Worst Umpire Ever: Fans Cant Keep Clam As Third Umpire Decisions In WI vs AUS 1st Test Sparks Controversy
The opening Test between West Indies and Australia at Kensington Oval has turned into a battleground not just between bat and ball, but between players and perplexing officiating. Day 2 saw a cascade of controversial decisions from third umpire Adrian Holdstock, igniting outrage among fans, experts, and players alike — with some calling it a new low for umpiring in the DRS era.
Adrian holdstock probably the worst umpire of this generation... Roston Chase was given out despite a clear deviation. What a shame! @ICC please take some action about this. #WIvsAUS pic.twitter.com/5ORQlWe7WO — Not Roudra (@Roy755384) June 26, 2025
Also Read: Inside Sara Tendulkar's Stylish London Getaway: Aesthetic Vibes & Travel Goals
While the match remains evenly poised — Australia at 92/4 in their second innings, leading by 82 — the real narrative has been dominated by umpiring blunders that could well swing the series.
The first major flashpoint came when West Indies captain Roston Chase, batting on a composed 44, was given out LBW to Pat Cummins. Chase reviewed immediately. UltraEdge showed what many interpreted as a clear spike before the ball hit the pads, suggesting bat contact. However, Holdstock ignored the spike, upholding the on-field decision. The cricketing world erupted.
Veteran commentator and former West Indies pacer Ian Bishop didn't mince words on air:
'I disagree with the decision. I thought he hit that. Chase is in total bewilderment. In my view, that clearly should not have been out.'
Fans flooded social media platforms, branding Holdstock as the 'worst umpire of this generation.' The phrase trended worldwide as anger over the technology's misuse grew louder.
Shai Hope's Dismissal Adds Fuel to the Fire
Just overs later, the controversy doubled. Shai Hope, a pillar in the West Indies batting lineup, was on 48 when he edged behind to Alex Carey. While initially appearing a sharp take, slow-motion replays strongly suggested the ball touched the turf as Carey completed the catch.
Yet again, Holdstock adjudged it a clean catch. Hope, visibly disappointed, walked back, and another potentially match-defining moment tilted away from the hosts.
Social media lit up:
'Absolutely horrendous umpiring… Not a clean catch, full stop,' one user posted.
'West Indies, walk off the field. This is a disgrace,' said another, voicing what many fans were beginning to think.
Flashback to Day 1: Travis Head Escape Raises Eyebrows
The seeds of controversy were sown as early as Day 1, when Travis Head survived a close call off Shamar Joseph. Replays seemed to show a clean edge carried to the wicketkeeper, but Holdstock ruled there was insufficient evidence to overturn the not-out decision. Head now finds himself in the middle once again, alongside Beau Webster, trying to rebuild Australia's innings.
Umpiring Under the Microscope: ICC Must Act
The consistency and integrity of the Decision Review System have once again been thrust into the spotlight. These are not mere judgment errors; they're pivotal moments influencing the course of the game and potentially the series. For a side like West Indies, rebuilding its red-ball identity, such calls can be crushing.
