
Patients facing 16-year wait for autism tests as MPs say waiting times must fall
A woman awaiting an autism assessment was given a waiting time of at least 16 years, MPs were told, as they said extra money for the NHS must lead to improvements in care and waiting times.
There were also calls from the Labour benches to ensure the Casey Commission into social care did not fundamentally delay a permanent solution for care as the Commons debated health spending on Wednesday.
The Department for Health and Social Care got a £25.6 billion increase in funding in last year's autumn budget, Labour's first since it came into Government.
This takes the overall budget to £201.9 billion according to a House of Commons report.
Chairwoman of the Health and Social Care select committee Layla Moran said the public will be unhappy if the long-awaited funding increase did not lead to better standards, and quicker waiting times.
The Liberal Democrat MP said a 34-year-old constituent was told she could have to wait until her 50s to be assessed for autism.
The Oxford West and Abingdon MP said: 'Now the Government has announced an incredibly welcome £22.6 billion increase in the Health and Social Care day-to-day spend, and that's in addition to the further £3 billion in capital expenditure.
'And it sounds like, and it is, a huge amount of money, and if it's not spent wisely the only thing that will be bigger than the uplift itself is the disappointment of our constituents if it doesn't lead to the change that they so desperately want and need.
'A constituent of mine was referred to her GP for an NHS-funded assessment for autism spectrum disorder. She took tests which all exceeded the threshold, and then she was told that she had to be on a waiting list with an expected wait of 16 to 18 years. Yes, years.
'She's now 34 with young children and waiting for an appointment until she's 51. It's clearly ridiculous.'
Health and Social Care committee member Gregory Stafford agreed on the need for the funding to be matched by improvements.
The Conservative MP for Farnham and Bordon said: 'The Government is pouring billions into the NHS, but without demanding productivity reforms the money is being absorbed by the system instead of reaching the frontline where it is needed the most.'
The Estimates Day debate heard concerns about health coverage being adequate to match growing housing need and a shortage of dental provision.
Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan (Poole) raised fears that the independent commission on adult social care reform, led by Baroness Louise Casey, will mean a long-term solution for the issue would be further delayed.
He said a national care service should be formed, and bring together medical, nursing, personal and social care – with free domiciliary and residential care provided to those who are already self-funding.
Mr Duncan-Jordan said: 'There is widespread acceptance that our current social care system is neither sustainable nor fit for purpose.
'For far too long it's been the Cinderella service of the welfare state, overlooked and underfunded and suffering from a number of inherent problems that started to emerge decades ago but which have now become critical as a result of severe cuts to funding and increasing demand.'
He added: 'I'm afraid the new Casey Commission will only delay that debate further in my view.
'Now we have known about the problems for a very long time. Over the last two decades we have had at least 20 commissions, inquiries and reports analysing what is wrong with the system and what might be done to address the problems.
'However successive governments have found the issue too difficult to tackle and have instead favoured short-term answers which have largely left the system untouched.'
Labour MP Clive Betts said at home chemotherapy should be offered on the NHS as he argued it is 'cheaper and it benefits the patients'.
In the Commons, Mr Betts, who is currently being treated for myeloma, said arranging sessions for chemotherapy can be difficult particularly for those travelling 'many, many miles' for appointments at specialist hospitals.
