logo
Child care is in crisis. High costs hurt parents and providers.

Child care is in crisis. High costs hurt parents and providers.

Yahoo16-04-2025

Early childhood education is a game-changer. It's a springboard to lifelong success for kids. It's a necessity for many parents to participate in the workforce and a lifeline to businesses who depend on a robust talent pool.
However, despite its well-documented benefits for families, employers and the economy, child care is in crisis. With costs rising, availability shrinking and state support limited, the child care market in Wisconsin's urban, suburban and rural areas alike is unable to meet the demand, leaving communities in dire circumstances.
Our children and our state's future deserve solutions that deliver on the promise offered by access to affordable, high-quality early education. Here are three things we could do in the Badger State to turn the tide:
Identify new sources of funding to help stabilize early childhood education providers and prevent devastating closures. Stabilizing this essential industry requires a consistent source of financial resources. Securing new sources of funding would minimize provider closures, ensuring families can remain in the workforce, keeping the state's communities and economy growing.
Supply is not meeting demand. Razor-thin margins and severe staffing shortages have significantly reduced the availability of care. More than 50% of the state and 70% of rural areas have just one licensed child care slot for every three children under age 5. More than 34,000 infants and toddlers in the state lack access to safe, regulated care, and waitlists in rural Wisconsin for families who need care exceed 25,500 spots.
Circumstances will not improve on their own. Recently, 663 Milwaukee child care providers surveyed by Milwaukee Succeeds, the Greater Milwaukee Foundation's strategic education initiative, indicated the vast majority of pandemic relief funds they received have been used for basic operating costs like rent, food, utilities and supplies. Inflation is pressuring budgets even further, and at least 15% of providers surveyed said they expect to close when emergency funding expires in June.
As we speak, other states are pursuing innovative options for getting more public and private funding into the sector. Retaining a dated, dysfunctional model for funding child care carries a high risk for harming Wisconsin children, families and employers.
Opinion: Changes to Social Security would cost average Wisconsin resident $7,000 a year
Strengthen Wisconsin Shares subsidies for lower income, working families so more households can afford care. Wisconsin Shares is a worthwhile program with the potential to have much greater impact if it covered more child care slots, reduced co-payments for families, increased eligibility to reach more families and simplified the application process.
Opinion: Musk, billionaires took over Wisconsin Supreme Court race. The joke is on us.
The expense of child care puts it out of reach for too many who need it. Families with one infant, for example, pay $11,900 per year on average at a child care center. And programs designed to help those with lower incomes aren't helping enough. Families in Wisconsin pay the highest co-payments on child care subsidies in the country – up to 17% of their household income for a family of three. You'll find co-pays of 5% and 5.7% in Minnesota and Michigan respectively.
Challenges accessing Wisconsin Shares also leads to underutilization. Only 18 percent of eligible children are enrolled in the subsidy program. We need to expand the access, grow the resources, and then better connect people to them.
Advance policies that increase compensation for early educators to reduce high rates of staff turnover. The staggering rates of turnover experienced in the child care sector could be mitigated if educators received dignified, livable pay commensurate with their training and experience.
Even though early education teachers are entrusted to nurture our youngest learners during critical stages of development, lack of investment in the sector has depressed their wages to poverty levels. At a time when the cost of living is rising rapidly, early educators are earning an average of $12.99 per hour, predictably leading to low recruitment and retention rates. Wisconsin providers report they are under capacity by 33,000 children – meaning low staffing levels caused classrooms closures, reducing the number of children served compared to the number they could have otherwise served.
Simply put, a living wage leads to more consistent staffing, which in turn means greater access to care for families.
Early childhood education's challenges all point to a flawed business model where parents can't afford care, providers can't afford staff and rising operational costs, and staff can't afford to stay in the profession. Meanwhile, Wisconsin businesses suffer as current and potential employees opt out of the workforce in the absence of quality child care. This is a systems issue, so systems solutions are needed.
And while one person cannot enact such change on their own, our voices are powerful together. Lawmakers in Madison are currently debating the state budget, and your opportunity to be heard is now. We encourage you to contact your state representatives and senators to educate them on the importance of early childhood education for Wisconsin's children and families, our economy and our future. Let them know that these three things could make all the difference.
➤Want to state legislator? Here's where you can find your representatives.
Gregory M. Wesley, JD, is president and CEO of the Greater Milwaukee Foundation. JoAnne Anton is president and CEO of Herb Kohl Philanthropies. Vincent Lyles is the executive director of Milwaukee Succeeds.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin daycare is expensive and scarce. We must act now | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say
White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say

