Legislative resolution seeks the dismissal of Oklahoma mental health commissioner
On the final evening of the 2025 session of the Oklahoma Legislature, two lawmakers have filed a resolution to remove the embattled commissioner of the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 13 was filed by Sen. Paul Rosino, R-Oklahoma City, and Rep. Josh West, R-Tulsa. Copies of the resolution were distributed in the Senate chamber about 7 p.m. on Thursday, Feb. 29. By law, the Legislature must adjourn its current session by 5 p.m. Friday.
Both chambers remained active Thursday night considering overrides of vetoes issued by Gov. Kevin Stitt. By 8:45 p.m., neither chamber had acted on the resolution to remove Friesen.
Stitt appointed Friesen in January 2024 and has defended her work, even as multiple financial issues have engulfed the state agency. The agency is the subject of multiple investigations, both executive and legislative. Legislators had to make a special appropriation for the agency to complete the current fiscal year. According to the resolution, the budget shortfall is about $30 million.
An audit conducted by State Auditor and Inspector Cindy Byrd's office reported that department staff were made to sign non-disclosure agreements and were discouraged from cooperating with investigators who were trying to unravel the cause of the agency's financial crisis.
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond has called for Friesen to be removed, citing a 'financial meltdown' of her agency that showed 'nothing short of government malpractice.'
'The House and Senate have the legal authority to hold Friesen accountable for her ineptitude and mismanagement, and I urge every legislator to vote in favor of her removal,' Drummond said Thursday night.
Stitt said the controversy surrounding Friesen is "a politically motivated witch hunt.""I tasked Allie Friesen with bringing accountability and transparency to the agency," Stitt said. "She disturbed the status quo and questioned long held practices at the agency. An agency rife with sweetheart deals and criminal elements was disrupted, and now, elected officials are quickly working to set the apple cart right for those who seek to get rich off of Oklahoma taxpayers."
He said West and Rosino should ask themselves what they stand to gain by removing Frisen.
The resolution said Friesen 'has the duty to oversee the delivery of all prevention, treatment, and education of mental health and substance abuse in the state and to ensure that the agency performs those services while having a budgetary and expenditure methodology that serves not only those Oklahoma citizens in need, but the employees and providers that deliver them.'
It goes on to cite the budget shortfall and said, '(T)he Senate and the House of Representatives have lost confidence in Commissioner Friesen to identify, oversee, and manage the critical services delivered by the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.'
The resolution says the Legislature has a right, under law, to remove Friesen with a two-thirds vote of both legislative chambers.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Resolution calls for removal of mental health agency leader
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump pushes for Jack Ciattarelli, saying New Jersey 'ready to pop out of blue horror show'
The Brief Trump implored voters in New Jersey's primary for governor to vote for Republican Jack Ciattarelli. "New Jersey is ready to pop out of that blue horror show," the president said. The president announced his endorsement of Ciattarelli last month. NEW JERSEY - President Donald Trump on Monday implored voters in New Jersey's primary for governor to support Republican Jack Ciattarelli when early in-person voting begins Tuesday and said the state was ready for a change after years of Democratic control. What they're saying The president, who has golf clubs around the state and frequently stays at his Bedminster property, announced his endorsement for Ciattarelli last month. On Monday, Trump held a telephone rally for the candidate, a former state lawmaker who transformed from a critic to vocal backer of the president. The phone call lasted about 10 minutes, with the president saying that voters will decide whether New Jersey remains a "high-tax, high-crime sanctuary state." "New Jersey is ready to pop out of that blue horror show and really get in there and vote for somebody that's going to make things happen," the president said. Dig deeper Trump's call for early voting echoed the pitch he made to voters in the 2024 presidential election. Ciattarelli said his first executive order if elected would be to end any sanctuary policies for immigrants in the country illegally. Currently, the state attorney general has directed local law enforcement not to assist federal agents in civil immigration matters. There is no legal definition for sanctuary city policies, but they generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Ciattarelli also said the attorney general he appoints if he wins won't be bringing lawsuits against the White House. New Jersey's current attorney general has pursued several high-profile challenges to the president's agenda, including a case challenging Trump's order calling for the end of birthright citizenship. Ciattarelli is running against former radio talk host Bill Spadea, state Sen. Jon Bramnick, former Englewood Cliffs Mayor Mario Kranjac and a southern New Jersey contractor named Justin Barbera. What's next Early in-person voting begins Tuesday and goes through Sunday. Primary day is June 10, though voters have been sending mail-in ballots in since late April. Though the primary isn't over, Ciattarelli hinted at what attacks against his eventual Democratic challenger in the general election might be, saying the party's eight years in the governorship and more than two decades of power in the legislature have been a failure. The Democratic field isn't set. There's a six-way contest between Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Mikie Sherrill; Mayors Ras Baraka of Newark and Steven Fulop of Jersey City; former state Senate President Steve Sweeney; and teacher's union president Sean Spiller. New Jersey tilts Democratic in presidential and Senate elections in particular, and the party has a roughly 800,000 voter registration advantage over Republicans. But independents make up a significant bloc as well, and voters have tended to alternate between Democratic and Republican administrations for governor. The Source Information from this article was provided by the Associated Press.
