
Bid to encroach Puri temple land won't be tolerated: SJTA
Bhubaneswar: The Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) in Puri has said it would protect the property of the 12th-century shrine and asserted that any move to encroach temple land would not be tolerated. The SJTA, in a statement, said it would computerise land records of the temple and protect them as per the Uniform Policy of the State government and the provisions of the Shri Janganath Temple Act, 1955.
The comments from the SJTA came after the Orissa High Court, in a recent judgment, stressed the need for seamless coordination and timely communication between the State's Law department and the temple authorities in all matters related to the alienation, lease or mutation of temple land. The temple in Puri is governed by the Law department under the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955.
The judgment was in connection with a case related to 15 acres of 'disputed' land belonging to Puri Jagannath temple, located in Jatni's Kantia Mouza in Khurda district. Odisha's Advocate General Pitambar Acharya argued in favour of the temple, and SJTA chief administrator Arabinda Padhee also appeared in the court to defend the interests of the shrine.
The court, in its order, has made it clear that no sanction or approval regarding temple land transactions would be considered valid, unless it strictly adheres to statutory requirements. These requirements include prior recommendations from competent land committees and valuation by the district sub-registrar, as mandated by law.
The court also observed that substantial tracts of land endowed to Lord Jagannath, particularly in urban and peri-urban areas, have been lost from the effective control ofthe temple administration due to flawed alienations of immovable property. Therefore, the High Court directed the revenue and land records authorities to take immediate action to correct entries related to properties held in the name of Lord Jagannath.
The court has also asked the State government to review the existing provisions and procedural mechanisms under the SJTA to address significant loopholes that have facilitated unauthorised alienation and mutation of temple properties.
'In this case, the court has given orders to manage the land property of the temple in the coming days. The court order will be a guideline for the SJTA and will be followed strictly. The SJTA is committed to protecting the temple land,' Padhee said.
Official sources said a total of 60,426.943 acres of land is in the name of Shree Jagannath temple, and these land parcels are located in 24 of the 30 districts of Odisha. Of these, the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration has received the final record of rights over 38,061.892 acres of land.
Besides, 395.252 acres of the temple land have been identified in six other States. A total of 169.86 acres of land, belonging to the Puri Jagannath temple remained encroached in Cuttack, Puri, Bhadrak, Kendrapara, Khurda, Balasore and Jajpur. As many as 974 cases have been lodged in different tehsils of the State to remove encroachments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
4 days ago
- New Indian Express
Calling a rapist 'family' is not just
The Supreme Court recently used its special powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to uphold the conviction of a 25-year-old man for raping a 14-year-old girl without imposing a sentence. Some hailed the decision as a 'landmark', but it has raised serious concerns about the message it sends on child protection and justice. In 2018, a child was kidnapped in West Bengal. Later, she was found married to the man who had raped her and gave birth to his child. The court acknowledged that a crime had taken place and upheld his conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, but reasoned that sending him to jail would make the victim the 'worst sufferer' because she had now built a life with the accused. The bench of Justices A S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made the decision based on the report of a committee consisting of a clinical psychologist, a social scientist and a child welfare officer, which found that the woman, now 21, is emotionally attached to the accused and protective of her 'small family'. Has the court interpreted her trauma-based dependence as 'consent' and survival as 'choice'? In another recent case, the Orissa High Court adopted a similar approach. Justice S K Panigrahi granted bail to a 26-year-old man accused of raping a girl he had allegedly been in a relationship with since 2019, when she was 16. The complainant said the accused had physical relations with her on the false promise of marriage and that she became pregnant twice, in 2020 and 2022, but was forced to terminate both pregnancies. A case under the POCSO Act was filed in 2023. In 2024, the accused sought bail, claiming both families had agreed he should marry the complainant. The judge, while granting bail, remarked that the allegations, though serious in statutory terms, arose out of a 'consensual relationship' between two individuals who were close in age and shared a personal bond before the case was filed and did not prima facie exhibit characteristics of force, coercion or exploitation.


India Gazette
5 days ago
- India Gazette
Deba Snana Purnima: Sudarsan Pattnaik crafts sculptures of Lord Jagannath, Devi Subhadra, Lord Balabhadra on Puri beach
Puri (Odisha) [India], June 10 (ANI): On the auspicious occasion of Deba Snana Purnima, celebrated with deep devotion at the sacred Jagannath Temple, renowned sand artist and Padma Shri awardee Sudarsan Pattnaik unveiled a magnificent sand sculpture of Maha Prabhu Jagannath, Devi Subhadra, and Lord Balabhadra on Puri Beach. The intricately crafted sculpture was complemented by an artistic installation of 108 Kalash (sacred pots)--symbols of purity, devotion, and divine energy--thoughtfully arranged to enhance the spiritual ambience of the display. The artwork eloquently portrays the emotional and religious significance of Snana Yatra, the ceremonial bathing ritual of the deities observed on this holy day. The installation attracted thousands of devotees, tourists, and art enthusiasts, blending tradition, devotion, and creative expression. Dr Arvind Padhee, IAS, Chief Administrator of the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA), visited the site and praised Pattnaik for his meaningful and inspiring contribution. He commended the artist's continued role in promoting and preserving Odisha's cultural and spiritual heritage through his globally recognised sand art. Sudarsan Pattnaik, acclaimed for using sand as a medium of storytelling and spiritual reflection, once again elevated Odisha's rich legacy onto the global stage through this divine tribute. Earlier on June 9, Padma Shri awardee and renowned sand artist Sudarshan Pattnaik on Monday created a sand sculpture on Puri beach to mark 11 years of the Narendra Modi-led government, highlighting the journey towards a 'Viksit Bharat'. Narendra Modi first took office as the Prime Minister of India on May 26, 2014, and is serving his third consecutive term. Last year, he took office on June 9 after winning the third-term elections. Recently, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President and Union Minister JP Nadda highlighted the government's achievements, including good governance, change in India's 'political culture,' and several bold decisions over the past 11 years. (ANI)


New Indian Express
7 days ago
- New Indian Express
Orissa High Court affirms civil courts' jurisdiction in land title disputes
CUTTACK: The Orissa High Court has held that the state government cannot determine ownership in its favour and proceed with eviction through summary proceeding as the proper and competent forum for declaration of right, title, interest and possession is the civil court. The ruling came while the vacation court set aside the eviction order issued by the tehsildar (Dhamnagar) under Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act, 1972 and the subsequent orders by appellate authorities - sub-collector (Bhadrak) and collector (Bhadrak) endorsing it. Dinabandhu Behera had filed a petition challenging the eviction order claiming that after the abolition of the estate, the ex-intermediary submitted an Ekpadia in favour of the petitioner's father, in whose name the tenant ledger was opened. His father thereafter paid rent to the government. Behera came into possession of the suit land after his father's death. Contrary to these facts, the land was erroneously recorded in the name of the state during the Hal settlement, a factual inaccuracy which led to the initiation of encroachment proceedings against him, the petition claimed.