The White House earlier this month directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters. Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinize Musk's contracts to prepare possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new U.S. missile defense system. Advertisement 5 The White House directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. camrocker – Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately $22 billion in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk's ventures. 'We'll take a look at everything,' the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6. Advertisement In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the 'Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts.' In a separate statement, a spokesperson at NASA said the agency 'will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defense Department responded to requests for comment. 5 Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new U.S. missile defense system. REUTERS The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is 'for political ammunition,' one of the people said. Advertisement Whether the U.S. government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security, and the public interest. 'There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts,' said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. 'Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security.' 5 Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the U.S. government in much of its aerospace and defense work, according to reports. AP 5 A White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the 'Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts,' in response to Reuters. Getty Images Advertisement Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the U.S. government in much of its aerospace and defense work, launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the 'Golden Dome' missile shield planned by Trump. Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president, such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender, his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX. 5 The review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk's ventures. AFP via Getty Images Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly $5 billion contract with NASA, is the only U.S. vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a U.S. intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with U.S. defense and intelligence services.

Worried about Social Security cuts in the future? 5 changes to make to your retirement plan now
Worried about Social Security cuts in the future? 5 changes to make to your retirement plan now

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Worried about Social Security cuts in the future? 5 changes to make to your retirement plan now

Americans are increasingly concerned about Social Security. The program will likely have to cut benefits around 2033 unless the federal government shores up funding for the program, which would affect more than 70 million people who receive Social Security benefits each month. Recent cuts to funding levels at the Social Security Administration and Tesla CEO Elon Musk's recent unsubstantiated claims of fraud are dragging down the public's confidence that the government will safeguard the program's payouts. Americans who think Social Security will eventually be cut may want to take action in their own finances to secure their retirement plan. Here are five things you can do to improve your retirement plan, replace potentially missing Social Security income, and safeguard your future. A 401(k) plan is one of the best tools that everyday Americans have for saving for retirement, since it lets you sock away so much each year via an easy-to-use paycheck deduction. Plus, many employers sweeten the deal by matching your contributions, turbocharging your savings. In 2025, all workers can contribute up to $23,500, while those age 50 and older can put in an additional $7,500 as a catch-up contribution. Those who are ages 60–63 can add even more, topping up their account with a super catch-up contribution of $11,250 in lieu of the regular one. Your 401(k) plan offers you a great way to save on a tax-advantaged basis, letting you contribute to a traditional plan on a pre-tax basis or an after-tax basis via a Roth 401(k). They're some of the best ways to grow your private assets and offset a potential Social Security shortfall. Your retirement plan's asset allocation is what financial advisors are referring to when discussing what portion of your investments are in stocks versus bonds, which are the two major asset classes. Your asset allocation is important because it determines how much your portfolio will grow over time. Portfolios with a heavy weighting toward stocks tend to deliver higher returns than those with a heavy weighting toward bonds, though stocks are more volatile in the short term. Allocating more of your assets to stocks can help you grow your 401(k) more over time than sticking with a bond-heavy portfolio. If you have a long time until you need to access your funds, you can afford to be more aggressive — that is, have more in stocks — than if you have a shorter time frame. By revising your asset allocation, you can make more money over time without contributing more to the account — but you don't want to get too aggressive with your 401(k). Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Dividend-paying stocks are one of the best picks for those looking for true passive income, and the best dividend stocks make a sizable payout quarterly and then grow that over time. Dividend stocks are a boon for retirees, offering regular, sustainable income to use in your golden years. If you don't want to do the heavy lifting of buying individual dividend stocks, it's easy to buy dividend stock funds, which are available in many 401(k) plans and most of the best IRA accounts. The best dividend funds allow you to own dozens or even hundreds of companies, reducing your risk through diversification, and they pay a solid dividend that should grow over time. Dividend stocks are a great way to offset any income that could be lost to Social Security cuts. An annuity is another way to generate a stream of income in retirement, and some even allow you to set up lifetime income for you and a spouse, offering a solution to a Social Security funding shortfall. Annuities offer a ton of different features, such as lifetime income (though that can increase the cost of these contracts), and they may make sense in your financial situation. The downside of annuities is that they're costly, complex and illiquid. Annuities have built-in fees that can eat up a huge chunk of your potential returns, and complex annuity contracts are tough to understand, so it may not always be clear what your rights are. Finally, it's difficult to cancel an annuity without paying a hefty fee, meaning accessing your money may be tough to do. Still, an annuity can help the right person to generate steady income, but working with a fee-only financial advisor can help you determine whether it makes sense in your situation. Learn more: 5 important questions to ask your financial advisor A financial advisor can help you make the smartest financial decisions and avoid some of the mistakes that trip up others. A great advisor can help you navigate the best time to take Social Security based on your needs, make smart investment decisions and avoid bad decisions. You'll want to work with an advisor who's incentivized to make decisions in your best interest, and that means working with a fee-only fiduciary advisor. You pay the advisor from your own pocket, but that helps ensure that you're always getting the best financial advice. As the old saying goes, he who pays the piper calls the tune. Learn more: How to choose the right financial advisor for you Savers with a long time until they need to access their retirement funds need to make relatively small changes to their retirement accounts to counter the effects of a potential cut to Social Security, while those with less time need to be more aggressive. However, neither group should delay in making changes, since time is your biggest ally in building wealth and a secure future. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation.

Tesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets
Tesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Tesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets

Most people are waiting early for news on Tesla's (TSLA) planned robotaxi rollout, an event that CEO Elon Musk has been hyping up for months. With the buzz surrounding this well-publicized event, one that could usher in a new era for the automotive transportation industry, it can be easy to overlook Tesla's updates in other areas. But the company recently revealed that it may face a new challenge from a competitor in a different part of the sector. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter On Wednesday, June 11, Tesla filed a complaint in a San Francisco Federal Court, accusing a former employee of leaving the company with illegal material that may have been used to launch another company, which several prominent venture capitalists have backed. Now this startup is threatening Tesla's progress in a fast-growing market, and Musk's company is taking legal action in an attempt to avoid loss of market share. Image source: Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images Over the past few years, Tesla's Optimus program, its division that focuses on developing humanoid robot technology, has come into focus as Musk has touted its progress. He's discussed a future in which robots outnumber humans and perform many of the tasks typically done by humans. Related: Elon Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos That may sound like something out of a work of science fiction, but Tesla's more recent news reads more like something out of a novel by John Grisham or Scott Turow. The company is suing a former employee who left the company and promptly started a competitor, allegedly with stolen trade secrets. Zhongjie "Jay" Li spent two years at Tesla, serving as a Technical Lead between August 2022 and September 2024. During this time, he "advanced robotic hand sensors - and was entrusted with some of the most sensitive technical data in the program," according to the company's attorneys. When he left Tesla, though, Li allegedly walked away with highly classified information that the company believes he used to launch listed as being launched the same month that he departed. The startup's LinkedIn profile states that it creates "humanoids dexterous enough to thread a needle." More Tesla News: Tesla rival gets good news as robotaxi launch loomsThe 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsTesla makes a desperate move as it continues to lose customers did not immediately respond to an inquiry from TheStreet regarding the lawsuit, and so far, has not issued a public statement on Tesla's accusations. However, Li has posted to X recently, implying - but not explicitly stating - that he doesn't trust Musk. Musk has staked much of Tesla's growth prospects on its robotaxi launch and its plans to advance into the humanoid robotics market. However, the lawsuit against Li isn't the only potential hurdle for the company to overcome as it rushes to usher in a turnaround. Related: Tesla faces new challenge as leader announces exit Early in June, Tesla lost one of its engineering leaders, as Vice President of Engineering Milan Kovic announced he would step down from his role at Optimus, effective immediately. He said his decision had nothing to do with Musk and purely reflected his own desire to spend more time with family. Even so, Musk's robotaxi ambitions are facing a growing list of challenges at a highly pivotal time. The company's declining sales across the U.S., Europe, and China indicate that it will need to make progress in other areas to remain competitive and keep shares elevated, despite Musk's decision to return to the company. Tesla has teased progress from its robotics division, including sharing a video of a dancing robot. But Proception claims to have overcome one of robotics' biggest challenges, that of creating a hand that can truly match human dexterity. It remains unknown how the lawsuit will progress. But in the short term, Tesla must deal with the fact that a new rival appears to be making progress in an important area. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store