logo
Lithium Royalty Corp. Announces Final Results of Substantial Issuer Bid

Lithium Royalty Corp. Announces Final Results of Substantial Issuer Bid

National Post16-05-2025

Article content
TORONTO — Lithium Royalty Corp (TSX: LIRC) ('LRC' or the 'Company) announces the final results of its substantial issuer bid (the 'Offer'), pursuant to which the Company offered to purchase up to C$7 million in value of its outstanding common shares (the 'Shares') from holders of Shares (the 'Shareholders') for cash, at a single price per Share of not less than C$5.20 per Share and not more than C$5.70 per Share, through a 'modified Dutch auction' process.
Article content
Article content
In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Offer and based on the calculations of TSX Trust Company, as depositary for the Offer (the 'Depositary'), the purchase price determined by the modified Dutch auction process will be C$5.70 per Share (the 'Purchase Price'), and the Company will take up and pay for all 561,594 Shares tendered to the Offer at the Purchase Price.
Article content
The Company commenced the Offer in part on the basis that the repurchase of Shares was an attractive investment by the Company and because the trading price of the Shares was meaningfully below estimates of net asset value per Share. Notwithstanding the extension to the original tender period and the increase in the original tender price range both announced on April 30, 2025, holders of Shares largely determined to continue holding their Shares, such that the Shares tendered to the Offer represented only 45.7% of the C$7 million maximum purchase amount of the Offer. The Company will continue to explore opportunities to grow net asset value per share, including through additional share repurchases if determined appropriate. Following the expiry of the Offer, the Company will no longer be restricted from making purchases under its normal course issuer bid.
Article content
Payment for the Shares accepted for purchase under the Offer will occur in accordance with the terms of the Offer and applicable law. The Shares tendered to the Offer represent approximately 2.24% of the total number of the Company's issued and outstanding Shares as of May 15, 2025, before giving effect to the results of the Offer. After the cancellation of the Shares taken up and paid for by the Company, LRC anticipates that approximately 24,494,283 Shares will be issued and outstanding, together with 30,549,214 convertible common shares of the Company (together with the Shares, 'Equity Shares') issued and outstanding, for an aggregate of 55,043,497 Equity Shares.
Article content
To assist shareholders in determining the Canadian tax consequences of the Offer, the Company estimates that for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), the paid-up capital per Share is approximately C$6.51 and the 'specified amount' for purposes of subsection 191(4) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) is approximately C$5.65.
Details of the Offer are available in the formal offer to purchase and issuer bid circular dated March 25, 2025, as amended by the notice of variation dated April 30, 2025 (the 'Notice of Variation'), the amended letter of transmittal and the amended notice of guaranteed delivery (collectively, the 'Offer Documents'). The Notice of Variation extended the original expiry date and increased the tender price range of the Offer.
Article content
This news release is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to buy or the solicitation of an offer to sell Shares.
Article content
About Lithium Royalty Corp.
Article content
LRC is a lithium-focused royalty company organized in Canada, which has established a globally diversified portfolio of 35 revenue royalties on mineral properties that are related to the electrification and decarbonization of the global economy. The Company's royalty portfolio is focused on the battery supply chain for the transportation and energy storage industries and is underpinned by mineral properties that produce or are expected to produce lithium and other battery materials. LRC is a signatory to the Principles for Responsible Investment; the integration of ESG factors and sustainable mining are considerations in our investment analysis and royalty acquisitions.
Article content
