Newscast Liverpool Parade Crash Charge + Trump Tariff Chaos
Today, we look at whether President Donald Trump will be allowed to continue with his tariffs plan.
On Wednesday a court put them on hold, saying they're beyond his power, then another court reinstated them pending an appeal.
Adam is joined by chief presenter in the US, Caitríona Perry, Americast's Justin Webb, and FT columnist Gillian Tett.
And we find out the identity of the man who has been charged with multiple offences after a car hit fans attending Liverpool's Premier League victory celebration.
You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers.
You can join our Newscast online community here: https://tinyurl.com/newscastcommunityhere
New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: https://bit.ly/3ENLcS1
Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Rufus Gray with Shiler Mahmoudi. The technical producer was Michael Regaard. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The editor is Sam Bonham.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness
A 'spiteful' boss cut his pregnant employee's work hours after she told him she had morning sickness, and then fired her when her maternity leave was due to start, a tribunal has heard. Sadia Shakil had worked as an accountant and bookkeeper at the property development firm Samsons in Bedford since October 2020, and became pregnant early the following year. But after Ms Shakil phoned her boss Mohammed Saleem on 30 March 2021 to inform him that she was experiencing morning sickness due to her pregnancy, he then proceeded to tell her in an email the following day that he was cutting her working hours. In the email seen by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote: 'Considering that I am unable to give you extra work as I am abroad and in view that you are feeling unwell during your pregnancy it would be best if you only come into work for 2 days per week.' The tribunal ruled that this was a 'fundamental' breach of Ms Shakil's employment contract, which caused her to experience 'stress, anxiety and panic' while questioning how she and her husband would be able to afford essential items for their baby now that their main source of income had been unilaterally reduced. During this period, Ms Shakil suffered sleepless nights and panic attacks while being 'plagued by worrisome thoughts', including 'doubts about whether she had done the right thing to have a baby at all when she was not financially stable'. After informing her boss that she needed to resign, Ms Shakil managed to secure a second full-time job in May, but she continued to work at Samsons in her spare time in the hope she would be able to resume her full-time role at the firm after her maternity leave. In the months that followed, Mr Saleem ignored multiple emails from Ms Shakil about her upcoming maternity leave, 'which caused her further stress and worry', at a time when she also suffered complications, being admitted to hospital on two occasions. By the end of September, blood tests had revealed a potentially serious condition which Ms Shakil was told put her baby at risk of still birth, resulting in the hospital booking her in to have her baby induced on 17 October. Two days after Ms Shakil's final email on 27 September, informing Mr Saleem that her leave would now commence on 1 October, he finally responded – referring to a letter she had not received 'putting her role at risk of redundancy '. Ms Shakil was dismissed with effect from 1 October 2021, when she began maternity leave, the tribunal noted. After her son was born on 18 October, the family were forced to move back in with Ms Shakil's parents 'due to the financial pressure that [her] loss of employment and lack of maternity pay had created'. Ms Shakil's subsequent claim to the Department for Work and Pensions for maternity allowance was then rejected on the grounds that her employer was responsible for paying it. 'The claimant's early weeks and months with her new baby were marred by the need to devote time to trying to resolve her financial predicament and bringing the employment tribunal proceedings,' the tribunal found. After an initial tribunal in Birmingham in April 2023, Ms Shakil was awarded £5,000 in damages for maternity discrimination and Samsons ordered to pay her for income lost while on reduced hours. In an email sent in June 2023 in which he asked Ms Shakil to provide her bank details so that he could pay her the sum awarded by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote 'I hope that you have a wonderful time utilising the monies gained from me', adding that the loss of money 'will make no difference to me'. A further appeal hearing in March 2025 found that Ms Shakil 'was horrified' by the email – which she described as 'disturbing and 'nasty' – and 'was shocked that Mr Saleem could be so spiteful to her'. Ms Shakil's appeal that the sum awarded to her had been too low was accepted, and the judge ordered Samsons to pay her a total of £31,860. Finding it to be a 'serious case of discrimination', the tribunal found: 'The discrimination took place at a time in the claimant's life which she had hoped and planned would be exciting and happy – the pregnancy, birth and early life of her first child. 'Instead, she suffered physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety and distress. These included sleepless nights, panic attacks, intrusive anxious thoughts and tearfulness. There was evidence that the claimant's confidence and self-esteem were damaged by the discrimination. 'These symptoms persisted from the time she was told that her hours had been cut to two days per week, until her baby was born. The symptoms did not stop then, however, because of the claimants' ongoing financial struggles.' It added: 'The effects of the discriminatory dismissal were ongoing at the time of the hearing, four years later, because the claimant is still worried that she might have a similar experience with her new employer if she decides to have another baby.'
