Airlines less optimistic for 2025, facing 'headwinds': IATA
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates fewer than five billion air journeys will take place this year, compared with the previously forecast 5.22 billion.
"The first half of 2025 has brought significant uncertainties to global markets," IATA's Director General Willie Walsh told its annual general meeting in New Delhi.
But he added: "Considering the headwinds, it's a strong result that demonstrates the resilience that airlines have worked hard to fortify."
Cumulative airline profits will reach $36 billion this year, $600 million less than expected, IATA said.
Commercial aviation revenues are expected to remain below the $1 trillion forecast in the previous December projections, with IATA now reporting $979 billion.
Walsh, addressing IATA delegates, called for the aviation sector to be spared from increased tariffs -- though he did not name US President Donald Trump, who unveiled sweeping duties on trading partners in April.
'Trade tensions'
While looking at profits, Walsh warned that "perspective is critical" to put industry-wide figures into context, saying that per passenger, it was still a narrow margin.
"It's still a thin buffer and any new tax, increase in airport or navigation charge, demand shock or costly regulation will quickly put the industry's resilience to the test," he said.
"Policymakers who rely on airlines as the core of a value chain that employs 86.5 million people and supports 3.9 percent of global economic activity must keep this clearly in focus."
The organisation also expects 69 million tonnes of cargo to be transported by air this year, down from the 72.5 million previously expected.
A barrel of Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark, stands below $65 as a result of Trump's tariffs, his call to "drill baby drill" and especially a decision by OPEC+ to hike crude output quotas.
This represents an immediate boon for airlines.
Jet fuel is expected to average $86 a barrel in 2025, well below the $99 average in 2024, "accounting for 25.8 percent of all operating costs", IATA added.
The 2025 total fuel bill of $236 billion is $25 billion lower than in 2024.
Among the "risks" weighing on commercial aviation, IATA identified conflicts such as the war in Ukraine, as well as "trade tensions".
"Tariffs and prolonged trade wars dampen demand for air cargo and potentially travel," IATA said.
"Additionally, the uncertainty over how the Trump administration's trade policies will evolve could hold back critical business decisions that drive economic activity, and with it the demand for air cargo and business travel."
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Musk blasts Trump mega-bill, days after White House farewell
Tensions between allies Elon Musk and Donald Trump erupted Tuesday, June 3, as the world's richest man derided the president's key piece of economic legislation in a startling rupture just days after exiting a controversial job in the White House. Musk was lauded by the Republican leader as he left his advisory role atop Trump's "Department of Government Efficiency" last week, despite criticism over his failure to deliver on promises of a transformative program of spending cuts. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk posted on X as he followed its progress from the sidelines, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's agenda. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill," which is set to add $3 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programs. But Musk's previous criticism was more restrained, with the Tesla and SpaceX magnate offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. On Tuesday, he said the bill, being considered by Congress, would burden "citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." His post laid bare an increasingly tense relationship between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's 2024 election campaign. Yet the normally pugilistic Republican has pulled his punches, aware of his biggest backer's enormous influence over young, tech-savvy and historically apathetic voters – a key Trump constituency in 2024. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. "This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." The spat came with House Republicans gearing up to pass legislation due from the White House later Tuesday that proposes to enshrine into law $9.4 billion of DOGE's cuts. House Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk's comments "disappointing," adding that he had talked his "good friend" through the bill during a 20-minute phone call on Monday, and that he "seemed to understand." 'Incredible service' As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's "incredible service." Trump even insisted that Musk was "really not leaving" after a turbulent four months in which the South African-born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. Take the survey DOGE – announced after Musk became a regular fixture on the campaign trail for Trump – led an ideologically driven rampage through the federal government, with its young "tech bros" slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But its achievements fell far short of Musk's original boast that he could save $2 trillion, more than the government's entire discretionary spending budget for 2024. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers less than a tenth of that total, just $175 billion, and fact-checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous serious inaccuracies in its accounting. Senate Democrats released a report Tuesday itemizing 130 examples of "unethical or potentially corrupt" administration actions they say have helped Musk add $100 billion to his wealth during his tenure. The report came as senators began what is expected to be a fraught month of negotiations on Trump's mammoth policy package, expected to add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over a decade. The White House says the legislation will spur robust economic growth to neutralize its potential to blow up America's already burgeoning debt pile, which has ballooned to $36.9 trillion. Trump said on Monday it was "the single biggest Spending Cut in History," although he added: "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse."
