Online brothels, sex robots, simulated rape: AI is ushering in a new age of violence against women
Society is sleepwalking into a nightmare. The rate of global investment in AI is rocketing, as companies and countries invest in what has been described as a new arms race. The Californian company Nvidia, which dominates the market in the chips needed for AI, has become the most valuable in the world. The trend has been dubbed an 'AI frenzy', with the components described by analysts as the 'new gold or oil'.
Everyone is getting in on the act, and politicians are desperate to stake their countries' claim as global leaders in AI development. Safeguards, equitable access and sustainability are falling by the wayside: when countries gathered for the Paris AI summit in February 2025 and produced an international agreement pledging an 'open', 'inclusive' and 'ethical' approach to AI, the US and the UK refused to sign it.
It is worth asking who is benefiting from this headlong rush, and at whose expense. One developer, who only goes by the name Lore in their communications with the media, described the open-source release of the large language model (LLM) Llama as creating a 'gold rush-type of scenario'. He used Llama to build Chub AI, a website where users can chat with AI bots and roleplay violent and illegal acts. For as little as $5 a month, users can access a 'brothel' staffed by girls below the age of 15, described on the site as a 'world without feminism'. Or they can 'chat' with a range of characters, including Olivia, a 13-year-old girl with pigtails wearing a hospital gown, or Reiko, 'your clumsy older sister' who is described as 'constantly having sexual accidents with her younger brother'.
This million-dollar money generator is just one of thousands of applications of this new technology that are re-embedding misogyny deep into the foundations of our future. On other sites men can create, share and weaponise fake intimate images to terrorise women and girls. Sex robots are being developed at breakneck speed. Already, you can buy a self-warming, self-lubricating or 'sucking' model: some manufacturers have dreamed up a 'frigid' setting that would allow their users to simulate rape. Millions of men are already using AI 'companions' – virtual girlfriends, available and subservient 24/7, whose breast size and personality they can customise and manipulate.
Meanwhile, generative AI, which has exploded in popularity, has been proven to regurgitate and amplify misogyny and racism. This becomes significantly more of a concern when you realise just how much online content will soon be created by this new tool.
Women are at risk of being dragged back to the dark ages by precisely the same technology that promises to catapult men into a shiny new future. This has all happened before. Very recently, in fact. Cast your mind back to the early days of social media. It started out the same way: a new idea harnessed by privileged white men, its origins in the patriarchal objectification of women. (Mark Zuckerberg started out with a website called FaceMash, which allowed users to rank the attractiveness of female Harvard students … a concept he now says had nothing to do with the origins of Facebook.)
Women, particularly women of colour, raised their voices in concern: some of the earliest objections to FaceMash came from Harvard's Fuerza Latina and Association of Harvard Black Women societies. They were ignored, Facebook was born and the rest is history.
Social media was rolled out at great speed. Back then, Zuckerberg's famous catchphrase was 'Move fast and break things'. The things that got broken were societal cohesion, democracy and the mental health, in particular, of girls.
By the time people started pointing out that online abuse was endemic to social platforms, those platforms were too well established and profitable for their owners to be prepared to make sweeping changes. Politicians seemed too enamoured with the powerful tech lobby to be prepared to stand up to them.
The results have been devastating. Young women have taken their own lives after experiencing sexualised cyberbullying. An alarming number of female parliamentarians have stepped down from office after experiencing intolerable levels of online abuse. Millions of women have been subject to rape and death threats, doxing, online stalking and racist and misogynistic abuse.
We failed to prevent this crisis when we didn't heed the warning calls in the early days of social media. We now risk squandering a similar opportunity. Without urgent action, we will be doomed to repeat the same mistakes with AI, only this time on a far larger scale. 'One of the reasons many of us do have concerns about the rollout of AI is because over the past 40 years as a society we've basically given up on actually regulating technology,' Peter Wang, co-founder of data science platform Anaconda, recently told the Guardian. 'Social media was our first encounter with dumb AI and we utterly failed that encounter.'
If women and marginalised communities have already learned from their frequent mistreatment on social media to self-censor, to disguise their real names and to mute their voices, these coping mechanisms and restrictive norms will follow them when they step into new technological environments. Nearly nine in ten women polled in a 2020 Economist study said they restricted their online activity in some way as a result of cyber-harassment, hacking, online stalking and doxing. This helps to explain the disparity between men's and women's use of AI; 71% of men aged 18 to 24 say they use AI weekly, while only 59% of women in the same age range do so. So long as men remain the main users of AI, the technology will be designed to cater to their preferences.
The answer isn't to reject new technology, or ignore the enormous potential of AI. Instead, we should ensure regulations and safeguards are implemented when AI is designed, before products are rolled out to the public, in much the same way that they are within other industries.