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Man from Slough charged with preparing terror attack
A 20-year-old man has been charged with preparing a terror attack. Ilyas Akhtar, from Slough, has also been accused of two counts of arson, against a family activity centre and an ice rink, and carrying out a bomb hoax at an Asda supermarket. Counter Terrorism Policing South East said the arson charges related to an incident at Salt Hill Activity Centre in Slough on May 31 and the Slough Ice Arena on May 14. Detective Superintendent Andy Penrith, of the Berkshire East local command unit, said: 'We understand that these charges for terrorism offences will be concerning to our communities in Slough. I want to reassure all our residents that Thames Valley Police is working closely with our communities and partners in Slough, as well as our colleagues in counter-terrorism. 'You are likely to see more officers and PCSOs in the area carrying out proactive patrols across Slough to reassure the community. If you have any information or concerns then please speak to our officers or PCSOs. 'Due to the ongoing court proceedings, our officers and staff won't be able to provide any further details on this specific case, but we will be there to listen and support our communities.' The man was charged with one count each of preparation of terrorist acts and possessing information likely to be useful to a person preparing an act of terrorism, two counts of arson with intent, and one count of causing a bomb hoax.
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Shocking moment lorry driver is caught with no hands on the wheel as he rolls a cigarette on the motorway
This is the shocking moment a lorry driver is caught driving with no hands on the wheel while he rolls a cigarette. The careless driver was captured on film as part of Gloucestershire Police's Operation Tramline on the M25. Up to 58 drivers were stopped for offences that included not wearing seatbelts, using a phone behind the wheel, alongside pulling trailers with insecure loads. Under the road safety initiative, undercover officers drove in an unmarked HGV lorry between May 6 and May 8, recording and i dentifying a number of traffic offences. These officers then intercepted the offending vehicle, pulling it over and dealing with the driver. Alongside capturing the careless cigarette-roller, officers also pulled over a tow truck that was found to have several major defects which included no brakes, cuts in tyres, bald tyres, cracked suspension springs and an insecure load. A prohibition notice was issued to the driver as the vehicle was not roadworthy and could have put other motorists at risk. Two motorists were also pulled over for towing vehicles while in the third lane of the motorway which is not permitted. The offences were handled under the Traffic Offence Reports and summons. These can potentially result in a fine of £100 for failing to wear a seatbelt, £200 and six penalty points for using a handheld mobile device and a £300 fine for driving a vehicle in contravention of a prohibition. Penalties for driving whilst disqualified can also lead to a fine of up to £5,000 and up to six months' imprisonment. Sergeant Matt Firth from the Roads Policing Unit said: 'Reducing the numbers of people killed or seriously injured on our roads continues to be a priority for Gloucestershire Constabulary. 'We will continue to run these operations to detect and deter those who choose to drive in this manner remembering that any of us or our loved ones could be impacted by such behaviours whilst using the county's roads.' National Highways Engineering Team Manager for Road Safety, Jack Mason, described it as 'disappointing' to see numerous drivers putting both themselves and others on the road at great risk. Pictured: a HGV which was pulled over as the driver was seen to be texting while driving. National Highways Engineering Team Manager for Road Safety, Jack Mason, described it as 'disappointing' to see numerous drivers putting both themselves and others on the road at great risk Mr Mason added: 'Figures show that you're twice as likely to die in a crash if you don't wear a seat belt and four times more likely to be in a crash if using a phone at the wheel. 'This year marks the 10th anniversary of Operation Tramline and our goal has always been to remind motorists to think carefully about their driving behaviours and to make our roads safer. 'These results show just how valuable our HGV cabs continue to be in helping to spot unsafe driving behaviours and we will continue working with our police partners to make our roads as safe as we can.' National Highways has three unmarked HGV cabs which it loans out to police forces across the country as part of Operation Tramline. The operation was introduced to help decrease the number of people killed or seriously injured on the National Highways road network.
