Penalisation case taken by Siptu official against union rejected by WRC
A case taken by a long-serving
Siptu
official who alleged her career had been 'sabotaged' after she made a series of protected disclosures alleging wrongdoing by senior managers at the organisation has been rejected by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC).
In a yet-to-be-published 136-page decision, adjudicating officer Marie Flynn said 12 of the 17 protected disclosures Ger Malone had said she made against the union did not meet the criteria set out under the Act, and she could see no evidence of penalisation in any of the 29 claimed.
Several other complaints were not considered by Ms Flynn as they were adjudged to have been time-barred.
Ms Malone, a shop steward at the Ray-Ban factory in Waterford and former Siptu national executive council member before she took up a full-time organisation role with the union more than 20 years ago, had made complaints under the Protected Disclosures Act, 2014.
READ MORE
Had she been successful, she could have been awarded up to five years' salary.
During the case, Ms Malone alleged she had been repeatedly undermined and humiliated by more senior officials at the union while attempting to represent workers at third-party employers, including Carlow and Kilkenny county councils.
She also highlighted issues concerning representation structures within Siptu itself, where staff are required to join the union they work for and are generally represented by a staff representative council (SRC).
During protracted hearings, she said this system was worse than the one unions routinely disparaged at Ryanair and that the entire membership of the SRC had signed a letter criticising it as entirely out of step with the union's publicly stated values. She repeatedly suggested it limited her ability to be represented at the hearings.
She criticised the fact that senior managers had a vote in electing members of the SRC, which she chaired for several years, and alleged they had played a part in ensuring she lost elections because they wanted to minimise her influence.
A small number of Siptu staff attended some of the hearings to support her, and at least one declined to give evidence because they said it would have the potential to cause them difficulties in their work environment.
Siptu, represented at the hearings by one of its former officials, Karan O'Loughlin, disputed much of Ms Malone's evidence, however, and denied any acts of penalisation had taken place. It characterised Ms Malone as an official who repeatedly declined to follow instruction from line managers and, in one instance, opened the union up to a potential defamation case.
The WRC adjudicator accepted that five of the intended protected disclosures could be validly regarded as such, but said the remaining 12 did not meet the required criteria under the Act.
She said Ms Malone had failed to establish that she had been penalised in any of the ways set out under the Act and rejected claims made in her closing statement that she had been unfairly treated.
'I strongly refute the complainant's assertion that she did not receive a full and fair hearing into this case,' she wrote.
'During the course of the hearing, it became apparent to me that the complainant expected me to investigate the conduct of the respondent organisation, particularly the form of representation it makes available to its staff.'
She said she was restrained by the Act in what she could investigate and had done all she could to allow Ms Malone put forward evidence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Keelings worker fired over claims regarding dead co-workers
The Keelings fruit and vegetable group sacked a warehouse worker after deciding he had brought the company into disrepute with 'false' posts on social media claiming excessive night work hours contributed to the deaths of two of his colleagues in 2013, a tribunal has heard. The worker, Rudolf Csikos, lost his job of 16 years with the north Co Dublin produce firm last December, and is pursuing a number of employment rights complaints against Keelings Logistics Solutions. The company maintains it was justified in dismissing him on the grounds of gross misconduct after an investigation which concluded he had 'acted recklessly by publishing false and misleading information' implying that Keelings was 'responsible for the deaths of two colleagues as a result of excessive working hours'. The LinkedIn posts were made amid a long-running legal row between Mr Csikos and his employer over alleged breaches of working time legislation. READ MORE A statutory complaint under the Organisation of Working Time Act originally filed in late 2019 by Mr Csikos remains live over five years later. Having been rejected as 'vexatious' by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), that ruling was quashed by the Labour Court on appeal and referred back to the WRC. In addition to a dispute over the payment of a Sunday premium, which Keelings maintains is covered by a collective agreement, Mr Csikos has alleged the company failed to comply with its legal obligations on the employment of night workers such as himself. 'The night working hours was breached by the company, and that's why it caused the people to die,' Mr Csikos said via a Hungarian-language interpreter at an initial hearing last week. When adjudicator Brian Dalton pointed out that Mr Csikos was not medically qualified and there was no medical evidence before him, Mr Csikos said his assertion was that there was a 'possibility'. The company's representative, Emily Maverley of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), said the Keelings workers referred to by Mr Csikos in his posts 'passed away, unfortunately, in 2013', some 11 years before the posts. Giving evidence last week, company disciplinary officer Alan Morrissey said the posts were 'damaging to the Keelings name, and our customers and other stakeholders'. 