China's factory activity ticks up but remains below key level
China's factory activity picked up slightly in June. But its key gauge remained below the boom-or-bust line for a third month in a row, as businesses are still concerned about the future of trade talks with the US.
The National Bureau of Statistics says the manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index was 49.7 for the month.
That's up 0.2 from May, but still below the 50-point threshold.
Figures above the mark indicate expansion, while those below suggest contraction. The Bureau surveyed 3,200 manufacturers.
The index for large businesses exceeded the threshold, at 51.2. But activity at medium- and small-sized firms remained sluggish.
Meanwhile, the index for the non-manufacturing sector, including service providers, improved by 0.2 points to 50.5.
Washington and Beijing continue to hold tariff negotiations after slashing additional levies on each other.
Concerns were somewhat eased following a round of talks in London, but this was not enough to reverse the cautious outlook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
6 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Not Just Shock Absorbers: How ASEAN Is Shaping the China Trade Balance
Even as China turns to the region to manage overcapacity and geopolitical headwinds, Southeast Asia will continue to shape trade on its own terms. Leaders from China and Southeast Asian nations pose for a photo during the 27th ASEAN-China Summit in Vientiane, Laos, October 10, 2024. China's recent manufacturing resurgence – dubbed the 'Second China Shock' — has prompted fears of deindustrialization across Southeast Asia. Writing in The Straits Times last month, Ravi Velloor argued that China's dominance in sectors from textiles to EVs threatens ASEAN industries, reviving calls to revisit the assurances made by former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji upon the signing of the China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). Yet framing Southeast Asia as a victim , as the term 'shock' implies , reflects both a misunderstanding of the region's historical autonomy and strategic agency and a misreading of China's intent. Complementarity, Not Exploitation China's trade with the region has historically been asymmetrical but stable, built on complementary strengths rather than competitive overlap. In 'The Nanhai Trade: The Early History of Chinese Trade in the South China Sea,' the historian Wang Gungwu's traces this dynamic from the Han dynasty (211 BCE) to the founding of the Song dynasty in 960 CE, highlighting both the imperial attitudes towards the region and the economic foundations of maritime commerce. Then and after, Southeast Asian kingdoms such as Srivijaya and Ayutthaya exported spices, rice, metals, and timber to China in exchange for ceramics, textiles, and manufactured goods. The modern iteration of this relationship is governed by a more institutional framework. In 2009, China overtook Japan as ASEAN's largest trading partner. Today, annual China-ASEAN trade is projected to reach $1 trillion, surpassing the combined trade volumes of the United States and the European Union with China, and making ASEAN China's largest trading partner too. These new dynamics shed light on the nature of China's trade surplus with Southeast Asia, which extends beyond conventional narratives of high-tech dominance or state-induced overcapacity. Pop Mart's soft toy, Labubu, for instance, illustrates China's expanding strength in IP-driven consumer goods, where value is derived from design, branding, and emotional appeal. Southeast Asia has emerged as the company's largest and fastest-growing international market, with revenue in the region rising 619 percent year-on-year to $336 million, nearly half of Pop Mart's overseas earnings. ASEAN Shaping Engagement Clearly, in recent years the nature of China-ASEAN trade has evolved, driven by the rising value of China's intermediate and finished goods relative to Southeast Asia's commodity exports. This shift, combined with the region's growing middle class and purchasing power, has contributed to a widening trade imbalance. Yet governments across Southeast Asia have increasingly learned to use access to their fast-growing markets as strategic leverage, positioning themselves not simply as recipients of investment and exports but as active participants capable of demanding reciprocity and shaping the terms of engagement. The clearest example of this strategic posture can be seen in the defense sector, one of the most politically sensitive domains. In 2024, Thailand opted for Sweden's SAAB Gripen fighter jet over a U.S. bid, securing not just a fighter platform but full operational control of its Link-T datalink and a 144 percent return on investment via industrial offsets. Indonesia followed suit in 2025 with its commitment to purchase 48 KAAN fifth-generation fighter jets from Turkey, securing terms for local assembly and capability transfer. ASEAN states are replicating similar leverage in civilian sectors by using market access to drive industrial upgrading through local content mandates, technology transfer, and IP enforcement. Thailand now requires electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers benefiting from government tax incentives to produce core components – such as electric motors, reducers, and inverters – locally by 2026. This local content policy has prompted major Chinese automakers, including BYD and Changan, to commit to sourcing more of their EV components from Thai suppliers. The policy is expected to boost Thailand's national EV output by 40 percent in 2025. In parallel, Vietnam has revised its 2025 feed-in tariff system for solar power to favor projects that use locally produced battery storage and polysilicon. The new tariffs provide higher rates to solar projects that meet minimum local content requirements for batteries and polysilicon, aiming to reduce Vietnam's dependence on (mostly Chinese) imports and to advance the country's position in the solar value chain. Furthermore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and other ASEAN governments have imposed a series of tariffs and trade barriers targeting Chinese goods to protect local industries from being