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Musk blasts Trump mega-bill, days after farewell
Musk left his role as an official government employee last week, lauded by Trump for spearheading a federal spending cuts program, but disagreements between the duo have been building. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk posted on X, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's spending plans. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill" which is set to add $3 million to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programs. But Musk's previous criticism was restrained, with the ex-head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) task force offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. On Tuesday he said that the bill -- being considered by Congress -- would burden "citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." The escalation in rhetoric indicated bitter hostilities between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's election campaign but has recently voiced frustrations. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. "This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's "incredible service." Once inseparable Trump even insisted that Musk was "really not leaving" after a turbulent four months in which the South African born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. Musk was once almost inseparable from Trump, glued to his side on Air Force One, Marine One, in the White House and at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. The right-wing magnate's DOGE led an ideologically-driven rampage through the federal government, with its young "tech bros" slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But DOGE's achievements fell far short of Musk's original goal of saving $2 trillion dollars. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers about eight percent of the $2 trillion figure so far -- $175 billion -- and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous serious inaccuracies in its accounting. But the non-governmental "Musk Watch DOGE Tracker" puts the verifiable figure at $16 billion -- less than one percent of the goal. Tesla shareholders called for Musk to return to work as sales slumped and protests targeted the electric vehicle maker, while SpaceX had a series of fiery rocket failures. © 2025 AFP
Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
European steel stocks dip as US firms gain on Trump's tariff plans
Major European steel giants saw their share prices falter on Tuesday afternoon, as investors continue to weigh the impact of US President Donald Trump's plan to double steel and aluminium tariffs from 25% to 50%, with the latter set to take effect from 4 June. The announcement has escalated trade tensions and drawn significant criticism from worldwide trade partners. Trump, meanwhile, claims the move will make the US steel industry even stronger. He said in a post on his social media platform Truth Social: 'Our steel and aluminum industries are coming back like never before. This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum workers. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' German steel company Thyssenkrupp's share price declined 0.5% on Tuesday afternoon on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Salzgitter AG's share price also declined on the exchange, by 0.4%. Following the trend, ArcelorMittal SA's stock dipped 1.1% on the Euronext Amsterdam exchange on Tuesday afternoon, while Austrian steel company Voestalpine AG's share price declined 0.8% on the Vienna Stock Exchange. On the other side of the Atlantic, however, major US steel companies such as Cleveland-Cliffs, Nucor, and Steel Dynamics saw their share prices surge on Monday. Cleveland-Cliffs' share price closed 23.2% higher, whereas Nucor's share price jumped 10.1%. Steel Dynamics' share price also closed higher, up 10.3% on Monday. The unpredictability of recent US tariffs continues to pose considerable risks to US businesses, despite Trump's reassurances that tariffs will benefit the economy. This is mainly because several US companies with international operations could be forced to scramble to find alternative foreign suppliers and customers. It is also remains unclear how long steel and aluminium tariffs could stay at the 50% level proposed, as Trump continues to negotiate other tariffs with various countries. Felix Tintelnot, professor of economics at Duke University, told TIME: 'We're talking about expansion of capacity of heavy industry that comes with significant upfront investments, and no business leader should take heavy upfront investments if they don't believe that the same policy [will be] there two, three, or four years from now. 'Regardless of whether you're in favour [of] or against these tariffs, you don't want the President to just set tax rates arbitrarily, sort of by Executive Order all the time,' he added. Tintelnot also highlighted that increasing the price of aluminium, which is a very common input material in several sectors such as automotive and construction, would, in turn, hurt those industries, even if there may be some advantages to the domestic US steel and aluminium sectors.
