Fianna Fáil minister defends James Browne over housing office tsar controversy
A FIANNA FÁIL minister has defended Minister for Housing James Browne over the controversy surrounding the appointment of a chief executive of a new housing office, saying there is cross-party agreement around establishing the unit to build houses at scale.
Minister for Higher Education James Lawless attempted to play down the controversy surrounding the government's plan to appoint a housing 'tsar', saying the move is more about creating an office to deliver housing solutions.
The head of NAMA Brendan McDonagh on Thursday withdrew his name from consideration to be the first chief executive of the new office.
Browne, a member of Fianna Fáil, had said on RTÉ Radio that McDonagh was his preferred candidate for the role.
The statement consternation in the coalition over a lack of agreement about the appointment of the role before Browne spoke out about it publicly.
A spokesperson for Tánaiste Simon Harris, the leader of Fine Gael, said this week that it is better that such matters are not discussed in public before they are discussed by Harris and Taoiseach Micheál Martin, as well as Independent Seán Canney who represents the Regional Independents.
'The minister is ambitious. He wants to build houses, he wants to get things done and he wants to get things done quickly – and we all do,' Lawless said of Browne, speaking on RTE's The Week In Politics programme.
'It's not about the tsar individual. It's actually about the office and the delivery. The public don't want politics: the public want houses, and that's what Government wants to deliver, that's what Minister Browne is committed to delivering, that's what all of us want to deliver,' Lawless said.
'We need to get through the barriers. We know what about infrastructural complications, we know about zoning, we know about planning permission,' he said, adding 'on paper, there is cross-party agreement, including opposition, including the Housing Commission, which produced the report last year'.
'We need a housing activation office to break down the barriers, to build houses at scale and at urgency.'
Advertisement
However, Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon said what the government has proposed is not in line with recommendations from the Housing Commission report.
'What the Housing Commission did say that we needed (was) that the housing oversight executive would be placed onto a statutory footing, that it would have a legislative strength,' he said.
He said that what was being delivered instead was a 'big title' for a role that is 'supposed to go in and shake things up without any legislation'.
'The whole thing was bizarre. The whole thing has just been a shambles, and it's indicative of the Government who don't seem to know what they're doing.'
Clare TD Donna McGettigan, Sinn Féin's education spokesperson, said that while a housing activation office is in the party's manifesto, their role is different to the one put forward by Government.
'The difference is it's an executive we were calling for, which is what the Housing Commission is also calling for, and that would give it legislative powers,' she said.
'What is being proposed here by the government is just a name, a person that doesn't have any powers, that is going to have a huge wage, which would have created 11 new garda, 11 new nurses, 13 new special needs assistants,' McGettigan said.
A poll published by Sunday Independent/Ireland Thinks revealed that 52% of the public blamed Housing Minister James Browne for the controversy, while 46% blame Taoiseach Micheál Martin.
Approval for Minister for Housing James Browne was at just 30%, according to the poll.
Some 88% of the public said the role should be advertised publicly and that the salary should be between €100,000 and €200,000.
Contains additional reporting by Press Association
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tesla suffers suffers biggest one-day drop in market value after Trump-Musk spat
Tesla 's market value suffered its biggest one-day drop on record on Thursday as an escalating feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk triggered a sharp sell-off in the carmaker's shares. The electric vehicle group's shares closed down more than 14 per cent, erasing $153 billion (€134 billion) from its market capitalisation, after the US president signalled he could terminate US government contracts with Mr Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social. Thursday's drop left Tesla's share price down 25 per cent since the start of the year. READ MORE The spat between two of the world's most powerful men included repeated barbs from Mr Musk on his platform X and Mr Trump's comment that the billionaire, who has been a close ally since the election, was 'wearing thin'. The Tesla sell-off reverberated through US stock markets, with the S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite ending the session down 0.5 per cent and 0.8 per cent respectively. Both indices began to decline at around midday, when Mr Trump and Mr Musk began exchanging insults. The pair's 'petulant drama shook up the stock market', said Mike Zigmont, co-head of trading and research at Visdom Investment Group. 'The bond market didn't care, nor should it.' Tesla investors have had a rollercoaster few months. The stock rallied hard in the final quarter of last year after Mr Trump won his second term as president, but fell between mid-December and early March amid a broader market sell-off fuelled by Mr Trump's trade wars. Shares in rivals to Mr Musk's space exploration group SpaceX and its satellite broadband network subsidiary Starlink rose on Thursday as Tesla fell. AST SpaceMobile gained 7.5 per cent while communications group EchoStar jumped 17.4 per cent. The breakdown of Mr Musk's relationship with Mr Trump comes as his public interventions in European politics, including support for far right parties, have contributed to falling car sales across Europe. In March, JPMorgan strategists wrote in a note to clients that they 'struggle[d] to think of anything analogous in the history of the automotive industry, in which a brand has lost so much value so quickly'. The cuts Mr Musk made to federal government spending as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency also sparked a backlash. The Tesla boss stepped back from his government role at the end of May, having blamed 'blowback' against his businesses. Some investors said the market should have anticipated Mr Musk's feud with Mr Trump, despite their earlier bonhomie. Renowned short seller Jim Chanos said on X that it was the 'Most. Predictable. Break-up. Ever.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Latest GDP figures hint at return of Leprechaun Economics