'I thought people should be aware,' said Leyla R Bravo, then president of Fuerza Latina, when she tried to raise the alarm at Harvard over the nascent FaceMash website back in 2003. This time, might someone listen? It isn't too late for political leaders to stand up to big tech. The harms of this technology aren't rooted in a future dystopia where robots take over the world. AI is already devastating the lives of women and girls, right now. If people realised this, they might desire to do things differently.
Laura Bates is the founder of the Everyday Sexism Project and author of The New Age of Sexism: How the AI Revolution is Reinventing Misogyny.
In the UK, Rape Crisis offers support for rape and sexual abuse on 0808 802 9999 in England and Wales, 0808 801 0302 in Scotland, or 0800 0246 991 in Northern Ireland. In the US, Rainn offers support on 800-656-4673. In Australia, support is available at 1800Respect (1800 737 732). Other international helplines can be found at ibiblio.org/rcip/internl.html.
In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie. In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on 988lifeline.org, or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Drug dealer who ran over and killed 'respected' man thinking his prone body lying in the road was a 'Halloween prank' is jailed
A drug dealer who ran over and killed a 'loyal' and 'respected' man after thinking his body lying in the road was a Halloween prank has been jailed. Karl Twyford, 29, knocked down Steve Day, 67, shortly before 10pm on October 30, 2021, in Sutton Bonington, Nottinghamshire. Mr Day, a keen motorcyclist, was walking in the village at the time he was run over. He suffered catastrophic injuries to his chest and head and died at the scene. At Nottingham Crown Court, prosecutor Esther Harrison revealed Twyford saw an 'obstacle' as he drove down the road in his silver Ford Ranger. She said: 'He said he did not know what it was and by the time he saw it he was unable to avoid it and drove over it. He said he thought it was a Halloween prank.' Miss Harrison said other people had stopped and saw Mr Day's body lying in the road, but Twyford made impact and drove on. She said: 'A witness was driving her car with a passenger and she saw something lying in the road and realised it was a person. 'She said he was laying on his back in the road with his hand over his chest and she slowed down and maneuvered around it. 'The defendant's silver Ford Ranger followed and drove over Mr Day causing catastrophic injuries to the chest and head. That vehicle stopped, reversed back and then drove off.' Twyford handed himself into police two days after the horror collision. There is no suggestion as to why Mr Day was lying in the road at the time. When police searched Twyford's home in Kegworth, they found three rooms set aside for growing cannabis and nearly a kilo of the Class B drug - worth £11,000. High purity cocaine worth £2,000 was also discovered. Following a retrial earlier this year, a jury took just an hour to unanimously find Twyford guilty of causing the death of Mr Day by careless or inconsiderate driving. The 29-year-old also pleaded guilty to charges of possession with intent to supply drugs and production of cannabis. Richard Thatcher, mitigating, said Twyford, now of Ashbourne in Derbyshire, works as a self-employed bricklayer and became a father in October last year. He said: 'He has perhaps matured and now has something of a family life. He made money (from drug dealing) but that does not mean he had an extravagant lifestyle.' In a victim impact statement read out in court, Mr Day's wife Gina said she was 'distraught and empty' without her husband, calling him a 'well-respected' man in Sutton Bonington where he had lived for almost four decades. She said: 'As his wife I am so distraught and empty. He had so much more living to do, he loved life, especially walking in Cornwall and Scotland with his dogs and loved motorcycling. 'He was kind, loving, loyal and would help anyone. He loved village life and was well known and respected in Sutton Bonington where he had lived for 38 years. He was my life and it will be so hard without him.' Judge Michael Auty KC jailed Twyford for four-and-a-half-years. He received a nine-month sentence for causing Mr Day's death and three years and nine months for the drug offences. The judge also disqualified him from driving until he passes a further test following his release. Judge Auty said: 'Steven Day's wife, Gina, describes her husband as a happy, kind and loving man who enjoyed life to the full. 'That does not surprise me because I have seen photographs of him which reveal a smiling gentleman utterly at peace with the world. 'Precisely why it was that you did not see him or slow down must be, as the jury found, inattentiveness and tragedy followed. You then panicked and left the scene leaving Mr Day.'
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man seriously injured in hit-and-run crash in Reigate
A man in his 20s has been left with "life-threatening" injuries after a hit-and-run crash, according to Surrey Police. The force said it was investigating the crash, involving a silver Mercedes and the male pedestrian, which happened just before 17:45 BST on Hornbeam Road in Reigate on Thursday. It said the driver left the scene, however officers later found the car. Officers said they were pursuing a "number of active lines" of inquiry. Surrey Police said Hornbeam Road was closed between the junction with Holly Road and Willow Road while officers attended the force urged anyone with information to get in touch.
