logo
Was the WP right to keep Pritam Singh and Sylvia Lim at Aljunied? Many believe so

Was the WP right to keep Pritam Singh and Sylvia Lim at Aljunied? Many believe so

- Advertisement -
SINGAPORE: Since the Workers' Party announced its candidates for the May 3 polls on Nomination Day, armchair commentators have questioned the party's strategy of keeping its two highest-profile candidates at Aljunied GRC.
Pritam Singh and Sylvia Lim, the party's secretary-general and chair, respectively, are aiming for a fourth term in Parliament representing Aljunied GRC, which is now pretty much established as an opposition stronghold.
At a press conference to introduce the WP candidates on April 17, Mr Singh said the party would be contesting fewer than a third of the seats in Parliament this year, signalling that while the WP would naturally want more elected MPs, the party would proceed with more caution than risk.
Prior to Nomination Day, speculation abounded as to where the WP would field candidates. Many believed that former MPs He Ting Ru, Jamus Lim, and Louis Chua would stay where they were, believing it would be necessary for them to serve a second term to solidify the party's foothold at Sengkang.
- Advertisement -
As for the Aljunied GRC MPs, Mr Singh, Ms Lim, WP vice chair Faisal Manap, and former Non-Constituency MP Gerald Giam, there was speculation they would go further afield to strengthen the WP's chances of winning more constituencies.
On Nomination Day, it was revealed that Mr Manap would lead the team at Tampines GRC, but Mr Singh, Ms Lim, and Mr Giam would contest at Aljunied.
There have been mixed reactions to this. Some argued that Ms Lim, in particular, could have helmed the WP slate either at East Coast GRC or Punggol GRC. It's possible, after all, that for the party chair, who just turned 60, this may be the last time she contests an election.
Others have said that Mr Singh, who is widely respected despite being convicted earlier this year of lying to a Parliamentary committee, could have lent his star power to newer candidates elsewhere. Some even dreamed of a Singh-Singh team-up, with the party chief heading a slate that included new candidate Senior Counsel Harpreet Singh, who is leading the charge for the WP at Punggol GRC.
- Advertisement -
There were commenters who even said that Ms Lim and Mr Singh could have passed the Aljunied baton to Mr Giam, a popular figure who has established himself as a capable parliamentarian in his own right.
However, many Singaporeans online believe that the caution exercised by the WP this time was a wise move.
'I believe their main focus for this election is to consolidate their seats (retaining existing seats plus perhaps 1/2 more constituencies), and to show that the quality of WP candidates is as good as the PAP's… Perhaps they have deduced that the time is not ripe yet for a more aggressive approach,' wrote one.
'Their goal, as mentioned by them, is to deny the PAP a 2/3 majority. They can't be too aggressive. As long as they hold this, plus a few new others like Tampines GRC (with Changkat), they will achieve their goal, which is a win for both the WP and Singaporeans,' agreed another.
- Advertisement -
Some pointed out that the WP is already fielding two new faces at Aljunied, Fadli Fawzi and Kenneth Tiong. If any of the other former MPs moved to another constituency, three new candidates might have made Aljunied voters skittish.
'If Sylvia goes to another GRC and loses, WP loses one of the veterans in parliament. WP losing a veteran is magnitudes more impactful than PAP losing a veteran,' a Reddit user wrote.
'I personally felt that it was a smart move on their part. Solidifying their foothold in Aljunied rather than sending out their heavyweights elsewhere. How would Aljunied residents feel then? After all, it took them 20 years of hard work in Hougang. Retain existing constituents and recreate 2020 with a quality team to further expand their foothold. That seems like the best possible move now for them,' another agreed.
As they say, hindsight is 20/20. Whether the WP played its cards right for GE2025 will be known after the last ballot is counted on May 3. /TISG
Read also: Pritam Singh explains why Singaporeans should vote for the WP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's Reeves sets out spending plans to meet 'working people's priorities'
UK's Reeves sets out spending plans to meet 'working people's priorities'

Straits Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

UK's Reeves sets out spending plans to meet 'working people's priorities'

Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves leaves 11 Downing Street, ahead of presenting the Spending Review to Parliament, in London, Britain, June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy LONDON - British finance minister Rachel Reeves prioritised spending on health, defence and infrastructure projects to drive economic growth on Wednesday, in a bid to reboot the Labour government's offer of a brighter future to increasingly disillusioned voters. Setting out day-to-day budgets for government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030, Reeves described the priorities of her so-called spending review as those of "working people" so that they are better off. Keen to promote capital spending on housing, transport and cleaner energy projects, Reeves wanted to show the Labour government was delivering on its plan for change. But with more money going to health and defence, day-to-day spending in other areas of government was expected to be squeezed. "The priorities of this spending review are the priorities of working people - to invest in Britain's security, in Britain's health and to grow Britain's economy so that working people are better off," she told a noisy session of parliament. "The choices in this spending review are possible only because of my commitment to economic stability," she said. Reeves set the overall total for spending in an October budget, financing her plan with the biggest tax rise in a generation and looser fiscal rules that make it easier for her to borrow to cover long-term investment. Her choices must start paying off quickly if Labour is to achieve its goals of boosting Britain's growth rate and improving the quality of overstretched public services. She said the government's departmental budgets would grow by 2.3% a year in real terms, offering a further 190 billion pounds for day-to-day spending on public services compared with the previous Conservative government's plans. Among the projects announced on Wednesday was a 39 billion-pound 10-year programme to build lower-cost housing - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with existing support. She also added to that by announcing an additional 10 billion pounds to build more homes in England. Since its sweeping election victory last July, Labour has seen its popularity slide, and Reeves herself has seen her ratings slump after the government introduced cuts to winter fuel payments for the elderly and to disability benefits. In October, she also decided to place the main burden of tax rises on employers and boost workers' rights - something the opposition Conservatives said was to blame for the jobless rate hitting its highest in nearly four years. The Labour government has since made a partial U-turn on winter fuel payments, but the right-wing Reform UK party led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is now repeatedly ahead of Labour in opinion polls and outperformed it in English local elections last month. "At the budget last October and again in the spring, I made the choices necessary to fix the foundations of our economy," she said. "We are starting to see the results." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts
Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts

This is the second time that The Online Citizen has been slapped with the declaration, with its first due to expire in July 2025. PHOTO: THE ONLINE CITIZEN/FACEBOOK Second round of Pofma sanctions for owner of The Online Citizen's website, social media accounts SINGAPORE – The people running The Online Citizen's (TOC) website, Facebook, Instagram, and X pages will continue to be barred from deriving any financial benefits from the running of its platforms till 2027. In a statement on June 11 , the Ministry of Digital Development and Information (MDDI) said TOC's website and social media pages – which were labelled as Declared Online Locations (DOLs) – had first been declared as such in July 2023, and were due to expire on July 21, 2025. DOLs have to comply with actions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) that would prevent their operator from financially benefiting during the period they are listed as one. However, said MDDI, TOC 'continued to communicate falsehoods through its online platforms over the past two years'. Between July 2023 and June 2025 , it received eigh t correction directions under the fake news law . These included one in Feb 25, after TOC published an article about modification works at the Ridout Road colonial bungalow leased by Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam's wife. In its article, it said the Singapore Land Authorit y had given Mr Shanmugam assurances of a lease extension beyond its 2027 expiry, and that public funds were used to pay for the earthworks carried out at the bungalow since 2024, among other claims. These are falsehoods, said MDDI. As a result, TOC's website and social media pages have again been labelled DOLs, a move necessary 'to ensure Singaporeans continue to be alerted to TOC's record of communicating falsehoods', said the ministry. The new declaration comes into effect immediately after the current direction expires and will remain till July 21, 2027 at 12p m. TOC will be able to continue its operations, but will have to carry a notice on its online platforms to notify its audience that it has been declared a DOL. The notice will also have to state that it had 'communicated multiple falsehoods' and that its viewers should exercise caution when accessing it for information. MDDI added that service providers, including digital advertising agencies, will have to take steps to ensure that their paid content on TOC's platforms are not made available in Singapore. 'Individuals and companies must also not provide financial support to TOC's DOLs to avoid promoting the communication of falsehoods in Singapore on these platforms,' it added. At present, there are three other outlets currently listed as DOLs. They are Transformative Justice Collective's website and social media pages, Gutzy Asia's website and social media pages, as well as opposition politician Kenneth Jeyaretnam's website and social media pages. A provision under Pofma allows the Government to order an internet intermediary to disable access to a DOL if the owner of the DOL does not comply with the declaration and paid content on the site continues to be displayed to users here. If an internet intermediary fails to comply and is convicted, it can be fined up to $20,000 for each day that the government order is not fully complied with, up to a total o f $500,000 . The owner or operator of a DOL can however apply to the Minister for Digital Development and Information to suspend, vary, or cancel the declaration. If the minister refuses the application, an appeal can be made to the High Court. Aqil Hamzah is a journalist covering breaking news at The Straits Times, with interests in crime and technology. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?
Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?

Straits Times

time2 days ago

  • Straits Times

Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?

I was heartened to learn that our Government is extending support to the 151 Singaporean students at Harvard (S'porean undergrads at Harvard can continue studies in universities here, June 6). I am sure the Government will similarly extend support to Singaporean students at other elite US universities if the situation deteriorates there. I sympathise with the Singaporeans studying at Harvard, but I wonder if the message is that our local universities do in fact have the capacity to take in more local students. Or is it that our local universities will reduce the number of places available to local students, to accommodate the returning US students? Many local students do not have the financial resources to seek an overseas education, and universities at home are their only option. But due to limited capacity, not every eligible applicant is accepted. So, I was surprised to learn that local universities are able to accommodate the affected Singapore students at Harvard. Wouldn't this be at the expense of eligible local applicants? Finally, these Ivy League students no doubt have the ability and resources to study in the US. They took the decision to study abroad willingly. In the face of adversity, is our Government expected to offer a safety net back home? What about a safety net for local students? Roy Tan Choon Kang More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store