
Memphis Grizzlies vs. Dallas Mavericks NBA Play-In tickets are selling for less than $20
Memphis Grizzlies vs. Dallas Mavericks NBA Play-In tickets are selling for less than $20
The Dallas Mavericks dominated the Sacramento Kings 120-106 on Wednesday night, earning a spot in the win-or-go-home Western Conference Play-In game.
Dallas will travel to take on the Memphis Grizzlies who clawed their way out of a huge hole against the Golden State Warriors only to lose the game in a heartbreaker.
The Grizzlies and Mavericks played four times during the regular season with the Grizzlies winning three of the four matchups.
Memphis Grizzlies vs. Dallas Mavericks Play-In game tickets are on sale now, and shockingly inexpensive given the magnitude of the game. Here's everything you need to know.
Shop Grizzlies vs. Mavericks NBA Play-In tickets
When is Memphis Grizzlies vs. Dallas Mavericks NBA Play-In game?
The Grizzlies host the Mavericks on Friday, April 18 at 9:30 p.m. EDT. Tickets are available now.
Memphis Grizzlies vs. Dallas Mavericks NBA Play-In cheapest tickets
As of publication, the cheapest available tickets for Friday's Grizzlies vs. Mavericks game cost just $16.
Shop Grizzlies vs. Mavericks NBA Play-In tickets

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"Some of those guys that think they are MJ? Bro, you would have come off our bench" - Kenny Smith humbles modern-day players about how they would've been "average" in his era
"Some of those guys that think they are MJ? Bro, you would have come off our bench" - Kenny Smith humbles modern-day players about how they would've been "average" in his era originally appeared on Basketball Network. There's long been a growing sentiment that players from the rough-and-tumble 1980s and '90s might struggle to adapt to today's NBA, where versatility and shooting are cornerstones of success. In contrast, others argue that modern stars - who thrive on pace-and-space offense, mid-range pull-ups, and deep threes would dominate if dropped into any past era. According to two-time NBA champion Kenny Smith, the reality is far more nuanced. Advertisement Moreover, "The Jet" believes while it's true that players in each era learned that game differently, not every modern-day hooper would've made the cut in the golden age of hard-nosed basketball. Smith confidently stated that many players today, especially those who tend to overthink their skill set and imagine themselves to be on Michael Jordan's level, would not even crack the starting lineup in the '80s and '90s. Smith laughs off at players who believe they could've been greater in past eras Back then, basketball was built on structure. Teams ran set plays religiously, designed in practice, and executed to perfection in games. Centers lived in the paint, and perimeter players earned every bucket by driving into traffic and absorbing contact. So for Smith, he admitted while speaking on "The Mark Jackson" s podcast, modern-day superstars like Kevin Durant, who boast elite shot-making and a deeper understanding of the game, could have thrived in his era, majority of others wouldn't have fared as well. Advertisement "Great players today, would've been great. Kevin Durant would've played in our era and been great. Go down the line, top five players. But then, it starts to get sticky. That's all I'm saying. It starts getting sticky because of the rule changes. Guys who are in the league now, would not be in the league. Even some of the guys we had wouldn't be in this league because they couldn't shoot. Some of those guys that think they are Michael Jordan? Bro, you would have come off our bench," the two-time Champ said. "You would've been an average back then if you are average now." Related: Luc Longley on why he and Michael Jordan couldn't get along: "Mike was doing what he did to rookies, what he was doing to me" Smith also fired shots at modern-day guards And while today's NBA is flooded with highlight-reel moments, where guards like Anthony Edwards and Ja Morant soaring over seven-footers, Smith takes issue with the assumption that today's players are more athletic. As a former Dunk Contest participant himself, he pushed back against the idea that modern guards are more explosive or skilled. He insists athleticism and talent were just as present in his day; they were simply displayed differently. Advertisement "Today's era of people, they always say, 'Oh, we more athletic,'" Smith once stated. "I don't believe that they are more athletic. How many point guards been in the Dunk Contest? I was in the Dunk Contest three times, I came in second once to the great Dominique Wilkins." Ultimately, the 60-year-old former Rockets guard admitted it is hard to predict how players from one generation would perform in another, given how dramatically the game has evolved. But one thing he's certain of — the true greats of today, with their elite feel for the game, adaptability, and constant adjustments, would have shined in any era. That level of basketball IQ and skill transcends eras, no matter the competition. Related: "One girl got smart and said, 'I want 10 thousand'" - Shaquille O'Neal explains why he loves to leave big tips This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jun 5, 2025, where it first appeared.


