
Families of Chinook crash victims demand full release of sealed files
All 25 passengers – made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army – were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members.
The incident remains one of the RAF's worst peacetime losses of life.
Nearly 31 years on from the crash, many of the bereaved families have written an open letter to the Government renewing calls for a public inquiry into the incident.
They have also called for the full release of documents that have been locked away until 2094 by the Ministry of Defence (MoD), something revealed in a BBC documentary last year.
Read More
NEIL MACKAY'S BIG READ: Could new mobile phone link finally solve mystery of the Chinook tragedy?
Letters: Why are they running scared of a full investigation into the Chinook tragedy?
Andy Tobias, who was eight when his father Lt Col John Tobias, 41, was killed, said the 'secrecy' raises questions about what really happened.
'I lost my father, and part of my childhood, because he was put on board a helicopter that had been deemed unairworthy and should never have taken off,' he said, speaking publicly about the incident for the first time.
'In my view, it's nothing short of corporate manslaughter.
'I have tried for many years to put this crash, and my family's unnecessary loss, behind me – but learning that the MoD has sealed away the archive until after all of us will be long gone seriously raises my concerns about what really happened and who knew what.
'Why the secrecy? Why did my father and 28 others die? We want answers.'
Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK Government 17 years later, following a campaign by the families.
A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash.
Esme Sparks, who was just seven when her father Major Gary Sparks lost his life, said it had been a 'shock' to learn about the existence of the documents.
'Why on earth would they be sealed for so long if there was not something being hidden? Who or what is being protected?,' she said, also speaking publicly for the first time.
'My whole family wants answers and action because my daddy was denied his right to life – put in danger by the MoD on an aircraft deemed not airworthy.
'We are furious that the Government and the MoD is refusing to listen or to meet us.
'Our request for a meeting with the defence minister was summarily dismissed with platitudes. What happened to their duty of candour promises?'
The open letter states the Chinook Justice Campaign – which includes most of the bereaved families – formally requested a public inquiry on October 9 2024, but that this was rejected by the minister for veterans and people Alistair Carns on December 17.
It adds that the minister has not yet responded to a subsequent request for a meeting.
The letter also describes the 'huge concern and upset' the sealed documents have caused to the bereaved families.
'The papers will not be released until 2094, long after the spouses and children of those killed have themselves passed away,' it states.
'It is unbearable to us as bereaved families to know that this sealed information could give us the answers we need.'
The letter adds: 'Wives, children, and families left behind deserve answers about why our loved ones never came home.
'They would never have boarded the helicopter had they known it was not airworthy.
'They would have had long, full lives and would have lived to see their children and grandchildren grow up.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Evening Standard
6 hours ago
- Evening Standard
‘We don't want to go back to court', says women's group over gender ruling delay
Speaking to journalists after the event, she said: 'We have spoken to the Scottish Government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action.


The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
For Women Scotland threaten SNP with fresh legal action
The judgment clarified that the terms 'man' and 'woman' in the legislation refer to biological sex, not acquired gender. While First Minister John Swinney welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the judgment, the Scottish Government has said it is waiting for guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). READ MORE Aitken: Glasgow 'disempowered' by Spending Review as English regions gain more powers Bowie: Time for Tories to stop 'self-flagellating' over Truss and Johnson chaos 'Farcical:' Ross criticised for chairing Holyrood committee meeting from Caribbean The watchdog is due to publish an updated statutory Code of Practice — effectively an authoritative instruction manual on applying the Equality Act — later this year. Speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference, For Women Scotland's Marion Calder said people needed to challenge organisations failing to implement the law. 'We are possibly going to have to go back to court in order to get some of the government policies — especially policies in prison — changed. There are still at least four male murderers in the women's prison estate in Scotland, and that is a shocking fact. 'But we have [the Supreme Court judgment] now, and this is a fantastic basis to go forward.' Speaking to journalists later, she said: 'We have spoken to the Scottish Government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance — just even say it is under review. They do not have to reissue anything at this point, but because it is clearly unlawful, we really do need some action. 'They are telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance. We do not believe this is true.' She pointed to comments from the EHRC stating that the judgment is effective immediately, and that those with duties under the Equality Act 2010 should already be complying with the law. Ms Calder said: 'And of course, the risk to the Scottish Government if they do not act is that, if a woman is assaulted in prison next week by one of these male convicts, their liability will have skyrocketed. 'In any case, the Scottish Government tells us that the Scottish Prison Service sets its own policy — that it is an arm's-length organisation — but any case would be taken against the Scottish ministers. 'So I think they need to start to step up and take a bit of responsibility, because these things are under their remit.' Ms Calder said she believed ministers were reluctant to act as they were 'worried about a legal challenge from the other side'. 'But my message to them would be — they should be more worried about a legal challenge from the people who have the law on their side,' she added. The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.


Powys County Times
7 hours ago
- Powys County Times
More than 900 people arrived in small boats on Friday
More than 900 people crossed the Channel in small boats on Friday, according to Government figures. Data from the Home Office indicated 919 people made the journey in 14 boats on June 13, taking the provisional annual total to 16,183. This is 42% higher than the same point last year and 79% up on the same date in 2023, according to PA news agency analysis. It is not the highest daily number so far this year, which came on May 31, when 1,195 people arrived. People thought to be migrants were pictured being brought into Dover on an RNLI lifeboat on Friday, while others were brought ashore by the Border Force. Rachel Reeves announced earlier this week that the Government will end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this parliament. Unveiling her spending review on Wednesday, the Chancellor set out how funding will be provided to cut the asylum backlog. She told MPs: 'I can confirm today that led by the work of the Home Secretary, we will be ending the costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this parliament. 'Funding that I have provided today, including from the transformation fund, will cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here, saving the taxpayer £1 billion a year.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security. 'The people-smuggling gangs do not care if the vulnerable people they exploit live or die as long as they pay, and we will stop at nothing to dismantle their business models and bring them to justice. 'That is why this Government has put together a serious plan to take down these networks at every stage, and why we are investing up to an additional £280 million per year by 2028-29 in the Border Security Command. 'Through international intelligence-sharing under our Border Security Command, enhanced enforcement operations in northern France and tougher legislation in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, we are strengthening international partnerships and boosting our ability to identify, disrupt and dismantle criminal gangs whilst strengthening the security of our borders.'