French Tesla customers sue over brand becoming 'extreme right'
Around 10 French clients with leases on Teslas are suing the US carmaker, run by Elon Musk, because they consider the vehicles to be "extreme-right" symbols, the law firm representing them said on Wednesday.
They feel they suffered "direct and concrete" damage from the way Teslas are now associated with "Elon Musk's actions", the GKA law firm said.
They are demanding the Paris commercial court order their lease contracts be terminated and legal costs reimbursed, it said in a statement, signed by lawyers Patrick Klugman and Ivan Terel.
The lawsuit comes as Tesla sales in the European Union have almost halved since the beginning of the year, a slump attributed to Musk's political activities.
Those activities include him -- until last week -- standing firmly with US President Donald Trump, and overseeing efforts to cut down US departments and agencies.
He has also lent public support to Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and came under criticism for making a repeated gesture with an out-thrust arm interpreted by many historians to be a Nazi salute.
"Because of Elon Musk's actions... Tesla branded vehicles have become strong political symbols and now appear to be veritable extreme-right 'totems', to the dismay of those who acquired them with the sole aim of possessing an innovative and ecological vehicle," GKA said in a statement.
The perception of the Teslas they leased "prevents them from fully enjoying their car", it said.
Most of the leases run for four years, with an option at the end to buy the vehicle.
Tesla cars in Europe and elsewhere have been targeted by vandals, with some drivers reporting they have been insulted for using what is sometimes called on social media a "swasti-car".
Several owners have taken to putting stickers on their Teslas reading "I bought this before Elon went crazy".
"The situation is both unexpected and impossible for French Tesla owners," Klugman told AFP.
"Musk's political positions have interrupted enjoyment" of the vehicles, and "we believe that Mr Musk owes these buyers the peaceful possession of the thing sold", he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
2 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Ford Ranger Stormtrak Hybrid review
Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. Twigs snap and gravel crunches under the all-terrain tyres of Ford's Ranger hybrid as we climb a rocky slope in the bush. Birds sing, leaves rustle in the breeze, and the calm voice of an off-road expert standing outside the car offers quiet coaching through a particularly tricky trail. I can hear all of this because there's no sound from the engine. Instead, it glides through the territory on battery power alone, moving with a grace that brings you closer to the surrounding environment. There's a precision to this hybrid-electric setup rarely found in the noisy, laggy motors of conventional utes. Smooth and silent, it offers fine throttle control off-road, allowing you to carefully apply power to get where you need to go. X SUBSCRIBER ONLY It might be Ford's best option for low-speed off-roading. And the experience improves when you arrive. Power points encourage you to plug in appliances and enjoy a touch of comfort when far from home. Ford demonstrated this with afternoon tea powered by a pie oven, kettle, toasted sandwich maker and espresso machine in a remote forest. 2025 Ford Ranger Wildtrak PHEV. Picture: Supplied MORE: Musk's Tesla dream going up in smoke Like taking a powered caravan site everywhere you go, the Ranger's 'Pro Power Onboard' system has two 15-amp outlets in the tray and a 10-amp outlet in the cabin. It will charge a tradie's tools on the worksite, or keep your home fridge and microwave in action during a blackout. These achievements are made possible by a turbocharged 2.3-litre four-cylinder engine paired with an electric motor and battery. The petrol motor makes 138kW and 411Nm, while the electric motor and battery claim 75kW of power and 11.8kWh of storage. This combination is good for maximum outputs of 207kW and 697Nm, figures that put it ahead of conventional utes, but behind Chinese rivals such as the GWM Cannon and BYD Shark. The Ranger is arguably a better car than those though it is definitely more expensive. Priced from $71,990 plus on-road costs in basic XLT form (think cloth seats and old yellow halogen headlights) to $86,990 plus on-roads in range-topping Stormtrak form (leather, matrix LED lights and loads of accessories), it certainly isn't cheap. Ford Ranger Stormtrak PHEV can wade through 800mm of water, claims peak payload up to 973 kilograms, and can do remarkable things off-road. Picture: Supplied MORE: 'Brutal' Aussie fave a 'gift from the Gods' Customers need to spend about $10,000 more than four-cylinder Rangers, or $5000 more than V6 versions. Smoother and quieter than those cars, the hybrid delivers effortless progress whether you're accelerating to pass slower traffic, or slogging through stop-start traffic in town. Ford reckons a fully charged Ranger is good for almost 50 kilometres of electric driving range. Claimed fuel economy is just 2.7L/100km though like all plug-in hybrids, that figure doesn't reflect real-world use. Short commutes can be completed without using a drop of fuel, while interstate road trips could return double-digit consumption. Especially if you take advantage of the Ranger hybrid's 3.5 tonne towing capability. That figure is an important one to Ford engineers who insisted the green Ranger should retain the same core capability as its combustion cousins. That means it can wade through 800mm of water, claims peak payload up to 973 kilograms, and can do remarkable things off-road. Interior cabin of 2025 Ford Ranger Stormtrak PHEV. Picture: Supplied MORE: Huge question mark over 'illegal' car While some rivals feel as though they were rushed to market accompanied by a promise to improve with running changes, this Ranger feels like the finished article. Its off-road ability is helped by Ford's decision to place the electric motor between the motor and transmission, which means it can make the most of a 10-speed automatic transmission and a low-range transfer case that give you incredible leverage in the rough stuff. Simple drive modes work in its favour. There's no mystery to EV Now, EV Later, EV Charge and Auto EV settings that let you drive on battery power, preserve the current battery level, use the petrol engine as a generator to charge the battery, or let the car sort itself out. And the core Ranger elements are all here the modern cabin, impressive ergonomics and thoughtful practicality that have made the blue oval's pick-up Australia's favourite car for the last two years. Verdict hhhhk Hybrid technology makes Australia's best ute even better. The Ford Ranger PHEV shows that the path ahead for pick-ups is cleaner, quieter and smarter than yesterday's diesel models. Originally published as Ford's latest PHEV is a serious contender
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Musk's attacks against Trump will not be ‘easy to walk back'
Newsweek Senior Editor-at-Large Josh Hammer discusses whether Elon Musk can reconcile with Donald Trump after launching personal attacks at the president on X. This comes after Mr Musk expressed his regret on X – formerly known as Twitter – at some of his previous posts about the US President, saying they 'went too far'. 'Not an easy thing to walk back ... having said that, I appreciate the instinct to try to walk it back,' Mr Hammer told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'It is best for the American right to try to get these two titans to try to let bygones be bygones but easier said than done.'
