Tesla exec cancels Rome conference trip over security concerns
ROME, April 23 (Reuters) - A Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab senior executive has cancelled her attendance at a conference in Rome over fears of protests surrounding the carmaker in response to CEO Elon Musk's right-wing activism.
Tesla cars, infrastructure and offices have recently become targets of vandalism in several countries, including Italy. The group's sales have nosedived along with its share price, which has lost more than 30% this year.
Samantha Harris, Tesla's Global Sustainability Lead, had been due to speak at Regenerative Futures, opens new tab, a conference planned in Rome for May 16-17 by the European Institute of Innovation for Sustainability (EIIS).
"Given the recent protests and violence against Tesla, and now in Rome, I've been asked to hold my external presence and travel ... I won't be able to attend," she said in an email to the EIIS seen by Reuters.
A fire at a Tesla dealership in Rome last month destroyed 17 cars in what tech-billionaire Musk described as an act of "terrorism."
Drone images of the fire showed the burnt-out remains of cars lined up in a parking lot, with two rows of vehicles back-to-back and a third row some distance away.
Musk, a close ally of President Donald Trump, has been working to eliminate wasteful U.S. public spending through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
However, he said on Tuesday he would cut back the time he devotes to DOGE in order to spend more time running his many companies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Wall Street titan slams Trump's mega-bill
Billionaire Ken Griffin has sided with Elon Musk in his attack on Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'. The Citadel CEO warned the act will 'add several trillion dollars' to the national debt, which will soon surpass $37 trillion. Unlike Musk, who called the bill a ' disgusting abomination,' Griffin criticized the legislation in more conciliatory terms. 'The bill will unquestionably add several trillion dollars,' Griffin said Thursday at the 2025 Forbes Iconoclast Summit in New York City. 'The challenge with the legislation is there's not enough tough decisions... around how we're going to put our fiscal house in order.' Griffin made his concerns known about runaway government spending after the Congressional Budget Office estimated the GOP budget bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Much of this comes down to the bill's extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts, which will decrease the revenue coming into the government. Griffin, who voted for Trump in the 2024 election, did not say he disagreed with the extension of the prior tax cuts. But he did take issue with even more tax relief for businesses. 'The continued reduction in tax rates for small and medium enterprise businesses; I'm not sure what we're going to achieve with that,' said Griffin, who is estimated to have a net worth of $44.5 billion. Griffin cast the bill, which is still winding its way through the Senate, as poorly thought out and dangerous to the nation's finances. 'You cannot run deficits of 6 or 7 percent [higher than GDP] at full employment after years of growth. That's just fiscally irresponsible,' said Griffin, who is worth $44.5 billion. 'There are a lot of question marks in the bill as to why we're continuing to increase our tax cuts when we have a fiscal deficit of this magnitude,' he added. approached Griffin's team and the White House for comment. Griffin also warned that if America's leaders fail to reign in spending, they risk a total collapse of US bond markets. Last week, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon sounded a similar alarm , predicting that at some point, investors will lose confidence in the US government's ability to service its debt. 'US default prices are probably the same as Italy or Greece,' Griffin said in reference to credit default swap markets where investors can bet on countries failing to meet their debt obligations. The consequences of a default - i.e. the country running out of money to pay its bills - would be 'catastrophic' for the US and the global economy, former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said. The stock market would almost certainly crash in such a scenario, with investors around the world coming to the understanding that the US - thought to be the most stable government in the world - could not fulfill its financial obligations for the first time in its nearly 250 years of existence. Back in April, when Trump unveiled and quickly paused his wide scale Liberation Day tariffs, multiple reports suggested that his U-turn was prompted by the major sell off in US bonds. Trump appeared to acknowledge this market turmoil at the time, saying: 'People were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit out of line.' Griffin didn't limit his criticisms of the administration to uncertainty on US debt or the big beautiful bill, which Trump wants passed by the Fourth of July. He also slammed the president for his ongoing trade policy, largely governed by historically-high tariffs. He said the tariffs have 'really taken their toll already on our economy' and have called 'into question American exceptionalism.' His firm Citadel has already cut its estimate for US economic growth by about half since Trump took office in January. As a parting shot at the president, Griffin decried Trump's decision to tear into Walmart CEO Doug McMillon for warning customers that the big-box retailer may have to increase prices thanks to tariffs. 'Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain. Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' and not charge valued customers ANYTHING, Trump posted to Truth Social in May.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
