logo
On this date: 36 Ballots later…

On this date: 36 Ballots later…

Yahoo17-02-2025

WASHINGTON D.C. (WHTM) — The Presidential election in 1800 was a bit of a mess.
In the first two elections in 1789 and 1792, George Washington was chosen easily because, hey, he was George Washington.
But the election of 1796 revealed a flaw in the Constitution.
Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution establishes the office of the President, and details the procedure for selecting the President by the Electoral College. It states the Electors would 'vote by Ballot for two Persons.' It goes on to say, 'The person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President,' and 'after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Elector shall be Vice President.'
September 28, 1787: The new Constitution goes to the states
The Founding Fathers had a dim view of organized political parties, and this arrangement reflects that view. It tries to get the best people to serve despite partisan politics. But like it or not, parties formed, and by the 1796 election John Adams was in the Federalist camp, and Thomas Jefferson was with the Democratic-Republicans. (Short synopsis, the Federalists favored a strong Federal government, Democratic-Republicans wanted more power on the State level. We're still trying to work this one out.)
When the votes were counted, John Adams was President, and his leading opponent, Thomas Jefferson, was his Vice President (neither side had nominated a candidate for Vice-President.)
On this day: It's Bill of Rights Day!
By the 1800 election, which pitted Adams and Jefferson against each other for a second time, both parties were pretty much solidified, and neither wanted a repeat of 1796. Both fielded blocks of electors and had candidates for both offices. Adams had Charles C. Pinckney as a running mate; Jefferson had Aaron Burr. When the electoral votes were counted, Adams lost to Jefferson 65 to 73, and Pinckney lost to Burr 64 to – whoops! – 73. That's right, the two Democratic-Republicans were tied for first place.
February 4, 1789: The first Electoral College meets
At this point, under the rules laid out in the Constitution, it fell to the House of Representatives to choose a winner. The fact Jefferson had been specifically nominated for President, and Burr for Vice-President, had no legal bearing on the matter.
On February 11, 1801, the House met to choose the next President. Thus began an epic deadlock. In 1801, there were 16 states. Under the rules laid out in the Constitution, each state had one vote. The Democratic-Republicans, of course, voted for Jefferson as President. But the Federalists, who despised Jefferson for helping found the Democratic-Republican party, voted for Burr. As a result, Jefferson got only eight votes, one short of the majority he needed.
And this went on through 35 ballots.
On this date: Congress passes the 13th Amendment
Enter Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton was one of the founders of the Federalist Party, but had no love for Aaron Burr. (The feeling was mutual. They finally settled matters in 1804.) Hamilton began to work behind the scenes for Jefferson's election, considering him the lesser of two evils. He persuaded several representatives to change their votes from Burr to 'no vote,' and on February 17, 1801, the 36th and final ballot would give the election to Jefferson.
On this date: 25th Amendment Ratified
You can read the entire 12th Amendment, click here.
This nasty debacle convinced Congress the method of electing President and Vice President had to change. On December 9, 1803, Congress passed the 12th Amendment, which required the Electoral College to hold two votes, one for President, and one for Vice President.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jimmy Kimmel attends anti-Trump 'No Kings' protest amid nationwide demonstrations
Jimmy Kimmel attends anti-Trump 'No Kings' protest amid nationwide demonstrations

Fox News

time9 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Jimmy Kimmel attends anti-Trump 'No Kings' protest amid nationwide demonstrations

Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel attended a "No Kings" protest with his parents over the weekend to oppose President Donald Trump's policies. "A huge, inspiring and yes - peaceful - turnout in the South Bay. I met many people who love this country and still believe it to be a force for good. I am grateful to see so many Americans take action to stand up for our friends and neighbors, most of all, my parents. I know how fortunate I am to have been born into a family that taught me to care about others and that the most important words ever spoken are 'Love one another.' It really is as simple as that," Kimmel posted on Instagram. The liberal late-night host posted a photo of a shirt that he wore for the protest as well, which read "Make America Good Again," and told his followers, "See you out there." "No Kings" protests occurred across the country over the weekend to oppose the president in what organizers described as a "day of defiance" against Trump and his allies. The protests occurred as a military parade was held in Washington, D.C., to honor the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. The late-night host has spoken out against Trump's decision to send the National Guard to Los Angeles to help quell riots that occurred in the wake of recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions in the city. "Los Angelenos gathered to demonstrate and, with very few exceptions, peacefully demonstrate to voice their opposition to this disgusting and unnecessary abuse of power instigated by our mentally ill president, who is dead-set on exacerbating this, who actually wants conflict, who is intentionally inflaming and lying to make it seem like there's a war going on," Kimmel said on Wednesday. Other liberal celebrities to attend the protests included Glenn Close, Mark Ruffalo, Susan Sarandon, and Natasha Rothwell. Ruffalo spoke to MSNBC about his attendance at the New York protests on Saturday and called Trump a "dictator." "We see a president who has made himself a king and dictator, and we don't see an opposition that's powerful enough to stand up against the trampling of our rights and the trampling of the Constitution that's happening every single day, with executive orders, with the refusal to obey court orders, kidnapping of immigrants, people who are here legally, people whose children are being taken from them. We're disgusted and we're scared, and we know the only way to fight this now is for people to come together," Ruffalo said. Close posted about her attendance on Instagram. "It's not about screaming slogans. It's not about spitting hatred. It's the calm, unified PRESENCE of MILLIONS of Americans who refuse to let our beloved, magnificent country be sold out to the wannabe KING/OLIGARCH and his RUTHLESS, cruel, scheming puppeteers," she wrote.

