Britain, under pressure on immigration, urges reform of European human rights framework
FILE PHOTO: A general view of Union Jack flags and the Houses of Parliament in London, Britain, April 12, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso/ File Photo
LONDON - Britain called on Wednesday for reform of the European Convention on Human Rights, amid growing domestic criticism that it allows a foreign-based court to meddle in sensitive areas of policy such as immigration and deportation rulings.
The convention, which dates back more than 70 years and aims to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe, must "evolve" to reflect changing political realities, justice minister Shabana Mahmood said.
Britain's Labour government has criticised the way the convention is interpreted in immigration cases, where its provisions have been used to try to prevent the deportation of migrants - some of whom have been convicted of serious crimes.
"It damages the public perception of human rights altogether," Mahmood told a meeting of the Committee of Ministers, the decision-making arm of the Council of Europe, which oversees implementation of the convention.
The convention applies to the 46 member states of the Council of Europe and can be enforced by binding rulings from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), based in the French city of Strasbourg.
While Britain has left the European Union, it remains a member of the Council of Europe and of the ECHR.
Labour has already promised to clarify how the convention should be interpreted by domestic judges, but Mahmood used her speech to urge wider reform of the human rights framework.
"The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved. Now, it must do so again," she said.
The Council of Europe did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mahmood's remarks.
OTHERS ALSO SEEKING REFORM
Britain is not alone in seeking reform.
Nine European countries, spearheaded by Italy and Denmark, urged the Council last month to ease the process of expelling foreign criminals.
Secretary General Alain Berset, the head of the Council, criticised that initiative, saying on May 24: "The court must not be weaponised — neither against governments, nor by them."
Britain's nearly one-year-old Labour government has seen its popularity slide partly due to public concerns over immigration and needs to show it can deport foreign criminals and migrants who have arrived illegally.
Labour is committed to remaining in the convention but Nigel Farage's Reform UK, a right-wing party now topping national opinion polls, has said it would immediately withdraw if it won power.
The Conservative Party, the biggest opposition party in parliament, has said it is reviewing its policy on Britain's continued membership. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Colombia's Council of State suspends Petro's labor reform referendum
Colombia's President Gustavo Petro speaks during the rally for peace and democracy at San Francisco Square in Cali, Colombia June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Sebastian Marmolejo/File Photo BOGOTA - Colombia's Council of State on Wednesday suspended a decree by President Gustavo Petro that sought to call a referendum on a labor reform, citing lack of Senate authorization. The decree, which Petro issued last week, sparked criticism from political opposition, which labeled it a coup d'etat and an overt challenge to the nation's institutions and congress, which must authorize such measures. Colombia's Council of State is a high court that settles disputes between the state and private parties. On Tuesday, the Senate approved a revised version of the labor reform bill after extensive debate. The bill, which passed with 57 votes in favor and 31 against, includes provisions for an eight-hour daytime workday, higher weekend and holiday pay, and mandatory social security contributions from delivery app drivers. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
20 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump administration resuming student visa appointments, State Dept official says
United States Department of State logo and U.S. flag are seen in this illustration taken April 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration WASHINGTON - The United States is directing its U.S. diplomatic missions abroad to resume student visa applications, but is requiring applicants to make their social media profiles public for vetting purposes, a senior State Department official said on Wednesday. On May 27, the Trump administration ordered its missions abroad to stop scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants as the State Department prepared to expand social media vetting of foreign students. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said updated guidance would be released once a review was completed. On Wednesday, a State Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said under new guidance, consular officers will conduct a "comprehensive and thorough vetting" of all student and exchange visitor applicants. "To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to 'public.' Posts may resume scheduling F, M, and J visa applications," the official said. "The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country." Trump administration officials have said student visa and green-card holders are subject to deportation over their support for Palestinians and criticism of Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza, calling their actions a threat to U.S. foreign policy and accusing them of being pro-Hamas. Trump's critics have called the effort an attack on free speech rights under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
