logo
Haiti paid France a costly ransom for independence. Some say it must be paid back

Haiti paid France a costly ransom for independence. Some say it must be paid back

Irish Times24-05-2025

April 17th was not so much a celebration – definitely the wrong word – as an 'occasion' to mark the bicentennial of
France
's belated recognition of
Haiti
's independence. French president
Emmanuel Macron
admitted as much, speaking with grotesque understatement of how France had subjected the first state liberated by its slave population to the 'unjust force of history' by shackling it, the poorest state in the western hemisphere, to a monstrous debt from which it has yet to escape.
His predecessor, François Hollande, acknowledged the debt France owes Haiti, swiftly clarified as 'moral debt'. Macron would go no farther – talk of reparations are still taboo – but last month he set up a joint commission of inquiry into the historical effect of that debt.
It was the crown jewel of French colonies, the most profitable of them all, thanks to its sugar, coffee and cotton production. But Haiti, then known as Saint-Domingue, had a population in the 1780s of half a million, 90 per cent of it transported slaves from Africa, the highest concentration of slaves in the Atlantic area. Between 1785 and 1790, Saint-Domingue absorbed 37 per cent of the entire
transatlantic slave trade
.
And in 1791 they rose up in the largest and most successful slave insurrection in history.
READ MORE
Its inspiration, and its message inspired by the French Revolution of 'liberty or death', struck fear in slave owners from Brazil to South Carolina. They mobilised and quickly secured the reinstatement of slavery in other French slaveholding islands (such as Martinique, Guadeloupe and Reunion Island, where slavery continued until 1848).
Although Haiti's new rulers declared its independence in 1804, France only recognised it in 1825 – and then only after a French fleet arrived in Port-au-Prince with 500 cannons and forced the country's leaders at gunpoint to 'indemnify' the dispossessed slave owners for their 'property' losses. They demanded and got a commitment to 125 million gold francs (€2.4 billion in today's currency), some six times the island's annual production. It was later reduced to 90 million francs.
The demand was outrageous even for the time. In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase (some or all of 15 US states) had been sold by France to the US for 80 million francs. Haiti occupies a territory only a 77th of that size.
Among those compensated at more than $3,000 per slave, the New York Times reported, were the empress of Brazil, the son-in-law of the Russian tsar Nicholas I, the last imperial chancellor of Germany, and Gen Gaston de Galliffet, nicknamed the 'massacrer of the Commune', after his bloody repression of the Paris insurrection of 1871.
It was impossible to pay it all at once. In some years, France monopolised more than 40 per cent of the Haitian government's revenues, and the country was forced to rely on a consortium of French bankers who advanced the sum required, with interest – the 'double debt' that Haiti dragged around like a ball and chain until the 1950s, and which was upheld by every French government in the interim, of whatever political complexion. Immense profits were generated by Crédit Industriel et Commercial, CIC, a bank that co-financed the Eiffel Tower and is now one of the largest financial conglomerates in Europe.
The long-running sore between the two states was opened up properly in 2022 by the
New York Times
with a groundbreaking investigation into the debt. According to its calculations, Haiti had by then repaid France the equivalent of $560 million (€498 million) in present-day prices, with historic losses for its economy estimated to be between $21 billion and $115 billion, eight times the country's GDP.
The former figure corresponds to what had been a much derided first demand for reparations made in 2004 by the later-deposed reformist president Jean-Bertrand Aristide. The coup in which France had a hand was almost certainly in response to that impertinent demand.
Violence-ridden Haiti's 'double debt', in effect a ransom for independence, and the borrowing to pay it, has pushed the country down a spiral of indebtedness over the last century, unable to break from the path of poverty and underdevelopment, its people still on the brink of famine. As cafe owner Cedieu Joseph
told the New York Times
, 'The slaves fought for our independence. To make them pay for that independence is simply to create a new type of slavery.'
Leading French economist Thomas Piketty puts it bluntly: 'Let's state it outright: France owes approximately €30 billion to Haiti, and should immediately start restitution talks. The notion that France cannot afford such a payment does not hold up. While the sum is significant, it represents less than 1 per cent of France's public debt (
€3.3 trillion
) and barely 0.2 per cent of private wealth (€15 trillion): It's like a drop in the ocean.'
[
Top French economist Thomas Piketty accuses Ireland of 'siphoning off' others' tax revenues
Opens in new window
]
Getting it, however, will be like getting blood from a stone.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs ban on citizens entering the US from 12 countries, including Iran, Haiti and Afghanistan
Trump signs ban on citizens entering the US from 12 countries, including Iran, Haiti and Afghanistan

