Gov. Cox signs 75 bills, vetoes 1 in latest review session
SALT LAKE CITY () — Gov. Cox announced on Monday that he had signed 75 bills — and vetoed one — in the latest legislative review session.
After this recent batch of 75 bills, the governor has signed a total of 176 bills. He has 406 bills left to act on before this week's Mar. 27 deadline. If a bill is not acted upon before that deadline, it becomes law without needing the governor's signature.
Cox most recently signed bills into law ranging in topics from civic education to medical cannabis regulation and more. Cox also announced that he had vetoed a bill addressing tax rate amendments for education.
Here's a breakdown of some of the major bills that were most recently addressed by the governor.
On Monday, Cox announced that he vetoed , or 'Minimum Basic Tax Rates Amendments,' which would have changed how property taxes would be used for education.
In a letter to Senate President J. Stuart Adams and House Speaker Mike Schultz, Cox explained the reasoning behind his veto of SB 37.
'Moving restricted property tax funding into the general fund creates significant technical and legal questions,' Cox's letter reads. 'For one, it's not entirely clear whether these property tax dollars, once they land in the general fund, still carry the restrictions that have always protected them for education use.'
Utah State Auditor Tina Cannon sent a letter to Cox after reviewing SB 37, listing several concerns about the implications of the bill. Cox went on to say in his letter that the bill he vetoed 'sets up a complicated system where school districts have to track these dollars as both incoming and outgoing revenue….'
The Utah Education Association, the state's largest teacher's union, issued a statement in support of Cox vetoing SB 37:
The Utah Education Association applauds Governor Spencer Cox's decision to veto SB 37. This bill would have redirected public education funds away from Utah's public schools and weakened local control. Utah must preserve education funds for their intended purpose: supporting the success of Utah's public school students.'
UEA statement on Cox vetoing SB 37
Gov. Cox signed and , which he called 'two of the most important bills of the 2025 legislative session.'
HB 381, 'Civics Education Amendments,' amends the graduation requirements for public high schools in Utah, making it so that students must meet specific social studies requirements and receive 'certain social studies related instruction.'
Of this bill, Cox said, 'Foundational civic education in our high schools will aid our students with a better understanding of our government institutions and their critical role in American society.'
SB 334, 'Center for Civics Excellence at Utah State,' establishes a Center for Civic Excellence at Utah State University, with Cox saying in a statement that the center 'will be tasked with building out a general education curriculum focused on viewpoint diversity, civil discourse and helping our students develop the analytical skills necessary to contribute in the public square.'
HB 381 and SB 334 will go into effect on July 1 and May 7, respectively.
On March 23, Cox announced that two bills related to cannabis and cannabinoids had been signed. One bill on alcohol amendments was also signed.
The cannabis bills — , 'Cannabinoid Amendments,' and , 'Cannabis Production Amendments' — address medical cannabis regulation and medical cannabis production.
The alcohol bill — , 'Alcohol Amendments' — adds provisions relating to banquet licensing for amphitheaters. The amendments define amphitheaters and under which circumstances alcohol would be licensed to be sold there.