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trump administration 'extremely serious' on Australia increasing defence spending as AUKUS review used as leverage to force Albanese's hand
The Trump administration is using a review of the AUKUS submarine deal as leverage to force Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's hand on defence spending. The United States President Donald Trump, and his officials, are frustrated with Mr Albanese's refusal to increase defence spending and his flippant attitude that it's an issue of sovereignty. They're also concerned about his commitment to the alliance more broadly, and specifically, his reluctance to robustly call out China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific region, according to multiple high-level sources. Sharri Markson will cover this story on her program later tonight. Tune in from 8pm on Sky News Austra lia. The Pentagon has publicly announced a review of the AUKUS alliance, between the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom, in a dramatic move that puts into doubt Australia's defence future. Senior national security sources, on the condition of confidentiality, told Sky News that Australia should have been proactive on the defence budget, particularly after Europe signed up to a 3.5 per cent target. Australia's position to keep defence spending at just under 2 per cent is considered unsustainable in the current strategic environment, which even the Albanese government acknowledges is the most volatile in recent history. The Trump administration gave Australia time and space on the issue of defence spending to avoid interfering with the May federal election. They were also waiting to see the outcome before pressing ahead with negotiations. But confidential sources said the Trump administration 'is extremely serious' about needing Australia to lift its game on defence spending, irrespective of budget constraints. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth made the point directly to Defence Minister Richard Marles in Singapore at the Shangri-La Dialogue. Mr Marles then audaciously shied away from publicly revealing the figure that the United States was pushing Australia to spend on defence, leading Hegseth to put the figure out there of 3.5 per cent of GDP. The issue escalated further when Mr Albanese repeatedly and testily pushed back on the request to increase defence spending, claiming it was an issue of sovereignty. It's understood that the Trump administration saw this response as unserious and staggering. There was concern that Australia thought it could get a free pass from increasing our defence spend, for no good reason, when the rest of the world was prepared to play its part. The NATO partners, and others, readily acknowledge the geo-strategic threat and are stepping up. Australia has made a point of sticking with the Paris agreement, leading the way internationally on climate targets. But they are not taking the same approach on defence spending. Australian defence officials met with their counterparts in Washington several weeks ago and were well aware of the expectation from the United States. The Albanese government was on notice. The United States is also looking for Mr Albanese to reinforce his commitment to the US alliance more broadly. The view is that he should be prepared to call out China in a robust fashion, which he has steadfastly refused to do even in the face of egregious action against Australia. While Mr Albanese insists defence spending is a matter of sovereignty, he wasn't as strong on sovereignty when it came to a Chinese warship circumnavigating the coast. The People's Liberation Army Task Group 107 launched live-fire exercises west of Hobart in February, yet there was barely a peep from Mr Albanese. This astounded the United States government. Their view is Australia's response should be more muscular and we should at least call out provocative behaviour when it occurs. Instead, Mr Albanese defended China's actions. In an interview with Sky News, former prime minister Scott Morrison said the Albanese Government needed to keep making the case for AUKUS. He said his impression is that President Trump had always been committed to it. But he also stressed that Australia needs to make it clear it's aligned on the threat China poses. 'We have to be very clear that we share the strategic intent which is to deter aggressors in the Indo-Pacific,' he said. 'That was a point that we made strongly at the time, which was well understood and well-appreciated, and I don't believe there's been any fundamental change to that. I think the tone of that has changed but what I've heard from Marles on that is that intent was still there.' Mr Morrison was very diplomatic in his language when he said there had been a change in tone from the Albanese government on China. The United States Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has also publicly expressed his disappointment with the Albanese government's hostile foreign policy platform on Israel after sanctions were issued against two controversial Israeli ministers. But there's a wider issue here, as well. Mr Albanese is also moving against America's interest at the United Nations and in other foreign policy areas with respect to Israel. Unless the Prime Minister changes his tune on defence in the next few days - he won't have an easy meeting with Trump on the sidelines of the G7. Mr Albanese may not personally care about the optics of this because Trump is out of favour politically in Australia. But he should care. Trump controls the commitment to AUKUS which is critical for the protection of our nation. Primarily, this AUKUS review is leverage over Mr Albanese for an increased defence commitment. Trump has got Mr Albanese over a barrel and if he loses AUKUS, under his watch, it would be disastrous - particularly if he loses it because of his stubborn refusal to commit to a higher defence target.