20 minutes ago
- Business Times
Restoring European tech leadership
[PARIS] Over the past few decades, the European Union has been relegated from global technology player to passive consumer of technologies developed elsewhere. Today, 80 per cent of the technologies and services Europe needs for its digital transformation are designed and manufactured beyond its borders, mostly in the United States and China. So deep is this consumer mindset that it has even shaped the philosophy behind our laws: the goal of recent tech regulations such as the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act was to protect Europeans as consumers, by keeping us safe online and ensuring fair competition. To their credit, these laws offer strong protections for EU citizens, and they have even served as blueprints for competition policy and online safety worldwide. Regulatory excellence has become Europe's trademark. But without a complementary innovation policy, and an assessment of whether our current rules promote or impede it, we risk becoming a mere spectator in the global tech race, particularly in the AI domain. Despite the deals announced during the AI Action Summit in Paris earlier this year, overall foreign direct investment into Europe fell to its lowest level in nine years in 2024, with France and Germany experiencing double-digit declines. And this decline is accompanied by other worrying figures: the EU's share of the global information and communication technology (ICT) market fell from 21.8 per cent in 2013 to 11.3 per cent in 2022. Need for a well-considered strategy For too long, Europeans have passively benefited from Silicon Valley's risk-taking and Shenzhen's manufacturing prowess. But this was not a free lunch. As former European Central Bank president Mario Draghi, the author of a landmark 2024 report on European competitiveness, put it, Europeans have done 'everything we could to keep innovation at a low level'. Europe must do much more than simply catch up to America and China. To reclaim a place in the global tech industry, it urgently needs to rethink its entire approach to autonomy, alliances, regulation, and leadership. This calls for a well-considered strategy. The aim is to ensure our security by building our own core capabilities, not to achieve technological autarky or autonomy in isolation. It makes little sense to invest heavily in technologies that are hard to scale or export. Recent efforts to develop homegrown cloud computing and alternatives to Google Search were motivated mainly by the desire for technological independence; but they have not succeeded despite strong political backing. Looking ahead, such projects' commercial viability should be stress-tested before they consume too much time or resources. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up One especially important issue is strategic interdependence, particularly when it comes to critical physical and digital infrastructures. At this point, no country could withstand an abrupt shutdown of digital payments, for example. That is why the payments sector has long relied on co-badging (multiple payment brands using the same payment instrument). And similar models of shared responsibility are found in the provision of submarine cables, low-orbit satellites, semiconductors, energy, and nuclear fusion. But expanding such partnerships requires a level playing field, so that all participants can use the available technological building blocks. For example, Helsing, the German-based drone startup, relies on open-source large language models developed by the French AI leader Mistral. Thanks to this synergistic arrangement, Helsing recently launched a factory with an initial monthly production capacity of more than 1,000 AI-enabled drones. We Europeans also must acknowledge our shortcomings. Draghi and former Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta – the author of a major report on strengthening the European single market – have both warned that the current approach to enforcing the EU's digital laws is burdening small innovators. More clarity, simplicity, and predictability in our legal framework for tech would bolster the single market and attract talent and investment back to Europe. This is not about watering down privacy or copyright laws. It is about creating a regulatory environment that both empowers and safeguards market participants. Protections for fundamental rights At the same time, the work of protecting people in the digital realm is far from complete, considering that children around the world still lack comprehensive protections online. Harmonising European innovation policies with protections for fundamental rights will remain a top priority. But Europe cannot leverage its diplomatic and regulatory power if it has no tech champions capable of shaping digital products, services, and markets at the global level. In this respect, a coalition of like-minded companies from across the EU and other countries that share its values could play an important advocacy role. We need to show that generative AI could represent a major opportunity, but only if it is deployed in ways that respect human rights and workers. And we need to create technological and legal frameworks that promote equity and pluralism across our many languages. These are the big challenges and opportunities in front of us. To succeed, industry leaders and policymakers must collaborate closely with civil society, universities, and trade unions. It is not too late to restore Europe's status as a global leader in technology and innovation, and we know how to do it. The most important step is a change of mindset. PROJECT SYNDICATE The writer is president of the executive committee of the Human Technology Foundation