You say we need more babies, rightwingers? Come back to me after you've fought in the trenches of soft play
I absolutely cannot fathom the number of populist rightwing politicians and commentators who have looked at the smouldering mess that is the world currently and thought: 'I know what this situation demands – more toddlers.' Population-boosting discourse and policies have spread across Europe (Hungary, Poland, Greece, Italy and beyond), while in the US an unholy coalition of tech bros, religious conservatives, blowhard podcasters and the politicians who pander to them have gone loudly pronatalist. JD Vance used his first speech as vice-president to proclaim: 'I want more babies in the United States of America'; Elon Musk called declining birthrates 'a much bigger risk to civilisation than global warming'; and Trump is considering various procreation-incentivising policies, including a $5,000 'baby bonus', which I believe is what a carton of eggs – hen, not human – costs in the US these days. Now Nigel Farage has hopped on the breeding bandwagon (tick that off your 'What fresh hell?' bingo card). Reform, he says, wants to go 'much further to encourage people to have children'. I needed to do something other than grind my teeth to stumps about this, so I've been brainstorming an entrance test for the role of publicly boring on about birth rates. Because having numerous children yourself (Vance lets the side down with a mere three; Musk tops the leaderboard with 14) doesn't qualify you to harangue others to do the same; you need to have actually walked the multiple-children walk – done the stuff parents without a flotilla of staff or a tradwife spouse have to do. Here are a few suggested 'canon' events politicians should experience before they're allowed to pontificate about our patriotic duty to breed. Your internal organs either feel like, or actually are, falling out; you can't sit down or lift anything safely (not sure how we simulate this for the bros, but it's 2025 – technology can surely assist). Unfortunately, the writhing newborn with its gums clamped to your nipple hasn't got the memo, and who's this erupting into the room, exuding the on-the-brink energy of someone whose world recently imploded? It's 12kg of inexplicably naked toddler barrelling towards a plug socket while intimating an urgent need to urinate, an open bottle of Calpol (where did they get that?) casually slung in one hand. Your move – oh, hang on, you can't move. Just regular, awful bedtimes: different, elaborate, multi-phase sleep rituals more complex than a Korean skincare regime for each child. A colicky baby. A toddler who fights sleep with the raw power of a heavyweight boxer. A child who waits until 11pm when you're on your very last nerve to ask the big questions about death. Standard stuff. You're hungover, sick or sleep-deprived (joke – you're always sleep-deprived) and desperate to crawl into a dark hole, but no, it's 9am, everyone's been up for four hours and you're in an echoing hangar with lighting, music and general ambience inspired by Guantánamo, having paid £10 per person for the privilege. One kid is attached to your leg, refusing to have fun without you; one has vanished entirely; another is headed straight into the ball pit, where they promptly have a screaming nervous breakdown. You'll need to retrieve them, knowing there's at least one rogue poo in there somewhere (worst lucky dip ever). How bad can it be, you say to yourself? Then the sweating and the flashbacks start. It's worse than 'Nam in Clarks and there's no way out but through. The cottage has vertiginously slippery stairs and surfaces full of low-hanging fragile knick-knacks, plus inadequate curtains, so everyone wakes at 4am. With no Freeview or phone reception, you can't outsource the early shift to Bluey. The intersection of allergy, intolerance and awkwardness is such that there is no food everyone will eat. It's day one and you're already praying for the sweet release of death. Guts in violent turmoil, you're physically unable to move more than a metre from your lavatory while being repeatedly called upon to clean up – probably even catch in your cupped hands! – your sick children's effluvia. Tell me again how more kids are the answer to the world's ills? Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump's ‘triumph': Newt Gringrich selective spins in new book praising president