This press release contains 'forward-looking information' and 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, which may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to future events or future performance, the Company's current intentions regarding the Offer, the timing, terms and conditions of the Offer, estimates of the net asset value per Share, the source of funds through which the Shares will be purchased, the ultimate Purchase Price, the number of Shares to be purchased and the resumption of the NCIB. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as 'plans', 'expects', 'is expected', 'budgets', 'potential for', 'scheduled', 'estimates', 'forecasts', 'predicts', 'projects', 'intends', 'targets', 'aims', 'anticipates' or 'believes' or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases or may be identified by statements to the effect that certain actions 'may', 'could', 'should', 'would', 'might' or 'will' be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of LRC to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking information is based on management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management. The forward-looking statements herein are made as of the date of this press release only and LRC does not assume any obligation to update or revise them to reflect new information, estimates or opinions, future events or results or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Article content
A number of factors could cause actual events or results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement, including, without limitation: fluctuations in the prices of the primary commodities that drive royalty revenue (including various lithium products); fluctuations in the value of the Canadian and Australian dollar and any other currency in which revenue is generated, relative to the U.S. dollar; changes in national and local government legislation, including permitting and licensing regimes and taxation policies and the enforcement thereof; the adoption of a global minimum tax on corporations; regulatory, political or economic developments in any of the countries where properties in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest are located or through which they are held; risks related to the operators of the properties in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest, including changes in the ownership and control of such operators; relinquishment or sale of mineral properties; influence of macroeconomic developments; business opportunities that become available to, or are pursued by LRC; reduced access to debt and equity capital; litigation; title, permit or license disputes related to interests on any of the properties in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest; whether or not the Company is determined to have 'passive foreign investment company' ('PFIC') status as defined in Section 1297 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; excessive cost escalation as well as development, permitting, infrastructure, operating or technical difficulties on any of the properties in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest; actual mineral content may differ from the resources and reserves contained in technical reports; rate and timing of production differences from resource estimates, other technical reports and mine plans; risks associated with the solvency of operators of projects that LRC has royalties over; risks and hazards associated with the business of development and mining on any of the properties in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest, including, but not limited to unusual or unexpected geological and metallurgical conditions, slope failures or cave-ins, sinkholes, flooding and other natural disasters, terrorism, civil unrest or an outbreak of contagious disease; and the integration of acquired assets. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are based upon assumptions management believes to be reasonable, including, without limitation: the ongoing operation of the properties in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest by the owners or operators of such properties in a manner consistent with past practice; the accuracy of public statements and disclosures made by the owners or operators of such underlying properties; no material adverse change in the market price of the commodities (including various lithium products) that underlie the asset portfolio; the Company's ongoing income and assets relating to determination of its PFIC status; no material changes to existing tax treatment; the expected application of tax laws and regulations by taxation authorities; no adverse development in respect of any significant property in which LRC holds a royalty or other interest; the solvency of project operators; the accuracy of publicly disclosed expectations for the development of underlying properties that are not yet in production; integration of acquired assets; and the absence of any other factors that could cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. However, there can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. LRC cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Contacts
Article content
Article content
Article content

