logo
Queensland police to have power to issue on-the-spot domestic violence protection orders

Queensland police to have power to issue on-the-spot domestic violence protection orders

The Guardian04-04-2025

The Queensland government says it will allow police officers to issue instant year-long domestic violence protection orders – a proposal that experts say could put vulnerable women at greater risk of harm.
The state's police minister, Dan Purdie, says the plan would save 'hundreds of thousands of hours' of police time.
But domestic and family violence experts and victims' advocates say handing police the power to issue on-the-spot orders – avoiding the need for a time-consuming court process – risks compounding problems caused by the widespread police misidentification of victims in DFV matters.
Heather Douglas, a law professor at the University of Melbourne and an expert on protection orders, said the plan was 'really problematic' and risked negative consequences for people wrongly labelled perpetrators by police, particularly First Nations women.
'Orders shouldn't be given out like parking fines,' Douglas said.
The 2022 inquiry into police responses to domestic and family violence heard evidence that officers disbelieved female victims and actively avoided attending DFV calls.
Research shows that almost half of the women murdered in Queensland had previously been labelled the perpetrator of domestic violence by police.
Guardian Australia first revealed last year that the former Labor government had begun consultation on a police-led 'efficiency' proposal – pushed by the former police commissioner Katarina Carroll – that would allow for officers to issue on-the-spot, year-long orders.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Confidential briefing documents were leaked to Guardian Australia at the time amid serious concern among women's advocates about the impact of the idea.
The former government had planned to introduce its laws in March last year, but shelved the proposal after the details leaked, and after taking onboard the concern about its potential impact on victims. The new government now appears to have taken up the same proposal.
Under existing laws, police can issue a temporary 'protection notice' that lasts until a magistrate can hear an application for a domestic violence order.
The new proposal would enable a 'police protection direction' that lasted a year.
'It's really important that there's careful consideration for a protection order,' Douglas said.
'I think the risk is [that police] end up [issuing orders] that aren't appropriate just to save themselves time and that's really problematic.'
Angela Lynch, the executive officer of the Queensland Sexual Assault Network, said Tasmania used a similar system of police protection directions. She said DFV services and victims agencies there were now 'advocating for their removal as they have increased misidentification of victims as perpetrators, which has had devastating consequences for the safety and justice of many vulnerable women and children'.
Lynch said the network was also concerned about the 12-month timeframe for police notices, when court-issued orders typically lasted for five years.
'A key recommendation from the Not Now, Not Ever inquiry was to increase the time of protection orders from two years (at that time) to five years to reduce victim-survivor's trauma in having to retell their experience at multiple court events.'
'We hope that the government has fully engaged with the DFV sector to fully understand all the consequences and impacts on victim survivors of these changes.'
Purdie said the laws would reduce paperwork at a time when the police domestic violence workload had increased dramatically.
'We want to give police tools that they can rapidly put in place protection toward vulnerable victims of domestic violence. We want to hold perpetrators to account and protect all victims of crime,' Purdie told reporters on Friday.
'What this does is allows police, once they've identified the person most in need of protection, they can rapidly put an order in place to protect that person. They can do that on the spot.
'We know we need to give the police those resources and those laws to be able to identify the person most in need of protection and to take decisive action to protect that person.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arsonist jailed for £1.4m damage to former mansion on Isle of Man
Arsonist jailed for £1.4m damage to former mansion on Isle of Man