Irish Times

time2 days ago

  • Irish Times

Trump signs ban on citizens entering the US from 12 countries, including Iran, Haiti and Afghanistan

US president Donald Trump has signed a sweeping order banning travel from 12 countries and restricting travel from seven others, reviving and expanding the travel bans from his first term . The nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be 'fully' restricted from entering the US, according to the proclamation. Meanwhile, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted. The US president said that he 'considered foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism goals' in deciding the scope of the ban. Mr Trump had cued up the ban in an executive order signed on January 20th, his first day back in the White House, instructing his administration to submit a list of candidates for a ban by March 21st. READ MORE Mr Trump has cited a range of justifications for the bans, including national security and concerns that visitors from those countries are overstaying their visas. But advocates and experts have said that blanket travel bans discriminate against groups of people based on ethnicity alone. They will likely result – as the travels bans did during Mr Trump's first term – in the separation of families. The bans on travel from Haiti, Cuba and Venezuela could be especially impactful in US communities with huge immigrant populations from those countries. 'This discriminatory policy, which limits legal immigration, not only flies in the face of what our country is supposed to stand for, it will be harmful to our economy and communities that rely on the contributions of people who come to America from this wide range of countries,' said Pramila Jayapal, a Democratic representative of Washington. The decision to ban travel from these countries comes amid a wave of hardline immigration policies that Mr Trump has issued, including the blocking of asylum claims at the southern border and cancelling temporary protected status for immigrants from a number of countries facing deep humanitarian crises. The president has also signed a proclamation to restrict foreign student visas at Harvard University and ordered US consulates to conduct social media screening of every visa applicant seeking to travel to the university. In a video message released on social media, Mr Trump said he was making good on a promise to act following the recent attack at a Boulder, Colorado, event showing support for Israeli hostages. The attack by an Egyptian national 'underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them,' he said. Mr Trump added that the list was 'subject to revisions based on whether material improvements are made' and that 'likewise, new countries could be added as threats emerge around the world'. Having instituted a travel ban on Muslim countries early in his first term, the president flagged his plans for a new ban during his election campaign against Kamala Harris last year. 'I will ban refugee resettlement from terror-infested areas like the Gaza Strip, and we will seal our border and bring back the travel ban,' Mr Trump said in September. 'Remember the famous travel ban? We didn't take people from certain areas of the world. We're not taking them from infested countries.' He was referring to the ban he imposed after taking office in January 2017, leading to chaos at airports as protesters and civil rights attorneys rushed to help affected travellers. Mr Trump said the ban was needed to combat terrorist threats. It was blocked by federal courts on civil liberties grounds but the US supreme court, to which Mr Trump would eventually appoint three hardline rightwing justices, allowed the ban to stand. The supreme court said his ban did not target Muslims – despite the fact it originally targeted travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, Muslim-majority countries. According to the court, the ban fell within the remit of a president's national security powers. North Korea and Venezuela were also included. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) said then: 'The Muslim ban's bigotry should have been as clear to the supreme court as it is to the Muslims demonised by it. Apparently, everyone but the supreme court can see the decision for what it is: an expression of animosity.' In 2020, shortly before the Covid pandemic drastically reduced world travel, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Myanmar, Tanzania and Sudan were added to the ban. In 2021, that travel ban was among measures Joe Biden ended within hours of being sworn in as Mr Trump's White House successor. The 2017 ban initially targeted seven predominantly Muslim countries before expanding to include North Korea and Venezuela. This new proclamation is broader and also makes the notable addition of Haiti. During his 2024 campaign for the presidency, Mr Trump amplified false claims made by his running mate, JD Vance, that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were 'eating the pets of the people that live there'. The proclamation falsely claims that 'hundreds of thousands of illegal Haitian aliens flooded into the United States during the Biden administration' and this 'influx harms American communities'. In fact, about 200,000 Haitians were granted temporary protected status, which gives legal residency permits to foreign nationals who are unable to return home safely due to conditions in their home countries. Also notable are the restrictions on Afghans, given that many of the Afghans approved to live in the US as refugees were forced to flee their home country as a result of working to support US troops there, before the full withdrawal of US forces in 2021. The agreement with the Taliban to withdraw US troops was negotiated by Mr Trump during his first term. Last month, homeland security secretary Kristi Noem announced 'the termination of temporary protected status for Afghanistan', effective May 20th. – Guardian

