Tories accuse Labour of lining up ‘crony' to head new football regulator
But the Conservatives claimed his links to the Labour Party called into question his 'ability to operate with the impartiality fans deserve' and showed the Government was 'more interested in rewarding its donors than serving the public interest'.
A Labour source did not deny that Mr Kogan was under consideration, but said the accusation was a 'shameful attempt' to undermine the regulator and 'smear a highly qualified, respected candidate for its leadership'.
Mr Kogan has considerable football experience, having spent years negotiating media rights deals across the sport, and is reported to have been approached about the role at the head of the new regulator by the previous Conservative government.
He is also a Labour donor, having given more than £30,000 to figures in the party in recent years, including £5,000 to Rachel Reeves in 2023 to support her work as shadow chancellor and £2,500 to Sir Keir Starmer's constituency party last year.
And he was a director of LabourList, a pro-Labour news website, until April 14 this year.
Floodlights (Peter Byrne/PA)
Shadow sports minister Louie French said: 'This Labour Government has been caught offside yet again, installing one of their key cronies at the helm of what should be an independent regulator.
'This deeply political appointment calls into question the regulator's ability to operate with the impartiality fans deserve.
'It's yet another example of a Labour Government more interested in rewarding its donors than serving the public interest.'
A Labour source said: 'This is a shameful attempt by the Tories to undermine the Independent Football Regulator and to smear a highly qualified, respected candidate for its leadership.
'Labour backs a regulator that puts fans first and safeguards the future of English football, ensuring our clubs are run sustainably, fairly and with the supporters at the heart of the game.'
Under the previous Conservative government, several Tory donors also received appointments to public sector jobs.
In 2022, Wol Kolade's appointment as deputy chairman of NHS England also sparked allegations of 'cronyism' due to his donations of almost £1 million to the Conservatives, while fellow Tory donor Simon Blagden's appointment to the UK Health Security Agency's advisory board faced similar criticism.
There is no suggestion an improper recruitment process was followed in either case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Sarwar dodges question on potential welfare reform revolt
Around 120 Labour MPs – including a reported 12 from Scotland – have put their names to an amendment which would block the welfare reform Bill. But on Wednesday, Mr Sarwar refused to say if he supported the reforms or the rebellion against them. When asked if he supports the Scottish MPs seeking to block the Bill at a live taping of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh, the Scottish Labour leader said: 'My position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform. 'We have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed.' Mr Sarwar said there were 'many positives' in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, but added that there were 'still conversations to be had' about potential changes. Pushed again on whether he supports the rebellion, Mr Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect. 'People are legitimately voicing their concerns, having those conversations.' Pressed again on his view on the potential revolt, Mr Sarwar added: 'We have to support the principle of reform. 'What those reforms look like has to be balanced and has to be fair.' Mr Sarwar stressed that he believed the best way out of poverty was through work, but said those who cannot work should be supported. The most controversial part of the plans will see the eligibility of the personal independence payment (Pip) in England and Wales be reduced in a bid to save £5 billion. Earlier on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner suggested that ministers were considering potential concessions to Labour MPs to stave off a rebellion. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable,' she said in an interview with ITV's Peston programme.
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer taking personal charge of picking off Labour rebels bidding to stop his benefits overhaul
SIR KEIR Starmer is taking personal charge of picking off Labour rebels opposing his benefits overhaul. He will hit the phones in a mad dash to quell the 123-strong insurgency intent on scuppering his welfare reforms. He insisted he would ' lead from the front ' to make £5billion of savings or face a gaping hole being blown in his public finance plans. But one senior rebel last night said No 10 needed to 'take their fingers out of their ears' to win over objectors. The source said: 'We can find a compromise that will achieve the Government's objectives and protect disabled people but they are going to have to get serious.' It also emerged that No 10 appeared to be blindsided by the scores of MPs ready to kill off the legislation. The PM, speaking from the Nato summit in The Hague, insisted he was able to understand the mood of his Labour MPs. He said: 'I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs.' A vote will take place on Tuesday on restricting personal independence payments and limiting the sickness element of universal credit. It will take only 80 MPs to rebel to wreck the move — and damage his authority. But Sir Keir appeared to leave some hope for rebels, saying: 'It doesn't work as it stands for people who desperately need help to get into work or for people who need protection. It is broken.' Meanwhile, new analysis from the Centre for Social Justice think tank reveals that limiting mental health benefits to people only with the most severe conditions would save £9billion and help more people back into the workplace. Rachel Reeves delivers the Spring Budget in full
The Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Sun