The full list of bills signed announced by Cox on March 24 can be viewed below:
, Voting Precinct Amendments
, Child Visitation Amendments
H.B. 31, Offender Information Amendments
H.B. 34, State Campgrounds Amendments
, Correctional Health Amendments
H.B. 54, Cannabinoid Amendments
H.B. 56, Civil Commitment Modifications
, Decommissioned Asset Disposition Amendments
H.B. 85, Environmental Permitting Modifications
, Water Transfer Amendments
H.B. 93, Rehabilitation Services Modifications
, Financial Disclosure Revisions
, State Land Access Road Amendments
H.B. 129, Adoption Records Access Amendments
, Adoption Modifications
H.B. 146, Mammography Amendments
, Health Care Facilities Amendments
, Offender Reintegration Amendments
, Substance Use Treatment and Enforcement Amendments
, Rollback Tax Amendments
, Urban Farming Assessment Amendments
H.B. 243, Agricultural Water Optimization Amendments
, Wildlife Management Area Amendments
H.B. 251, Pollinator Program Amendments
, Agriculture and Food Amendments
H.B. 254, Waste Classification Amendments
, Local Land Use Modifications
, Water Amendments
, Water Infrastructure Modifications
, Infectious Disease Procedures Amendments
H.B. 302, Minors in State Custody Amendments
H.B. 307, Wildfire Funding Amendments
, Wildlife Amendments
, Watershed Amendments
, Medications in Schools Amendments
H.B. 342, Animal Composting Amendments
, Cannabis Production Amendments
, Department of Agriculture and Food Amendments
H.B. 347, Medicaid Program Amendments
, Geologic Carbon Storage Amendments
, Civics Education Amendments
, Small School District Scale of Operations Formula
, Public Asset Ownership Amendments
, Grazing Amendments
, Environmental Legal Action Amendments
H.B. 439, Outdoor Recreation Revisions
H.B. 446, Great Salt Lake Amendments
, Brine Mining Amendments
H.B. 490, State Parks Modifications
, Law Enforcement Salary Amendments
H.B. 504, Financial and Conflict of Interest Disclosures by Candidates Amendments
, Water Entity Amendments
, Diaper Program Amendments
, Elected Official Publicity Amendments
, Election Fundraising Amendments
, Forest Fire Resources Compact Amendments
, Water Rights Recording Amendments
, Water Quality Board Amendments
, State Resource Management Plan Amendments
, Statewide Initiatives Amendments
, Water Fee Amendments
, Traffic Code Amendments
S.B. 145, Technical Senate District Boundary Adjustment
S.B. 149, Natural Resources Modifications
, Sale or Lease of Federally Managed Public Land Amendments
, Environmental Quality Modifications
, Local Health Department Amendments
, Environmental Quality Amendments
, Construction Modifications
, Severance Amendments
S.B. 290, Candidate Licensing Amendments
, Special District Modifications
, Alcohol Amendments
S.B. 334, Center for Civic Excellence at Utah State University
, Nonprofit Entities Amendments
Lindsay Aerts and Matthew Drachman contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."
Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Impeachment wars
Rep. Jasmine Crockett's mere mention of a possible impeachment inquiry into President Trump has touched off negative reactions from some colleagues. "I think she's going to turn off a lot more people than gain," a House Democrat told us. Why it matters: House Democratic leaders are staying neutral. But many Democrats are allergic to the word after they impeached Trump twice only for him to return to power with full control of the government. Crockett (D-Texas), asked in a local news interview if she would pursue impeachment if Democrats retook the House in 2026 and she became Oversight Committee chair, said she would "absolutely at least do an inquiry." The other three candidates for the ranking member job on Oversight, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), told us they wouldn't go that far. 👿 "Turning this ranker race into a proxy for impeachment is unhelpful and unfair to her colleagues," said a House Democrat who predicted Republicans will "try to motivate their base by saying that a Democratic majority will inevitably lead to impeachment." Crockett told us the term "impeachment inquiry" would stress to the public the "next level of gravity" of the subject matter — such as Trump's pardons for big money allies and the Qatari jet scandal. "A lot of times we as Democrats can overthink stuff," Crockett said. "A lot of people ... felt like [Oversight Committee chair] James Comer was an embarrassment. But at the end of the day, who won the House?" The bottom line: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deferred to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), whose panel, he said, "has jurisdiction over impeachment."
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Reagan's Diplomacy Returns
President Donald Trump's Middle East trip represents a fundamental break with the 'liberal internationalism' of his recent predecessors and returns the U.S. to the pragmatic foreign policy practiced by Ronald Reagan ('The Trump Doctrine of the Deal,' Review & Outlook, May 17). While the president may not use Reagan's idealistic language, his approach is similar to that outlined by Reagan's first U.N. ambassador, Jeane Kirkpatrick, who advocated cooperation with regimes that shared Washington's core interests regardless of their internal governance. Mr. Trump, a firm believer in peace through strength, is marrying restored deterrence, realistic strategic objectives and a commitment to commercial diplomacy to restore America's global standing after 25 years of overstretch and strategic missteps. His speech in Riyadh is a fitting antidote to President George W. Bush's 2005 inaugural address, which promised to 'end tyranny in our world' and diverted American attention from the rising threat of China and the return of great-power competition. Alexander B. Gray
