French chauffeur to face trial over alleged theft from UK minister
Both the driver and Foreign Minister Lammy filed complaints after the 600-kilometre (370 mile) ride, regional prosecutor Boris Duffau told AFP late Wednesday.
But it was the complaint filed by Lammy that was retained by the judicial authorities and will now go to trial, Duffau added.
The French driver, based in the southeastern French city of Avignon, was placed under judicial supervision with a driving ban and allowed to go free ahead of trial on 2,000-euro ($2,200) bail, the prosecutor said.
He will appear in court on November 3 in the southeastern city of Bonneville for "theft of cash and personal belongings," he added.
Duffau said that a row had erupted after a dispute over the fare and the "tone escalated".
The driver alleged in comments to the regional daily La Provence that he had never been paid for a trip on April 11 between Forli in northern Italy and Flaine, a ski resort in the French Alps.
The driver said the ride was ordered by the British Embassy in France and also claims to have been "the victim of assault and violence" by his passengers. The fare, according to him, was 1,550 euros.
'Victims in this matter'
"We totally refute these allegations. The fare was paid in full. The foreign secretary and his wife are named as victims in this matter and the driver has been charged with theft," a British foreign ministry spokesman told AFP in London.
"As there is an ongoing legal process, it would be inappropriate to comment further."
Prosecutor Duffau added: "The driver left after the two customers had got out of his car, with their luggage still in the boot."
"He dropped them (the bags) off at a municipal police station the next day," he said, adding this "is considered theft" because of the length of time he kept these personal belongings.
The prosecutor said that the driver is accused of taking cash from the baggage, helping himself to the amount he insisted was owed by the passengers.
British media reports said Lammy had been heading to a private skiing holiday in France with his wife Nicola Green after accompanying after King Charles III on his state visit to Italy.
British media said Green told police in a statement that she felt threatened and that the taxi driver had showed her a knife in his glovebox.
The reports said the driver is a chauffeur who provides services to VIPs. The dispute erupted after he demanded more money than had been previously agreed for the trip, the reports said, citing Lammy's version of events.
The Times of London said that although the taxi was organised by Foreign Office officials, the Lammys paid the fare.
Lammy represents the north London area of Tottenham in parliament and has been foreign secretary since July 2024 in the wake of Labour's election win.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
42 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Charged with the murder of Tunisian national Hichem Miraoui in southern France, Christophe Belgembe denies any racist motive
Christophe Belgembe, the suspect in the murder of Tunisian national Hichem Miraoui on May 31 in the southern French town Puget-sur-Argens, was charged on Thursday, June 5, with "murder and attempted murder in connection with a terrorist enterprise, motivated by race, ethnicity, nationality or religion." This judicial investigation is the 20 th opened by the French National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor's Office (PNAT) since 2017 for acts inspired by far-right ideology, most of which were foiled attack plots. However, this is the first time an actual attack – in this case a murder – linked to this ideology has been treated as a terrorist act. In a statement released on Thursday, the PNAT said that Belgembe, 53, had admitted to the facts while in police custody. Married, without children and unemployed, he nevertheless denied "any racist motivation" as well as "any terrorist intent." But the PNAT noted that prior to his deadly rampage, he had posted a video on Facebook where he declared: "French people (...) wake up, go find them where they are," pledged "allegiance to the blue, white and red," and announced his intention to say "stop to Islamics" and to "take out a few, just by leaving my house, all the undocumented [migrants]."
