Alastair Campbell's diary: This UK-EU reset must be just the start
'Despite all the damage Brexit has done, despite all the lies told and the promises broken by the charlatans who led the fight for it, despite all the bullshit fake patriotic coverage in the right wing rags over decades, the broadcasters continue to take their lead from the same people and papers who got us into the mess in the first place. The real surrender has been to their lies and propaganda. We will only properly fix the mess if we admit the scale of it and start to put those who led the campaign for it under the kind of scrutiny and pressure from which the media and mainstream political class has inexplicably spared them.'
I'm pleased that both sides have shared a determination to bring down some of the trade barriers that NASH (National Act of Self-Harm 23/06/16) erected. But while we're thinking big and bold, I think the time may be ripe for a big, bold swallow, and an announcement of a reversal of the winter fuel allowance cuts.
Not for people like me – yes, yes, I know… you can't believe I am a pensioner – because I think people don't object to ending the universal nature of the payment. But of all the things that the Labour government has done, this is the one that has done the most political damage, and it continues to do so. Some U-turns can get you back on the right road.
Cartoon: Boris's comeback trial
A busy week on the podcast interview front… Jacinda Ardern, Ed Miliband, and Arab Barghouthi. I'm guessing you've all recognised the first of those two names – Jacinda the former New Zealand prime minister, who is about to publish her highly emotional autobiography (spoiler alert, I really like it, but I'm biased, because I really like her); and Ed the former Labour minister and former Labour leader who lost an election but stayed around in frontline politics and is now the Cabinet minister charged with stopping the planet burning to death.
The third name, I suspect, may be less familiar to you. Arab Barghouti knows that we interviewed him not because of who he is, but because of who his father is. So why not interview the father instead, you wonder? The answer is that Marwan Barghouthi has been in an Israeli jail for more than 20 years, and just as it's impossible for us to get into Gaza right now, ditto the jail where our interviewee's dad has spent much of his time in solitary confinement.
He too may not be familiar to all of our readers. But in the Middle East Marwan Barghouthi is a household name, to many a hero, and to some – including Israeli politicians more moderate than those driving the current government – the man who could and should be the leader of the Palestinian people.
As the horror and brutality of the Hamas attacks of October 7 unfolded, Rory Stewart and I decided that we should use the Rest Is Politics platform to try to explain the history of the conflict and the political complexities, and seek to be fair and balanced in our approach to all sides. We got plenty of plaudits for that effort, Rory's explainer of the history getting shared and viewed many millions of times, but also lots of flak; supporters of Israel sometimes felt we were apologists for terrorists, supporters of the Palestinians were more likely to suggest we were too soft on the Israeli government.
But what started out as a fight between Israel and Hamas is now a fight by the government of Israel against the Palestinian people. What qualifies as genocide is a question for international law. However, that the far-right extremists in the Israeli government, led by Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, are acting with genocidal intent, can hardly be disputed; that intent is evident pretty much every time they open their mouths.
One reason diplomats and politicians are attracted to the notion of President Marwan Barghouti is his lifelong commitment to a two-state solution which recognises Israel – he is fluent in Hebrew, which he learned in prison, and has built good relations with many Israeli politicians in the past – and his rejection of the taking of civilian life in the fight for the Palestinian cause.
I strongly recommend you listen to Mr Barghouti Junior – the interview is out on our LEADING channel now – not just for the family story, but for his account of what life is really like for Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, and the suffering being deliberately inflicted upon them. I also urge the Israeli government media team to listen too, and understand that sometimes you can get your points across better by speaking softly, clearly and calmly, rather than just hammering pre-prepared talking points, and attacking the questioner when you don't like the question.
Amid the bling, and the bung of a free Boeing 747, and the billion-dollar business deals, there was a lot of substance in Donald Trump's tour of the Gulf. That impression was perhaps reinforced by my new Trump-consumption tactic – I read rather than watch his speeches. The stomach churns a little less when you are not confronted by the whole monstrous picture. Strip away the usual BS and bluster, and his big speech in Riyadh was interesting, well-argued, and with a lot of food for thought.
The historic stand-out moment from the trip, à mon avis, was his meeting with President Ahmed al-Sharaa, and his announcement that sanctions were to be lifted on Syria. Just three months ago (with apologies for another podcast plug, but it is relevant), we interviewed al-Sharaa, and though it was clear getting sanctions lifted was his big goal, he had little expectation that it would happen any time soon. And here we are, it's done, cue dancing in the streets of Damascus.
