
Environmental advocates react to more EPA cuts, Braun executive orders
Staffing cuts to agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency are a willful cruelty one former leader of the agency hasn't seen in her lifetime.
Debra Shore, former regional administrator for EPA Region 5, has been distressed watching the agency undergo attacks from the Trump administration, including staffing changes, grant cancelations and deregulations.
Shore was appointed by former President Joe Biden in October 2021 and served as administrator until Jan. 20.
'What I found in my time leading Region 5 was a remarkable team of smart, devoted professionals who had a shared sense of mission,' Shore said. 'They wanted to help protect human health and the environment, and they were doing so.'
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin on Wednesday announced 'the biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history,' according to a news release from the administration.
Actions include reconsideration of power plant regulations, vehicle regulations and terminating environmental justice and diversity, equity and inclusion arms of the agency.
'We are driving a dagger straight into the heart of climate change religion to drive down cost of living for American families, unleash American energy, bring auto jobs back to the U.S. and more,' Zeldin said in the release. 'Alongside President Trump, we are living up to our promises to unleash American energy, lower costs for Americans, revitalize the American auto industry, and work hand-in-hand with our state partners to advance our shared mission.'
Shore mentioned multiple concerns with Zeldin's announcement, particularly that he didn't mention protecting human health and the environment. The deregulation isn't about reducing spending or identifying waste and fraud, Shore said.
The agency was created in 1970 in the wake of growing concern about the impact of industrial and agricultural pollution on public health across the country. Locally, multiple fires broke out in the Indiana Harbor and Ship Canal, fish dieoffs occurred in the 1960s along the Grand Calumet River, and open hearths at steel mills routinely pumped dust into the atmosphere that rolled over Gary like a blanket of fog.
An internal memo to the EPA said Zeldin plans to reorganize and eliminate offices of environmental justice at all 10 EPA regional offices and the one in Washington, D.C., the New York Times reported. The EPA had reached out to local communities like Gary to be
Shore doesn't know how many staff members will be impacted in Region 5 because of the environmental justice office closures. However, that will make communication between the Region 5 office and communities like those in Northwest Indiana more difficult.
'That's going to affect their ability to disperse funds and inspect facilities and more,' Shore said. 'You can remove the label 'environmental justice,' but you still have those communities — many of them rural — that are overburdened by pollution from nearby chemical plants, manufacturing plants and power plants.'
In Indiana, Gov. Mike Braun signed two executive orders targeting the environment, including one to make state regulations consistent with national ones and one prohibiting the use of 'environmental justice' in permitting, enforcement and grant decisions.
'…the concept of 'environmental justice' has become increasingly politicized and has often led to the introduction of subjective, non-scientific factors into environmental policy and regulation…' one of Braun's executive orders read.
Hoosier environmental advocates have expressed concerns with Braun's actions.
Coupled with EPA deregulations, environmental protections are at risk and rollbacks can have deadly consequences, said Robyn Skuya-Boss, chapter director for the Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter.
'It's sort of this question that if the federal EPA is looking to roll back environmental protections, then can this be followed suit by Indiana and our state agencies in reducing those environmental protections?' Skuya-Boss said.
Although Skuya-Boss is not surprised by the actions of Zeldin and Braun, he is disappointed to see the environment isn't prioritized.
Skuya-Boss encourages local leaders and advocacy groups to become more engaged and make their voices heard, especially in more polluted communities, like those in Northwest Indiana.
'Pollution is not distributed equally,' Skuya-Boss said. 'Promises were made by our government in addressing these sort of long-standing environmental impacts, what we're really seeing is those promises being broken under the guise of these public policy changes and environmental protection rollbacks.'
Northwest Indiana environmental groups also reacted to EPA changes and Braun's executive orders. Gary Advocates for Responsible Development said in a press release that shutting down environmental justice offices means more serious health harms in the city.
'The country is going to see more people with asthma, cancer, lung diseases and health problems,' President Dorreen Carey said in a news release. 'This will be especially true in the communities like Gary that already suffer from being overburdened with air, land and water pollution.'
Susan Thomas, director of policy and press for Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said Zeldin's actions are not science based, and rollbacks will be damaging and dangerous to communities nationwide.
'This ends three decades of work the EPA has tried to push forward addressing the disparities between low income and minority communities, and the brunt they have historically had to bear against polluting industry,' Thomas said. 'This removes all protections. We are in a very precarious spot, and there will be pushback.'
Zeldin's actions won't safeguard community health or the environment, Thomas said.
Closing environmental justice offices will put communities at a disadvantage and will no longer help communities advocate for themselves.
EPA cuts will not immediately happen, Shore said, because action will be taken in the courts. However, it's dangerous to roll back measures that monitor air and water quality and that hold corporations accountable.
'Those efforts to both monitor and then enforce will be reduced because of cuts to people and cuts to budgets, and so many residents of communities that live near polluting industries won't know what they're being exposed to,' Shore said. 'They'll still suffer from air emissions and degraded water quality, but they just won't know about it.'
