logo
CNN's Christiane Amanpour afraid to travel to America as a foreigner, says it's like going to North Korea

CNN's Christiane Amanpour afraid to travel to America as a foreigner, says it's like going to North Korea

Fox Newsa day ago

British-born CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour revealed on her podcast "The Ex Files" on Wednesday that she recently prepared to travel to the U.S. as if she were traveling to North Korea.
Speaking with her ex-husband Jamie Rubin, a former State Department official, Amanpour recalled a speech she gave at Harvard Kennedy School last month. Although she was a prominent media figure, she expressed fear that she would be stopped by border security.
"I must say I was afraid," Amanpour said. "I'm a foreigner. I don't have a green card. I'm not an American citizen. I'm fairly prominent, and I literally prepared to go to America as if I was going to North Korea. I took a burner phone. Imagine that. I didn't take a single…not my mobile phone, not my iPad, nothing, and I had nothing on the burner phone except a few numbers."
She added that she spoke to CNN security before her visit after hearing several anecdotes about her fellow British citizens being either detained for hours or turned around at the border. However, she found that she was welcomed into the country and that the immigration officer she met "could not have been nicer."
"So, huge sigh of relief I breathed, but wow, can you imagine if I'm afraid, what do others think?" Amanpour said.
Rubin argued that President Donald Trump's attempts to bar Harvard from accepting foreign students were only the latest attacks he's made against the country itself.
"With Donald Trump's basically weaponization of the immigration and naturalization service to scrutinize people, to imagine that every single non-American is a threat to the United States, is a war on what our country has been since its founding," Rubin said.
The podcast episode premiered hours before the Trump administration announced an executive order blocking travel to the U.S. from nearly 20 countries identified as "very high-risk" for terrorism, high visa overstay rates and other security concerns.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern
Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chris Hayes: Trump's 'secret police': Masked agents' sweeping immigration raids raise concern

This is an adapted excerpt from the June 5 episode of 'All In with Chris Hayes.' The term 'secret police' invokes a kind of haunting specter. When we see representations of it in movies or history, we immediately identify it with a certain kind of regime: One that tramples people's liberty with no accountability. We associate it with authoritarian governments and dictatorships like the former Soviet Union, where people, usually armed, could wield the authority of the state but were, themselves, totally unaccountable in the same way. Whatever issues there are with American policing — and there are many — at least our police officers have names on their uniforms and badge numbers. But now, in the era of immigration under Donald Trump, one cannot help but notice that in clip after clip, interaction after interaction, the people enforcing the president's policies have all the qualities that one would associate with the concept of 'secret police.' In videos, these individuals are usually masked and either wearing plain clothes or irregular uniforms. They won't give their names or say what agency they're with. Watching it feels wrong, weird, alien and menacing. It does not feel like these law enforcement officials are subject to the authority of a democratic government. It's so striking, in scene after scene, to see regular people asking masked agents, 'Who are you?' and 'What are you doing?' and not receiving an answer. That's what we saw play out in one of the first videos of this kind to be made public: The arrest of Columbia student and lawful resident Mahmoud Khalil. In that video, you can see plainclothes officers apprehending Khalil in the lobby of his building. The officers pointedly refused to identify themselves or what agency they were with. 'We don't give our name,' one man said, after handcuffing and detaining a legal resident of the United States. Not long after that, we got video of the arrest of Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was snatched off the street by masked agents and led away in handcuffs. In New Bedford, Massachusetts, there was the chilling scene from last month in which masked agents broke a car window and forcibly removed a man they say was in the country illegally. Just last weekend, in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, masked agents detained an apparently undocumented gardener at his place of work. In San Diego that same weekend, residents tried to hold back what appeared to be militarized agents who were reportedly executing an immigration raid on local businesses. We've also got allegations of all kinds of lies, manipulation and subterfuge. Eyewitnesses in Tucson, Arizona, allege agents posed as city utility workers as part of an arrest attempt. There have been reports of agents performing wellness checks on children, which critics say is a trap for immigration enforcement. All this feels like something distinct from the normal forms of policing and law enforcement that we're used to. As the writer M. Gessen, who was born in the then-Soviet Union, put it in a column for The New York Times: 'The United States has become a secret-police state. Trust me, I've seen it before.' 'The citizens of such a state live with a feeling of being constantly watched. They live with a sense of random danger,' Gessen wrote. 'Anyone — a passer-by, the man behind you in line at the deli, the woman who lives down the hall, your building's super, your own student, your child's teacher — can be a plainclothes agent or a self-appointed enforcer.' This administration is treating people as if they have no rights, as if they can be rounded up at whim without any due process. That is the legal theory of the Trump administration. It believes that immigrants in this country don't have rights, even though that's very clearly not true. The Constitution is clear on this, and precedent is clear on this: Immigrants have due process rights. But the Trump administration seems to believe the state can do whatever it wants to people. According to Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, the agents in these videos are wearing masks for their own safety. 'They wear a mask because they're trying to protect themselves and their families,' Homan said on Fox News. 'Agents are getting doxed every day, their pictures and phone numbers being put on telephone poles. These leftists are following and filming when they go home from work at night.' In a statement to NBC News about these recent immigration crackdowns, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said, 'Under Secretary Noem, we are delivering on President Trump's and the American people's mandate to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens and make America safe.' This article was originally published on

