Demonized by Trump, DEI Professionals Go ‘Discrete' to Find Jobs
(Bloomberg) -- On the website of diversity consultant BWG Business Solutions is a sentence that would have felt out of place five years ago, when companies were bragging about their DEI efforts: 'Due to the increasing scrutiny and politicization of equity efforts, the public listing of clients and partnerships has been removed from this website.'
The Battle Over the Fate of Detroit's Renaissance Center
NYC Real Estate Industry Asks Judge to Block New Broker Fee Law
NJ Transit Strike Would Be 'Disaster' for Region, Sherrill Says
Iceland Plans for a More Volcanic Future
NJ Transit Urges Commuters to Work Remotely If Union Strikes
BWG's founder, Janice Gassam Asare, isn't the only one changing the way she's doing business now that the Trump administration has placed diversity, equity and inclusion in its crosshairs. The attacks are forcing professionals in the field to rebrand themselves to get contracts, battle over the remaining staff positions and reimagine what the industry will look like going forward. Some in the field are repositioning how they market themselves, including leaning away from talking about race and gender, and prioritizing their leadership expertise, according to interviews with more than a dozen DEI professionals.
'I like to call it DEI done discreetly,' said Gassam Asare.
Some longtime BWG clients started letting contracts lapse in early 2024, as pushback against DEI entered the US presidential election. Gassam Asare said that corporate clients are now less interested in long-term consulting that includes a comprehensive equity audit — analyses that assess how policies impact various gender or racial groups — and surveys with staffers. They're more inclined to ask for workshops that don't require a long-term financial commitment. It's led to a 60% drop in the amount of money she's bringing in via contracts compared to two years ago.
'Companies aren't sure what the future of DEI is going to be,' she said, 'so they don't want to invest in what they fear could be illegal.'
For Keith Wyche, who writes and speaks about workplace culture and was previously a corporate vice president at Walmart Inc., the current environment is prompting him to emphasize other parts of his resume.
'Personally, I do make sure that I lean into my leadership skills, I lean into my career and background in change management transformation so that I'm not labeled a DEI guy,' he said.
In his first days in office, President Donald Trump made good on his pledge to fight what he called an 'anti-White feeling' in the US. He's signed executive orders aimed at pressuring corporations and other groups to end policies that constitute 'illegal DEI discrimination,' saying the initiatives disguise race and sex-based discrimination, undermine meritocracy and divide people into an 'identity-based spoils system.' He revoked a longstanding requirement that federal contractors follow affirmative action commitments and dismantled diversity programs across the government.
A slew of US businesses including Amazon.com Inc. and Walmart rolled back their diversity and inclusion efforts as they increasingly face campaigns and legal attacks over their efforts.
A March NBC News survey found that a slightly higher share of voters had negative versus positive feelings on DEI, with roughly half of respondents saying there is 'too much political correctness in our society today.' That kind of divisiveness prompted Wyche to stop using the acronym altogether.
''DEI' has been co-opted to mean, you know, a bunch of other things,' he said. 'But when I say 'diversity, equity, and inclusion,' it's kind of hard to fight those three words.'
Michael Welp is the founder of WMFDP —or White Men as Full Diversity Partners. But the full name is one the organization is shying away from, opting to use the acronym lately. When Welp runs multiday leadership-coaching sessions on topics like conflict resolution or better communication, the first thing he asks prospective clients now is whether they are government contractors. If so, he'll change the sessions to veer away from explicitly discussing gender or race.
'I've actually moved more outside of the DEI space to honor what the laws are,' Welp said. 'And also I find that there's plenty of work to do in growing the kinds of leadership skills that people need that we use to grow DEI, without a need to focus on DEI.'
One recent example is an auto supplier that was having issues with team dynamics. WMFDP created a four-day program aimed at improving how the group provides feedback and finding each of the team members' strengths.
'It was not necessary to have a conversation about race to do that, for example,' Welp said. But in the end, you improve 'those same kinds of skills.'
