‘Significant challenges' in use of AI within UK screen sector
Other issues highlighted by the British Film Institute (BFI) report include the safeguarding of human creative control, the fear of jobs being lost as positions are replaced through the use of AI, and investment in training in new skills.
High energy consumption and carbon emissions, and the risks to creative content around biased data, are also described as being of concern.
The report, which has been carried out in partnership with CoSTAR universities Goldsmiths, Loughborough and Edinburgh, analyses how the screen sector is using and experimenting with rapidly evolving generative AI technologies.
It warned that the 'primary issue' was the use of copyrighted material – such as hundreds of thousands of film and TV scripts – in the training of generative AI models, without payment or the permission of rights-holders.
'This practice threatens the fundamental economics of the screen sector if it devalues intellectual property creation and squeezes out original creators,' the report said.
But it added that the UK's strong foundation in creative technology – as it is home to more than 13,000 creative technology companies – means that the UK screen sector is well positioned to adapt to the technological shift.
The report – titled AI in the Screen Sector: Perspectives and Paths Forward – said generative AI promises to democratise and revolutionise the industry, with the BBC, for example, piloting AI initiatives.
Meanwhile, projects such as the Charismatic consortium, which is backed by Channel 4 and Aardman Animations, aim to make AI tools accessible to creators regardless of their budget or experience.
It said this could empower a new wave of British creators to produce high-quality content with modest resources, though concerns about copyright and ethical use remain significant barriers to full adoption.
The report sets out nine key recommendations it suggests should be addressed within the next three years to enable the UK screen sector to thrive in using AI.
These include establishing the UK as a world-leading market of IP licensing for AI training, and embedding sustainability standards to reduce AI's carbon footprint.
It also calls for structures and interventions to pool knowledge, develop workforce skills and target investments in the UK's creative technology sector, while it urges support for independent creators through accessible tools, funding and ethical AI products.
The BFI's director of research and innovation, Rishi Coupland, said: 'AI has long been an established part of the screen sector's creative toolkit, most recently seen in the post-production of the Oscar-winning The Brutalist, and its rapid advancement is attracting multimillion investments in technology innovator applications.
'However, our report comes at a critical time and shows how generative AI presents an inflection point for the sector and, as a sector, we need to act quickly on a number of key strategic fronts.
'Whilst it offers significant opportunities for the screen sector such as speeding up production workflows, democratising content creation and empowering new voices, it could also erode traditional business models, displace skilled workers, and undermine public trust in screen content.
'The report's recommendations provide a roadmap to how we can ensure that the UK's world-leading film, TV, video games and VFX industries continue to thrive by making best use of AI technologies to bring their creativity, innovations and storytelling to screens around the globe.'
Professor Jonny Freeman, director of CoSTAR Foresight Lab, said: 'This latest CoSTAR Foresight Lab report, prepared by the BFI, navigates the complex landscape of AI in the screen sector by carefully weighing both its transformative opportunities and the significant challenges it presents.
'The report acknowledges that while AI offers powerful tools to enhance creativity, efficiency, and competitiveness across every stage of the production workflow – from script development and pre-production planning, through on-set production, to post-production and distribution – it also raises urgent questions around skills, workforce adaptation, ethics, and sector sustainability.'
CoSTAR is a £75.6 million national network of laboratories that are developing new technology to maintain the UK's world-leading position in gaming, TV, film, performance, and digital entertainment.
Last month stars including Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Sir Ian McKellen, wrote a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer, urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
an hour ago
- Coin Geek
The startup playbook: Why SEA is leading with purpose, not just profit
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... As emerging technologies redraw the competitive map, Southeast Asia's startup founders are rewriting the rules—not by chasing unicorn status, but by building resilient, impact-driven companies that solve real-world problems. That was the powerful message from a panel discussion at the Asia Tech x Singapore Summit featuring Yinglan Tan (Founding Managing Partner, Insignia Ventures), Dr. James Ong (Founder, AI International Institute), and Yanan Wu (Founder & CEO, Surfin Group). Yanan Wu: The next billion users For Wu, the mission is clear: bring financial access to underserved communities using artificial intelligence (AI) and social data. 'We use social behavior data to give them a credit score, to give a micro-learning program so that they can start a journey,' said Wu, whose fintech platform serves 70 million users across 10 countries. 'Everyone deserves a financial advisor, whether you're rich or you're underprivileged.' Wu emphasized the vast untapped potential in underserved and emerging markets, pointing out that the real opportunity for unicorn creation lies not just in mature markets but in reaching the 'next billion users.' 'There are still hundreds of millions of people in this region who are either unbanked or underbanked. That's a huge opportunity,' he said. 'The tech has to be scalable, yes, but it also has to be meaningful to people. What's the utility? That's what drives sustainable growth.' Wu added that understanding hyperlocal needs—whether in rural Indonesia or secondary cities in Vietnam—will determine which companies can truly scale across Southeast Asia. His drive isn't just intellectual—it's personal. A former nuclear physicist turned entrepreneur, he lives on red-eye flights to lead a multi-country operation. 'You need resilience to cross over different cycles… Sometimes, it feels lonely. But you always have to cherish the moment where you came from, why you want to do this, and where you're going,' he shared. Wu's ambition goes beyond scale. He believes Southeast Asia has a unique opportunity to leapfrog traditional financial models and embrace what he calls 'agentic AI'—financial co-pilots for the underbanked. 'In the past, banks could not reach those remote areas. Now, technology can be flat. Technology can be scalable. Technology can be sustained.' Yinglan Tan: Growth happens in cycles Tan, whose venture fund backs companies like Wu's, echoed the importance of vision and grit. When evaluating founders, Tan looks for one thing: 'They're unstoppable.' He described successful entrepreneurs as those who 'see a wall—they go on top of it, around it, dig under it, or make friends with the wall to get things done.' Beyond hustle, Tan emphasized the ability to hire well, operate globally, and maintain perspective. 