US charges Kilmar Abrego Garcia with transporting people who were in the country illegally
US charges Kilmar Abrego Garcia with transporting people who were in the country illegally

Chicago Tribune

time25 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

US charges Kilmar Abrego Garcia with transporting people who were in the country illegally

WASHINGTON — Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose mistaken deportation to El Salvador became a political flashpoint in the Trump administration's stepped-up immigration enforcement, was being returned to the United States to face criminal charges related to what the Trump administration said was a massive human smuggling operation that brought immigrants into the country illegally. He is expected to be prosecuted in the U.S. and, if convicted, will be returned to his home country in El Salvador at the conclusion of the case, officials said Friday. 'This is what American justice looks like,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said Friday in announcing the return of Abrego Garcia and the criminal charges. The charges stem from a 2022 vehicle stop in which the Tennessee Highway Patrol suspected him of human trafficking. A report released by the Department of Homeland Security in April states that none of the people in the vehicle had luggage, while they listed the same address as Abrego Garcia. Abrego Garcia was never charged with a crime, while the officers allowed him to drive on with only a warning about an expired driver's license, according to the DHS report. The report said he was traveling from Texas to Maryland, via Missouri, to bring in people to perform construction work. In response to the report's release in April, Abrego Garcia's wife said in a statement that he sometimes transported groups of workers between job sites, 'so it's entirely plausible he would have been pulled over while driving with others in the vehicle. He was not charged with any crime or cited for any wrongdoing.' The Trump administration has been publicizing Abrego Garcia's interactions with police over the years, despite a lack of corresponding criminal charges, while it faces a federal court order and calls from some in Congress to return him to the U.S. Authorities in Tennessee released video of a 2022 traffic stop last month. The body-camera footage shows a calm and friendly exchange between officers with the Tennessee Highway Patrol. Officers then discussed among themselves their suspicions of human trafficking because nine people were traveling without luggage. One of the officers said, 'He's hauling these people for money.' Another said he had $1,400 in an envelope. An attorney for Abrego Garcia, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said in a statement after the footage's release in May that he saw no evidence of a crime in the released footage. 'But the point is not the traffic stop — it's that Mr. Abrego Garcia deserves his day in court,' Sandoval-Moshenberg said. The move comes days after the Trump administration complied with a court order to return a Guatemalan man deported to Mexico despite his fears of being harmed there. The man, identified in court papers as O.C.G, was the first person known to have been returned to U.S. custody after deportation since the start of President Donald Trump's second term.