Attacks against Minnesota lawmakers prompt concern, caution in New Hampshire
Attacks against Minnesota lawmakers prompt concern, caution in New Hampshire

Boston Globe

time13 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Attacks against Minnesota lawmakers prompt concern, caution in New Hampshire

Advertisement 'I would suggest you stay continuously vigilant while going about your daily routines. Your situational awareness is your best tool for your personal safety,' he wrote. 'If you see something that doesn't look or feel right, say something.' Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up The New Hampshire Department of Safety said there was Representative Alexis Simpson of Exeter, the Democratic minority leader in the New Hampshire House, relayed guidance to her colleagues suggesting they 'consider keeping Advertisement Democratic US Senator Amy Klobuchar had been slated to attend a Flag Day Dinner in Manchester on Saturday, but she returned to Minnesota home after news of the attacks that claimed the life of In a joint 'Public service should never come with the threat of violence,' they said. 'We affirm our shared commitment to civility, safety, and the rule of law.' 'We know our country is divided on many issues, but in moments like these, we must remember what unites us,' they added. 'We must reject the forces of hatred, political violence, and extremism in all forms.' This article first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, Steven Porter can be reached at

Randi Weingarten, Lee Saunders quit DNC in latest blow to Dem Party leadership
Randi Weingarten, Lee Saunders quit DNC in latest blow to Dem Party leadership

Fox News

time13 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Randi Weingarten, Lee Saunders quit DNC in latest blow to Dem Party leadership

Two top union leaders have departed the Democratic National Committee (DNC), escalating an internal conflict about the future of the party that was stirred up by former vice chair David Hogg. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, and Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, declined offers to stay on as at-large members of the DNC, as first reported by The New York Times. "I appear to be out of step with the leadership you are forging, and I do not want to be the one who keeps questioning why we are not enlarging our tent and actively trying to engage more and more of our communities," Weingarten, the education leader and longtime voice in Democratic politics, said in a letter to Chair Ken Martin which is now circulating on social media. The union labor leaders' departure is the latest blow to Martin, who just last week put his Hogg problem behind him. Hogg, the 25-year-old progressive firebrand, announced last week he would not seek re-election for vice chair after sparking internal rifts with his $20 million plan to primary challenge older incumbent Democrats he said are "asleep at the wheel" through his outside political action group, Leaders We Deserve. "There is a huge vacuum of leadership in the Democratic Party and Ken is proving to be a weak, ineffective leader who isn't ready for any of this," a former DNC official, who asked for anonymity to speak more freely, told Fox News Digital. A DNC committee member, who was also granted anonymity, told Fox News Digital it was "not surprising" the union leaders decided to step down from the DNC, "given they both supported another candidate." Both Weingarten and Saunders supported Martin's competitor in the race for DNC chair, Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler. As chair, Martin later removed Weingarten from the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, which is the group responsible for drafting the Democratic Party's presidential nominating calendar and election process. The committee member said Weingarten and Saunders "are both incredible leaders" with the country's best interests in mind, and they are "confident we will all come together and focus and continue beating Republicans." "I have no doubt both of them, and the labor unions, will move forward and work together with the Chairman, and every other Democrat who is, first and foremost, focused on beating Donald Trump and the existential threat that he and Republicans pose to Americans' lives and livelihoods and our democracy," they added. Another source close to the DNC also pointed to Weingarten's support for Wikler in a statement to Fox News Digital: "Ever since the horse she bet on in the Chairs race lost, she has always been on the other side of the fence as Ken — this is no surprise." Weingarten was also among those in the party who supported Hogg's controversial plan to primary incumbent older Democrats in safe blue districts. Hogg's decision to leave the DNC followed a damning Politico report, which included leaked audio from a Zoom meeting of Martin lamenting over Hogg's fallout at the DNC, claiming it had made it harder for Democrats to do their jobs and for Martin to demonstrate his ability to lead. "I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So, it's really frustrating," Martin said. Martin affirmed the DNC would stay neutral in Democratic primaries after Hogg's $20 million primary pledge. The DNC chair gave Hogg the ultimatum to either rescind his vice chair position or forego his political influence through his PAC. However, that did not stop Hogg from defying advice and wading into additional Democratic primaries by endorsing Virginia state Del. Irene Shin in the special election to replace the late Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. Members voted Wednesday to uphold the Credentials Committee's resolution proposed by longtime Democratic Party activist, Kalyn Free, to host a re-election for two vice chair positions, which were held by Hogg and DNC Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta. Martin commended Hogg's decision Wednesday, thanking him for "his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation," as the Democratic Party seemed prepared to leave their Hogg drama in the dust. The union leaders' departure is the latest public infighting to plague the Democratic Party in the aftermath of losing the White House and Congress in 2024. Weingarten and Saunders did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store