Hamilton Spectator
43 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans have made it a priority this year to require people to prove citizenship before they can register to vote. Turning that aspiration into reality has proved difficult. Trump's executive order directing a documentary, proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal elections has been blocked by a judge, while federal legislation to accomplish it doesn't appear to have the votes to pass in the Senate. At the same time, state-level efforts have found little success, even in places where Republicans control the legislature and governor's office. The most recent state effort to falter is in Texas, where a Senate bill failed to gain full legislative approval before lawmakers adjourned on Monday. The Texas bill was one of the nation's most sweeping proof-of-citizenship proposals because it would have applied not only to new registrants but also to the state's roughly 18.6 million registered voters. 'The bill authors failed spectacularly to explain how this bill would be implemented and how it would be able to be implemented without inconveniencing a ton of voters,' said Anthony Gutierrez, director of the voting rights group Common Cause Texas. Voting by noncitizens is already illegal and punishable as a felony, potentially leading to deportation, but Trump and his allies have pressed for a proof-of-citizenship mandate by arguing it would improve public confidence in elections. Before his win last year, Trump falsely claimed noncitizens might vote in large enough numbers to sway the outcome . Although noncitizen voting does occur, research and reviews of state cases has shown it to be rare and more often a mistake. Voting rights groups say the various proposals seeking to require proof-of-citizenship are overly burdensome and threaten to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Many do not have easy access to their birth certificates, have not gotten a U.S. passport or have a name that no longer matches the one on their birth certificate — such as women who changed their last name when they married. The number of states considering bills related to proof of citizenship for voting tripled from 2023 to this year, said Liz Avore, senior policy adviser with the Voting Rights Lab, an advocacy group that tracks election legislation in the states. That hasn't resulted in many new laws, at least so far. Republicans in Wyoming passed their own proof-of-citizenship legislation, but similar measures have stalled or failed in multiple GOP-led states, including Florida, Missouri, Texas and Utah. A proposal remains active in Ohio, although Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, has said he doesn't want to sign any more bills that make it harder to vote. In Texas, the legislation swiftly passed the state Senate after it was introduced in March but never made it to a floor vote in the House. It was unclear why legislation that was such a priority for Senate Republicans – every one of them co-authored the bill — ended up faltering. 'I just think people realized, as flawed as this playbook has been in other states, Texas didn't need to make this mistake,' said Rep. John Bucy, a Democrat who serves as vice chair of the House elections committee. Bucy pointed to specific concerns about married women who changed their last name. This surfaced in local elections earlier this year in New Hampshire , which passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement last year. Other states that previously sought to add such a requirement have faced lawsuits and complications when trying to implement it. In Arizona, a state audit found that problems with the way data was handled had affected the tracking and verification of residents' citizenship status. It came after officials had identified some 200,000 voters who were thought to have provided proof of their citizenship but had not. A proof-of-citizenship requirement was in effect for three years in Kansas before it was overturned by federal courts. The state's own expert estimated that almost all of the roughly 30,000 people who were prevented from registering to vote while it was in effect were U.S. citizens who otherwise had been eligible. In Missouri, legislation seeking to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement cleared a Senate committee but never came to a vote in the Republican-led chamber. Republican state Sen. Ben Brown had promoted the legislation as a follow-up to a constitutional amendment stating that only U.S. citizens can vote, which Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved last November. He said there were several factors that led to the bill not advancing this year. Due to the session's limited schedule, he chose to prioritize another elections bill banning foreign contributions in state ballot measure campaigns. 'Our legislative session ending mid-May means a lot of things die at the finish line because you simply run out of time,' Brown said, noting he also took time to research concerns raised by local election officials and plans to reintroduce the proof-of-citizenship bill next year. The Republican-controlled Legislature in Utah also prioritized other election changes, adding voter ID requirements and requiring people to opt in to receive their ballots in the mail. Before Gov. Spencer Cox signed the bill into law, Utah was the only Republican-controlled state that allowed all elections to be conducted by mail without a need to opt in. Under the Florida bill that has failed to advance, voter registration applications wouldn't be considered valid until state officials had verified citizenship, either by confirming a previous voting history, checking the applicant's status in state and federal databases, or verifying documents they provided. The bill would have required voters to prove their citizenship even when updating their registration to change their address or party affiliation. Its sponsor, Republican state Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, said it was meant to follow through on Trump's executive order: 'This bill fully answers the president's call,' she said. ___ Cassidy reported from Atlanta. Associated Press writers Mead Gruver in Cheyenne, Wyoming; David A. Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; and Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Rand Paul dismisses GOP budget bill's spending cuts as 'wimpy and anemic'