overwhelmed by subsidized, low-priced imports. Malaysia has levied anti-dumping duties ranging from 4.48 to 20.42 percent on certain Chinese steel products and is considering broader measures to shield domestic manufacturers. Indonesia, facing a surge of cheap Chinese imports that threaten its small and medium-sized enterprises, has announced plans to impose tariffs of up to 200 percent on a range of Chinese products, including textiles, footwear, ceramics, and cosmetics. Both Vietnam and Indonesia have also launched anti-dumping investigations and duties on various Chinese goods to counteract unfair trade practices. Beyond tariffs, governments are also taking action against Chinese e-commerce platforms. Indonesia, for example, has blocked the Chinese online marketplace Temu, citing concerns over the impact on local micro, small, and medium enterprises and regulatory non-compliance. These moves reflect a broader trend across ASEAN to tighten enforcement, strengthen trade defense mechanisms, and safeguard domestic industries in the face of mounting Chinese overcapacity and aggressive export strategies. As global scrutiny of Chinese exports intensifies, ASEAN is increasingly strengthening its own trade defenses, demonstrating it is far from a passive absorber of the 'Second China Shock'; they are actively shaping the terms of engagement, an approach that in fact aligns with China's own strategic interests. China's Interest in ASEAN's Success Global trends are making reliance on single-source manufacturing untenable. According to McKinsey's 2025 survey of 400 Chinese export firms, 58 percent now use a 'China+1' strategy, with ASEAN as the leading secondary production base. Overcapacity is another driver: Factory utilization rates for China's EVs have fallen below 50 percent (a significant gap from the 80 percent breakeven point), and its solar panel industry faces declining margins due to global oversaturation. Exporting this surplus into politically neutral, fast-growing ASEAN markets is a growing strategic necessity. Finally, amid rising geopolitical pressure, China sees stable ties with ASEAN as a hedge against regional isolation. The 2024 CAFTA upgrade and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership underscore Beijing's commitment to trade frameworks that bolster ASEAN's role in global supply chains – and its value to China. What most threatens ASEAN-China interdependence today is not economic logic, but growing domestic political pressure. In both regions, public opinion is increasingly shaping the boundaries of foreign policy. As such, managing ASEAN-China ties requires mutual recognition of domestic political realities and the cultivation of political capital to sustain the relationship over the longer term. This is why narratives like the 'Second China Shock,' which suggest ASEAN passivity or acquiescence, should be reconsidered. The shock, if it exists, may be real – but so is ASEAN's capacity to respond on its own terms.
Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Support for Ishiba slips ahead of key national vote, NHK survey shows
Support for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's government has slipped ahead of key national elections next month, a poll showed on Monday, with his cash handout plan to help the public deal with inflation having failed to impress voters. The current ruling bloc of Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and junior partner Komeito lost its Lower House majority last year. A poor showing in the Upper House elections slated for July 20 would likely weaken his grip on power further. Support for Ishiba's government stands at 34%, down from 39% in the previous poll three weeks ago, according to the poll conducted by public broadcaster NHK. The LDP says in its campaign pledges that it plans to give out ¥20,000 ($139) to each individual and an additional ¥20,000 to children as well as adult members of low-income households amid rising prices. But the NHK poll showed 32% of those surveyed do not evaluate the plan very positively and 31% do not evaluate the plan positively at all.
Japan Times
9 hours ago
- Japan Times
Niigata holds first public hearing on nuclear reactor restart plan
Niigata Prefecture has held the first public hearing, attended by residents, on the advisability of restarting reactors at Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings' Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant. Sixteen residents of the two municipalities hosting the plant, the city of Kashiwazaki and the village of Kariwa, attended the session held Sunday. Chosen by open application or through recommendations from relevant organizations, the participants shared their opinions online for some 10 minutes each. Only the consent of local communities is now required for the reactor restart. The plant's No. 6 and No. 7 reactors have already passed safety screenings by the Nuclear Regulation Authority and are fully loaded with nuclear fuel. An emergency evacuation plan has also been approved. Niigata Gov. Hideyo Hanazumi plans to hold four more such hearings by the end of August as a basis for deciding whether to approve the restart. Mixed views were shown in Sunday's session. A man in his 40s backed the restart, saying, "Supporting the economy of the capital area (of Tokyo and its vicinity) with electricity generated by the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant will directly lead to galvanizing the economy of Niigata." Another man in the same age group said, "I think many residents would approve (the restart) if Niigata is added to Tepco's service area and cheaper electricity is supplied to Kashiwazaki and Kariwa from the nuclear power plant." The prefecture currently receives electricity from Tohoku Electric Power. Meanwhile, a man in his 70s said, "It would be preposterous to bring the reactors back online before an evacuation route is built." A man in his 40s told reporters after the session that the public hearing was "very good because there had not been many opportunities for supporters of the restart to express their views." Still, a woman in her 70s who opposes the restart said, "Given the diversity of opinions, I'm skeptical that a consensus can be reached through such public hearings."