Experts and former players have called on the International Cricket Council (ICC) to take a hard look at the use — and abuse — of technology. When the tools at hand are misread or mishandled, the game's spirit suffers. Fans deserve better. Teams deserve fairness. The sport deserves clarity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
10 minutes ago
- News18
Major Concussion Mandate Comes Into Being As ICC Releases Fresh Set Of Riles
Last Updated: ICC has introduced new concussion rules requiring a seven-day stand-down for concussed players, starting with the World Test Championship 2025-27 cycle. In what has come as a major addition to the International Cricket Council's concussion rules, a concussed player will now have to keep away from the game for seven days before returning to the fold, as recommended by the cricket body's medical advisory committee. In the context of concussion protocols, the ICC stated that there are two changes. The implementation of these rules has begun with the first Test of the World Test Championship 2025-27 cycle. The sides will now have to nominate designated concussion replacements for every game, which is being brought in to curb the home team's advantage of being able to select from a larger group of cricketers. The ICC announced a minimum seven-day stand-down period for any cricketer diagnosed with a concussion. 'A player diagnosed with a concussion during a match must observe a minimum stand-down period of a minimum of seven days before returning to play. The ICC Medical Advisory Committee has recommended this change to support players' safety and well-being," ICC said. New wide-ball rule in limited-overs cricket The upcoming limited-overs series between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka will mark the start dates for the new playing conditions for ODIs and T20Is. The series consists of three ODIs and as many T20Is, starting July 2. The ICC said that two new rules will be trialled by full members for six months beginning in October. It includes a new wide-ball rule for ODIs and T20Is. 'The position of the batter's legs at the point of delivery will now be used as the reference point for a wide, even if the batter subsequently moves across to the off side," the ICC said. 'The trial will see a ball that passes the popping crease between the leg stump and the protected area marker not being called a wide. To help with this, the protected area marker line will be extended to the popping crease and act as a guide for the umpires," the statement added. New rule for Ranji Trophy Another rule to be tested is for domestic first-class cricket, in which sides can now name replacements for a cricketer who suffers a serious injury after being picked in the XI. First Published:
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
West Indies fast bowler Jayden Seales fined and handed over one demerit point for celebrations of Pat Cummins' wicket
West Indian fast bowler Jayden Seales has been fined 15 per cent and has been given one demerit point for his celebration after picking the wicket of Pat Cummins in the 55th over on Day one. 'Using language, actions or gestures which disparage or which could provoke an aggressive reaction from a batter upon his/her dismissal during an International Match,' ICC quoted. Seales breached the code of conduct 2.5. 'Pat hit a couple of good shots off me and I just showed him where the dressing room was and there wasn't really anything in it,' Seales said after Day's play. Australia carved out an 82-run lead over West Indies on day two of the first test in Barbados on Thursday, with the hosts frustrated by several close umpiring calls that went against them. Australia, who were 92 for four at stumps in their second innings, continued their top-order struggles for a second consecutive day on a zippy Kensington Oval pitch that offered plenty for the pacers. West Indies resumed on 57 for four, trailing the tourists by 123 runs after bowling Australia out for 180 in their first innings. Two contentious umpiring calls helped Australia's bowling attack claw back control of the contest, dismissing the hosts for 190. What began as West Indies' day threatened to unravel after lunch, when captain Roston Chase was given out lbw to Pat Cummins for 44, despite his protestations that he had inside-edged the ball onto his pads. The Ultraedge technology offered no definitive evidence either way, sending an exasperated Chase back to the pavilion after his watchful 108-ball innings. The morning session belonged decisively to the home side as Chase and white-ball skipper Shai Hope, returning to test cricket after a four-year absence, navigated the Australian attack with increasing assurance in their 67-run sixth-wicket partnership. Controversy struck again when Hope, cruising towards a half-century on 48, edged Beau Webster into Alex Carey's diving gloves. Replays suggested the ball may have grazed the turf as the wicketkeeper completed a spectacular one-handed catch, but third umpire Adrian Holdstock ruled in Australia's favour. (With agency inputs)
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Jasprit Bumrah wanted to elope with Sanjana Ganesan before marriage? India pacer's wife spills beans
Would you believe that Jasprit Bumrah once wanted to elope with Sanjana Ganesan for marriage? Four years after their marriage, Ganesan, a sports presenter by profession, has spilled the beans on a YouTube chat show hosted by former India cricketer Harbhajan Singh and his wife Geeta Basra. While the full video is yet to be released, the trailer has already set the internet ablaze with Ganesan recounting the hilarious conversation with Bumrah. "Tum run-up per bhi nahi bhagte ho. Tum mere sath kya bhagoge?" (You don't even run during your run-up. So how will you run with me?)," told Ganesan in reponse to Bumrah's suggestion to elope with him before their marriage. After their relationship under wraps, Bumrah and Ganesan tied the knot at a private ceremony in Goa in 2021. It was an intimate wedding with only close friends and family members in attendance. Bumrah's India teammates couldn't attend the event as they were in a bio-bubble during the then T20I series against England in Ahmedabad. The couple also has a son named Angad, who was born in September 2023. Post their marriage, Ganesan had interviews Bumrah several times during the ICC events and bilateral series. Meanwhile, both Bumrah and Ganesan are currently in England due to their respective works. While Bumrah is a part of the Indian team for the ongoing Test series against England, Ganesan is a part of the broadcast team in the same series.