Greenpeace activists swipe Emmanuel Macron waxwork from Paris's Grevin Museum before using it in anti-Russia protest
Greenpeace activists swipe Emmanuel Macron waxwork from Paris's Grevin Museum before using it in anti-Russia protest

The Irish Sun

time4 days ago

  • The Irish Sun

Greenpeace activists swipe Emmanuel Macron waxwork from Paris's Grevin Museum before using it in anti-Russia protest

A WAX figure of French president Emmanuel Macron was yesterday stolen by Greenpeace activists — then used in an anti-Russia protest. The £35,000 depiction of the 47-year-old head of state has often been compared to a 3 Activists placed the wax figure of the French President in front of the Russian embassy, urging France to halt gas and fertiliser imports from Moscow Credit: Reuters 3 When it was created in 2018, even museum staff admitted the Macron waxwork did not look much like Mr Macron Credit: AFP Two women and a man disguised as staff took the £35,000 model from They placed the figure in front of the Russian embassy, urging France to halt gas and fertiliser imports from Moscow. Greenpeace's Jean-Francois Julliard said: 'France is playing a double game. "Macron embodies this. He supports Ukraine but encourages French firms to continue trading with Russia.' READ MORE WORLD NEWS When it was created in 2018, even museum staff admitted the Macron waxwork did not look much like Mr Macron. Grevin's director, Yves Delhommeau, said: 'A tense and anguished face, a frozen statue that doesn't live, this is not beautiful, it is something that just doesn't work.' Mr Delhommeau said President Macron did not meet with them in order to scan his face, so sculptors were forced to work with pictures of the 40-year-old. Others went online to ridicule the model, saying it was one of the worst depictions of a public figure ever made. Most read in The Sun The Grevin Museum is often compared to London in 1835 by the French sculptor Marie Tussaud. Like the British version, Grevin displays the waxworks of numerous famous figures from around the world. Little Mix waxworks unveiled at Madame Tussauds Both museums are massive tourist attractions, with hundreds of thousands of visitors enjoying the waxworks every year. 3 A wax figure of French president Emmanuel Macron was yesterday stolen by Greenpeace activists — then used in an anti-Russia protest Credit: AFP

Greenpeace activists steal Macron wax figure for anti-Moscow protest
Greenpeace activists steal Macron wax figure for anti-Moscow protest

RTÉ News​

time4 days ago

  • RTÉ News​

Greenpeace activists steal Macron wax figure for anti-Moscow protest

Greenpeace activists have stolen a wax figure of French President Emmanuel Macron from a Paris museum and placed it in front of the Russian embassy as part of a protest against French economic ties with Moscow in the wake of the invasion of Ukraine. According to a police source, two women and a man entered the Grevin Museum posing as tourists but changed their clothes to pass for workers once they were inside. They slipped out through an emergency exit with the wax work, estimated to be worth €40,000, which they had covered up. The museum said that the activists had called to promise that the statue would be returned "unharmed". "They had clearly done their research very thoroughly," a museum spokeswoman told AFP. According to the spokeswoman, the activists distracted a security guard by asking a question about a disabled access lift, while some of them donned maintenance coats. After making away with the Macron wax figure, they placed it in front of the Russian embassy in a protest against the economic ties between France and Russia in the gas, chemical fertilizer and nuclear sectors. The action in front of the embassy lasted only a few minutes. The activists unfurled a Russian flag behind the Macron statue, while one man held up a yellow placard reading "Business is business". The activists also threw fake banknotes around. "For us, France is playing a double game," said Jean-Francois Julliard, head of Greenpeace France. "Emmanuel Macron embodies this double discourse: he supports Ukraine but encourages French companies to continue trading with Russia." He said Greenpeace targeted Mr Macron because he had a particular responsibility, adding that the French president "should be the first" among European leaders to end trade contracts with Russia. France has been one of the most vocal supporters of Kyiv since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Mr Macron has taken the lead in seeking to forge a coordinated European response to defend Ukraine, after US President Donald Trump shocked the world by directly negotiating with Russia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store