Majority of Finnish exporters support EU countermeasures to U.S. tariffs: survey
HELSINKI, June 18 (Xinhua) -- More than half of Finnish export companies want the European Union (EU) to respond to U.S. tariffs with equivalent countermeasures, according to a new survey released Wednesday by the Finland Chamber of Commerce.
The poll found that 51 percent of Finnish exporters surveyed support the EU imposing retaliatory tariffs that mirror those introduced or proposed by the United States.
The Chamber said in a statement that Washington's trade policies are placing significant strain on Finnish export businesses.
More than 86 percent of companies surveyed said uncertainty caused by U.S. trade measures is negatively affecting their business. Only 10 percent reported no impact.
Exporters in the technology sector have been particularly hard hit, with new orders nearly coming to a halt, according to a separate industry survey also published on Wednesday.
Despite trade tensions, confidence in export growth has risen. Some 64 percent of respondents expect exports to grow this year, up from 47 percent in the same period last year.
"It is gratifying to note that despite U.S. President Donald Trump's rapid policy shifts and broader global turmoil, the outlook for export companies has improved," said Paivi Pohjanheimo, director of international affairs at the chamber. "Exporters believe they can weather the situation, and the economy will recover as exports gain momentum."
Exporters' growing confidence may stem in part from their proactive search for alternative markets, indicated the survey. Around one-third said they are increasing business within the EU and the European Economic Area due to the threat of a trade war.
Furthermore, among companies with business operations in China, 86 percent said China's importance to their activities remained unchanged.
The export manager survey was conducted from June 5 to June 10 and received responses from 138 Finnish export firms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
26 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
G8, G7 and now G6: The world order unravels under Trump's exit — Phar Kim Beng
JUNE 19 — When Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, it was swiftly ejected from the G8, reverting the influential economic forum back to the G7. That decision was made on the premise that great powers must abide by international law. But nearly a decade later, the grouping faces yet another foundational rupture — not by expelling a member, but through the voluntary abandonment of the G7's raison d'être by the United States under Donald Trump. The original G7—formed in the wake of the 1973 oil crisis and the subsequent economic instability wrought by the Yom Kippur (or Ramadan) War between Egypt and Israel—was intended to stabilize the Western-led economic order. It emerged at a time when US global dominance was waning, following the messy withdrawal from Vietnam and the global inflation shock caused by skyrocketing oil prices. The G7 offered a platform to coordinate macroeconomic policy, uphold liberal norms, and contain geopolitical shocks. Yet what began as an exercise in economic and political solidarity has now become a theater of fragmentation. As Politico Europe reports, the latest G7 summit in Canada has exposed just how fragile Western cohesion has become. President Trump, a self-styled disruptor, once again upended multilateral expectations. He abruptly departed the summit before its conclusion, offering no support for a unified declaration on Ukraine—an omission which signals not just indifference, but active resistance to the group's foundational values. His departure, ostensibly to deal with the escalating Iran-Israel crisis, leaves the G7 teetering on the edge of irrelevance. In effect, what remains is a G6—Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom—desperately trying to hold the center while the United States absents itself both physically and diplomatically. What is most striking is the G7's quiet embrace of realpolitik in response. Rather than challenge Trump head-on, leaders like France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Olaf Scholz are engaging in what the Politico article calls 'damage control'—seeking ways to work around, rather than with, the current US administration. The multilateral system, already weakened by trade wars, pandemic nationalism, and populist shocks, is now adjusting to an America that no longer sees value in leading it. Trump's exit from the G7 is more than just another example of diplomatic unpredictability. — AFP pic This marks a profound structural and systemic shift. The G7, once an anchor of stability, has become a venue for managing disunity. With Trump's early departure and refusal to align with the group on Ukraine, the prospect of a coherent Western stance on major global crises—be it Iran, Ukraine, climate, or AI regulation—is collapsing. The implications are sobering. Worse still, the institutional fragility may soon be compounded by a looming financial vacuum. Jerome Powell, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, is due to conclude his term in June 2027. Should Trump seek to replace him with a more compliant figure—or worse, politicize the independence of the Fed—the implications for global financial stability could be disastrous. Markets are jittery as it is, and the absence of a steady US hand in both fiscal and monetary policy