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Crazy idea': Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns
‘Crazy idea': Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns

CTV News

time35 minutes ago

  • CTV News

‘Crazy idea': Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns

Ontario Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack attends Question Period at Queen's Park in Toronto, Tuesday, May 13, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston A month after Ontario's government extended strong mayor powers to a swath of new municipalities, some leaders are promising never to use the measures — but a chorus of small-town councillors warn that local democracy is under threat. As of May 1, another 169 mayors in the province can now veto bylaws, pass new ones with just one-third of council in favour and hire or fire municipal department heads unilaterally. Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister and MPP for Elgin-Middlesex-London Rob Flack said last month that the province decided to more than triple the number of mayors who can access the powers in an effort to build housing faster and streamline local governance. The measures were first introduced in 2022 and initially only applied to the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario's two most populous cities. Several municipalities are taking active steps to reject the powers now that they have been granted more widely. Mark Hunter, one of 10 city councillors in Stratford, recently got unanimous support for his motion to reject the new powers. Hunter said it was symbolic and designed to show that municipal democracy shouldn't be 'subject to provincial whim.' Stratford City Hall downtown Stratford City Hall seen here on Feb. 4, 2021. (Dan Lauckner / CTV Kitchener) 'What it effectively does is get rid of majority rule in our council,' he said. 'It's the expectation of the residents in our community that their representatives are able to fully represent them and this change puts some level of diminishment on that.' Hunter said his fellow councillors can have strong disagreements at council, but lively discussions result in better decisions for the community. Anything that diminishes that discussion is worse for residents, he said. Councillors aren't concerned about Stratford's current mayor abusing his power, said Hunter, but they are worried about what could happen in the future. 'It's another example of concentrating power in fewer hands. Unfortunately in human history, that doesn't always work out so well,' he said. David O'Neil, a councillor in Quinte West, said he is also concerned about strong mayor powers, adding they represent 'a real misdirection' by the province. 'I think this decision is on par with the crazy idea of building a tunnel under the 401,' O'Neil said, referring to Premier Doug Ford's promise to add a tunnel under the major Ontario highway. He added he is skeptical that strong mayor powers would lead to new housing being built in his community, and thinks the province should waive development fees if it wants to see more housing built. Zack Card, another councillor for Quinte West, said he believes the expansion of the strong mayor powers will 'erode the democratic traditions of municipal councils in Ontario.' 'I believe effective councils work collaboratively and with an understanding that all voices carry equal weight. Tipping that balance could potentially hinder governance and make solving issues within our communities more difficult,' Card wrote in an email. Neither O'Neil nor Card would speak to the recent dismissal of the municipality's chief administration officer, which was described on the municipality's website as a 'mayoral decision' pursuant to the legislation, made on the first day the powers were available. Quinte West Mayor Jim Harrison said in an email to The Canadian Press that 'the decision was made in close collaboration and consensus with council, utilizing strong mayor powers to move forward.' Less than a week after the decision, he told a council meeting that he wasn't planning to make use of the strong mayor powers. O'Neil suggested his concern is more future-oriented: it's unclear what could a different sort of mayor do with these powers five, 10 or 20 years down the road. David Arbuckle, executive director of the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, said unilateral power threatens a local government's administrative authority and staffers' ability to give non-partisan, evidence-based advice. 'It's changed the dynamic where (a city staffer) now has to be mindful of the fact that they could be hired or fired by the mayor at any point in time,' Arbuckle said in a recent interview. 'The advice they're bringing forward may not be as neutral as possible because ultimately they are now responding to one individual.' Corey Engelsdorfer, a councillor from Prince Edward County, said he's worried the powers will exacerbate existing divisions on his council and, should they be used, could 'sideline' constituents even as the community experiences a boom in development. The traditional model of majority rule is already divisive, Engelsdorfer said — especially when it comes to housing decisions — so decisions being made with even less support could lead to even more public cynicism. Queens Park Queens Park in Toronto is seen in this undated file photo 'The way we build homes is by working together as a council and not by one person or a third of council pushing through what they want to push through,' he said. 'I always hear Premier Ford say that these changes cut red tape, but democracy to me is not red tape. I don't think it's something that needs to be in place at all.' Mayor Steve Ferguson said in an interview that he was working to defer several of the strong mayor powers, including personnel decisions, back to council. The council also unanimously passed a resolution asking the province to rescind strong mayor legislation, Engelsdorfer said. Despite the concerns, Matti Siemiatycki, director of the University of Toronto's Infrastructure Institute and a professor of geography and planning, said the uptake of the powers has been 'fairly underwhelming.' Before last month, there were only 46 so-called strong mayors in Ontario. Only a few made use of their powers. High-profile examples include Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath advancing affordable housing development on two municipal parking lots in April 2024, and Mississauga's former mayor Bonnie Crombie passing bylaws to build fourplexes in October 2023. But Siemiatycki said he fears there's greater risk for strong mayor powers to go unchecked in smaller municipalities, where there is less oversight and, often, less journalistic scrutiny. 'We've seen an erosion and a decline of the local presses across Canada, and it's no more visible than in small communities,' he said. 'If you're concentrating powers, what's really needed is external oversight bodies. And the media is one of those, so smaller communities might struggle to have that accountability and people being aware of what's happening.' Siemiatycki said while he sympathizes with the province's desire to tackle a housing and infrastructure crisis, he agrees with the councillors who have raised concerns. 'It doesn't necessarily mean you'll go further just because you're aiming to go faster,' he said. 'The thing that's more sustainable over the long term is acceleration through processes that have very clear accountabilities and timelines to them.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 1, 2025.

Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns
Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns

CBC

time38 minutes ago

  • CBC

Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns

A month after Ontario's government extended strong mayor powers to a swath of new municipalities, some leaders are promising never to use the measures — but a chorus of small-town councillors warn that local democracy is under threat. As of May 1, another 169 mayors in the province can now veto bylaws, pass new ones with just one-third of council in favour and hire or fire municipal department heads unilaterally. Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack said last month that the province decided to more than triple the number of mayors who can access the powers in an effort to build housing faster and streamline local governance. The measures were first introduced in 2022 and initially only applied to the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario's two most populous cities. Several municipalities are taking active steps to reject the powers now that they have been granted more widely. Mark Hunter, one of 10 city councillors in Stratford, recently got unanimous support for his motion to reject the new powers. Hunter said it was symbolic and designed to show that municipal democracy shouldn't be "subject to provincial whim." "What it effectively does is get rid of majority rule in our council," he said. "It's the expectation of the residents in our community that their representatives are able to fully represent them and this change puts some level of diminishment on that." Hunter said his fellow councillors can have strong disagreements at council, but lively discussions result in better decisions for the community. Anything that diminishes that discussion is worse for residents, he said. Councillors aren't concerned about Stratford's current mayor abusing his power, said Hunter, but they are worried about what could happen in the future. "It's another example of concentrating power in fewer hands. Unfortunately in human history, that doesn't always work out so well," he said. Worries about democratic processes David O'Neil, a councillor in Quinte West, said he is also concerned about strong mayor powers, adding they represent "a real misdirection" by the province. "I think this decision is on par with the crazy idea of building a tunnel under the 401," O'Neil said, referring to Premier Doug Ford's promise to add a tunnel under the major Ontario highway. He added he is skeptical that strong mayor powers would lead to new housing being built in his community, and thinks the province should waive development fees if it wants to see more housing built. Zack Card, another councillor for Quinte West, said he believes the expansion of the strong mayor powers will "erode the democratic traditions of municipal councils in Ontario." "I believe effective councils work collaboratively and with an understanding that all voices carry equal weight. Tipping that balance could potentially hinder governance and make solving issues within our communities more difficult," Card wrote in an email. Neither O'Neil nor Card would speak to the recent dismissal of the municipality's chief administration officer, which was described on the municipality's website as a "mayoral decision" pursuant to the legislation, made on the first day the powers were available. Quinte West Mayor Jim Harrison said in an email to The Canadian Press that "the decision was made in close collaboration and consensus with council, utilizing strong mayor powers to move forward." Less than a week after the decision, he told a council meeting that he wasn't planning to make use of the strong mayor powers. O'Neil suggested his concern is more future-oriented: it's unclear what could a different sort of mayor do with these powers five, 10 or 20 years down the road. 'It's changed the dynamic' for non-partisan staff David Arbuckle, executive director of the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, said unilateral power threatens a local government's administrative authority and staffers' ability to give non-partisan, evidence-based advice. "It's changed the dynamic where (a city staffer) now has to be mindful of the fact that they could be hired or fired by the mayor at any point in time," Arbuckle said in a recent interview. "The advice they're bringing forward may not be as neutral as possible because ultimately they are now responding to one individual." Corey Engelsdorfer, a councillor from Prince Edward County, said he's worried the powers will exacerbate existing divisions on his council and, should they be used, could "sideline" constituents even as the community experiences a boom in development. The traditional model of majority rule is already divisive, Engelsdorfer said — especially when it comes to housing decisions — so decisions being made with even less support could lead to even more public cynicism. "The way we build homes is by working together as a council and not by one person or a third of council pushing through what they want to push through," he said. "I always hear Premier Ford say that these changes cut red tape, but democracy to me is not red tape. I don't think it's something that needs to be in place at all." Mayor Steve Ferguson said in an interview that he was working to defer several of the strong mayor powers, including personnel decisions, back to council. The council also unanimously passed a resolution asking the province to rescind strong mayor legislation, Engelsdorfer said. 'Underwhelming' uptake of new powers Despite the concerns, Matti Siemiatycki, director of the University of Toronto's Infrastructure Institute and a professor of geography and planning, said the uptake of the powers has been "fairly underwhelming." Before last month, there were only 46 so-called strong mayors in Ontario. Only a few made use of their powers. High-profile examples include Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath advancing affordable housing development on two municipal parking lots in April 2024, and Mississauga's former mayor Bonnie Crombie passing bylaws to build fourplexes in October 2023. But Siemiatycki said he fears there's greater risk for strong mayor powers to go unchecked in smaller municipalities, where there is less oversight and, often, less journalistic scrutiny. "We've seen an erosion and a decline of the local presses across Canada, and it's no more visible than in small communities," he said. "If you're concentrating powers, what's really needed is external oversight bodies. And the media is one of those, so smaller communities might struggle to have that accountability and people being aware of what's happening." Siemiatycki said while he sympathizes with the province's desire to tackle a housing and infrastructure crisis, he agrees with the councillors who have raised concerns. "It doesn't necessarily mean you'll go further just because you're aiming to go faster," he said. "The thing that's more sustainable over the long term is acceleration through processes that have very clear accountabilities and timelines to them."

