Norway imposed sanctions on far-right Israeli cabinet ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
Israel called the action "outrageous" and said the Israeli government would hold a meeting early next week to decide how to respond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
43 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
DuPage GOP to launch vote-by-mail pilot program to combat Democratic strides
After a spring election in which Democrats were victorious across the suburbs, DuPage County Republicans are launching a pilot program to encourage mail-in voting among their GOP base. Set to begin in earnest until later this summer, party officials have high hopes the initiative will help the GOP regain strength in DuPage, a once Republican stronghold that has been shifting blue for years now. 'For numerous cycles now, strong DuPage County Republican candidates have been defeated by lesser Democratic candidates who have benefitted to an enormous degree from vote-by-mail (VBM) voting,' DuPage GOP Chairman Kevin Coyne, a former Naperville City Council member, said in a statement on social media earlier this month. 'Those days are over effective today. … Numerous states have witnessed Republicans dominate vote-by-mail returns. DuPage County will be no different.' Through the pilot program, the local party will be encouraging Republican voters in select precincts across DuPage to sign up for the county's permanent vote-by-mail program, Coyne said in a call. Any eligible registered voter in DuPage can vote by mail ahead of an election. Voters can request to do so per election or opt into the county's permanent vote-by-mail program, which would sign them up to receive mail-in ballots each election. DuPage Republicans will be working with M3 Strategies, a Chicago-based political consulting firm, to conduct the pilot program later this summer, Coyne said. The hope is it will help get Republicans on 'equal footing' with Democrats in DuPage, he said. To date, significantly more Democratic primary voters are on the county's permanent vote-by-mail list, DuPage County Chief Deputy Clerk Adam Johnson. As of Wednesday, there was a total of 98,413 voters on the county's permanent vote-by-mail list, according to Johnson. That number divides into voters who have opted to receive mail-ballots for general elections only and those who have requested to also receive primary ballots, he said. The latter is how the county can glean the partisan divide in its vote-by-mail program as voters must request either a Democratic or Republican primary ballot. Current numbers show that 47,110 Democratic primary voters have signed up for the program compared to 19,525 Republican voters, Johnson said. Those totals have also grown since the 2022 primary election, which was the first in which the permanent vote-by-mail program was offered. In 2022, there were 20,482 Democratic primary voters compared to 8,009 Republican voters. 'The Democrats, to their credit, have done a really good job of getting their voters to sign up for it. Republicans have not,' Coyne said. 'Until we close that gap, it's going to be really, really hard for Republicans to win around here. … It's a massive advantage that they have right now, and we simply have to address it.' Republicans were once at least as likely as Democrats to vote by mail, but the dynamics changed in 2020 when President Donald Trump turned against early in-person and mail voting. He spun conspiracies about the process and convinced his supporters to wait until Election Day to cast their ballots. The Republican Party also amplified dark rumors about mail ballots to explain Trump's 2020 loss. However, national messaging has shifted over the past couple of years, with the GOP changing course to encourage early and mail voting for the November 2024 election cycle. As far as if and to what extent the partisan divide in voting by mail impacts election results, that's hard to measure, said Stephen Maynard Caliendo, a dean and political science professor at North Central College in Naperville. That's the sort of question that runs into something called the ecological inference problem, which is the process of using aggregate data to draw conclusions about individual-level behavior, Caliendo said. 'In other words, there's no way to know whether vote-by-mail actually helped Democrats because we can't know … (who) the people (who voted by mail) exactly voted for,' he said. Still, research has tried to suss out an answer. A 2021 Stanford University study found that record rates of mail voting in 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic didn't help Democrats or lead to an increase in voting. The research was the latest in a number of studies finding no partisan benefit to mail voting. However, Caliendo said broadening ways to vote is a worthwhile pursuit. 'Even if you're wrong, even if it hasn't really hurt you,' he said, 'expanding vote by mail isn't going to hurt you among your own voters. … If (a party has) the resources to dedicate to this, it makes a lot of sense that they're going to do it. I encourage it because anytime … (we remove) barriers for people to vote, that's better for democracy.' Coyne promoted the county's permanent vote-by-mail program as a means of getting more information out to voters, even if they still opt to vote in person. 'You can still vote in person, even if you're registered for vote-by-mail balloting,' he said. 'But there's a lot of reasons to do it.' Receiving a ballot ahead of time in itself is an important notification that an election is going on, Johnson said. That's especially true for local consolidated elections in the spring 'when voters aren't seeing (the election) on the news every day,' he said. Coyne, who has chaired DuPage County Republicans since January, said devoting more energy to mail-in voting had 'always kind of been on our radar' but the results of the spring election made it clear action was needed. In April, Democrats pulled out wins in all 49 contested partisan races across the county, according to Dianne McGuire, vice chair of the Democratic Party of DuPage County. 'Until we stop complaining about vote-by-mail being here and accept that it is here and do something about it,' Coyne said, 'I think Republicans are going to have to deal with a lot of ugly elections.'