The same people who have been giving me and Rory Stewart grief for being too hard (sic) on Israel were livid that we travelled to Syria to talk to al-Sharaa. Yet Trump lifts sanctions, praises to the skies a man who not long ago had a 'Most Wanted' multi-million bounty on his head, tells him how strong and handsome he is to boot, and largely pulls it off without opprobrium.
Trump is nothing if not unpredictable, if I may mangle a mouthful of negatives. This particular piece of unpredictability strikes me as a risk worth taking.
I'm not a big fan of awards ceremonies – black tie, usually too long, often cringe acceptance speeches – but I always make an exception for the Sport Industry Awards. I have been a judge, which gave me a great insight into the scope, scale – and impact – of the industry, and all it contributes to the UK.
At this year's awards I presented the Integrity and Impact Award to a wonderful man named Mel Young, a homelessness campaigner. In his acceptance speech, Mel, a soft-spoken Scot, summed up his approach to life by saying that just because you can't do everything, you mustn't do nothing… you do something. His something was founding the Homeless World Cup in 2003, since when more than 100,000 homeless youngsters, across 74 countries and 450 cities, have been given the chance to take part in an international sports tournament. That of itself does not put a roof over their heads. But it gives them a chance, and plenty have seized it.
The Lifetime Achievement Award went to boxing promoter Frank Warren and the Outstanding Contribution Award to cyclist Sarah Storey. She has won 19 Paralympic gold medals, and if she stays fit Los Angeles 2028 will be her TENTH Paralympics. Given the general British hopelessness at learning foreign languages, it was good to hear her explain how she won that last medal in Paris. She was up against a 'young French wonderkid,' and as they chased each other around the track, she could hear her rival's coach bellowing out tactical instructions.
Doubtless the Frenchman assumed that Sarah was just your average Brit who didn't bother with other languages, because English is King. Little did he know!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer refuses to set date for UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence
Keir Starmer has refused to give a date for the UK to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence, saying he would not indulge in 'performative fantasy politics', as he prepared to launch the government's strategic defence review. Speaking at a defence facility in Scotland, the prime minister said his commitment to hit 2.5% of GDP on defence spending from 2027 showed he was serious about the issue, but that he could not go further without fiscal certainty. 'I am not, as the prime minister of Labour government, going to make a commitment as to the precise date until I can be sure precisely where the money is coming from, how we can make good on that commitment, because I don't believe in performative fantasy politics, and certainly not on defence and security,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Pressed again on the date, Starmer said: 'We had a commitment for 2.5% by the end of this parliament. We pulled that right forward to 2027. We showed that when we say there's a new era of the defence and security of our country, is our first priority – as it is – that we meant it. We take the same approach to 3%. 'But I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air until I'm absolutely clear that I can sit here in an interview with you and tell you exactly how that's going to work.' The defence review will say Britain must be ready to fight a war in Europe or the Atlantic, though it is not expected to promise immediate increases in the size of the armed forces to deal with the threat. The 130-page document will call for a move to 'war-fighting readiness' to deter Russian aggression in Europe and increases in stockpiles of arms and support equipment, some of which currently may only last days in a crisis. Asked about this, Starmer said: 'We have to recognise the world has changed, and if the world has changed, we need to be ready. What I would say, by way of reassurance, is if you want to deter conflict, then the best way to do that is to prepare for conflict.' Questioned on whether this could involve, for example, British troops being sent to defend attacks on countries adjoining Russia, Starmer replied: 'I very much hope not. And in order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare. But we cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses. 'We've seen what's happened in Ukraine just over three and a half, three years ago, those tanks rolled across a border, something I think all of us thought we wouldn't really see in our lifetimes – the invasion of a European country. Russia has so shown in recent weeks that it's not serious about peace. We have to be ready.' The review is not expected to contain any additional spending commitments. The defence secretary, John Healey, acknowledged on Sunday that any plans to increase the size of the British army, at its smallest for 300 years, would have to wait until after the next election. Speaking to the BBC, Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our armed forces' as he acknowledged that the size of the army had fallen to 70,860, below the government's target of 73,000.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Calls for changes at supermarkets to combat 'shrinkflation'
