Tactical analysis: Aerial dominance and nous in final third will prove pivotal in decisive football weekend
It has been hard to gauge exactly where everyone stands in the race for
Sam Maguire
, but all should be clearer after the final round of group games this weekend, where every match has something at stake.
One of the key aspects of the final round is the fact that teams have two weeks of preparation time. That leaves plenty of time to identify opposition strengths and weaknesses.
It is very hard to call the games as we head into the weekend. Games are taking on a life of their own as teams try to make the new rules work best for them. It has led to some thrilling games and no shortage of drama.
Three of the biggest games are
Dublin
v
Derry
and
Armagh
v
Galway
on Saturday, and
Mayo
v
Donegal
on Sunday, so let's take a look at some of the strengths of each of the six teams.
READ MORE
Mayo
As Mayo approach Donegal in a do-or-die game, they will be hoping the kickout zone will be as profitable for them as it was
against Tyrone
. Mayo opted to go long for all of Colm Reape's 16 kickouts and managed to secure possession on 12 out of 16 (75 per cent).
Mayo scored 1-6 from these 12 won, while Tyrone scored 1-1 from their four won. Mayo would have been happy with their five-point profit from their own kickout. It would be easy to look at these figures in isolation and say that Mayo were excellent at the breaking ball zone, but interestingly, they won three of these kickouts as a result of Tyrone fouls in the air, trying to shield the ball through.
In the absence of Tyrone's Brian Kennedy, it would have made sense for Reape to avoid Conn Kilpatrick, but going right down his throat was an aspect of Mayo's play that showed bravery and a willingness to fight. They made sure Kilpatrick won nothing clean, through subtle and not-so-subtle contact on the Edendork man in the air. They were also ravenous on the breaking ball, often with two men at the front of the break.
Mayo worked hard to get men around the breaking ball in the landing zone.
Mayo tried to curb the influence of Conn Kilpatrick by stopping him getting off the ground.
Additionally, Mayo showed a strong hand on the Niall Morgan kickout, winning nine out of 12 (75 per cent) that were sent long. Over the course of the encounter across kickouts in both directions, that is a staggering 21/28 (75 per cent) of the long kickouts won by Mayo. This really indicated their hunger for the battle.
However, Mayo also managed to put Tyrone under severe pressure on their short kickouts, as Tyrone only returned 0-3 from their 12 short kickouts won. Mayo even managed to spoil one short one, as Davitt Neary turned over Shea O'Hare when Morgan didn't get his kickout wide enough.
Mayo also smartly fouled the first receiver on the Tyrone kickout on three occasions, allowing all the Mayo bodies behind to reset. In further emphasising this cuteness, they managed to not concede a 50m penalty on any of these. Overall, Mayo scored 0-6 from the Tyrone kickout, with Malachy O'Rourke's men only managing a point more than that, 0-7.
Mayo managed to force lots of pressure on the Tyrone kickout, even when they went short, such as Davitt Neary turning over Shea O'Hare on this kickout.
The big question as Mayo head for Dr Hyde Park to face Donegal is whether they can replicate such a performance on the kickout. Donegal are unlikely to be as profligate if they get hands on ball on their own short kickouts and there is the added risk of goalkeeper Shaun Patton – if he's back – going over the break zone.
Donegal
With their Atlantic coastline, Donegal are used to waves. When they get their running game going from deep, those waves can be hard to stop.
Two scores before half-time against Cavan
, initiated from defensive turnovers that led to 1-1 at the far end of the field, highlighted this strength.
The first score started as Eoghán Bán Gallagher intercepted a loopy Cavan handpass, then Donegal attacked in unison as the ball went through hands of both Ciaran Moore and Peadar Mogan, with Ryan McHugh also ahead of the ball, before a Cavan foul - Patrick McBrearty scored the resultant free.
Then a turnover and a powerful Finbarr Roarty burst started from behind where the ball was turned over and ended with him palming the ball to the net, as he left the tracking Cavan men in his wake. This sent Donegal into half-time on a high after a lot of good Cavan work in that opening half was wiped out.