Newsweek
34 minutes ago
- Newsweek
NBA Analyst Floats Knicks Theory Regarding Giannis Antetokounmpo, Jason Kidd
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The New York Knicks made a major move following their Eastern Conference Finals loss to the Indiana Pacers, firing head coach Tom Thibodeau. Since that move, rumors have begun flying with both Giannis Antetokounmpo and Jason Kidd at the center of them. After a great all-around 2024-25 NBA season, the rumor mill is suggesting that the Knicks could blow some things up during the offseason. Last offseason, New York made two major moves by acquiring both Mikal Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns in separate trades. This offseason, the Knicks might be looking to make another monstrous trade. Giannis Antetokounmpo #34 of the Milwaukee Bucks drives to the basket defended by Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks during the second half at Madison Square Garden on January 12, 2025 in New... Giannis Antetokounmpo #34 of the Milwaukee Bucks drives to the basket defended by Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks during the second half at Madison Square Garden on January 12, 2025 in New York City. More Photo byAccording to a report from longtime NBA reporter Gery Woelfel, New York is preparing to make a "tsunami-type offer" to trade for Antetokounmpo. In addition, the Knicks may be trying to bring in a favorite of the superstar forward to be their new head coach. Read more: Warriors Trade Idea Lands 2-Time All-Star in Massive Offseason Move Kidd was Antetokounmpo's head coach with the Milwaukee Bucks. He is receiving interest from New York for its head coaching position, according to NBA insider Marc Stein. "Knicks expected to formally request permission to speak to Jason Kidd," he reported. "Knicks interest described by league sources as serious. Some believe Kidd is at top of NY's wish list. Unclear how Dallas would respond to Knicks." Now, notable sports analyst Nick Wright has chimed in on the topic. He shared an eye-opening theory about Antetokounmpo and Kidd potentially teaming up with the Knicks. "Perhaps someone from Giannis' camp said 'if Person X was your coach maybe Giannis would ask for a trade to the Knicks specifically,'" Wright said. Bringing in Kidd would certainly make New York a more attractive destination for Antetokounmpo. He has been very vocal about his love for the former NBA superstar and current Dallas Mavericks' head coach. Read more: Shaquille O'Neal Shares Harsh Criticism for Thunder After NBA Finals Loss Of course, all of this is pure speculation at this point. The Mavericks may not let the Knicks interview Kidd and it's quite possible that Kidd wouldn't want to leave Dallas to join New York. It's simply something to keep an eye on. If the Knicks were to bring Antetokounmpo and Kidd on board, it would likely come at the cost of a new-look roster. A duo of Jalen Brunson and Antetokounmpo would be lethal, but New York would have to give up a lot of value to make it happen. New York fans should buckle up for what will seemingly be a very busy offseason. For more on the New York Knicks and general NBA news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Why Thunder vs. Pacers gives NBA a Finals matchup to embrace and enjoy
My thoughts as the NBA Finals play on? First, this is the series we needed to see. It's a look into the NBA's immediate future, one the Golden State Warriors will find difficult to negotiate, and Bay Area fans can only hope it prompts some major changes. The league's high-scoring hierarchy is moving on past Stephen Curry, in a manner dramatically exemplified by Oklahoma City's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Indiana's Tyrese Haliburton, each a prime-of-life superstar with a ton of presence. Not that they'll ever be Curry, as a shooter or an influence, but they represent a dynamically youthful revolution in the backcourt, and the signs are just as ominous in the Finals frontcourt with the Thunder's Chet Holmgren and Indiana's Myles Turner, hardly an upstart but still shy of his 30th birthday. • What the Warriors are likely to encounter in trade talks: Jonathan Kuminga looms as a hidden gem, no guarantee to be a master of court vision but spectacular in the transition game. And that's it for high value outside the Big Three of Steph, Draymond Green and Jimmy Butler. The rest of the rotation players are strictly average by NBA standards. They fit into the league, they have their moments, and once again Warriors have a knack at bringing in character people. But on the scale of talent and track record: nothing special. Even the endearing Brandin Podziemski would be viewed by contending teams as a high-energy reserve. • As a bonanza for small-market teams, these Finals are hardly welcomed by the TV networks, merchandise outlets, ticket-revenue proprietors or sponsors. But as a fan, that's not your problem. Absolutely, Curry's Warriors against the Knicks — Games 1 and 2 at Madison Square Garden — would be