'They don't treat competitors as enemies. They see each day as a football match—you play to win, but you play by the rules. And when the day is done, it's another match.' Tan believes Southeast Asia is moving past a correction phase and entering what he called a 'refounding' phase—an environment that favors innovation built on stronger fundamentals. 'What we are seeing is that companies that have gone through that discipline are now coming out stronger. There are a number of companies that are now going regional. I think that is the next phase of growth,' said Tan. 'We also look for founders that are missionary rather than mercenary because you need a missionary to last the ten years required to build a great company.' He added that venture capitalists (VCs) are not simply searching for flashy tech or growth stories. The right founder-market fit, the ability to adapt, and a clear understanding of business fundamentals are just as crucial—if not more so—than hype. James Ong: AI as Infrastructure Dr. Ong urged founders to think beyond vanity metrics like valuations. 'Why are we focusing on unicorns? In Silicon Valley, it's all a financial engineering play. In Southeast Asia, we have a chance to reset the narrative,' he said. Instead of unicorns, he champions 'zebra-cons'—startups that balance profit with purpose. 'We also measure how much better life people are achieving, how much energy we're using.' Ong offered a perspective rooted in deep tech and AI, framing AI not just as a tool but as an infrastructure layer that can drive exponential value—if harnessed properly. 'We see AI as the next form of infrastructure, like electricity or the Internet,' he said. 'But the challenge is how to democratize AI, so it's not just in the hands of the big players.' He believes the next unicorn could emerge from a company that not only uses AI but also builds platforms that enable others to use AI to solve local problems—from agriculture and healthcare to logistics and finance. 'Democratization and localization of AI will be key. And that means building models, data, and interfaces that are actually trained and tested in Southeast Asia, not just imported from somewhere else,' he noted. Key takeaways Southeast Asia isn't just riding the AI wave—it's shaping a new one. 'Southeast Asia is at an inflection point,' said Dr. Ong. 'Entrepreneurs here are not only delivering economic value—they're solving humanity's problems with resilience and heart.' Watch: Alex Ball on the future of tech: AI development and entrepreneurship title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on Monday, with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI. The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to "train" its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs. Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion. Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP (WPP.L), opens new tab – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights. A Stability AI spokesperson said that "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas," adding: "Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression." Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the U.S. and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists. Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI. "Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said. She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits. Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development".
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Young Brits issued stark warning as nearly a quarter turn to TikTok money advice
A survey from HSBC UK and the national education charity, Young Enterprise, reveals that Gen Z feel judged about how they manage money, leading some to turn to unreliable sources for financial advice New research suggests that Gen Z feel judged by parents, friends and social media about how they handle their money. Despite a strong digital fluency and desire for greater financial literacy, the younger generation is dealing with low confidence and misinformation when it comes to personal finances. Survey findings from HSBC UK and national education charity Young Enterprise reveals that while half of Gen Z respondents are actively saving, 67% say they feel judged or embarrassed about how they handle their money - predominantly by their family. That compares to 33% of the wider UK population, exposing a generational 'shame gap' between young and older generations. . The survey also highlights that Gen Z does not feel particularly supported in their attempts to become more financially literate, especially by their schools. Only 13% of Gen Z respondents said they would turn to their school or university as a top source for money management education. This lack of formal financial education is leading Gen Z to seek less reliable sources of financial advice. Nearly a quarter of Gen Z respondents say they have turned to social media influencers for financial advice in the last year - almost double the UK average. According to the study this trend is not indicative of financial carelessness, but rather 'reveals the consequences of growing up without reliable financial education'. Sarah Porretta, CEO of Young Enterprise, said: 'The myth that young people are careless with money just doesn't hold up. Gen Z wants to be financially capable, but they don't feel supported…Teachers are doing their best in a crowded curriculum, but they need more support too – we can't expect them to tackle this challenge alone.' Research indicates that parents are paying the price for the lack of formal financial education. According to research commissioned by Moneyfarm, 84% of British parents said that their child would have access to money that they saved for them when they turned 18 - with the average amount being £23,000. While social media is not the most reliable source of financial information, it is helping younger generations fight the stigma about discussing their personal finances. The dying stigma is also enabling Gen Z to make more informed financial decisions, negotiate better salaries and encourage financial equity. Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you! Additionally, a 2025 consumer survey from Intuit revealed 58% of 18-35-year-olds are integrating financial management into their overall wellness routines. The report confirms that the declining stigma actually encourages 'a holistic view of wealth that aligns with personal values and long-term life satisfaction.' But as the research highlights, it is up to more than parents and teens to prioritise financial education. This past March, Conservative MP Peter Bedford brought forward a motion in Parliament to introduce a bill to make provisions around financial education in primary schools and tertiary education. Speaking in Parliament on the issue, Bedford said: "Schools should prepare young people for the adult world. Yet for all the focus on balancing an equation, there is no attention given to balancing one's bank are sending our young people out into the world and putting them into the game of life without even teaching them the rules first."