The Best Technology ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right Now
The Best Technology ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right Now

Globe and Mail

time39 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

The Best Technology ETF to Invest $2,000 in Right Now

Succeeding in the stock market doesn't require one to pick the best individual businesses for their portfolio. Thousands of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) exist that can help automate the investing process, providing exposure to various themes or industries that you might be bullish on. Perhaps no trend has had a greater impact on the economy and markets in the past couple of decades than technology. More recently, this is showing up in the ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) boom. Luckily, investors don't have to look far to bet on this tailwind. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Here's the best tech ETF to buy with $2,000 right now. Betting on technology looks like a lucrative move It seems that technology, the internet, and AI will only become more important. From an investment perspective, it makes sense to want more of your capital in the right place. That's why the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) is the top technology ETF to invest $2,000 in. It tracks the performance of the largest 100 non-financial companies that trade on the Nasdaq stock exchange. As of this writing, this fund had $324 billion in assets under management, demonstrating its impressive scale. This ETF might have 100 different stocks in it, but the top 10 account for a whopping 49.8% of the total. Unsurprisingly, the " Magnificent Seven" are very important. Investors considering owning the Invesco QQQ Trust must be bullish on various tech-driven trends. Companies in the ETF are benefiting from e-commerce, digital advertising, digital payments, streaming entertainment, electric vehicles, cloud computing, and of course, AI. Stellar performance at a low cost The beauty of owning this ETF is that there is no need to try to pick single stocks that could be the big winners of tomorrow. The Invesco QQQ Trust ensures you'll have exposure to the tech companies that become successful in their respective market niches. Viewed this way, it's a low-maintenance strategy to allocate capital. In the past decade, the Invesco QQQ Trust has generated a total return of 404% (as of May 27). This means a $2,000 investment made in May 2015 would be worth $10,000 today, trouncing the performance of the broader S&P 500 index. Understanding the cost structure is critical. The last thing investors want to do is buy an ETF that charges an arm and a leg for subpar returns. This isn't the case here. Out of a $2,000 investment, just $4 goes to paying the 0.2% expense ratio on an annual basis. You get to keep more of your money. What will the future hold? Investors have heard the saying that past results won't guarantee future returns. This is the right way to think about the Invesco QQQ Trust over the next decade and beyond. While outsize returns are possible, it's best to keep expectations in check. The optimistic view is that technology businesses generally have done well over the long term, due to their disruptive products and services and cultures of innovation. And there's no reason to think this will change. That bodes well for return prospects. But it also pays to have the right mindset. Don't forget that volatility is the name of the game, especially with some of the companies that are included in the Invesco QQQ Trust. Investor sentiment can shift on a dime. That's why it's a good idea to think about the next 10 years and beyond with this investment. Those who are patient may be rewarded. Should you invest $1,000 in Invesco QQQ Trust right now? Before you buy stock in Invesco QQQ Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco QQQ Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store