100 percent of Gazans at risk of famine: says UN
100 percent of Gazans at risk of famine: says UN
The UN says Gaza is the only defined area in the world where the entire population is now at risk of famine. Photo: Reuters
Gaza is "the hungriest place on Earth", the United Nations said on Friday, warning that the Palestinian territory's entire population was now at risk of famine.
Negotiations to end nearly 20 months of war have so far failed to achieve a breakthrough, with Israel resuming operations in Gaza in March, ending a six-week truce.
"Gaza is the hungriest place on Earth," said Jens Laerke, a spokesman for the UN humanitarian agency OCHA.
"It's the only defined area – a country or defined territory within a country – where you have the entire population at risk of famine. 100 percent of the population at risk of famine," he said, rejecting claims to the contrary by Israeli authorities.
In recent days, Israel has partially eased a total aid blockade on the Palestinian territory that it imposed on March 2, leading to severe shortages of food and medicine.
Daniel Meron, Israel's ambassador in Geneva, rejected the claim, saying UN agencies "cherry pick the facts to paint an alternative version of reality and demonise Israel".
"In a desperate effort to remain relevant, they lambast the best efforts of Israel and its partners to facilitate delivery of humanitarian aid to the civilian population. UN feeds Hamas, we make sure aid gets to those in need," he wrote on X.
At a press briefing in Geneva, Laerke detailed the difficulties faced by the United Nations in delivering humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip.
He said 900 trucks of humanitarian aid had been authorised by Israel to enter the Strip since the blockade was partially lifted.
But so far only 600 trucks have been offloaded on the Gaza side of the border, and a smaller number of truckloads have then been picked up, due to multiple security considerations.
Laerke said the mission to deliver aid was "in an operational strait-jacket that makes it one of the most obstructed aid operations not only in the world today, but in recent history".
Once truckloads enter Gaza, they are often "swarmed by desperate people", Laerke said.
"I don't blame them, for one second, for taking the aid that essentially is already theirs -- but it's not distributed in the way we want."
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation – a new organisation backed by Israel and the United States that emerged in early May –has been distributing aid at several sites across the Strip this week.
The organisation has faced accusations of helping Israel fulfil its military objectives while excluding Palestinians and failing to adhere to humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence.
Asked about the foundation's operations, Laerke said: "It's not working. It does not meet the needs of people. It creates chaos." (AFP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
8 hours ago
- RTHK
Lee Jae-myung to win S Korea presidency: exit polls
Lee Jae-myung to win S Korea presidency: exit polls Members of the Democratic Party are jubilant as exit polls point to Lee Jae-myung's victory. Photo: Reuters South Korea's liberal party candidate Lee Jae-myung is projected to win Tuesday's snap presidential election by wide margins, according to exit polls, ushering in a political sea change after backlash against martial law brought down his predecessor. Results of the surveys by the country's broadcasters were released after nearly 80 percent of the country's 44.39 million eligible voters had cast their ballots. South Koreans are hoping to put six months of turmoil from ousted leader Yoon Suk-yeol's martial law decree behind them and for a reversal in the ebbing fortunes of Asia's fourth-largest economy. The joint exit poll by broadcasters KBS, MBC and SBS, which has in previous elections mostly been in line with the final results, put Lee of the Democratic Party on 51.7 percent and his conservative rival Kim Moon-soo on 39.3 percent. A separate survey by broadcaster JTBC put Lee on 50.6 percent and Kim on 39.4 percent. Channel A also predicted a Lee win by similar margins. After being impeached by parliament in December, Yoon was removed from office by the Constitutional Court on April 4, less than three years into his five-year term, triggering the snap election that now stands to remake the country's political leadership and foreign policies. Lee had called the election "judgement day" against the previous Yoon administration and the conservative People Power Party, accusing them of having condoned the martial law attempt by not fighting harder to thwart it and even trying to save Yoon's presidency. "I hope the issues surrounding martial law are addressed more clearly and transparently," said 40-year-old Seoul resident Kim Yong-Hyun. "There are still many things that don't make sense, and I'd like to see them properly resolved." Park Chan-dae, acting leader of the Democratic Party, told KBS that the party was holding out for the votes to be officially counted, but that the projections suggest voters rejected the martial law attempt and are hoping for an improvement in their livelihoods. "I think people made a fiery judgement against the insurrection regime," he said. The winner must tackle challenges including a society deeply scarred by divisions made more obvious since the attempt at military rule, and an export-heavy economy reeling from unpredictable protectionist moves by the United States, a major trading partner and a security ally. If the exit polls' projections are accurate, Lee should be on course to officially become president when the National Election Commission declares the winner sometime on Wednesday, immediately taking power including becoming commander-in-chief of the military. (Reuters)
Asia Times
15 hours ago
- Asia Times
Lebanon: ceasefire for tomorrow in a country with no future
