logo
Historic Harvard Square landmark to reopen after 5 years

Historic Harvard Square landmark to reopen after 5 years

Yahoo20-05-2025

The former newsstand that has been a central landmark in Harvard Square for a century will reopen May 30 after multiple years of construction.
The structure, to be known as the Cambridge KiOSK, will now be a visitor information center and community space hosting arts and culture programming.
The inaugural exhibit at the kiosk will celebrate its legacy as a newsstand, exploring the history of print media in Cambridge, including radical newspapers, music and cultural publications and Out of Town News, the business that occupied the kiosk for decades.
'The reopening of the Cambridge KiOSK is a milestone for our community,' City Manager Yi-An Huang said in a news release. 'This transformation respects the KiOSK's rich history while creating new opportunities for gathering, creativity, and civic engagement in the heart of Harvard Square. We are excited to see it thrive as a welcoming hub where residents and visitors can connect and celebrate Cambridge's cultural vibrancy.'
According to the Cambridge KiOSK website, the building was first constructed in 1925 by the Boston Elevated Railway Company and served as the headhouse—the aboveground portion of the station—for the subway. It was converted into a newsstand in the 1950s when Harvard Square station was constructed.
Out of Town News closed permanently in 2019. Local nonprofit CultureHouse took over with a pop-up community space for eight months, until the pop-up was shuttered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The restoration and renovation of the kiosk was part of a wider transformation of Harvard Square, which will improve accessibility and introduce new landscaping and public seating. Construction on the project began in September 2024 and is expected to be completed in 2026.
CultureHouse was again selected to operate the reimagined kiosk, with plans to host live music and poetry, open mics, art workshops and rotating exhibits celebrating local art and history.
'Out of Town News once brought global conversations to Harvard Square when news from overseas was hard to access. Today, information from around the world is readily available on our phones, but it's local connections that are often hardest to find,' said CultureHouse Executive Director Aaron Greiner. 'By partnering with local artists, creatives, and community leaders, we're transforming this historic landmark into a dynamic hub where people can connect with neighbors, share ideas, and experience culture.'
The Cambridge Visitor Information Center will also return to the kiosk after moving to a temporary space on the first floor of nearby Cambridge Savings Bank during the renovations.
'At the Cambridge KiOSK, visitors will find more than just information; they'll receive personalized recommendations, curated itineraries, and insider tips to experience the very best of Cambridge's arts, culture, and history,' said Cambridge Office for Tourism Interim Executive Director Candice Beaulieu. 'This space has long been a gateway for discovery, and we're excited to continue that tradition with the help of our dedicated volunteers.'
The KiOSK will host a public opening celebration on Friday, May 30 from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. with live music, refreshments and a speaking program, after which it will officially open to the public.
The kiosk will be open 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. Sundays, 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Mondays through Thursdays and 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. Fridays and Saturdays.
CultureHouse is seeking artists, nonprofits and businesses to bring events and programing to the kiosk. For more information, fill out the organization's interest form.
Celtics trade rumors: Jrue Holiday more available than other guard (report)
Ex-Patriots WR signs with Buffalo Bills
Mets manager vows to discuss hustle with superstar after Red Sox gaffe
Warriors looking at Boston Celtics guard as trade option (report)
Jordon Hudson is telling people that she and Bill Belichick are engaged (report)
Read the original article on MassLive.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The True Story Behind RomCon: Who the F*** is Jason Porter?
The True Story Behind RomCon: Who the F*** is Jason Porter?

Time​ Magazine

time36 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

The True Story Behind RomCon: Who the F*** is Jason Porter?

