Cambridge scientists' plant display wins Chelsea medal
A university team has won a silver-gilt medal at the RHS Chelsea Flower Show for its interactive plant science exhibit.The Sainsbury Laboratory at the University of Cambridge said its garden gave visitors the chance to see how plants attract bees and how bees perceive flowers.Blooming Numbers features in the show's GreenSTEM section.Kathy Grube, from the laboratory, said there were "even more amazing beautiful features" in plants at "microscopic level".
"We are all about plants and we thought it would be the perfect marriage for us to come here and share some of the research we are doing," she said.
The laboratory is researching how the growth of plants can influence crop sustainability and pollinator populations.Ms Grube explained how judges had laid out their medal for them to find when they turned up to water their plants."We were jumping up and down when we found it."
The team collaborated with a family-run garden centre in Oakington near Cambridge for the project.Melanie Sadler, owner of the garden centre, said: "They wanted a garden to match their experiments because bees see something completely different under a UV light, to what we see."We have actually chosen these plants to show off what the bees see."The patch features plants and flowers which have been growing since Christmas, including yellow bidens.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain's enemies could dim the sun and weaponise weather
Ministers are preparing for a scenario where a hostile foreign power could weaponise sun dimming technology, The Telegraph can reveal. A ministerial letter, seen by The Telegraph, states the Government wants to understand the risks of an 'independent or third party actor' deploying technologies to reflect sunlight away from the earth. Experts said these third-party actors could include countries taking drastic action to lower their carbon emissions or hostile nations such as Russia using solar geoengineering to orchestrate an environmental disaster against their enemies. Solar geoengineering, also known as solar radiation modification, seeks to limit global warming by reducing the amount of sunlight that reaches Earth. One of the most researched techniques involves shooting aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space. In the letter, Kerry McCarthy, the climate minister, said: 'The UK is a longstanding leader on climate action and an active international collaborator in scientific research. The Government recognises the need to understand the risks and impacts of [solar radiation modification] approaches that could be deployed by an independent or third-party actor. Robust scientific evidence is essential for informing responsible and inclusive governance.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why nuclear war, not the climate crisis, is humanity's biggest threat, according to one author
Climate breakdown is usually held up as the biggest, most urgent threat humans pose to the future of the planet today. But what if there was another, greater, human-made threat that could snuff out not only human civilisation, but practically the entire biosphere, in the blink of an eye? As you read this, about 4,000 nuclear weapons are poised for a first strike across the northern hemisphere, enough atomic firepower to kill as many as 700 million people from blasts and burning alone. And that is just the start. The explosions and fires – like nothing seen on Earth since the comet strike that led to the Cretaceous mass extinction – would loft enough soot into the stratosphere to cast an impenetrable shadow over the globe. No light means no photosynthesis, the basis of planetary foodwebs. No heat means that the surface of the Earth would plunge into an icy, years-long winter. That is the message of Mark Lynas, a British writer who for two decades has worked to help people understand the science of climate breakdown while pushing for action on carbon emissions. But after three years of research for a new book, published last month, he now sees nuclear war as an even greater threat. 'There's no adaptation options for nuclear war,' Lynas said. 'Nuclear winter will kill virtually the entire human population. And there's nothing you can do to prepare, and there's nothing you can do to adapt when it happens, because it happens over the space of hours. 'It is a vastly more catastrophic, existential risk than climate change.' Lynas got started on his work on nuclear war in 2022, soon after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Like many born into the era of the cold war, he was aware of the concept of nuclear winter – the likely environmental impact of a global thermonuclear exchange. But what emerged from his research was far more horrifying. As the rest of the world gradually forgot about the nuclear threat, researchers began applying the new models of climate science – the same ones used to predict the developing threat of climate breakdown – to understand its dramatic implications. 'The burning of the cities is the mechanism that causes nuclear winter,' Lynas said. 'You get soot that's lofted through pyrocumulonimbus clouds – big, fire-generated thunder clouds – which pump [it], like a chimney, into the stratosphere. 'Once it gets above the tropopause, into the stratosphere, it can't be rained out. And because it's dark coloured, it catches the sun, heats up and gets higher and higher. It gets probably totally dark at the surface for weeks, if not months.' The temperature rapidly drops below freezing. And it stays there, for years. 