could trigger widespread volatility, especially at a time when multiple regional conflicts threaten to metastasize. Trump's exit from the G7 is more than just another example of diplomatic unpredictability. It signals the possible eclipse of the US as a reliable pillar of global leadership. From G8 to G7, and now de facto G6, we are witnessing not just the erosion of Western unity—but the unraveling of the post-World War II order itself. The collapse is not loud or sudden. It is slow, confused, and hollowed from within—one summit walkout, one abandoned declaration, one missed opportunity at a time. The world now inches closer toward a multipolar chaos, where no single actor has the legitimacy, stability, or willingness to lead. In such a landscape, it is not only the rules that break—but the very idea of rules itself. *Phar Kim Beng is Professor of Asean Studies at the International Islamic University Malaysia. Professor of Asean Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US crypto stocks soar as Senate clears path for stablecoin regulation
NEW YORK: Top crypto stocks on Wall Street surged on Wednesday after the US Senate approved a milestone stablecoin bill, fuelling hopes for broader adoption of what was once a niche corner of the crypto sector. The bill was passed with bipartisan support, marking a turning point in the debate over crypto oversight, and a breakthrough for a sector long stuck in regulatory limbo. The tokens have gained traction for offering crypto's convenience without its volatility. Pegged to currencies like the US dollar, they aim to hold a stable value backed by reserves. Stablecoin issuer Circle's shares were last up 20 per cent. Crypto exchange Coinbase rose 14 per cent, while commission-free brokerage Robinhood, which offers crypto trading, gained 3.40 per cent. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives must pass its version of the bill, known as the GENIUS Act, before it heads to President Donald Trump for approval. "Once passed into a law (likely by the end of summer), we expect stablecoins to evolve from the money rail of crypto to the money rail of the internet," analysts at brokerage Bernstein said. Circle, the issuer of the second-largest stablecoin by market value, went public earlier this month in a blowout debut on the New York Stock Exchange. Its shares were last at US$173.60, versus its IPO price of US$31. The company's flagship USDC stablecoin has a market value of around US$61.40 billion, according to data from CoinGecko. The stablecoin legislation is one of two major crypto bills that industry supporters hope to have signed into law this year, analysts at Barclays said. GAINING MOMENTUM Proponents say by setting clearer rules for issuing and managing dollar-pegged tokens, the bill could bring greater legitimacy to the sector. Several high-profile corporates are also reportedly exploring launching their own stablecoins. "History is being made," Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said in a post on social media platform X, adding that he expects the legislation will "drive US economic and national competitiveness for decades to come." Stablecoins account for roughly US$256 billion of the crypto sector's total US$3.30 trillion market value, according to CoinMarketCap data. "While stablecoin demand is already impressive, the new bill advancing through Congress can accelerate that demand," said Andrew Rocco, stock strategist at Zacks Investment Research. "The bill would finally put a regulatory framework around issuing and operating stablecoins, lending credibility to the industry." If signed into law, stablecoins will have to be backed by liquid assets — such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills — and for issuers to publicly disclose the composition of their reserves on a monthly basis. "Stablecoin adoption could also serve as a strong tailwind for major cryptocurrencies like bitcoin," analysts at brokerage KBW said.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump says no final decision yet on us strikes against Iran
WASHINGTON: United States (US) President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he has yet to make a final decision on whether to authorise military strikes on Iran, adding that he prefers to wait until the 'last second.' 'I don't want to fight either. I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and them having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do. And maybe we won't have to fight,' he told reporters in the Oval Office, Anadolu Ajansi reported. Trump said he had 'ideas' on possible steps but preferred to decide 'one second before it's due.' 'Things change, especially with war. You go from one extreme to the other. War is very bad. There was no reason for this to be,' he added, noting he would be holding a Situation Room meeting within the hour. Tensions have escalated sharply since June 13, when Israel launched large-scale strikes on Iran's military and nuclear sites, targeting facilities in several cities, senior command centres and nuclear scientists. Iranian media reported on Wednesday that the death toll from Israeli airstrikes had risen to 585, with over 1,300 injured. In response, Iran launched ballistic missile attacks on Israel, reportedly killing 24 people and injuring more than 500. When asked if he believed the Iranian government might collapse under continued Israeli pressure, Trump said, 'Anything could happen.'