Ten years ago Ireland's growth was described as "Leprechaun Economics" by Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman after the State's Gross Domestic Product grew by an astonishing 26% in 2015. The row over how Ireland calculated its national accounts also prompted debate about whether the country was a "tax haven". The Department of Finance shut down tax loopholes and the Central Statistics Office now offers alternative figures which give a clear picture of the domestic economy. Yesterday, the CSO published latest GDP figures showing the economy grew by an enormous 9.7% in the first three months of the year. By any measure, the figures were remarkable and caused considerable surprise in Government circles and among economists. Ordinary people did not suddenly become 10% richer in the first quarter of the year. But that's how it appears to international observers who use GDP as a measure of a country's national income. What's really happened is there has been a surge in exports as pharmaceutical companies have raced to ship products to the US ahead of Donald Trump's tariffs. Exports are only one component of GDP. Multinational companies have been booking profits in Ireland and that too has added to the surge in economic growth. Observers expect those profits will result in a significant rise in corporation tax in the coming months when that money is taxed. But the latest Exchequer returns, which show how much money Ireland collected in tax, reveal a more mixed picture. Corporation tax receipts are down so far this year by 9.4% while the other main taxes are up. The Department of Finance said that is due to a timing issue, so it is unlikely to be a structural decline in revenue. The Fiscal Advisory Council, an independent watchdog which monitors the public finances, has raised concern about the speed of increase in the Government's spending. It said current spending "is growing strongly so far this year, up 5.9% on the same period last year. This is much faster growth than Budget 2025 forecasts would allow. Should this continue, large overruns will occur". While the multinational sector is booming, the picture is different for the domestic economy, which grew by a moderate 0.8% in the first three months of this year. That is a much better barometer of conditions for workers who saw wage growth of 0.8% in the first three months of the year. One way or another, the activity of multinationals is distorting Ireland's economic figures. The lesson for the Government is that circumstances are going to be highly volatile as it prepares for the Budget over the summer months.
Irish Independent
10 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Great shame we do not have the legislation needed to underpin vital care of older people
One of the critical failings exposed then was the complete lack of focus in government agencies towards meeting the complex needs of older people. Then as now, they remain the key adult demographic for health and social care services. To hear two decades later that patients can still be badly mistreated, having their dignity and most basic needs ignored, is a terrible indictment of the State's commitment to the care of the very people who served it all their lives. Mr O'Donnell said there is a commitment for a national policy on safeguarding for adults in the Programme for Government and he wants this brought to the Cabinet before the summer recess. Most people will be astonished such a policy is not in place to protect people who may be vulnerable. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan has said the Government is committed to developing the policy. But what does it say about respect for our people that such critical protections have not already been built into the infrastructure of care? Unless agencies have the necessary legal powers to enforce compliance, the potential for abuse will continue 'Even if there is one person being abused, that is a serious incident that should be followed up immediately,' said Safeguarding Ireland chairperson Patricia Rickard-Clarke. She appealed to the Government to implement the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission's report from last year. This would put a critical legal framework in place, she said. Former INMO chief Liam Doran said he felt shame, sadness, frustration and anger over the revelations in the RTÉ report. 'Looking at people who have served this country, have worked for this country and have shown fortitude much more than the modern generation, and that's how we treat them. Shame, shame on all of us,' he said. We have waited too long for the vital legislation needed to underpin the care of older people. Unless agencies have the necessary legal powers to enforce compliance, the potential for abuse will continue. Seán Moynihan of charity Alone has expressed fears that Ireland is 'walking into the privatisation of nursing homes', where economics seems more important than the rights of the older person. For older people to be left frightened by institutional failings is indefensible. German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer wrote: 'The first 40 years of life give us the text – the next 30 supply the commentary on it.' And what a sad commentary it is on our society that once again we have been found wanting when it comes to taking care of our older citizens. There are no excuses and no exceptions, for as the poet Gertrude Stein put it: 'We are always the same age inside.'