The Liberal Democrats want government legislation amended to legally require large supermarkets to inform shoppers when the quantity of goods within a pre-packaged product has decreased thereby increasing the price per unit of measurement. Details of the changes would need to be attached or placed alongside the product for a 60-day period, according to the amendment tabled to the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill. Digestive biscuits, butter, crisps and chocolate bars were among the items found to have decreased in size while their unit cost increased, according to 2024 research by Compare the Market. MPs could be asked to vote on the Lib Dem proposal on Wednesday when the Bill returns to the Commons for its report stage. The Bill as a whole gives powers to ministers to regulate the marketing and use of goods in the UK after Brexit. It was previously amended in the House of Lords to provide protections to the imperial pint measure to ease fears over its future. The changes accepted by the Government would bar ministers from preventing or restricting the use of the pint in relation to draught beer, cider or milk in returnable containers. It also provides a definition of a pint as 0.56826125 cubic decimetres. Lib Dem trade spokesman Clive Jones said: 'The scourge of shrinkflation needs to be exposed. 'Shoppers have been hammered during a cost-of-living crisis all while massive companies and big supermarket chains are forcing them to pay more for less to protect their bottom lines. 'They need to be called out on it and for shoppers to know when they are at risk of being ripped off. 'The Government should accept this Liberal Democrat amendment so that we can help protect shoppers and their already stretched household budgets from another round of shrinkflation.' A Department for Business and Trade spokesman said: 'We're committed to protecting consumers from unfair commercial practices and making sure they have all the information they need to make informed decisions on purchases. 'That's why we're bringing in strict new laws next year to make sure businesses use clearer labelling for prices on supermarket shelves, and retailers show all unit prices in either kilograms or litres to improve clarity for shoppers.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
New WASPI online map shows position of every MP on State Pension age change compensation
New research from the WASPI campaign finds 134 MPs who previously backed compensation, no longer do so. A new interactive tool launched by the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign shows the UK-wide state of play of MP support for a compensation scheme for millions of women affected by changes to their retirement age. The new analysis shows 179 MPs have publicly blasted the UK Government's decision not to compensate WASPI women in recent months. WASPI said that of these, 56 Labour MPs have openly criticised Downing Street's failure to deliver justice, while dozens more are thought to be supportive behind the scenes, including several senior ministers. The map shows how smaller parties are almost unanimous in their support, with a strong coalition of Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru and DUP MPs backing calls to compensate WASPI women. The smaller parties are almost unanimous in their support, with a strong coalition of Liberal Democrat, Reform UK, SNP, Green, Plaid Cymru and DUP MPs backing calls to compensate WASPI women. Around a dozen Conservative MPs have also recently reaffirmed their support for compensation. The findings come at the launch of WASPI's new website, which has new resources to enable supporters to write to their MP and join the campaign for as little as £15 per year. Some of the strongest advocates for WASPI women include members of the State Pension Inequality for Women APPG, chaired by Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey. The cross-party group of MPs is one of the largest in Parliament and includes representatives from across the major political parties who have vowed to continue the fight for justice. However, WASPI campaigners say 134 MPs previously backed calls for compensation but have failed to reaffirm their support since the Labour Government's announcement in December. The figures do not include serving government ministers or whips, at least 80 of whom have previously pledged their support for the campaign. Angela Madden, Chair of Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI), said: 'The Government's refusal to compensate WASPI women, despite admitting wrongdoing, is a national scandal. 'We know hundreds of principled MPs are still resolute in their support for those affected and firmly disagree with the decision taken by the Labour leadership. 'While some appear to have given up on us, abandoning the vulnerable women they once promised to fight for, it is clear that a majority of MPs know deep down that compensating WASPI women is the right thing to do.' With a High Court challenge into the UK Government's decision under consideration and a key vote on proposed disability benefit cuts due this month, it is thought more Labour MPs could soon speak out. In December, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall stunned MPs when she apologised for the failures made by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), but stopped short of announcing plans for a compensation scheme. Campaigners say the failure of the Labour and Conservative leadership to back WASPI compensation has boosted support for the Liberal Democrats and Reform UK, as well as the Greens in urban areas, south of the border. It is thought both Plaid Cymru and the SNP could benefit from their strong support for WASPI women at next year's elections in Cardiff and Holyrood. All MPs' positions on compensation can be found on WASPI's interactive 'state of the nation' map, alongside new campaign resources, here.