'There was no going back. I asked Rudolf did he think he made a mistake. He was quite happy in what he said and did,' he said. Asked whether he was aware of the allegations Mr Csikos had aired about his working hours, Mr Morrissey said he didn't 'get into it', but said he believed Mr Csikos had referred to the posts as a protected disclosure. Lauren O'Brien, head of people for Keelings Logistics, said at an earlier hearing in the case last week that she was 'concerned' after seeing the first post, which the tribunal heard Mr Csikos posted on LinkedIn at the end of October 2024. 'It was seriously defamatory to several ex-colleagues, accusing us of being responsible for the deaths of two colleagues,' Ms O'Brien said. At a hearing on Thursday, the company investigation officer, Damien O'Brien, noted in his report that Mr Csikos continued to allege Keelings had broken the law and maintained his comments 'were not false' when they met on an unspecified date last year. He quoted Mr Csikos as saying: 'How many more people need to die?' and said Mr Csikos was 'consistent that his beliefs are honestly held' and that it was 'not the first time he has raised these concerns'. Mr Csikos, cross-examining Mr O'Brien, asked: 'Why did he not say that Keelings is keeping according to the law and is making progress to keep the law and do things according to the regulations?' Mr O'Brien replied: 'My objective was to investigate the two posts.' Mr Dalton said: '[Mr Csikos] is claiming two workers died. That's not something [the witness] could exercise any role in.' Mr Csikos said: 'In my opinion, it was that if the working hours are breached and the health and safety regulations are breached, we can draw a conclusion.' 'We have no conclusion on that, and that doesn't follow, because [Mr Csikos] is not medically qualified. We have no evidence that there's a correlation between the [alleged] breach and what he says has happened. He may speculate, and he may have an opinion. He cannot use this forum as an opportunity to make outlandish allegations,' Mr Dalton said. Mr Dalton said the matter was at an 'impasse' without further submissions being made to him about the company's working time records. He adjourned the matter and said he would seek a further hearing date in July. In addition to the original Organisation of Working Time Act claim, Mr Csikos's further complaints are under the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973, the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 against the company, arising from his dismissal.
The Journal
3 days ago
- The Journal
Man who sexually assaulted five women at Lough Derg pilgrimage site jailed for four years
A WORKER AT the Lough Derg pilgrimage site, who lured five women into helping him at the retreat so he could sexually assault them, has been jailed for a total of four years. Tomas Gallagher asked the five female victims to help him repair washing machines and tumble dryers during a series of incidents at the renowned religious setting. A court heard he sexually assaulted the women at the site. Details of the plans hatched by Gallagher were outlined before Letterkenny Circuit Court last week. Gallagher, 42, initially denied the charges in interviews with gardaí. He subsequently pleaded to seven charges in all, four for sexual assaults of adults, two for sexual assault on children and one charge of invitation to a child to sexually touch. Today, having considered reports on Gallagher as well as the statements from his victims, Judge John Aylmer jailed the father-of-one for five years with the last 12 months suspended. He said the crimes, as outlined in the case, were 'egregious acts of violence in a sacred place of pilgrimage'. He told Gallagher that his crimes were 'deceitful' and 'premeditated' and that he placed them in the mid-range for such offences and which merited a sentence of seven years before mitigation. In mitigation, he noted an early plea, the fact that the accused had no previous convictions, that he appeared to be remorseful and ashamed of his actions. Judge Aylmer also noted that Gallagher had undertaken 24 counselling sessions, that he was fully cooperative and that he had been ostracised in the local community. Taking the totality factor into account and that all sentences will run concurrently, Judge Aylmer said he was reducing the overall sentence to one of five years. He then added that with regard to all efforts to encourage rehabilitation and the fact that it needs to be encouraged, he suspended the final twelve months of that sentence, meaning Gallagher will serve four years in prison. He is also to go under the supervision of the Probation Services for 12 months. Gallagher, from Rathanlacky, Dunkineely pleaded to a total of seven charges against five different women at the holy island on the shores of Lough Derg. He pleaded to six charges of sexual assault at St Patrick's Purgatory. These offences are contrary to Section 2 of the Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990, as amended by Section 37 of the Sex Offenders Act 2001. He also pleaded that in the same period and location, he did attempt, by inviting, inducing, counselling or inciting a child to sexual touching. This offence is contrary to Section 4 Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act, 2017. The victims, who cannot be named to protect their identity, ranged in age from their early teens to more mature women in their later years. All the offences took place in 2022 when Gallagher worked both as a maintenance man at the retreat, as well as driving a boat taking pilgrims to and from the island. Lured victims by asking for help Barrister for the state, Ms Fiona Crawford, BL and investigating Garda Joanna Doherty outlined the details of the incidents. Statements given to gardaí by the victims told how Gallagher had approached them, asking them to come into a laundry room as he needed help fixing various machines. The statements outlined how the unsuspecting women