sensational theater. But in terms of big names and traditional settings, what are we really missing? Once you grew tired of the aging LeBron James and the ceaselessly complaining Luka Doncic, the Lakers were no fun at all. Minnesota's Anthony Edwards found himself stepping aside once again. Kevin Durant and Giannis Antetokounmpo appear immersed in wanderlust. • Above all, share the Celtics' hurt over Jayson Tatum's Achilles tear, perhaps costing him all of next season. That was an absolutely brutal development, one we've shared locally with Klay Thompson. But the Celtics had been exposed as a lazy, tedious outfit long before Tatum went down. Running an offense that basically came down to five guys whipping passes around the perimeter — hey, one of these 3-point marksmen has to be open — they won a championship bearing no resemblance to the Celtics' finest traditions. This is the franchise that changed things: Bill Russell revolutionizing defense, Bob Cousy inventing the fancy fastbreak, Red Auerbach fielding the first all-Black starting five, John Havlicek setting the all-time standard for moving without the ball (like a blur, even if he was out there 48 minutes), and 3-point shooting rendered secondary by the 1985-86 frontcourt genius of Larry Bird, Bill Walton, Kevin McHale and Robert Parish. The modern Celtics haven't changed a thing, unless it's your viewing habits. After their Game 1 loss to the Knicks in the second round, Boston Globe columnist Gary Washburn claimed they were 'guilty of obscene arrogance, truly believing it's impossible to lose with their relentless long-range style.' It only got worse in Game 2, when the Celtics didn't take 45 shots from 3-point range, they missed 45, and their fourth-quarter disgrace — heaving 19 of their 20 shots from distance — was 'one of the stupidest damn stats I ever heard,' Charles Barkley said on TNT. 'Nobody's that dumb.' • Nobody in the WNBA, that's for sure. What a haven for the fundamentals — and once you get past such obvious favorites as Caitlin Clark, Sabrina Ionescu, Paige Bueckers, A'ja Wilson, Napheesa Collier, Kelsey Plum and Chelsea Gray, you start discovering Natasha Cloud, Allisha Gray, Gabby Williams, Brittney Sykes, Leonie Fiebich, Sonia Citron — we could easily offer 20 more names. That's what I love about the women's game: You never know what's going to happen next. With the Celtics, easy answer: a 3-point shot. And then a thousand more. • It's not such a crime that the Warriors passed on Haliburton in the 2020 Draft, because eight other teams followed suit as the evening progressed. The disgrace falls on the Sacramento Kings, who once had Haliburton and De'Aaron Fox in their backcourt and let both of them depart. No, their numbers playing together weren't great, but with that kind of talent, show some patience. • First thought on the Knicks' head coaching search: Jay Wright, a pillar of wisdom at Villanova and a chance to reunite with Jalen Brunson, Mikal Bridges and Josh Hart. Second thought: Becky Hammon. It's well past time for a woman to take an NBA head job, and the Las Vegas Aces' coach — who spent eight years as an assistant to Gregg Popovich in San Antonio — couldn't be more ready. Then again: Forget both names. I wouldn't wish incompetent bully James Dolan, the Knicks' owner, on either one of them. • When you know Boston is a great sports town: As Globe columnist Dan Shaughnessy took note of Brunson missing what looked to be an easy layup at the worst possible time, 'It was a Frank Selvy moment that would have defeated a lot of teams.' That's it. No explanation. Just 63 short years ago. • Caitlin Clark is brash and defiant, a window into her greatness as she fends off intense defensive scrutiny and every other obstacle in life. But she has to lay off the refs before she becomes the WNBA's version of the whining, petulant Doncic. Some words of advice from one of her biggest fans and a legend in women's soccer: 'You don't want to become the girl, the team, the coach who cries wolf all the time,' Megan Rapinoe said on Sue Bird's 'A Touch More' podcast. 'It's just constant, and to what end? Sometimes you just have to play through it and earn a little bit more respect. If you're constantly asking for fouls all the time, it's just annoying and I feel you get less fouls.' • Final note: Congratulations to former Sporting Green writer Mark Fainaru-Wada, who recently returned from his alma mater, Northwestern, where he was inducted into the Hall of Achievement at the Medill School of Journalism, one of the most distinguished in the country. A Bay Area sportswriter all the way, from his days at the Marin Independent Journal and the Santa Rosa Press-Democrat, he moved on to the San Francisco Examiner in 1997 and the Chronicle in 2000 before joining ESPN in 2007. Among his many achievements in investigative reporting: collaborating with the Chronicle's Lance Williams on 'Game of Shadows' (probing the BALCO steroids scandal) and with his brother, Steve, on 'League of Denial,' about the NFL's concussion issues.