If federal standards are taken away, Indiana standards will also be gone, Thomas said after Braun's executive orders were released.
Reducing environmental regulations will have negative economic effects, Thomas also said. People want a healthy, vibrant quality of place, Thomas said, and if the quality of place is decreased, those communities will suffer.
'What EPA (deregulations) and these executive directors do is rip the rug out from under that,' she added. 'Industry and businesses really need to look at how they are impacting the quality of place because that has a strong economic impact.'
Indra Frank, coal ash advisor for the Hoosier Environmental Council, said she's worried how deregulation is going to impact coal ash cleanup.
In Zeldin's Wednesday announcement, he said the EPA plans to prioritize its coal ash program to expedite state permit reviews and update coal ash regulations. However, changing coal ash rules can take years, Frank said, and it could stall cleanup.
'Coal ash cleanup projects are large, multi-year projects,' Frank said. 'Changing the federal rule in the middle of cleanups that were already happening because of the rule in place just throws that off. How are our industries supposed to plan and budget for these multi-year projects when the rule keeps changing? That inconsistency can be very costly.'
Coal ash is a byproduct that is created primarily from burning coal in power plans, according to the EPA. Communities statewide have had issues with coal ash, including the Town of Pines, which has fought for cleanup measures from NIPSCO for more than 20 years.
Coal ash contamination also negatively impacts the economy, Frank said, because it contaminates groundwater and makes large amounts of land unavailable for development.
Going forward, Frank said she plans to still advocate for responsible cleanup of coal ash and protecting Indiana communities. She encourages community groups to advocate for better environmental standards locally.
Shore continues to tell staff at EPA Region 5 that American people want and deserve clean water, clean air and safe places to live. Staff need to continue advocating for Americans while their jobs are under attack, Shore said.
'Science supports what the EPA has been doing, and it's clear cut in many places,' Shore said. 'I think when Americans start realizing what's at risk, as they have with other parts of society, they will let people know. That's my hope.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump issued a blanket pardon to more than 1,500 people charged in the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection. But it still wasn't enough. Now, five Proud Boys leaders are suing the Department of Justice (DOJ) over their prosecutions and asking the government to surrender millions. The lawsuit, filed by Dominic Pezzola, Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, and Zachary Rehl, asks the government to pay them $100 million in restitution, despite the fact that the latter four were found guilty of engaging in a seditious 2021 conspiracy to keep Trump in power. Two years after the riot, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs and Rehl were found guilty of plotting to oppose Congress' election certification by force. Pezzola was the only one who was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but was still found guilty of assaulting police, stealing a riot shield, smashing a window breached by rioters, conspiring to impede lawmakers and police, and more. The five men filed the lawsuit Friday in Florida, putting the ball in Trump's court to either defend the prosecutions or pay an exorbitant sum at taxpayers' expense. The Proud Boys is a far-right militant organization that promotes political violence and embraces misogynistic, xenophobic, and anti-LGBTQ+ ideologies. If the DOJ decides to pay the Proud Boys members, many Democrats worry that it could symbolize the president's willingness to outwardly sanction political violence and empower extremists. In the pardon proclamation announced on Jan. 20, Trump noted that the controversial mercy 'ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.' Prior to the pardons, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs, Rehl, and Pezzola were each sentenced to 22, 18, 17, 15, and 10 years in prison, respectively. The Proud Boys members claim there was an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' 'A settlement would suggest that the violence of January 6 was entirely justified,' Matthew Dallek, a political historian at The George Washington University, told The Washington Post. 'It would say to the country that these Proud Boys who were convicted in a court of law, in a fair trial, were wrongfully prosecuted and victims. It just turns the entire day on its head.' The insurrection interrupted Congress' attempt to certify former President Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. After a mob stormed the Capitol, five people died in or immediately after the violence and 140 officers were assaulted. The Daily Beast has reached out to the Trump administration for comment.

Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chaco region ban on oil and gas drilling being reconsidered under Trump
Jun. 6—The Trump administration's focus on domestic energy production has pushed the Bureau of Land Management to reconsider a rule against oil drilling in a 10-mile area surrounding the Chaco Culture National Historical Park. As Department of Interior secretary, New Mexico gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland issued an order in 2023 to prevent oil and natural gas drilling in the 10-mile radius surrounding Chaco Canyon for 20 years. The All Pueblo Council of Governors wants those protections to stay in place for the sake of protecting sacred sites in the Chaco region. But the Navajo Nation is suing to revoke the protections, arguing the withdrawal causes significant economic harm to its members. Increasing domestic energy production and mining is a Trump administration priority. On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order telling agency heads to identify actions that impose an "undue burden" on the development of domestic energy resources, particularly oil, natural gas, coal, hydropower, biofuels, critical minerals and nuclear energy resources and to make plans to revise or rescind those actions. "This will restore American prosperity — including for those men and women who have been forgotten by our economy in recent years. It will also rebuild our nation's economic and military security, which will deliver peace through strength," the order reads. Subsequently, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issued an order in February essentially telling his agency to take steps to follow Trump's order, including "actions to review and, as appropriate, revise all withdrawn public lands." When it comes to Chaco, the Bureau of Land Management is following that order to review withdrawn public lands. According to an agency spokesperson, no formal decision has been made yet related to the Chaco order, which prohibits oil and gas development and exploratory mining on federal lands within a 10-mile radius of the Chaco Culture National Historic Park. "It's deeply disappointing that Trump and his administration are working to undermine our communities rather than to address the struggles and concerns that New Mexicans face every day," Haaland said in a statement. The Bureau of Land Management held a tribal consultation in late May about considering revoking the Chaco order. Ahead of the meeting, Acoma Gov. Charles Riley called for a united tribal response to keep the protections in place. Recently, the All Pueblo Council of Governors also passed a resolution reaffirming its opposition to weakening Chaco protections. "Chaco is a place that's very sacred to us," Riley said. "It contains many of our beliefs and origins. ... Many times, people don't understand our connection with these sites, whether it be Chaco, Mesa Verde, Bears Ears, things like that, many of our religious tribal leaders still go back to these places and call upon our ancestors to guide and protect our people, and that's what people don't understand." Acoma also received notice of the consultation late, only 19 days ahead of time instead of the typical 30, Riley said, giving the pueblo leaders less time to prepare, and the consultation didn't seem like a "true consultation," he said. "It just doesn't seem like this administration is listening. They hear you, but they're not listening," Riley said. 'A domino effect' As the Biden administration came to a close in January, the Navajo Nation filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the United States, the Interior Department, the Bureau of Land Management and Haaland, arguing that she failed in her statutory obligations and fiduciary duties to the Navajo Nation when issuing the order. Navajo Nation members hold mineral rights for land in the area, and the lawsuit argues that profiting off of those mineral rights will be effectively impossible with the checkerboard of surrounding federal lands ineligible for lease. "This will result in sizable financial losses, especially relative to modest incomes that are prevalent in this isolated region, and will significantly reduce economic activity and employment in the region, further detrimentally affecting the Nation and its citizens," the lawsuit reads. The Navajo Nation repeatedly proposed a 5-mile withdrawal radius as a compromise approach to protecting Chaco. The lawsuit argues that the U.S. government never officially considered that suggestion, so it didn't encourage public consideration of it. The office of Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren did not respond to a request for comment by the Journal's print deadline. In April, the Acoma and Laguna pueblos asked to join the lawsuit as intervenors on the side of the defendants. New Mexico's all-Democratic congressional delegation have been vocal about trying to protect certain wild or culturally significant areas in the state, like the Gila and Pecos watersheds, from mining and oil and gas development. In April, Sen. Ben Ray Luján and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández led the reintroduction of a bill to make the 10-mile protected area around Chaco permanent. All five members of the delegation are cosponsors. It seems unlikely to pass in a Republican dominated Congress. "With the atmosphere of today and the push for shorter environmental reviews, the fast track of mining of uranium and oil and gas production, it really does threaten a lot of our sacred places around the country," Riley said. "And if we — God forbid — fail on Chaco, then, in my opinion, it's just a domino effect. Then, who's next? What's next?" Journal Capitol Bureau Chief Dan Boyd contributed to this report.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida residents voice opposition to potential offshore drilling plans
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is taking public comments on a program that would open up nearly the entire U.S. coastline to oil drilling. As you can see on this map, the coasts of both Florida and Georgia are included. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< The Florida state constitution bans drilling on the coastline, but that only applies to water within three miles of the coast. The rest is federally owned, and that's the water the Trump administration wants to open. Jahlonious Monk has been living in Jacksonville for the last 20 years. He is completely against the idea. 'I think it's messed up like I don't think that should happen. I think that the nature here is so amazing and it's such a beautiful place that we should protect and preserve,' said Monk. 'Who wants to visit here when it's full of pollution?' [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] Visitors such as Kenneth Smith, who traveled here from Ohio, felt the same way. 'No, I wouldn't come if there is drilling. I'd just leave everything like it is,' said Smith. While the White House tries to make the change, there's a bill in Congress to help. It would remove former President Biden's block on adding offshore drilling sites. [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] We reached out to all four U.S. representatives in our viewing area, whose district includes the Atlantic coast. Congressman Aaron Bean (R-FL) 'While I support responsible investments in American energy, I remain opposed to opening Florida's Atlantic Coast to offshore drilling. We must continue to safeguard our beautiful beaches and coastal waters that drive our state's economy,' U.S. Congressman Aaron Bean (R-FL) said. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's 45-day public comment period ends June 16th, 2025. To learn more about the oil and gas leasing program, click here. Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.