Corporate leaders are understandably jittery. In one of Trump's early executive orders, the president directed the head of every government agency to identify up to nine large public companies, nonprofits, universities and professional associations they think should be investigated over DEI policies.
And the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, created in the Civil Rights era to fight discrimination in the workplace, has questioned some of the country's biggest law firms over their diversity focused hiring practices. Elsewhere, anti-DEI activists like Robby Starbuck are drumming up social media campaigns that have ended in companies like Deere & Co. and Tractor Supply Co. scaling back their initiatives.
And yet, at a January gathering of about 60 corporate CEOs, the moderator asked who in the audience was dismantling programs within their corporations. No one raised their hand.
'Most CEOs tell us: 'We're going to do the work of diversity, equity and inclusion. We may not boast about it, you may not get a DEI annual report anymore, you may not see us use it as a branding opportunity. But we're going to do the work,' said Cid Wilson, president of the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility, a pro-DEI group working to advance the inclusion of Latinos in corporate America.
He's spoken to some 200 corporate leaders about the topic in recent months, and he's come away with what he described as interest in figuring out how to 'navigate this tighter lane.' Wilson added: 'That's been a very difficult maze.'
Since the US Supreme Court banned race-conscious admissions in colleges in 2023, company leaders worried about whether diversity programs would face legal challenges, even if laws hadn't actually changed yet. Big companies, including Wall Street banks, began opening up programs focused on women and minorities to include everyone and scouring their internal and external communications to weed out language that could draw scrutiny.
'If you're the general counsel, arguably you are the second most powerful person in corporate America right now,' Wilson said.
Companies are notably pulling back on hiring DEI-specific roles. The number of new positions at S&P 500 companies was down more than 70% in 2024 from a peak three years earlier, according to a Bloomberg News analysis. This year, just six new roles were added through the start of April. 'If your job title's got inclusion in it, it's either been changed or eliminated or repurposed,' said Chantalle Couba, who advises leadership at private sector companies, nonprofits and higher education institutions on human capital issues.
California-based Michael Streffery, who has been job hunting since the end of 2024 and has previously worked at Realtor.com and Ubisoft, is feeling the effects of those cuts. In recent months, he has been in the final round of interviewing for four DEI roles. Two of those positions were removed, and he didn't progress in the others.
'Have I considered pivoting to other areas like head of talent development, head of talent attraction, or HR business director?,' he said. 'Absolutely. And I have applied to those positions, but what I'm also seeing is that the competition is so extreme.'
Nearly all of the professionals interviewed said they expect the industry to transform further, though it's not entirely clear what that new reality will look like. Most agree that the days of plush budgets and listening sessions about race at work are gone, at least for now.
'My hot take is that we haven't done diversity well,' said Misty Gaither, who previously oversaw DEI at Indeed Inc. and now works as an independent consultant. She hopes this moment allows companies to move away from narrowly focusing on hiring diverse talent, which often draws pushback. The better strategy is making sure that performance reviews are equitable for those that fall into marginalized groups or ensuring talent development is accessible throughout an organization.