Over 280 pages, Newt Gingrich, House speaker turned Republican presidential hopeful turned prolific author of historical (and critics would say political) fantasy, goes all out to flatter the man in the Oval Office. 'President Trump's reelection was the triumph of a man and a movement,' Gingrich writes. 'Each needed the other if America was to be saved.' More to the point, perhaps, a second Trump term enabled a second ambassadorial gig for Callista Gingrich, Newt's third wife. Emissary to the Vatican in Trump's first term, she is on her way to being envoy to Switzerland. Newt also slobbers over Elon Musk: the world's richest person turned chainsaw-wielding enemy of the federal government, turned embittered Trumpworld exile. 'Musk is in many ways the Christopher Columbus of our time,' Gingrich writes. Gingrich might have been better advised to compare Musk to Tony Stark, alter ego of Iron Man. The Gingrich family brokerage account may be talking, too. A recent filing by Callista Gingrich with the office of government ethics reveals between $1m and $5m in Tesla stock. Then again, Musk has emerged bruised, literally sporting a black eye. According to the New York Times, the Tesla and SpaceX billionaire ingested ketamine and other drugs while wreaking havoc and ruining lives as a special government employee. Not that special, either: Musk's so-called 'department of government efficiency' failed to significantly reduce government spending. Musk arrived in DC vowing to slash $2tn, then left $1.86tn short of the mark. 'Was it all bullshit?' Trump openly asked. Musk quickly returned the favor. Mincing no words, he branded Trump's beloved 'big, beautiful bill' a 'disgusting abomination'. Quickie political tomes, ripe for airport bookstands, are dashed out fast by design. Apparently, Gingrich didn't bet on Musk's lame exit or his trashing Trump. Like most such books, Trump's Triumph contains score-settling, too. Gingrich has plenty outstanding. Nearly 40 years ago, as the Republican House whip, he clashed with George HW Bush, hammering the 41st president for breaking his pledge of 'no new taxes'. Later, in 2012, Gingrich badly lost the Republican nomination to Mitt Romney. During that run, news of profligacy exploded. The Gingriches maintained a credit line between $500,000 and $1m at Tiffany's, the New York jeweler. Barack Obama 'would have Newt for breakfast … at Tiffany's', a Romney spokesperson said. If Trump's Triumph is any guide, Gingrich has failed, or never tried, to conquer his resentment of such establishment figures. 'We were for fundamental change within the GOP and had taken on the Gerald Ford-Bush family-Mitt Romney accommodationist wing of the Republican party,' he crows, of the Trump takeover. But unpaid debts linger. Literally. In a 2014 filing with the Federal Election Commission, Newt 2012 debts exceed $4.652m. More than a decade later, the campaign's latest filing puts the figure at $4.637m. Debt be damned. Gingrich would rather claim credit. 'Early on,' he writes, Trump 'decisively sided with the legacies of Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, and, frankly, myself'. There is faux nostalgia, too: 'In the fall of 1996, President Bill Clinton and I were planning major bipartisan reforms for Medicare and Social Security. The Monica Lewinsky scandal exploded and destroyed everything … Neither of us could have possibly ignored or downplayed it without facing severe political consequences.' For the record, Gingrich led an impeachment that failed. After details of his own affair emerged, he left Congress. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'I'm willing to lead but I'm not willing to preside over people who are cannibals,' he complained of his Republican colleagues. Trump's Triumph does not discuss how, in 1988, Gingrich filed an ethics complaint against Jim Wright, then Democratic speaker who resigned rather than face the music. The wheel turned. In 1997, the House ethics committee recommended Gingrich be reprimanded, and he was fined $300,000. The House adopted the ethics report by a vote of 395-28, making him the first speaker so admonished. Nowadays, Gingrich is more eager to stay on the right side of the powers that be. But he and Trump are not always on the same page. Differences emerge on Iran and immigration. In 2012, Gingrich received $20m in campaign donations from Sheldon Adelson, the late casino magnate who wanted to nuke Tehran. Gingrich still wants regime change. 'We need a strategy that helps the Iranian people take their own country back from a dictatorship that has trapped, imprisoned, and impoverished them,' he writes. 'We still have no strategy except accommodation and diplomacy with a regime we assume is unchangeable. This must change.' Trump has other ideas. 'I would like to see Iran be very successful,' he said last October. 'The only thing is, they can't have a nuclear weapon.' In office, he pursues a nuclear deal – to replace the one he trashed first time round. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has increased its stockpile of highly enriched uranium by half since February. Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, Gingrich chivvies Trump's negotiator, Steve Witkoff: 'There's a real danger of the Trump envoys being talked into a pretty foolish deal that's not enforceable.' On immigration, Gingrich praises the legal kind as a 'powerful source of economic and technological growth'. Legal immigrants, he writes, help 'make America wealthier and more technologically advanced'. In the real world, the Trump administration works to restrict foreign students. True to form, Gingrich also tries to go big, gazing back toward Rome and the American revolution. He's a historian by training, after all. 'The Founding Fathers sought to protect freedom by inventing a machine so complex and divided against itself that no dictator could force it to work quickly,' Gingrich writes. Yet he opposes anyone standing in Trump's path, as many courts are doing. 'I think in Trump's sense, he really does believe God wants him to make America great again,' Gingrich writes. 'And if that means you take on Harvard, or you take on the courts, or you take on the bureaucracy or whatever, that's what he's going to do.' The divine right of Trump? Caesar will approve. Trump's Triumph is published in the US by Hachette