were asked to reach behind them into the machines while Gallagher fixed a 'pipe'. The women thought they were holding a pipe, but instead they were gripping the accused man's penis. On one occasion, Gallagher told one of his victims to twist the pipe like she was 'revving a motorcycle'. Gallagher told another victim that the 'pipe' would be soft and moist. Advertisement An older victim was approached by Gallagher who asked her to reach behind a dishwasher and hold a pipe, but she 'knew immediately it was no pipe' as it was warm and soft and felt like a penis. The woman couldn't see it, but the shocked woman jumped back and shouted: 'What the fuck is that?' The woman didn't tell anybody else about the incident that day but felt upset and did later tell her daughter about what had happened. On another occasion, Gallagher asked a young teenage girl to help him with a washing machine and asked her to hold a 'pipe'. She grabbed his penis and he told her to 'hold it there' as he chatted to her about school. The girl said how the pipe didn't feel like plastic but was warm and had a rubbery texture, and that it felt sticky or sweaty. Another teenager said Gallagher asked him to assist her with a tumble dryer and told her to put her hand behind a wooden board, and he got her to hold something. He told the girl to hold the 'pipe' harder and then to loosen it and then to increase her grip before he said: 'Yeah, that's fine.' The young woman said the pipe was 'squishy, wet and warm' and when she stood up she saw Gallagher's penis sticking out from the zip of his trousers. Denied accusations with gardaí One young woman eventually came forward and told a person in charge what had happened, which led to others coming forward making complaints of a similar nature against the man. Gallagher was interviewed by gardaí on three occasions and initially denied anything had happened. During one interview with Detective Garda Paul McHugh, Gallagher admitted asking one woman to hold a pipe on a tumble dryer as it had been leaking. He claimed the woman had got up and left for no apparent reason, and he had been left nervous and embarrassed by the incident. He later admitted the offences and entered a guilty plea. Victim impact statements from the women were read out in court, while two young women chose to read out their own statements. Victims feel vulnerable and intimidated One young woman fought back tears as she told how despite being the victim, she felt ashamed and disgusted by what had happened and often thinks about if she could have stopped this from happening to other women. She added that she often thinks about Gallagher's son and that she prays that he is safe. An older victim said she feels vulnerable and intimidated by what had happened and that she is sorry that she did not speak up sooner, but was afraid that people would laugh at her or not believe her. Another victim told how she was a student but failed her exams because she became depressed after Gallagher's assault on her. She later completed her exams and was proud of herself and was determined not to allow her attacker to ruin her life further. She said she still feels he stole something from her. A teenage victim said she has been forced to attend counselling because of anxiety and that she is now always on edge and simply cannot trust men. She decided not to come to court, as she feared that seeing Gallagher again would trigger her anxiety. Another woman, who now lives abroad and gave her evidence by video link, said she lives in an apartment with a lift and if a man gets into the lift she can't stop thinking 'what if?' She said she realises that she should not tar all men with the same brush, but Gallagher's attack had made her an angrier, wearier and a meaner person as a result. She added that she does feel disgusted by what had happened but sometimes feels glad that he had chosen her and that she had alerted the authorities to what was happening as she hated to think what number of victims there might have been. Man apologises Gallagher took to the witness stand and said he wanted to apologise to his victims. He said he 'truly regretted' his actions and was sorry for the hurt and pain he had caused his victims and their families. Asked by his barrister, Mr Colm Smyth, SC, if he realised this was a huge breach of trust, Gallagher replied that he did. He said he had engaged in 24 counselling sessions to better understand the impact his actions have had on others. Mr Smyth said his client accepted full responsibility for his actions, that he had now lost his employment and had become a pariah in the local community because of the publicity surrounding the case. He added the fact that the offences took place in a sacred place, a place of pilgrimage for Christian people going back many centuries, also had to be acknowledged. Mr Smyth suggested to Judge John Aylmer that there also has to be 'light at the end of the tunnel' for Gallagher, asking him to consider his client's remorse, his blameless life up until now and his guilty plea. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
3 days ago
- Irish Independent
Chef whose colleague thrust into him ‘as if he was riding a horse' and let out a ‘yee-haw' loses discrimination claim against Dublin nightclub
While the tribunal accepted Mr Aksakal was subjected to 'unedifying' behaviour with 'undeniable sexual overtones', it found the Odeon took the incident 'very seriously' A chef has failed to have a Dublin nightclub held liable for the conduct of a colleague who thrust into him with his genital area 'as if he was riding a horse' and let out 'a loud 'yee-haw'' in an incident with 'undeniable sexual overtones' last year. Rejecting the worker's discrimination claim under the Employment Equality Act 1998, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) found the Odeon Bar and Restaurant on Harcourt Street in Dublin 2, operated by Kivaway 2 Ltd, was not a workplace where sexual harassment was tolerated.