'Moving away from more performative, topical things that have been bold headlines but really doing the hard work, the less sexy work,' Gaither said. 'I think that is something that can be a positive output from what we're seeing in this current landscape.' — With assistance from Weihua Li, Lauren Pizzimenti and Saijel Kishan
Made-in-USA Wheelbarrows Promoted by Trump Are Now Made in China
US Border Towns Are Being Ravaged by Canada's Furious Boycott
100 Moments You Might Have Missed From Trump's First 100 Days
How an Israeli Hostage Negotiator Outsmarts Ransomware Hackers
Can the Labubu Doll Craze Survive Trump's Tariffs?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
27 minutes ago
- Business Insider
It sure looks like Mark Cuban is on board with Elon Musk's idea of a new political party
Billionaires Mark Cuban and Elon Musk seem to have found some common ground. As the Tesla CEO's relationship with President Donald Trump blows up in real time on social media amid their clash over the "Big Beautiful Bill," Musk proposed creating a new political party for "the middle." "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk asked in an X poll on Thursday. Cuban, who has sparred with Musk on X multiple times on subjects ranging from DEI to Trump, appeared to endorse the idea, responding to Musk's post with three check marks. Cuban did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. That Cuban is attracted to the idea of a new political party may not come as a surprise. The former "Shark Tank" star and Cost Plus Drugs founder has previously expressed his dismay with both political parties. He once described himself as "socially centrist" while "very fiscally conservative." During the 2024 election, Cuban campaigned heavily for former Vice President Kamala Harris, previously telling BI that he liked that she's "not an ideologue" and supporting her pro-business stance. In January, when journalist Matthew Yglesias proposed a 2028 presidential run for Cuban, BI asked the billionaire if he'd seriously consider the proposal. "No," Cuban responded.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Uber CEO Wants Customers Using More Than One Product
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi talks about adding the company's first chief operating officer since 2019 and trying to get customers to use more than one product. "People who use multiple products on Uber tend to transact with us much one of the reasons I wanted to get an experienced operating executive to really focus on the overall relationship with the customer rather than, you know, separate P&Ls," he told Bloomberg's Tom Giles at the Bloomberg Tech summit in San Francisco. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Plunges After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Tesla Inc.'s shares sank the most in almost three months as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's simmering feud devolved into a public war of words between two of the world's most powerful people. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars Trump on Thursday said he was 'very disappointed' by the Tesla chief executive officer's criticism of the president's signature tax policy bill. Musk fired back in several social media posts, saying in one that 'without me, Trump would have lost the election.' The president later floated terminating federal contracts and subsidies extended to Musk's companies and said that he had asked the Tesla and SpaceX leader to leave his administration, which Musk said was a 'lie.' Tesla's shares fell 15% as the volleys continued, the stock's biggest intraday decline since March 10. The loss knocked about $156 billion off the automaker's market value. The spat highlights how policies advanced by Trump and Republican lawmakers put billions of dollars at risk for Tesla. Trump's massive tax bill would largely eliminate a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of this year, seven years ahead of schedule. That would translate to a roughly $1.2 billion hit to Tesla's full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts. After leaving his formal advisory role in the White House last week, Musk has been on a mission to block the president's signature tax bill that he described as a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest person has been lobbying Republican lawmakers — including making a direct appeal to House Speaker Mike Johnson — to preserve the valuable EV tax credits in the legislation. Separate legislation passed by the Senate attacking California's EV sales mandates poses another $2 billion headwind for Tesla's sales of regulatory credits, according to JPMorgan. Taken together, those measures threaten roughly half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Wall Street expects Tesla to post this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman said in a May 30 report. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The House-passed tax bill would aggressively phase-out tax credits for the production of clean electricity, and other sources years earlier than scheduled. It also includes stringent restrictions on the use of Chinese components and materials that analysts said would render the credits useless and limits the ability of company's to sell the tax credits to third parties. Tesla's division focused on solar systems and batteries separately criticized the Republican bill for gutting clean energy tax credits, saying that 'abruptly ending' the incentives would threaten US energy independence and the reliability of the power grid. The clean energy and EV policies under threat were largely enacted as part of former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The law was designed to encourage companies to build a domestic supply chain for clean energy and electric vehicles, giving companies more money if they produce more batteries and EVs in the US. Tesla has a broad domestic footprint, including car factories in Texas and California, a lithium refinery and battery plants. With those Biden-era policies in place, US EV sales rose 7.3% to a record 1.3 million vehicles last year, according to Cox Automotive data. --With assistance from Kara Carlson, Keith Laing, Josh Wingrove and Kate Sullivan. (Updates shares, adds Trump, Musk comments starting in the second paragraph.) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.