RomCon: Who the F*** is Jason Porter?, a docu-series out on Prime Video June 13, tells the sad story of a Toronto woman whose relationship with a repairman broke apart after she discovered his extensive lies. Heather Rovet met Jason 'Jace' Porter in 2018 when he was a handyman who came to her condo to fulfill a maintenance request. In 2021, she discovered that throughout their three-year relationship, he lied to her repeatedly, went on wild spending sprees with her money, and stole Tiffany jewelry from her family. She found a new life's purpose in exposing his frauds—and the series is a product of that. Over two episodes, the docu-series follows Rovet's story of falling in love and then finding out that the man she'd been living with was not who he said he was. RomCon also features other women who were wooed by Porter who say, that like with Rovet, he would pursue them actively at first, and then cool off. These women had reached out to Rovet after journalist Jane Gerster's wrote a Toronto Life exposé on her ordeal. Rovet's hope is that the series will have a far reach on Prime Video, not only to other potential victims of Porter's deceptive schemes, but also to warn viewers about scams. According to the Federal Trade Commission, victims of such scams lost $1.14 billion in 2023. Here's a look at Rovet's quest to expose the wrongs of the man she initially thought was her Mr. Right. Warning signs At first, the relationship with Porter—who introduced himself as "Jace Peretti"—was a dream come true to Rovet, who was 46 years old at the time she met him. He was a great kisser, and they went on motorcycle rides together. Porter had also hit it off with her mother. Within weeks, Porter had told her she was the love of his life. However, her father, Ernest, had a bad feeling about Porter from the get-go. In the series, he says he regrets that he didn't speak up about it earlier. After the relationship was over, Rovet says he told her that he thought Porter "sounded like a thug—very inarticulate, very clipped sentences. He mumbled a lot." And it didn't track with this cosmopolitan lifestyle he claimed to be living. Likewise, her friend Krystin said Porter had talked about living in China for two years, and because she had also spent a lot of time in China, she asked how much Mandarin he knew. He said he didn't need to learn it and that he didn't travel around the country much, which she found hard to believe given his claims of living there for an extended period of time. The romantic gestures continued, before petering out. Porter promised her vacations, like a getaway to Rome, but would backed out last-minute, saying he couldn't leave because of an ongoing custody battle with his ex-wife over his son. Three years into dating Porter, Rovet wondered if she would ever meet this son. The moment Heather realized Jason Porter was lying Rovet started to notice peculiar behavior in Porter when he moved into her condo in Toronto at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, when they were in close quarters all of the time. Living together, Heather began noticing and growing annoyed that he'd stay up really late, and then take long naps in the afternoon. Though she was a city slicker through-and-through, she agreed to compromise and move out to the Toronto suburb of Aurora so he could be closer to his son. Meanwhile Rovet's mother discovered she was missing her two wedding bands. When she asked her housekeeper who took it, the housekeeper said Jace took it. When her mother didn't believe her, the housekeeper quit. "I still, to this day, feel terrible for what he took from my mom, because she's never going to get it back," Rovet says. "And it's not about the actual things; it's the sentiment, the memories, that he stole from her." He was draining their bank account on gas, cigarettes and vaping accessories, they started fighting regularly. After one fight, in which he couldn't commit to attending a BBQ hosted by one of her friends, he said he needed space. He left for five weeks, and she got suspicious about where he was spending his time. He used to use her computer, so she guessed at his password and gained access to his gmail account and several dating apps that he had actively been using while they had been dating. The more she dug into his background, the more disturbing information she found, including that Porter had been to jail multiple times. While he was out of the house, she went into his workshop and found receipts to pawn shops. In a room in their house that she specifically designed for his son, she found a bag of documents that contained proof that the custody battle had concluded years ago. As she was sleuthing, Porter called her. Rovet says she told him, 'I feel like I don't even know who you are anymore.' He immediately locked her out of his email accounts. Who was Jason Porter? Porter refused to participate in the series, but there are some things Rovet knows for sure about him. His real name was not Jace Peretti, but Jason Porter, and he was not actually Italian in any way like his fake surname implied. While it's true that he was a dad, he was not a software engineer, like he told prospective dates. The filmmakers wanted to get some shot of him walking into a local courthouse, so Rovet came along to try and confront him. Porter pulled his jacket over his head when he saw her so that cameras can't see his face. In April 2025, he was sentenced to about two years in prison and three years probation for stealing Rovet's mother's jewelry. He was ordered to repay her mother for the stolen jewelry and report any future romantic relationships to his probation officer. Though justice has been served, there's a lot still unknown about Porter. 'I would love the opportunity to speak to someone in his family to learn more, but I have to let this go," says Rovet. "I can't keep going down the rabbit holes and letting it consume me.' What Heather Rovet wants other women to know The series ends with Heather driving around in her car, saying that she wished she had been onto Porter sooner. 'I'm happy, I'm really happy,' she says, noting it's been six years since the saga began, and she's ready to move on. She reiterates that she's feeling happier in her conversation with TIME. She has started dating again, although she still feels some trepidation about it, 'not so much with trusting other people, but with trusting myself,' she says, 'trusting that I'm making smart decisions around dating and opening myself up again to being in a relationship.' She hopes the series will spark a conversation around romance scams and romance fraud and lead to more protection for victims. 'Women who have been betrayed or conned or scammed, I don't think they need to feel embarrassed or ashamed," she says. "If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone."