ICE can remove undocumented immigrants from courts, but not yet seen in Lake County
ICE can remove undocumented immigrants from courts, but not yet seen in Lake County

Chicago Tribune

time25 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

ICE can remove undocumented immigrants from courts, but not yet seen in Lake County

While several U.S. communities have seen Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers waiting to detain defendants outside court hearings, Lake County hasn't experienced that yet. A spokesperson for the U.S. department said in a statement that ICE officers are permitted to conduct 'civil immigration enforcement in or near courthouses' with credible information. 'The memorandum gives further procedures and responsibilities for ICE officers to conduct civil immigration enforcement actions against targeted aliens discreetly to minimize their impact on court proceedings, avoid unnecessarily alarming the public or disrupting court operations, and avoid enforcement actions in or near courthouses, or areas within courthouses that are wholly dedicated to non-criminal proceedings,' the statement said. To remove an undocumented immigrant, a judge has to sign off on an order of removal, said Vanessa Cruz Nichols, an assistant professor of political science at Indiana University. Under President Trump, Cruz Nichols said a new ICE tactic has been to wait outside immigration court hearings to deport people who, in most cases, had their cases dropped — meaning they could remain in the country. The Indiana Capital Chronicle reported May 30 that federal officials are considering Camp Atterbury in south central Indiana as a temporary holding site for immigrant detainees. No official announcement has yet been made. President Donald Trump has vowed to deport millions of people, staging the 'largest deportation operation in American history.' Stars and Stripes — a news source from the U.S. military — reported Thursday that the National Guard is prepared to provide more than 20,000 troops to 'crack down on immigration.' Army officials say they don't yet know the role that National Guard members will play, Stars and Stripes reported, but 'troop involvement would be legal and in line with training.' As of Monday, no one in Lake County had been taken by ICE when going to court, Lake County Sheriff Oscar Martinez said in a statement. Martinez does not know how many people have been detained by ICE or at risk of detention. 'As the elected Lake County Sheriff, I took an oath to enforce the law and I'm committed to collaborating with our federal partners to do so,' Martinez said in a statement. 'Those who break the law in Lake County, regardless of immigration status, will be brought to justice. I take the safety of all of our citizens seriously and will continue to work tirelessly to ensure their well-being.' The goal of waiting outside the hearings, Cruz Nichols said, is to follow Trump's directive to remove people who have been in the U.S. for about two years with temporary status and told to follow up for routine appointments in immigration court. 'The Trump 2.0 administration doesn't see any of those cases really being legitimate,' Cruz Nichols said. 'These new plans adopted under the Trump administration are quite different and quite a big deviation from what he had in his first administration and what we've seen previous presidents do.' With ICE waiting to arrest and deport people outside of immigration hearings, Cruz Nichols said it will break down trust of authority figures in immigrant communities. 'It makes these routine court hearings very high risk. People will end up avoiding these appointments and hearings as a result if they feel like they are being staked out by ICE agents,' Cruz Nichols said. 'People should be able to attend important court cases, advocating for their rights, their due process, without fear of being arrested, detained or deported outside of the court.' Typically, if police discover that someone they arrested is an undocumented immigrant, then local sheriff officials notify ICE, Cruz Nichols said. Depending on the local county resources and its jail capacity, as well as the crime committed, an undocumented immigrant could be held for weeks or a few days before being released if an ICE agent didn't come, she said. Each day, the sheriff's department provides a list of non-citizen inmates to ICE, who then notifies the department of which inmates they request to be held on a detainer, Martinez said. Then the department receives the detainer, serves it and places a hold in the system. ICE has 48 hours to take the person into custody or the sheriff's department will release them after they become eligible for release. ICE agents could obtain a judicial warrant, which is signed by a judge, listing the person's name and address, to detain and deport someone, Cruz Nichols said. A judicial warrant allows the ICE agents to enter the address listed on the warrant, which could be the person's home or workplace. ICE agents could also obtain an administrative warrant, Cruz Nichols said, but that's more vague and only lists a person's name but no specific address to pick them up and it isn't signed by a judge. 'Those administrative warrants are not sufficient for an ICE agent to use that at like a church or at a public space claiming they can enter those spaces. They can't do that with an administrative warrant. They could do that if they have a judicial warrant,' Cruz Nichols said. Many activist organizations have been working with undocumented immigrants to let them know that if ICE doesn't have a judicial warrant, they don't have to open the door if agents come knocking, Cruz Nichols said. An administrative warrant is easier to obtain, Cruz Nichols said, and it's an intimidation tactic because many undocumented immigrants just see an official piece of paper but don't know it's not signed by a judge. 'It's an easier thing to request from the agency than a specific, targeted, more onerous judicial warrant that provides the address information, provides the signature by the judge,' Cruz Nichols said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store