In the first half, Donegal scored 1-6 (including a two-pointer) from the 10 possessions that originated behind their 45m line, eight from turnovers on Cavan and another two short kickouts from Gavin Mulreany.
Donegal's Finbarr Roarty started his run from behind where the turnover occurred.
And it ended with Roarty palming the ball to the net.
This relentless efficiency from ball originating inside their own 45m line continued in the second half, as another seven turnovers and a short kickout led to a further 2-3. Donegal by the end of the game scored 3-9 from the 19 attacks that originated inside their own 45. This is a warning to Mayo to make sure that they don't allow Donegal to get possession in this area, as the punishment will be more severe than what Tyrone served up.
Dublin
Armagh got a lot of credit coming out of
Croke Park two Sundays ago
, but equally Dublin were nowhere near as bad as it was portrayed. It is easy to point to the missed efforts, as Dublin hit 16/37 efforts (43 per cent), and there was also the uncharacteristic three-up breaches.
Dublin will have come away from the game very happy with how they set up on Ethan Rafferty's kickouts. With their zonal approach, they forced Rafferty to try to execute high-risk kicks into pockets of space.
Dublin's zonal press meant Ethan Rafferty was occasionally forced to go wide with his kicks.
Dublin's zonal press here forces Rafferty to make a risky chip into a congested area.
Dublin won 15/33 (45 per cent) of the Armagh kickout, but they didn't convert this strength to the scoreboard. Rafferty is really accomplished at striking the ball and this zonal set-up may yield better dividends for Dublin in Newry.
Ethen Rafferty getting off a perfect kickout in Croke Park - Dublin's press may yield better returns against someone not as accomplished as Rafferty.
Derry
Are Derry getting back to being the side that promised so much in recent years? Not quite, but some of their key players are back performing at a high level and others are delivering high-energy performances. Niall Loughlin was one of these, but so was Conor Glass.
The Glen man was back to his best, as he scored 1-3, assisted 0-3 and secondary assisted another 0-2. That is a direct impact on 1-8 of Derry's scores. His awareness of space and ability to manipulate the Galway defence shows a man at the top of his game.
Derry create the space to allow Conor Glass take up a scoring position.
For the second backdoor cut, Derry manipulate the space by moving eight players inside the 20m line while Conor Glass assesses the space around him.
Having moved backwards before making his run, Glass then advances with his teammates smartly keeping their shape to afford him space.
Glass was on hand in the clutch moments when Derry needed leaders. After Galway's first goal, he was there to palm the ball to the back of the net. He was a key man again after Galway's fourth goal, as he slipped John Maher (who was specifically detailed to mark him when Derry were in possession) with a backdoor cut to set up the Derry equaliser.
However, it is not necessarily these on-the-ball actions where he is most influential for the team. He was marauding around the field, making his presence felt at the tackle zone as he imposed himself physically on Galway. It is often hard to get a true gauge of the defensive output of a player, but he was involved in turnovers, tackles and slowing attacks throughout the encounter.
On two occasions, with Cillian McDaid in the first half and Jack Glynn in the second half, his ferocity in the tackle led to a break in play as the Galway men required medical attention. His contact and tackle technique as Seán Kelly attacked the goal during the Galway resurgence contributed to the defensive display.
Armagh
Armagh have shown really strong attacking creativity over the past number of years. The basketball influence of Kieran Donaghy along with the thirst for innovation in the management when it comes to finding an extra percent advantage is always evident.
Armagh showed a number of excellent screens in the encounter at Croke Park which helped to unlock the Dublin defence. One particular screen, by Rory Grugan on Sean MacMahon in the 24th minute, allowed Andrew Murnin glide in for a shot at goal. It brought Stephen Cluxton into action with a great save. The ease of cutting through the Dublin defence really highlighted the power of such screens. Armagh do this regularly and to great effect.
Rory Grugan screen creates space for Andrew Murnin to move into - the effort on goal was saved by Stephen Cluxton.
A closer image of Armagh's Rory Grugan creating the space for Andrew Murnin.
The Orchard county were lauded last year for their attacking innovation in terms of set plays and while the game has become faster with the new rules, they are still able to manufacture them and execute.