BBC News

time2 days ago

  • BBC News

Arsonist jailed for £1.4m damage to former mansion on Isle of Man

A man who set fire to a mansion house, sexually assaulted a child and stole underwear from homes has been Corteen, 19, deliberately set fire Africa House in Douglas causing £1.4m of damage to the vacant property in August Courthouse heard he had sent a video message of himself at the site to a friend shortly before the blaze was reported by a was jailed for three years and two months and given a two-year extended licence period. The court heard the 19-year-old had deliberately set fire to the property on Woodbourne Road, which was the former home of the late disgraced millionaire Trevor Baines, with a cigarette on 11 August blaze was reported to the emergency services at about 18:00 BST by a passer-by who saw smoke coming from the vacant said the site had become a "hotspot" for anti-social behaviour and it was originally feared Corteen could still be inside when firefighters arrived at the police found out he was by that time travelling on a bus back to he initially denied involvement, he later accepted he had started the fire deliberately with a cigarette. 'Remain a danger' The court heard that in April the following year he stole various items of women's and children's underwear from washing lines and later admitted two charges of theft and four of court heard he had also pleaded guilty to indecent assault and having sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16 in him, Deemster Graeme Cook said if he had been older he would have been handed a longer the deemster said he was satisfied "you remain a danger to the public".The 19-year-old was also placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely, and handed a sexual harm prevention order banning him from having contact with children and restricting his access to devices that can connect to the internet. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.

Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive
Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive

The Guardian

time2 days ago

  • The Guardian

Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive

Imagine you have $3m in super and have just retired, only to hear that Labor plans to hit you with a new tax. Or perhaps you're worried (dream?) that at some point in the near or distant future you might cross that multi-million-dollar savings threshold. Either way, you might be wondering whether the government's proposal to whack an extra 15% tax on earnings on balances over $3m is going to put a major crimp in your retirement plans. Breathe easy, your annual trips to Europe are safe, as are your smashed avocado brekkies. According to Guardian Australia's analysis, a wealthy Australian retiring with $3m in super today would pay an extra $2,355 in tax. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email And that's from annual retirement income of more than $170,000, based on an estimate from Asic's MoneySmart retirement calculator. In other words, the tax represents barely 1% of your income. If that doesn't make you feel better, then remember that the median full-time salary in Australia is $88,400, according to the ABS, and $72,590 across all employees. So you are making nearly twice the median full-time salary – and those suckers are paying income tax! Well, consider this: The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia reckons that a single person with a paltry $595,000 in savings can generate a 'comfortable' lifestyle in retirement with $51,807 in income a year. You're making more than three times as much, even after paying Labor's damned extra tax! What's that? You only have $800,000 in savings? Gosh, how sad. (If it makes you feel any better, that's still four times the median super balance among 65-69 year-olds, according to the ATO). Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Don't worry, though, you won't be paying the proposed extra 15% tax - remember it only starts kicking in on balances over $3m. And anyway, you can still live pretty well on $67,000 a year, tax-free. That all sounds OK for the small-fry with $3m in super. But what about the serious savers with $5m? How much extra tax will they have to suffer in the name of making the super system 'fairer'? Bad news. They could be paying something like an extra $25,000 in tax under the proposed policy, if they earn the average 7.5% annual return in the year. The good news is that they'll still have nearly $270,000 left over to … wait, can a single retiree even spend that much in a year?

Candidates asked to support homelessness people in Guernsey
Candidates asked to support homelessness people in Guernsey

BBC News

time3 days ago

  • BBC News

Candidates asked to support homelessness people in Guernsey

A charity has called for every election candidate to pledge a commitment to end homelessness in directors of At Home in Guernsey (AHIG) have written an open letter to the 82 candidates asking them to help ensure every person on the island has an affordable, adequate and secure charity said more than 1,000 people were "insecurely housed", at risk of losing their home or currently experiencing homelessness in director Charlie Cox said the directors wanted candidates to think about people who were roofless and sleeping in cars and bunkers when they discussed the island's housing problems. 'Use your influence' Ms Cox said although people without homes were placed at the top of the social housing list, they were having to wait months to be allocated a home during which some were having to sofa-surf or live in there was one States-run homeless shelter in Guernsey, St Julian's House in St Peter explained: "We'd like to see a wider range of emergency accommodation so that we can help people no matter what they're going through, whether it's families, individuals or the elderly."In the open letter the AHIG directors asked the candidates, if elected, to "use your influence and vote" to provide practical and emotional support to people who are homeless. Guernsey election 2025: What you need to know They asked candidates to create sufficient emergency housing, eradicate the social housing waiting list and to support the Homelessness Delivery and Implementation is a plan that the charity is in the process of co-producing with the States of Guernsey as agreed in the existing Housing Action Guernsey General Election will take place on 18 June.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store