How Keir Starmer will use persuasion, arm-twisting & dark arts to save Labour as he goes into crisis mode
IT was only last July that Sir Keir Starmer cruised to a landslide victory. Yet, not even a full 12 months later, he looks haunted. A man under real pressure. 2 2 No PM this early in their tenure should have to use an international summit to insist they are ' very confident ' of still being in post at the next election. Yet such is the scale of the revolt over the Government's modest package of welfare savings that No10 has gone into crisis mode. Ministers may be keeping calm in public but, like a duck's feet furiously paddling below the surface, in private they are panicking. I can reveal that Sir Keir 's diary was being rejigged last night so he can personally lead the ring-round of Labour rebels upon his return from his Nato dash to Holland. It is therefore perhaps a happy coincidence that his aides recently discovered the Downing Street vending machine has started stocking Red Bull. They are going to need all their energy for a fraught few days that could decide the fate of Labour's entire premiership. The golden rule in politics is knowing how to count — so some numbers: Around 120 Labour backbenchers are threatening to torpedo the government's £5billion package in benefit cuts. They say the squeeze on Personal Independence Payments specifically could push 250,000 claimants into poverty. Combined with the opposition parties, they have marshalled enough troops to easily wipe out Sir Keir's 156 majority when the vote happens in just five days' time. Defeat would strike a humiliating blow to Sir Keir's authority and throw into doubt his ability to push through any serious reform. National inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal finally ordered by Keir Starmer in another Labour U-turn If he cannot even convince his troops to get behind £5billion in welfare cuts, what hope does he have of reining in a sickness benefits bill set to balloon to £100billion within five years? Downing Street has been left with two options: Postpone the vote and buy time to redraw their proposals in a way that satisfies the rebels, despite the stench of weakness. Or roll the dice, stand firm, and try to peel off as many mutineers as possible. For now, Starmer has chosen to call their bluff, with both him and his deputy Angela Rayner publicly stressing the vote on Tuesday will happen. Over the next few days the PM, his ministers and his whips will use a mix of persuasion, arm-twisting, and downright dark arts to smash the revolt. A 'bleeding stumps' pitch has seen rebels told that popular policies — like more cash for hospitals and school breakfast clubs — could all be at risk without welfare savings. Meanwhile the more career-driven MPs are being gently warned that their hopes of a government job will evaporate if they walk through the wrong voting lobby. The name of one ambitious newbie who has been excitably telling colleagues he wants 'regime change' has worked its way back to No10. He can kiss goodbye to a ministerial red box . . . 'EMBARRASSING U-TURNS' But even MPs loyal to Starmer — and there are still a lot of them — are not convinced anything other than serious concessions will pull the rebels back from the brink. One member of the government tells me: 'It's hard to see how they can get this over the line on the current voting timeline without some concessions to get some of the heavy hitters to change course. 'But it is unclear if that reality has yet fully landed with No10.' Another supportive MP reckons a commitment on the floor of the House of Commons to soften the package later down the line is 'the only way to keep the show on the road'. One senior rebel insists they 'can find a compromise' but Downing Street 'need to take their fingers out of their ears'. And the rebellion is not just contained to the backbenches. One MP swears that as many as five Parliamentary Private Secretaries — the first rung on the ministerial ladder — are willing to abstain in protest. Many see this whole mess as symptomatic of a deeper problem running through his premiership: a growing sense he is not in control. A string of embarrassing u-turns — from winter fuel cuts to the grooming gangs national inquiry — are a dangerous smoke signal to his MPs that he can be pushed around. And worryingly to the Government — much like the Brexit Spartans who hamstrung Theresa May 's government — the new Labour rebels are organised. Experienced committee chairs on the soft left of the party have developed a sophisticated shadow whipping operation to marshall their troops. That No10 was totally blindsided by the ambush on Monday night — to the alarm of those in Starmer's inner circle — is testament to their tactics. Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway Labour insider Or as one Labour MP put it: 'The amendment landed like a Viet Cong ambush from the soft-left — swift, unexpected, and overwhelming in its force.' Terrified of party whips getting wind, the ringleaders recruited disgruntled MPs to their cause through snatched conversations in corridors and on the Commons terrace. As one MP warns: 'They have spreadsheets and they can count. This whole saga has given them intel on how to whip'. And you can bet that fighting benefits cuts will not be their only rallying cause over the next four years. Axing the two-child benefit cap — on which the PM has already shown ankle at the mere flickers of backbench grumblings — will be next. The danger for Sir Keir now is spiralling into a doom loop of chaos, which breeds unpopularity, which breeds more chaos, which breeds more unpopularity. For some MPs watching endless polls predicting their seats falling to Reform, they are resigned to being one-term wonders. 'Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway?', says one party insider. Almost one year ago our beaming PM walked into Downing Street with the most seats since Tony Blair. Next week's benefits vote will be a test of whether he is the master of that majority - or a mere passenger in his own government . . .