One such attack took place in the 16th minute. Éamonn Fitzmaurice on RTÉ correctly identified that Dublin stayed zonal as Armagh tried to set up an overload in attack. After Armagh probed the weak side, they quickly transferred the ball back to the other side of the pitch through Oisín Conaty and Grugan shot a controlled two-pointer.
Kieran McGeeney has recently described Grugan as 'one of the best players I've ever seen'. Stopping the Ballymacnab man will be top of Galway manager Pádraic Joyce's priority list this weekend.
Rory Grugan signals for Armagh to create the move - they have succeeded in setting up setplays this season despite the game being faster.
After probing one side, Oisín Conaty switches the ball across the pitch with a kick to Rory Grugan in space.
Galway
There are many moving parts with Galway. If consistency and cohesion arrives, they will be very hard to stop. The question is how does that consistency and cohesion materialise?
Joyce will be hoping to have his best players on the field, but he will also be looking to have the players on the field who enable those stars to function. As was mentioned with Conor Glass, he makes such an impact off the ball and is unselfish in his actions. Can Galway get a similar return from their on-ball stars?
One thing we know for sure is that this Galway set-up is a cut-throat environment. The game against Derry finished with Paul Conroy, Cillian McDaid and Shane Walsh all watching from the bench. There are not many teams that can leave players of their quality on the line and stage a comeback like the Tribesmen did.
Armagh have already qualified for the next phase but any question of this being a soft fixture is nonsense. The Galway v Armagh rivalry has become one of the best in the country. If past evidence is anything to go by, a one-score game is likely to materialise. It could go either way in Breffni Park.
Analysing an opposition on one game is layered with danger as there is so much individual context to a one-off game. What materialised in the round-two fixtures is unlikely to be an indicator of what happens in the round-three games.
The matches are so variable and unpredictable at the moment, swinging wildly based on how teams set up for the opposition and how the opposition sets up for them. This is great news for supporters, but it also means management and analysis teams are second guessing everything.
Paul O'Brien is a performance analyst with The Performance Process.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
As Mediahuis Ireland reaches 100,000 online subscribers, four reporters reflect on how their roles have evolved
To reflect on the milestone, four journalists write about how their work has changed since the Irish Independent's website launched its paywall five years ago. Conor McKeon (Sports journalist) Bob Knight, the legendary American college basketball coach, had an especially dim view of sports writing and its practitioners. 'Most of us learn to write by the second grade and then move on to other things,' he said. The gig has changed, but probably not so much that the now late Knight would reappraise his opinion. The main difference being accountability. Time was the sports section was just the back part of the newspaper, packaged with the serious journalism: crime, politics, celebrity gossip, horoscopes. Like a tub of Quality Street, it was just assumed there was something for everyone. It didn't matter whether you considered your little corner of the paper to be the sought-after caramel cups or the dreaded coffee creams. It was all the one tin. Sold as a single unit. Now, snazzy metrics such as 'user engagement minutes' relay not just how many people read your hurried 800-word report from a small, frozen provincial GAA ground with dodgy wifi, but how long they persisted with it. This is a terrifying vista for those of us whose job it is weekly to conjure new ways to describe the choreography of a student kicking a ball over a bar. Take Rory McIlroy's win at the Masters in April. Being at Augusta National that week was to witness something profound and historic. Sporting mega news on local and global scales. Brandel Chamblee, one of the sharpest minds in sports analysis, said on NBC's Sunday morning programme that McIlroy would start his final round under 'the most pressure of any golfer' in major history. ADVERTISEMENT Learn more Which was undeniably true. But in trying to win the Masters, McIlroy never experienced pressure quite like trying to produce something on McIlroy winning the Masters that was worth reading. Nobody waits until the morning editions to find out yesterday's results any more. But there is intense demand for context, analysis, colour and interpretation. Not what happened necessarily, but why and how it happened. Building an audience of subscribers means means being able to cater specifically for tastes, to gauge what lands and what doesn't. To best deploy those skills we learned in second grade. Maeve McTaggart (Multimedia reporter) When I started working as a journalist almost three years ago, I occasionally