The Sheffield South East MP said one of his consultants has 'developed an idea for at home chemotherapy, it works, it's good'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
QMU launches support site for autistic students
A new online resource designed to help autistic students thrive in higher education has launched at Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... QMU's Autism&Uni Toolkit offers guidance and practical tools to support autistic students before, during, and after their transition into university life, helping to break down barriers and promote confidence, independence, and academic success. The resource is also relevant for other neurodivergent students regardless of whether they have a formal diagnosis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Developed as part of the European-funded Autism&Uni initiative which aims to improve educational opportunities for autistic people across Europe, QMU is one of the first universities in Scotland to officially launch the toolkit as part of its widening access ambitions. Disability Services at QMU QMU's new site will include: Testimonials from autistic students sharing their experiences; Insights from university staff, including autistic staff members; Campus information including visual guides to help students familiarise themselves with the building layout; Approaches to help handle stress and maintain wellbeing; Guidance on academic expectations and resources, and strategies for adapting to new routines and environments; An outline of QMU's policies that allow for adjustments to accommodate diverse learning needs, such as offering online teaching alternatives. Leading the development of QMU's Autism&Uni Toolkit is a small team representing people across the university. One team member, Dr Donald Maciver is a lecturer in occupational therapy at QMU and is passionate about this project and strongly believes in the neurodiversity paradigm. He said: "Too often, the university experience can be less positive for autistic students, due to the sensory environment, social expectations, and a lack of tailored support. The Autism&Uni Toolkit is one way of changing that. We hope it will increase awareness about autistic people in the university and will equip students and lecturers with practical strategies and help more autistic students succeed and stay in higher education. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "This is part of a broader initiative to change how we teach and support students, and how we work together. Autistic people are at the centre of the project and involved at every stage. Through this we hope to ensure that the project outcomes are directly influenced by and designed specifically for the students we are working for." The launch of the toolkit is part of QMU's commitment to inclusivity and support for autistic students. The university invites educators, students and stakeholders to explore the toolkit and provide feedback to enhance its effectiveness for our community of students. Dr Sarah Haywood is an autistic lecturer in the Division of Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies at QMU and a member of the Autism&Uni working group. She said: "I really wish this kind of toolkit had been around when I was studying at university. This is a great starting point for developing neurodiversity-affirming culture at QMU, and I am really looking forward to taking the project forward in collaboration with our current and future autistic learners. We are so grateful to them for giving their time, energy and expertise to help us develop these resources." Dr Marc Fabri, Reader in Participatory Design at Leeds Beckett University, is the brain behind the original multi-national project. He said: 'I'm really pleased to see the toolkit being launched at QMU. The Disability Advice team has done an excellent job adapting the toolkit to the environment at QMU. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'In a recent evaluation of the toolkit's impact on students, we found that it plays a crucial role in offering guidance and strategies for study success. It also gives students the confidence to seek help, knowing where to seek it and what level of support to expect. This strengthens their sense of belonging at university. Looking at the way QMU has set up its toolkit, I'm confident students will appreciate the advice given and especially the interviews with students and lecturers.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Hospitals in Kent, Surrey and Sussex given £67m for repairs
Hospitals across the South East will receive nearly £67m in government funding for small-scale building upgrade cash comes from a £750m fund that the chancellor announced in the 2024 autumn budget to address critical infrastructure and safety risks in NHS buildings, according to the supported by the money included upgrades to faulty wiring, patching leaking roofs and addressing fire safety Secretary Wes Streeting said: "Patients and staff deserve to be in buildings that are safe, comfortable and fit for purpose." In Kent, William Harvey Hospital, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital and Kent and Canterbury Hospital will share £13.2m for Maritime Hospital will get £4.8m for better ventilation systems, repairing machinery and replacing its nurse call system, the government Maidstone Hospital was granted £3.5m for a series of works while mental health facilities Coleman House in Dover and Priority House in Maidstone will share £400,000. The government has awarded £2.9m to East Surrey Hospital in Redhill, £1.4m to Queen Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead, and £1m to Darrent Valley Hospital in Dartford for improvements to "energy systems".Councillors granted planning permission for a two-storey extension to East Surrey Hospital in Surrey County Hospital, Haslemere Hospital, and Milford Hospital have been awarded a combined £2.9m for building fabric, plant equipment and roof works, while St Peter's Hospital in Chertsey will receive £ in Surrey, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust was awarded just over £10m for upgrades to Wexham Park Hospital and Frimley Park government has pledged to rebuild Frimley Park Hospital at a cost of up to £2bn by 2030, as about two-thirds of the building is made from unstable reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac).In Sussex, Conquest Hospital in St Leonards-on-Sea and Eastbourne District General Hospital will share £8.5m. University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust was awarded £11.8m for works at four of its hospitals while Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust has been granted £2.3m, which it will spend across six Community NHS Foundation Trust was awarded £120,000 for its Brighton General Hospital and Chailey Clinical Services government previously pledged to rebuild Eastbourne District General, Conquest Hospital and Bexhill Community Hospital, but said it did not expect to begin work until at least 2037. South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust will receive £810,000 for upgrades to its sites.