If you spend time in Lebanon, you will frequently hear the term ' bukra .' Bukra translates to 'tomorrow.' The Lebanese often use the term in the context of deadlines, expectations, and responsibilities. For example, 'When will my car be fixed?' ' Bukra .' One quickly learns that bukra is not a serious response in Lebanon. It is an excuse—a 'promise' that evades any firm commitment. The promise of 'tomorrow' leaves the respondent believing he is entitled to determine when and how he feels or desires (if ever, anything). Given the prevalence of that thinking in Lebanon, it is not surprising to witness it once more in the context of the country's international affairs. Lebanon's leadership agreed to a ceasefire with Israel beginning on November 27. Seven months later, the Lebanese officials are still promising that the terms of the ceasefire agreement will be realized 'tomorrow,' the latest being Prime Minister Nawaf Salam on May 26. The behavior exudes an aura of entitlement and unaccountability that further degrades whatever remains of the country and erases its future. Lebanon is a dystopic state and society. It experienced 13 months of daily violence and further destruction of its land because it could not control its southern border. Periodic violence continues. Lebanon endures the fifth year of a historic economic collapse and massive inflation. Crime and corruption are rampant. Among other things, there have been no state indictments regarding more than a dozen assassinations of political, state, and media personalities and the Beirut port blast. Basic services are almost nonexistent. A full day of electricity is a luxury and modest healthcare comes at a premium. Despite all that, many Lebanese officials and their supporters act as if time is on their side. They believe commitments can be adjusted to suit their interests. They feel deserving of constant international pandering and a 'special status.' They think their word is forever good. Note the entitlement and lack of accountability. Lebanese officials demonstrate an indifference to deadlines. They had 60 days and a 22-day extension to implement the stipulations of a US-mediated ceasefire with Israel—disarm and remove the Lebanese militia Hezbollah—and failed. When or if the terms will be realized is anyone's guess. Their behavior is remarkable. US mediation saved the already debilitated country from further destruction. Any grateful entity would recognize this opportunity to prevent another outbreak of violence and to put Lebanon on the road to recovery. Instead, the Lebanese government drags its feet. Many Lebanese point the finger at Israel for its shortcomings regarding the ceasefire. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun regularly speaks to US officials (responsible for monitoring the ceasefire) about 'outstanding issues' regarding the ceasefire and Israeli violations. Lebanese personalities blame Israel's continued presence at five locations in Lebanese territory for impeding their ability to disarm and remove Hezbollah from southern Lebanon. Who exactly governs Lebanon? Their rhetoric is quite ironic. Have Lebanese officials forgotten what transpired in 2006? Following a 33-day war initiated by Hezbollah, UN Resolution 1701 stipulated an Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon. It also called on Lebanese officials to disarm Hezbollah and remove the militia from southern Lebanon. Israel withdrew. Lebanon did not disarm and remove the militia. Their failure enabled Hezbollah's unprovoked October 8, 2023, attack on Israel. Why would Israel trust Lebanon and make itself vulnerable again? Lebanese officials decided to adjust the terms of the ceasefire agreement after signing it. The Lebanese president announced that a dialogue with Hezbollah must precede their disarmament. When the dialogue happens, how long it will take, and whether it will be a success are mysteries. What would happen if Hezbollah decided not to cooperate? Nothing? Like before? Israel would not have agreed to a ceasefire under these conditions. The Lebanese track record on domestic dialogues is poor. The behavior indicates that Lebanese leadership either never intended to fully implement the ceasefire or knew they could not. One wonders if leadership and its supporters are serious about rebuilding the country for tomorrow, bukra . Recent attention by the Lebanese government has been on disarming Palestinians residing in Lebanon while ignoring the real elephant in the room—Hezbollah. The longer Hezbollah stays armed, the chance for violence remains and the harder it is to disarm the militia. Both factors deter investment in the country and hopes of a return to normalcy. Has leadership forgotten that a majority of Lebanese are impoverished? Lebanon has little to offer the world at the moment. Lebanon's halcyon days as a hub of commerce and banking are 50 years removed. They are reliant on the goodwill of the United States, Europe, the Gulf and international institutions. Do the Lebanese believe they can continue to act and think this way without repercussions? Do they want their word to eventually be as worthless as the Lebanese pound? Until those leaders get serious about shedding their entitlement and becoming accountable, the bukra many Lebanese speak about will continue to look like an immiserating today. Inaction, empty words, excuses and finger-pointing come at a price to the country's image, its people and its future. Eric Bordenkircher, PhD, is a research fellow at UCLA's Center for Middle East Development. He tweets at @UCLA_Eagle. The views represented in this piece are his own and do not necessarily represent the position of UCLA or the Center for Middle East Development.
RTHK
15 hours ago
- RTHK
Mainland factory activity hits 32-month low: survey
Mainland factory activity hits 32-month low: survey The Caixin index primarily surveys small and medium-sized enterprises. File photo: Reuters China's factory activity in May fell to its lowest in 32 months, a private-sector survey showed on Tuesday, suggesting US tariffs are now starting to directly hurt the manufacturing superpower. The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing PMI fell to 48.3 from 50.4 in April, missing analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll and marking the first contraction since September last year. The 50-mark separates growth from contraction. It was also the lowest reading since September 2022. "The surprisingly sharp fall... means that the survey data now point to a loss of economic momentum last month," said Huang Zichun, China economist at Capital Economics. "Domestic headwinds [are] more than offsetting the boost from the US-China trade truce," she said. The result is broadly in line with China's official PMI released on Saturday that showed factory activity fell for a second month. Wang Zhe, senior economist at Caixin Insight Group, said the slowdown was linked to "sluggish external demand, which fell for a second straight month". Beijing should target effective measures to boost domestic demand by improving household incomes, Wang added. A US federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the most sweeping tariffs, a day after a trade court ruled that President Donald Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and ordered an immediate block on them. Two weeks after breakthrough negotiations that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday the talks are "a bit stalled". Premier Li Qiang last week said the country is mulling new policy tools, including some "unconventional measures", which will be launched as the situation evolves. According to the Caixin survey, new export orders shrank for the second straight month in May and at the fastest pace since July 2023. Producers said the US tariffs restrained global demand. That dragged down overall new orders to the lowest since September 2022. Factory output, meanwhile, contracted for the first time since October 2023. (Reuters/AFP)