met people – and still do – who told me how rarely they saw newspapers out in the wild any more. I think some of those I met felt like they were breaking some very unfortunate news to me: that I had missed the golden age of newspapers, and that it was over before I even had the chance to get started. Of course, they are right in many ways. Commuters are scrolling on their phones and print is no longer the industry it was. But people are still reading the news, they're still eager to know more beyond the headlines – and it's clear that quality, trusted reporting and analysis are more important than ever. I am not from a newspaper-buying generation. I grew up with Snapchat, Twitter, Instagram and all the positives and perils of social media as a news source. While print may be on the way out, the need for insightful and trusted journalism is definitely not. Online coverage and commentary can be constant, all-consuming and confusing. My job as a multimedia reporter did not exist when I started secondary school in 2012. I knew I wanted to be a journalist, but I did not know what the industry would look like by the time I got there 10 years later. Quality journalism remains the priority, but video, podcasting and a digital-first approach have changed how stories are covered, providing more insight, more live coverage and more transparency in reporting. The methods may have changed, but the needs have not. And it is clear that a subscription to journalism you trust has become as essential as that morning coffee or streaming subscription. Ralph Riegel (Southern correspondent) Irish Independent subscribers have transformed my working life. When I began my journalism career more than 40 years ago, I worked in a newsroom where typewriters were the norm and you submitted a typed story at 6pm to be published in a newspaper you could buy only from 7am the following day. Podcasts and video reports were unheard of. And computers were the size of a large cabinet, not the sleek smartphones that are now in every pocket. Most newsrooms had communal phones and, famously, one regional newspaper even had a payphone for its journalists where coins were dispensed very sparingly. Journalists covered courts with shorthand notebooks and pens, not laptops. The advent of digital journalism has transformed everything. I recently covered the Central Criminal Court murder trial of Richard Satchwell, which ran for six weeks in Dublin. On a busy day, I would file a mid-morning report, a lengthy lunchtime update and a late afternoon wrap before working on a 1200-word summary that ran online and in print. I would also file a daily video wrap and appear on The Indo Daily podcast that offered a more detailed analysis of trial proceedings. All of which is driven by the knowledge that subscribers want their news in different ways. Our news cycle has gone from a timeframe determined by the effectively medieval print technology of Johannes Gutenberg to the digital power of Silicon Valley and the 21st century. News is now immediate. An old mentor of mine told me that our main job as journalists is to offer a voice to people who, for whatever reason, cannot be heard in society. Without you, our subscribers, that would not be possible. So, from one veteran journalist, thank you for your support. Katie Byrne (Money editor) Incisive personal finance reporting, led by award-winning journalist Charlie Weston, has always been a cornerstone of the Irish Independent. But as our subscriber numbers have grown, we've seen that our audience wants to read not only personal finance news but also people's personal experiences with major money decisions. Reflecting this shift, we launched 'Indo Money' earlier this year. It's a dedicated hub for everyday money matters, with new voices and fresh perspectives. We publish seven days a week, alongside a weekly newsletter and a soon-to-launch podcast. Charlie Weston continues to lead the charge with breaking news stories and in-depth analysis. We've broadened the scope of our reporting to reflect the human side of money and tell the personal stories behind the latest personal finance headlines. What's interesting is that our subscribers now play an active role in the stories we tell. Over the past few months, through our subscriber-only newsletter, we've been engaging with our audience and inviting them to share their personal finance questions with our team of experts. Occasionally these questions become follow-up articles. With the reader's permission, we publish their question along with the expert response. We've taken this a step further with our latest columnist Eoin McGee. As a subscriber-only perk, readers can send their personal finance dilemmas directly to him. Meanwhile, money reporter Saoirse Hanley is starting important conversations with our audience through questionnaires on social media. By inviting readers to share their experiences, we get a wider range of perspectives that leads to more nuanced reporting. The term 'community-building' gets thrown about a lot these days. But we believe we're building a space that cultivates a deeper connection with our subscribers. They know they can rely on us to crunch the numbers and compare the best deals. We're getting to know our subscribers better, and just as they're learning more about money matters through our journalism, we're learning from the questions they ask us and the experiences they share. It's a two-way street.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Everybody loves Leinster
