Minister harassed by Palestine activists
A government minister was "terrified" after being confronted by two pro-Palestine activists while campaigning, a court has heard.
Alex Davies-Jones said she felt "scared and intimidated" after being approached by Ayeshah Behit, 31, and Hiba Ahmed, 26, both from Treforest, Rhondda Cynnon Taf.
Cardiff Magistrates' Court heard Ms Behit and Ms Ahmed had leaflets describing the MP for Pontypridd as a "full-blown supporter of this genocide" in Gaza.
Ms Davies-Jones, a justice minister, was approached while leafletting in the defendants' hometown on 26 June last year ahead of the general election - Ms Ahmed and Ms Ahmed deny their actions amounted to harassment.
Ms Davies-Jones said she was asked questions "around the conflict in Israel and Palestine and my conduct as an MP, if I had taken part in votes, membership of organisations such as Labour Friends of Israel".
"They asked me about the ceasefire and why I had abstained. I clarified I hadn't abstained, I wasn't in the country, I was paired in that vote," she added.
"It was escalating in terms of passion and intensity. We walked off in the opposite direction. We felt scared and intimidated and we wanted to leave the situation.
"They began to follow us. They were shouting and bellowing down the street at us - 'why do you support genocide, why are you murdering babies, Alex Davies-Jones, do you support genocide?"'
Women in court accused of harassing MP over Gaza
How controversial US-Israeli backed Gaza aid plan turned to chaos
Hamas makes hostage pledge but demands changes to US Gaza ceasefire plan
Ms Davies-Jones said the two defendants also handed out leaflets and put posters on the Labour office in Pontypridd that referred to politicians "enabling genocide".
She told the court their actions left her feeling "terrified" and a video of the confrontation was uploaded on to social media with the caption, describing Ms Davies-Jones as racist, was "manipulated in a way that made it seem I had lied".
Ms Davies-Jones said, as a result of the incident, she reduced campaigning sessions and had to be accompanied by close protection officers.
Ms Ahmed said she and Ms Behit wanted to raise awareness of Ms Davies-Jones's actions on Palestine ahead of the election and had planned to hand out and post leaflets that afternoon when they saw their MP coming towards them.
Ms Ahmed said she filmed the video "because I thought nobody would believe me" adding that "it felt like a really normal conversation between people who don't agree on something".
Ms Behit told the court "it was never about Alex as a person... part of her job as an MP is having people look at her policies, her opinions and how she voted," she said.
Their trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
30 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Netanyahu says Israel has 'activated' some Palestinian clans in the fight against Hamas
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel has 'activated' some local clans of Palestinians in Gaza in the fight against Hamas. In a video posted to his X account, Netanyahu said the government made the move on the advice of 'security officials,' in order to save lives of Israeli soldiers. The announcement came hours after a political opponent criticized him for arming unofficial groups of Palestinians in Gaza. Some local Palestinian families in Gaza are known to have arms and often wield some control in parts of the territory. In the past, before and during the war, some have had clashes or tensions with Hamas. An Israeli official said that one of the groups that Netanyahu was referring to was the so-called Abu Shabab group. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media. In recent weeks, the Abu Shabab group announced online that its fighters were helping protect aid shipments to the new distribution mechanism backed by Israel in southern Gaza.
Miami Herald
33 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Red Sea Passage Remains a No-Go for Shipping Despite U.S. Action
The largest commercial shipping companies continue to avoid the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, despite a recent ceasefire agreement between the United States and Houthis intended to make the trade lanes safer. The ceasefire, which began May 6, ended a U.S. campaign that involved more than 1,100 strikes against the Houthis in Yemen and became a source of embarrassment for the Trump administration after group chats about the strikes inadvertently became public. The Pentagon had planned on a monthslong bombardment, but President Donald Trump ended it after about 50 days. 'If the intention was to restore freedom of navigation, which is what they stated it was, then the results speak for themselves: The shipping industry has not gone back,' said Richard Meade, editor-in-chief of Lloyd's List, a shipping publication. Ship traffic through the Red Sea is down by around three-fifths since 2023 when the Houthis started targeting ships there in solidarity with Hamas in its war with Israel in the Gaza Strip, Meade said. Fearing that their vessels would be struck, big shipping companies avoided the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, taking a much longer route around the southern tip of Africa to travel between Asia and Europe. The Houthis have said they are still at war with Israel and will attack vessels bound for the country. And though the Houthis have not attacked a commercial vessel since December, shipping companies say they worry that their vessels may be hit, deliberately or mistakenly, and have no plans to sail the southern part of the Red Sea anytime soon. 