‘The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue' Is Finally Inching Closer to the Screen
‘The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue' Is Finally Inching Closer to the Screen

Elle

timean hour ago

  • Elle

‘The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue' Is Finally Inching Closer to the Screen

Every item on this page was chosen by an ELLE editor. We may earn commission on some of the items you choose to buy. V.E. Schwab's bestselling fantasy novel, The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue, blew up on BookTok during the height of the COVID pandemic—and is now officially being adapted for the screen. Here's everything we know about the forthcoming film, produced by Schwab herself. The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue, originally published in October 2020, follows a young woman in 1714 France who makes a deal to become immortal. But she soon discovers that she's been cursed to be forgotten by everyone in her life. That is, until 300 years later, when she meets a man who remembers her. The film adaptation was first announced ahead of the book's release in 2020 by Variety. Although Schwab drafted an earlier version of the script, she will now serve solely as a producer for the adaptation. Augustine Frizzell (Never Goin' Back, Euphoria, Sweetbitter) is set to direct, according to Variety. She'll also be penning the script with her filmmaker husband, David Lowery (The Old Man & the Gun, The Green Knight). Schwab celebrated the writer-director duo on Instagram back in 2021, saying, 'The news is out! The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue has found its director!!! Augustine (Euphoria) is brilliant, and she and her husband David Lowery (The Green Knight) are penning the latest version of the script that she will direct.' In the same caption, she also included a note to fans who may be nervous about how the adaptation might differ from the book. 'I have said this about books I love, and I will say it about my own adaptations in the works: I see so many messages that amount to 'they better not change/ruin/fuck up this thing I love.' And I get it, I do. But please remember, no one can change/ruin/fuck up my book. Because my book is my book. It is not undone. It is not erased. It is not a palimpsest, written over by a new iteration. The book will always be the book. The film will always be the film.' Yes! Back in September 2022, Schwab posted a photo of the script on Instagram with the caption, 'When I read the script, I knew I was in good hands. It's phenomenal. A love letter to the book, and a feat in its own right. I'm beginning to think these two made a deal with Luc, to do this story justice.' Yes, the author provided an update about the much-anticipated film in a recent interview with Variety, saying that, of all her adaptations currently in the works, the Addie film is the furthest along. 'Addie is definitely the closest,' she said. 'It's been a really weird journey because when I first sold [the film rights for] Addie LaRue, I hadn't written the book, and then I spent like five years essentially being a living story Bible at the screenwriters' disposal. And then it went through many, many iterations.' She then mentioned that eOne (the production company that had initially acquired the rights for the film) was then acquired by Lionsgate. 'So now Addie is at Lionsgate,' she said. 'And Lionsgate is so invested in making it the best version of itself. I am really heartened by that, because there is a way to make Addie faster, cheaper, put it on streaming, and be done. And I just went out and met with Lionsgate in LA, and they're so aware of what it is and of what they have. It's one of the reasons they wanted eOne. So they're very, very intentional about, let's move slow and measured and make sure that we have the perfect version of this script so that we can do exactly what we want with it. It's not there yet. I am a deep skeptic of all things Hollywood, but I'm really, really excited by where it's at and how it's moving. And I cannot wait to see the next step of it.' This story will be updated.