WEST DES MOINES, Iowa - A decade ago, U.S. GOP Sen. Rand Paul recalled strolling into a downtown Des Moines Halloween party wearing a red turtle neck with words that gave him a scare: "$18 trillion." Paul, Kentucky's junior senator, was dressed as the national debt for a 2015 costume party at Buzzard Billy's to engage with young voters ahead of the 2016 Republican Iowa caucuses. "That was 10 years ago," he told a crowd Wednesday, May 28, at The Hall in West Des Moines hosted by the Dallas County Republicans. "It's doubled, $36 trillion and counting. It's rolling so fast we've got to have the clock updated continuously. I've got a debt clock in my office, but it's crazy.' More: Trump's tax policy bill clears the House. Next up: An opinionated Senate Paul continues to harp on the national debt as the "greatest threat to our national security" after House Republicans advanced a sprawling budget bill that he believes doesn't go far enough to rein in federal spending. The fiscal hawk is among several GOP senators who say they won't vote for the domestic policy package backed by President Donald Trump, dubbed the "one big, beautiful bill." It would extend the 2017 tax cuts Trump signed into law during his first term, impose immigration restrictions and slash an estimated $625 billion from the Medicaid public insurance program. More: Congress passes budget bill with deep cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. What that means for Iowa It also makes steep cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps, that would tally up to $300 billion over the next 10 years. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects the legislation would add $3.1 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Democrats have sharply criticized the measure as hitting the poorest Americans who rely on public assistance the hardest. House Speaker Mike Johnson has made the rounds on cable news to urge passage of the bill with few changes after it narrowly passed the chamber, but that seems unlikely as several GOP senators have declared their intent to make some tweaks. Trump has urged the majority-Republican Senate to bring the measure to a vote by July 4. 'Even though I do like a lot of the things that Donald Trump is doing, someone's still gotta be watching the Treasury, watching the money," Paul said. Paul favors making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, but he said deeper spending cuts would be necessary. "I think the spending cuts are wimpy and anemic," Paul said. "So, some of that's because the president keeps saying, 'We can't do anything to Medicaid.' If we can't do anything to Medicaid, we're not doing anything to Medicare, we're not doing anything to Social Security, that's what a large chunk of all our federal spending is." And while Paul said he would approve cuts proposed by the federal Department of Government Efficiency effort to curb spending, he believes the savings found there so far are insufficient. DOGE's charge to reduce the federal bureaucracy, led by billionaire Elon Musk until he stepped down late May 28 after Paul's visit, initially set out to slash $2 trillion. DOGE has reported coming up with closer to $160 billion in cuts. "The thing is is that we still have to look at entitlements," Paul said, referring to programs such as Medicaid and Social Security that are mandatory and make up more than half of federal spending. The budget bill House Republicans moved forward would shift a significant share of SNAP and Medicaid costs to the states. After President Obama's Affordable Care Act passed in 2010, most states expanded Medicaid as the federal government initially covered all expansion enrollees who were newly eligible for Medicaid. The federal government's share later dropped to 90% of expansion costs. To make a true dent in the national debt, Paul said he wants to see the federal portion of Medicaid costs further reduced to an even split with states. "It helps us balance our budget," Paul said. "You say, 'Well, what's the difference? Now the states have to pay.' States then have to decide to tax you, and they have decided to have (Medicaid) work requirements" and limit who gets SNAP benefits. Republican state lawmakers on May 14 sent Gov. Kim Reynolds a bill that would require thousands of Medicaid recipients to fulfill work requirements or lose their health care coverage. The Republican governor has already submitted a request to the federal government for permission to institute work requirements for about 171,000 people enrolled in the Iowa Health and Wellness Plan, the state's Medicaid expansion program. And U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins approved Reynolds' waiver request to limit Iowans' use of SNAP dollars to buy foods that are exempt from sales tax in Iowa. "We need people in your state Legislature who're brave enough to take it on and just say we can do it," Paul said. "And I think then you have to explain it to people. If everybody in Iowa were told the state Legislature were cutting people on Medicaid, you may lose, so what you have to do is you're going to tell them, 'We'll get you something better.'" Marissa Payne covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. Reach her by email at mjpayne@ Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @marissajpayne. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Sen. Rand Paul slams Trump-backed GOP spending cuts: 'wimpy and anemic'