'We're pretty far from the threshold,' said Vincent Clerc, the CEO of A.P. Moller-Maersk, a large shipping line based in Copenhagen, Denmark. Speaking soon after the ceasefire in May, he said the Red Sea would have to remain safe for the foreseeable future before the company's vessels returned. Shipping executives said they also feared a severe disruption to their networks if they returned to the Red Sea but suddenly had to pull out of the region because attacks resumed. When Trump started the military engagement with the Houthis in March, he said their attacks on shipping had cost the global economy 'BILLIONS of dollars.' Commenting on the ceasefire, he said, 'They say they will not be blowing up ships anymore.' Oman brokered the ceasefire between the Houthis and the United States. Describing the truce, Oman's foreign minister said that 'neither side will target the other, including American vessels, in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Strait, ensuring freedom of navigation and the smooth flow of international commercial shipping.' But maritime analysts said it was unclear whether the ceasefire applied just to American ships. 'Was this only an agreement between the Americans and the Houthis not to fire at each other's military capabilities, or was this something that did indeed also cover the merchant ships going through the area?' asked Jakob Larsen, chief safety and security officer at BIMCO, a shipping trade group. Nor did the ceasefire appear to involve the Houthis' conflict with Israel. The Houthis expanded their attacks on Israel last month to include vessels at or on their way to Haifa, an Israeli port, noted Jack Kennedy, head of country risk for the Middle East and North Africa at S&P Global Market Intelligence. And while the Houthis are unlikely to attack American vessels during their ceasefire, 'the unclear designations around a vessel or company's relationship to Israel and Israeli ports, and uncertainties around Houthi targeting accuracy, mean there is a severe risk to ships transiting the Red Sea,' Kennedy said. In an email to The New York Times, the Houthi-linked group that communicates with the shipping industry said that 'no guarantees can be provided to shipping companies.' The group added: 'Sanctions and prohibitions are limited exclusively to companies and vessels affiliated with or linked to' Israel. The group also said the Yemeni armed forces' actions 'are carried out through a precise mechanism designed to prevent mistakes.' The White House and the Pentagon did not comment. Even though the route around Africa uses more fuel and crews are at sea for longer, shipping operations have adapted to the detour. 'If it were really a pain, if this new route was really imposing costs, I think you might see more countries willing to take the risk,' said Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, a research institute that favors restraint in foreign policy. In fact, traveling longer distances has allowed the shipping lines to deploy the glut of new ships that they ordered during the pandemic trade boom. Before the Red Sea attacks, the supply of new vessels threatened to depress shipping rates and the earnings of shipping companies. 'Frankly, this disruption, this long way round, has allowed the industry to a certain extent to defy economic gravity,' Meade said. Still, one large shipping company, CMA CGM, based in Marseilles, France, has been sending a small number of vessels through the Red Sea. Ship tracking sites showed that, in recent weeks, at least five had been in the southern part of the Red Sea, near Yemen. But CMA CGM said in a statement that it did 'not plan to resume transits through the Suez Canal on a large scale in the short term, unless security conditions allow it.' The rerouting of vessels away from the Red Sea has deprived Egypt of billions of much-needed dollars in toll revenue from the Suez Canal. To coax shipping companies back, the canal is offering large vessels a 15% discount to go through the canal. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
USA Today
37 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump explains why Egypt was not part of travel ban after citing Boulder attack
Trump explains why Egypt was not part of travel ban after citing Boulder attack 'Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control,' Trump said of the nation's exemption from his travel ban. Show Caption Hide Caption Travelers react to the latest travel ban from President Trump "Pros and cons." Travelers in Los Angeles responded to the news of President Donald Trump's travel ban impacting nearly 20 countries. WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says he did not include Egypt in a travel ban, which he tied to a terror attack allegedly carried out by an Egyptian national, because the United States works closely with the Arab nation. "Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control. The countries that we have don't have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5. In introducing the partial or complete ban on travel from citizens of 19 nations on June 4, Trump cited the Boulder, Colorado, attack that took place at an event raising awareness about Israeli hostages. The suspect in the case, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is an Egyptian man who entered the U.S. on a tourist visit that he overstayed after applying for asylum, federal officials say. More: Trump's travel ban is his fourth attempt. See how list compares to 2017 Yet, the travel ban that Trump unveiled days later did not include Egypt, raising questions about the timing and purpose of the ban, which the president's critics say unfairly targets African and Muslim-majority nations. Trump requested that the State Department and other national security officials put together a list of countries for potential visa restrictions in an executive order just after taking office. But nothing came of it for months, until the Boulder attack, which he blamed on the previous administration. "We want to keep bad people out of our country. The Biden administration allowed some horrendous people," Trump said in the Oval Office, as he touted his deportation policies. Egypt has acted as a central mediator alongside the United States and Qatar in the conflict between Israel and Hamas, helping to establish a ceasefire and secure the release of prisoners and hostages. The United States had conducted joint training exercises with Egypt since 1980 and considers the Arab nation that has been ruled by Abdel Fattah El-Sisi since 2014 a regional partner. The Egyptian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