New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Labour promised to fix the NHS but seems set on breaking it even more
Illustration by Charlotte Trounce When NHS Providers – the membership organisation that represents NHS trusts – starts using language like 'unthinkable', it's time to sit up and take note. They chose the term in early May to characterise the scale of the cuts being forced upon NHS managers by Wes Streeting's Department of Health and Social Care. Using evidence gathered from 114 trusts – more than half the total number in England – NHS Providers revealed the 'eye-watering' array of local services that face being scaled back or completely shut down: diabetes care for young people, rehabilitation centres, talking therapies, even – incredibly – palliative care beds. Meanwhile, nearly every trust surveyed said they were planning to cut – or had already begun cutting – up to 1,500 posts each to save money. Crucially, these include clinical roles such as doctors and nurses. How have we arrived at this brave new world in which the route to 'an NHS fit for the future… with world-class care for the many, not just the few' (Streeting at last year's party conference) is through slashing clinical services upon which the health, well-being and dignity of patients so manifestly depend? The role of Jim Mackey, Streeting's choice to lead the NHS in England, is key. In March, Mackey ordered trusts to comply with a 'financial reset' – code for unprecedented budget savings during 2025-26 to avoid a projected £6.6bn NHS deficit in England. The government, like its Conservative predecessors, insisted cuts required could occur harmlessly, through 'efficiency savings' alone. Needless to say, savings of up to 12 per cent of entire trusts' budgets cannot possibly be achieved without cutting services. Perhaps Mackey and Streeting hoped that so long as they had a target-driven story to tell the press about falling waiting lists, no one would care very much about the less headline-grabbing forms of NHS care such as rehabilitation after serious injuries or humane deathbed care. It is no coincidence that services for people with disabilities, mental health conditions and terminal illnesses are on the line; certain patients have long been deprioritised by those in power. As one anonymous finance director told NHS Providers: 'Health inequalities [are] a real issue when streamlining services. We need investment to reach the most vulnerable and excluded populations, not disinvestment.' What happens now? In a speech at the Medical Journalists' Association on 9 May, Mackey gave short shrift to the prospect of additional funding: the government, he said, was 'maxed out on what's affordable'. Meanwhile, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson doubled down on the fiction that reducing red tape could square the circle: 'We have underlined the need for trusts to cut bureaucracy to invest even further in the front line.' Easy for them to say. Less so for the doctor forced to have deathbed conversations with patients on trolleys in corridors (me, with increasing frequency these days). From a patient perspective, the impasse is painfully familiar. In his conference speech, Streeting rightly slammed 14 years of underinvestment as a legacy of 'Conservative neglect'. He explicitly stated, the day after the general election, that: 'The policy of this department is that the NHS is broken.' For NHS staff, this radical candour was more than a relief – it felt exhilarating. At last, it seemed, we had a health secretary willing to be honest about the scale of the task required to rebuild an NHS to be proud of. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Less than one year later, Streeting appears to be the first Labour health secretary willing to countenance the cutting back of end-of-life care on his watch. For me – a palliative care doctor who entered my specialty precisely to advocate for the patients that so many in power overlook – the only thing that's 'maxed out' right now is incredulity and disgust. Rachel Clarke's 'The Story of a Heart' has been shortlisted for this year's Women's Prize for Non-Fiction [See also: The public doesn't like Brexit. Has anyone told the media?] Related