'There's never another harvest for humanity. The food will never grow again. Because by the time the sun comes back out and temperatures rise again, within a decade or so, everyone's dead.' How likely is this scenario? Surely no one could be so reckless as to start a nuclear war? Actually, says Lynas, they could. After all, the US did use nuclear weapons against civilians in Japan in 1945, and since then there have been numerous moments when the world stood minutes from nuclear war, whether by accident or brinkmanship. Today, both the US and Russia have espoused first-strike doctrines that threaten the use of nuclear weapons even against conventional attacks (China, notably, has a policy of 'no first use'). Meanwhile, nuclear weapons continue to proliferate. The US and Russia hold the biggest arsenals, with about 12,000 between them. China is racing to catch up, with an estimated 500 as of 2024. Also armed are Britain, France, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea, with Iran apparently on the cusp developing its own weapon – a step that onlookers fear it may be more likely to take after last week's attacks by Israel. And the potential for error is also high. If US early warning systems went off, its nuclear doctrine would give Donald Trump six minutes to decide whether it was a glitch (which has happened) or to respond in kind. Russia is said to have a 'dead hand' system that would launch ballistic missiles automatically in the event its own command and control structures were disabled. So what can be done? We could stop ignoring it, for a start. Lynas calls for the revival of an anti-nuclear weapons movement on a scale to match that of the present-day climate movement, although he has criticisms of past such movements. 'On the success side, it had some very dedicated people who devoted their whole lives to this issue, in quite large numbers,' he said. 'But it was also politically very, very left of centre, very kind of hippy, peace movement type thing – women-only spaces. And that kind of stuff, of course, then means that anyone who's politically centrist or right centre isn't involved. 'And if you have a very narrow political base in your movement, you're going to have a very narrow success rate.' Lynas disavows unilateral nuclear disarmament as naive, and maintains – unlike previous anti-nuclear campaigners – that nuclear power is not only not a threat, but possibly a massive benefit to human civilisation, not least because of its potential for producing low-carbon energy. Nevertheless, some of his suggestions are quite radical, including treating everyone in the chain of command in the 'nuclear nine' states, from leaders down, as a potential war criminal, subject to legal restrictions and sanctions in states that choose not to hold nuclear weapons. In spite of all the grim possibilities, Lynas sees hope – and in unusual places. 'Trump gets credit for basically shaking things up in a way which could lead to a more positive outcome,' he said. Much as it took another Republican president, Ronald Reagan, to kickstart the US and Soviet disarmament of the 1980s, so Trump could do what Democrats, eager to prove their strength, could – or would – not. 'And you know, maybe his bromance with [Vladimir] Putin and Kim Jong-un or whatever will bring them to the table.' Six Minutes to Winter was published in May by Bloomsbury.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jeremy Clarkson stunned by Steph McGovern's shock revelation on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
Jeremy Clarkson was left gobsmacked during a celebrity edition of ITV 's Who Wants to Be a Millionaire – all thanks to an unexpected confession from presenter Steph McGovern. The 43-year-old TV host took to the famous hot seat for the show's charity special and stunned Jeremy when she revealed she helped develop a staple of British garden sheds – the humble leaf blower. Before the quizzing even began, Clarkson's Farm star Jeremy couldn't resist digging into Steph's surprising CV – and he was seriously impressed. He said: 'I was looking at your notes, obviously, business and economics you're known for, but you're also a champion Irish dancer and a novelist, and a journalist, and most important of all, an engineer by trade. 'And you developed the leaf blower! Couldn't you have made it electric?' From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the Daily Mail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. The TV host, 43, took to the famous hot seat for the show's charity special and stunned Jeremy when she revealed she helped develop a staple of British garden sheds – the humble leaf blower Steph explained that during her time at Black+Decker over 20 years ago, an electric version wasn't an option at the time. Working on the company's Leaf Hog as part of a Six Sigma team, she helped save the firm £150,000 by improving manufacturing techniques. Jeremy typically joked: 'There's nothing more annoying, am I right, than somebody else's leaf blower?' Before her TV career took off, Steph was a trailblazer in engineering. She won the prestigious Arkwright Engineering Scholarship in 1998 and was crowned Young Engineer for Britain a year later. Her Millionaire appearance, which was a repeat from earlier this year, wasn't just impressive for her backstory, but also saw her raise a huge sum for charity. Steph walked away with a whopping £150,000 for Rubies, a Middlesbrough-based organisation supporting young girls. 'I am happily gonna take the money and am not gonna carry on, if that's okay', she told Jeremy, wisely bowing out before risking a tricky £250,000 question. The charity, which Steph has supported for over five years, helps create 'unforgettable' experiences for girls, including trips to TV studios with Steph herself. He said: 'I was looking at your notes, obviously, business and economics you're known for, but you're also a champion Irish dancer and a novelist, and a journalist, and most important of all, an engineer by trade, and you developed the leaf blower!' But the same couldn't be said for fellow celeb contestant Anton Du Beke, who left viewers cringing after a brutal blunder. The Strictly Come Dancing star was stumped by the question: 'Which Tony Award-winning musical features a mash-up called 'Elephant Love Medley'?' He guessed The Book of Mormon – but the correct answer was Moulin Rouge, leaving him with just £1,000 for his chosen charity, The Sick Children's Trust. Fans were quick to roast the slip-up on social media. One user wrote on X, formerly Twitter: 'The audience are absolute FOOLS and so is Anton Du Beke. Surely this is his wheelhouse??'; 'That mishap means Anton is only taking £1k for his charity… ouch.'