Sir, – Following their United Rugby Championship (URC) semi-final win over Glasgow Warriors last weekend, Leinster second-row Joe McCarthy declared 'everyone loves to hate Leinster'. Post match, rugby commentator Donal Lenihan, a former Munster, Ireland and Lions great, considered McCarthy's comment 'over the top'. I agree. All true lovers of Irish rugby will rejoice if Leinster overcome the South African Bulls in Croke Park in today's URC final. Their considerable past achievements will hopefully be embellished by a long overdue win to reward the consistent brilliance which ought to be admired rather than envied. READ MORE Come on Leinster! – Yours, etc, PJ MCDERMOTT, Westport, Co Mayo.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Rory McIlroy scraps his way to making cut at US Open
The script turned nasty for the two pals, as Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry – who'd started this 125th US Open with genuine ambitions – were cast as fall guys, forced to find an escape route out of an examination that asked one tough question after another. McIlroy survived. Lowry didn't. Frustration was evident in their behaviour as the pressure mounted, hole by hole, shot by shot. In McIlroy's case, it was a club throw down on the 12th hole after an iron approach to the Par 5 turned so that the ball nestled into the gnarly rough. The two-handed toss of the 3-iron some 20 yards down the fairway left nobody watching in any doubt as to his utter frustration. READ MORE On the 17th, it surfaced again when he smashed his 3-wood into the tee marker after pushing his shot into a greenside bunker, short-siding himself. There was a pair of them in it, sharing the frustration of the game; and the course! For Lowry, his frazzled mind played tricks on him. On the 14th green, he inexplicably bent down to pick up his ball without marking, a one stroke penalty for his actions turning what was a bogey into a double-bogey. Not that it truly mattered at that juncture, as Lowry's fate was well and truly sealed by then after a start to his round that saw him go bogey-double bogey-bogey-bogey in his opening four holes. Shane Lowry of Ireland reacts to a bunker shot on the second hole during the second round of the US Open. Photograph:Somehow, McIlroy found a way to survive into the weekend. The task proved beyond Lowry. McIlroy ensured he would be around for the weekend – some nine shots behind 36-holes leader Sam Burns – after signing for a second round 72 for six-over-par 146, a shot inside the cutline. McIlroy showed his class when it matted on the Par 4 18th, standing on the tee box on the cutline, he unleashed a drive of 372 yards down the middle of the fairway and hit an approach in to five feet for a birdie. He calmly rolled in the putt, and gave a sigh of relief. It hadn't started so well. McIlroy could hardly afford to put a foot wrong in his bid to, firstly, make the cut, and, secondly, to try to play his way back into the championship. Rory McIlroy throws his club on the 12th hole during the second round of the US Open. Photograph:The misstep, though, came right from the off: his driver, so often the foundation in a season that has already claimed him three titles – the Pebble Beach pro-am, The Players and the Masters – was disobedient from the get-go, finding a fairway bunker down the left of the first hole as McIlroy started the second round with a double-bogey six. If that misdemeanour put McIlroy on the back foot from the off, worse was to follow. Another double-bogey six followed in quickstep time, on the third hole. This time, McIlroy's drive found a fairway bunker down the right. Having started his round four-over from an opening round 74, the world number two's challenge to survive had doubled before he knew it. A birdie from 30 feet on the ninth hole at least gave McIlroy some hope as he turned for home, only for another tee shot on the 11th to sneak into a fairway bunker down the left which led to another bogey. The club toss on 12 graphically showcased his frustration, where he would par the Par 5. Finally, McIlroy saw some light, as a 20-footer for birdie on the 15th brought him to 7-over for the championship (onto the cut line). Survival at least within reach. And he closed the deal magnificently on the final hole to get into the weekend's final two rounds and the chance to play pursuit of Burns and those ahead. Lowry, though, will have to wait until a return to Royal Portrush for next month's 153rd Open after a thoroughly disappointing return to Oakmont where he was runner-up in 2016. This time, a 78 second round to add to his opening 79 left him cast well adrift on 17-over-par 157.