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
French grandmother files 'genocide' complaint over Gaza killings
Jacqueline Rivault filed her complaint with the "crimes against humanity" section of the Court of Paris, lawyer Arie Alimi said. Rivault hopes the fact her daughter's children, aged six and nine, were French citizens means the country's judiciary will decide it has jurisdiction to designate a magistrate to investigate the allegations. Rights groups, lawyers and some Israeli historians have described the Gaza war as "genocide". But Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews during World War II, vehemently rejects the explosive term. The complaint states that "two F16 missiles fired by the Israeli army" killed Janna, six, and Abderrahim Abudaher, nine, in northern Gaza on October 24, 2023. They and their family had sought refuge in another home "between Faluja and Beit Lahia" after leaving their own two days earlier due to heavy bombardment, the 48-page document stated. One missile entered "through the roof and the second directly into the room where the family was", it said. Abderrahim was killed instantly, while his sister Janna died shortly after being taken to hospital. The complaint argues the "genocide" allegation is based on the air strike being part of a larger Israeli project to "eliminate the Palestinian population and submit it to living conditions of a nature to entail the destruction of their group". Though formally against unnamed parties, the complaint explicitly targets Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli government and the military. Mother convicted The children's brother Omar was severely wounded but still lives in Gaza with their mother, identified as Yasmine Z., the complaint said. A French court in 2019 convicted Yasmine Z. in absentia of having funded a "terrorist" group over distributing money in Gaza to members of Palestinian militant groups Hamas and the Islamic Jihad. Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Militants abducted 251 hostages, 55 of whom remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. Israel's retaliatory offensive in Hamas-run Gaza has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry there, figures the United Nations deems reliable. No court has so far ruled the ongoing conflict is a genocide. But in rulings in January, March and May 2024, the International Court of Justice, the United Nations' highest judicial organ, told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza. The International Criminal Court has issued arrests against Netanyahu and ex-defence minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation Israel had killed him. ICC prosecutor Karim Khan initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh as well, but dropped those applications after their deaths in Israeli attacks.
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe
Airline passengers in the EU enjoy the world's most generous system of compensation if their flight is delayed or cancelled. However these rights seem set to decrease after the European Council agreed to an overhaul of compensation rules, following intense lobbying from the airline industry. The agreement to extend delay times and cut compensation levels was made at a European Council summit, despite opposition from Germany and Spain. Controversially, the Council bypassed discussions with the European Parliament and made its decision legally binding using a process that has not been deployed in more than a decade. Advertisement However the European Parliament can still make changes to the new rules - it has four months to respond with a proposal that must be backed by a majority of 361 MEPs. So what changes? The ruling doesn't scrap all the customer protections, but it changes the rules on compensation payments - changing both the payment amounts and the delay time after which compensation rules kick in. Under current EU Air Passenger Rights Regulation rules, passengers can claim between €250 and €600 in compensation if a flight is delayed by at least three hours, if the delay is the fault of the airline. Under the agreed changes, compensation will only be due after a four-hour delay for flights of less than 3,500 kilometres. For longer flights, airlines would be obliged to pay compensation if flights land at least six hours late, compared to the current three-hour standard. Under the new rules, €300 compensation will apply for delays of more than four hours – while €500 will be payable for delays of more than six hours involving flights of more than 3,500km. In exchange for the higher delay thresholds, airlines will have to streamline the complex and obfuscatory compensation process - in which many airlines make it very complicated to claim financial compensation but very easy to claim airline vouchers. And what doesn't change? Other compensation rules remain unchanged, especially around the 'extraordinary circumstances' definition which covers whether airlines have to provide any compensation at all. Compensation for delays or cancellations is not paid if the problem is due to 'extraordinary circumstances' – the exact definition of this in the legislation is vague but it generally applies to situations like extreme weather, political instability, security risks or problems with air traffic control. Advertisement Strikes are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances, neither are routine mechanical problems or staff shortages. The rules cover airlines that are registered in the EU – such as the Ireland-based Ryanair – or flights taking off from an EU or Schengen zone country. Since Brexit the rules no longer apply to the UK, but the British government has mostly "copied and pasted" it into UK legislation. READ ALSO Fears EU plans to 'water down' air passengers' rights in review Also unchanged are rules on flight cancellations and airlines responsibility to provide food, accommodation and alternative travel for passengers whose flights are delayed or cancelled. In truth this is not well policed - passengers are often simply told to make their own arrangements for accommodation and alternative travel and submit compensation claims to the airline later. Airlines do, however, routinely provide refreshments, usually in the form of food vouchers to passengers whose flights are delayed. Why the change? In a word - lobbying. Airlines had argued that the compensation payments were too high, especially for budget airlines where the compensation may be higher than the cost of the ticket. Airlines also said that they were unable to provide a replacement aircraft and crew within three hours in many European locations, and that this can lead to additional flights being cancelled because high compensation payments have already been incurred. READ ALSO What are your rights in Europe if your flight is delayed or cancelled? When does this happen? The change is not immediate, first the European Parliament has four months to stage any objections and if no objection is received, then an introduction date will be set. So we can say for sure that this summer holiday period will still be covered by the old rules.