Business Insider
44 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Head of Trump's U.S.-Africa policy at the State Department set to step down
A senior U.S. official overseeing Africa policy at the State Department is expected to step down in mid-July, marking another significant transition in President Donald Trump's foreign policy team. Troy Fitrell, leading the Bureau of African Affairs, plans to step down on July 15. His tenure involved advancing U.S. diplomatic and commercial ties with Africa. The White House has not yet announced plans for a permanent replacement post-departure. Troy Fitrell, who has been leading the Bureau of African Affairs in an acting capacity, played a central role in managing U.S. diplomatic, security, and economic relations with countries across the African continent during a period of rising global competition and shifting alliances. Although it was not immediately clear why he is leaving, Troy Fitrell will leave his post on July 15, according to Reuters reports that cited sources with direct knowledge of the decision. The reports added that Troy Fitrell shared his plans to leave by that date over an email. Recently, he had tasked U.S. ambassadors on the continent to find commercial opportunities for U.S. companies. The State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and Troy Fitrell also did not respond to a request for comment, according to the reports. The departure comes amid a prolonged vacancy at the assistant secretary level, with no confirmed nominee in place more than a year into Trump's current term. However, it is important to note that, apart from Troy Fitrell's office at the Bureau of African Affairs, the office of President Trump's adviser on Africa affairs, led by Massad Boulos, also plays a largely informal but visible role as a diplomatic envoy focused on promoting peace and advancing U.S. private-sector investment in Africa. Troy Fitrell's Africa strategy Just a month before his expected resignation, Troy Fitrell laid out a bold and business-focused vision for U.S.-Africa relations under the Trump administration, emphasizing a pivot from aid-driven engagement to private sector-led trade and investment. During the launch of the Bureau of African Affairs' Commercial Diplomacy Strategy in Côte d'Ivoire last month, Troy Fitrell outlined a six-point plan to strengthen U.S.-Africa commercial ties. The strategy includes making commercial diplomacy a central pillar of U.S. engagement, advancing market reforms and infrastructure projects in priority African countries, and expanding commercial diplomacy trips. It also seeks to better connect U.S. companies and capital to African opportunities while reforming U.S. trade and finance tools to compete more effectively on the global stage. Under the current administration, the U.S. has sought to recalibrate its Africa policy by prioritizing counterterrorism cooperation, advancing trade initiatives such as Prosper Africa, and responding to strategic competition from global rivals.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Irish government rejects motion to stop sale of Israeli bonds
The Irish government on Wednesday defeated a cross-party motion that called on it to stop the Central Bank of Ireland from facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds. The motion, presented by the Social Democrats and supported by Sinn Féin, Labour, and People Before Profit, was intended to block what many refer to as 'Israeli war bonds'. The instruments provide economic support to Israel while it conducts military operations in Gaza, and Ireland's Central Bank currently approves the sale of these bonds in EU markets. Bonds issued by non-EU countries must be approved by the financial regulator in one member state before they can be sold within the single market. The bill failed with 85 votes against and 71 in favour, upholding the government's position. Several TDs, Irish members of parliament, argued that Ireland should not be involved in financial instruments that fund destruction in Gaza. The Central Bank estimated that Israel has raised between €100mn and €130mn from their sale. Taoiseach Micheál Martin nonetheless rejected claims that the Irish government is complicit in genocide by allowing the facilitation of the bond sales. Despite publicly acknowledging the severity of Israel's attacks in Gaza, he maintained that Ireland must oppose the military action within legal and diplomatic channels. As such, the government argued that it cannot legally direct the Central Bank due to its independence under Irish and EU law. When the same objection arose last month in response to a similar motion from Sinn Féin, party leader Mary Lou McDonald argued: 'We have over 20 pages of independent, robust legal opinion clearly stating that the bill is compliant with Irish law, European law and international law.' Related Entertainment world reacts to Greta Thunberg interception in Gaza-bound aid boat Does the public support the government of Israel in Western European countries? As per the EU's Prospectus Regulation, non-EU countries like Israel must meet disclosure and legal standards to issue bonds in the bloc. If those standards are met, the Central Bank doesn't have the authority to reject bond applications. 'The Central Bank cannot decide to impose sanctions for breaches or alleged breaches of international law. It is for international bodies such as the UN or the EU to determine how to respond to breaches or alleged breaches of international law,' said Central Bank Governor Gabriel Makhlouf. He added that the Genocide Convention applies to the Irish State, not regulatory bodies like the Central Bank. The reason why the Irish Central Bank is at the core of this issue — despite Ireland being one of the EU countries that has been the most vocally pro-Palestine — is Brexit. When the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in 2016, Israel chose Ireland to be the home member state to approve its bonds. Prior to 2021, this responsibility fell to the UK. The current prospectus for Israeli bonds is set to expire in September, but Central Bank officials believe that Israeli authorities will likely initiate the renewal process several weeks beforehand. In the absence of new EU sanctions or changes to existing legislation, the Central Bank will remain legally bound to approve the bond prospectus, regardless of the political fallout. Meanwhile, protesters have been gathering for months outside the seat of the parliament, Leinster House, and the Central Bank, demanding that the government block Israeli bond sales.