Restaurant charges $17 fee for customers who commit this common dining practice: ‘Going a bit far'
Restaurant charges $17 fee for customers who commit this common dining practice: ‘Going a bit far'

New York Post

time7 hours ago

  • New York Post

Restaurant charges $17 fee for customers who commit this common dining practice: ‘Going a bit far'

People are expressing 'reservations' about this new policy. A French restaurateur has been ripped online after announcing a new fine on dining parties whose number of members didn't match their original booking. Olivier Vincent, chef and manager at L'îlot in Amboise, had reportedly become fed up with parties that either exceeded or fell short of the number of patrons they had reserved for, local media reported. Advertisement The problem — which reportedly occurred on a 'weekly' basis, per the boss — was particularly damaging as his venue only has 20 seats. 4 L'îlot (pictured) currently boasts a respectable 4.7 stars on Google, where it's described as serving 'inventive gourmet plates prepared in a down-to-earth restaurant with an open kitchen.' The Island Restaurant / Facebook Vincent announced in a Facebook post, which has garnered 27,000 views in the first 24 hours, that diners who fail to arrive with the number of guests specified on their reservation 'will be charged 15 euros ($17.27) per missing or additional person.' Advertisement 'Thank you for your understanding,' the Frenchman wrote. 'We're here because we need to make people responsible.' L'îlot currently boasts a respectable 4.7 stars on Google, where it's described as serving 'inventive gourmet plates prepared in a down-to-earth restaurant with an open kitchen.' 4 'From now on, if you do not come with the number of guests for which you reserved, you will be charged 15 euros per missing or additional person,' Vincent announced in the Facebook post (pictured). The Island Restaurant / Facebook According to Vincent, the incorrect booking issue had been ongoing since COVID, but things came to a head last Sunday when one customer exchanged multiple messages trying to change the booking. Advertisement 'After about ten emails with one person, she told us there would be eight, then nine, and finally, they arrived at seven without warning, without apology,' he recalled. 4 The incorrect reservation issue had been piling up since the COVID-19 pandemic, per Vincent. Scott Griessel – Vincent said there's no excuse for this mistake in a day and age where 'everyone has their phone on them, 24/7, in their pocket.' 'If we are able to reserve, we are able to call to say if we will be less, or more, or that we are not coming,' he declared. Advertisement 'If we are here, it is to work. It is not to have tables, not to have customers,' Vincent vented. 'We organize ourselves so that everything is serene. We have staff. We work with fresh products. We do not pay employees and suppliers with Monopoly tickets. My restaurant is a business.' 4 The issue was particularly damaging as the venue (pictured) only has 20 seats. The Island Restaurant / Facebook However, the policy received mixed reviews with some critics claiming that it was unfair to diners who had to cancel last-minute due to unforeseen circumstances. 'A bit of a limiting business practice if there are only one or two people missing from a large table,' said one. 'Emergencies exist. You're not going to get great publicity for yourself.' They added, 'Even if abuses exist, you are going a bit far. Imagine an on-call doctor who can't join their family for dinner, or someone who has a family emergency.' 'A last-minute unforeseen event,' said another. 'Getting left outside the restaurant (it's happened to me before)… Well, I might as well go somewhere else then. It seems pretty counterproductive to me.' However, many were on board with the issue, which they felt was the perfect antidote to an epidemic of inconsiderate diners. Advertisement 'I think it's completely normal, people just have to give enough notice, it's a lack of good manners, that's what reservations are for,' said one defender. 'You have guests, you count 8 people, two don't come without warning, you've done the shopping and the cooking accordingly.' They added, 'Personally, the next time I don't invite them. This is his livelihood, he loses two places, so I completely understand his approach.' Meanwhile, a fellow restaurateur claimed that 'this kind of situation has unfortunately become commonplace.' 'Between phantom reservations, last-minute cancellations, and customers arriving very late hoping to be served anyway, it's become a real headache,' they wrote. 'For a small establishment, every table counts. Service isn't just about dishes coming out, it's about meticulous organization, a kitchen team, precise timing—and when things go off the rails because of careless behavior, the loss of revenue is very real.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store