Associate Housing Minister tells officials domestic violence victims get emergency accommodation
'Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka has told officials to ensure people escaping domestic violence aren't turned away from emergency housing.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins raised the issue in the House two weeks ago.
The Prime Minister denied Hipkins' claim that women and children fleeing violent homes were "no longer eligible" for emergency accommodation.
"That is not happening. Those services are available and that support is available," he said.
But Potaka on Tuesday morning seemed to admit there were cases in which some of those people had not been able to get into emergency housing.
He told the Social Services and Community select committee: "it's unfortunate that it has happened, and it should not have happened."
Potaka believed the first he heard of domestic violence victims being turned away from emergency accommodation was in the House, and he
did not recall hearing that from front line providers
.
Following the exchange in the House, he was "pretty direct" in reminding Ministry of Social Development officials that was not the government's policy, he said.
"When I found out about this, I said... there's a policy in place, you must not use that as a basis for declining an emergency housing application to progress on the basis of that being a cause of that circumstance."
As part of
government changes
last year which made emergency housing harder to get into, and stay in, MSD staff assessed whether emergency housing applicants have "unreasonably contributed" to their situation.
But Potaka said that did not, and should not, include someone's decision to leave a violent home.
However, he reiterated emergency housing was still a last resort.
"Emergency housing isn't necessarily the best place to place or land victims of sexual and domestic violence... there are better options for people who have come out of that very dangerous and risky situation."
They included transitional, social and community housing, and there would be different availability in different places, he said.
The changes to emergency housing were brought in nearly a year ago as part of the government's effort to end the large-scale use of emergency housing.
Housing minister Chris Bishop had previously labelled emergency housing as one of the biggest public policy failures in the country's history, and he was adamant no one should be living in motels long-term, saying it carried a huge
social and economic cost
.
But opposition parties criticised proposed changes to the emergency housing system, saying it would leave people sleeping on the street.
The latest Ministry of Social Development figures showed at the end of May there were 453 households in emergency housing - down from 2,280 in the same month last year.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Vocational Education Penny Simmonds says staff to student ratios at polytechnics abysmal
Vocational education minister Penny Simmonds. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds says the staff to student ratios have been abysmal. Appearing before the Education and Workforce Select Committee to answer questions about the government's Budget decisions for Tertiary Education, Simmonds said institutions' ratio of staff to students was critical for their viability. She said polytechnics had reduced their staff numbers by 8.2 percent on a headcount basis and about 4.9 percent on a full-time equivalent basis but their staff to student ratios were still lower than they were in 2016-17. "Those ratios are critical to the viability of an institution. If you're running at a ratio of less than one to 18 for academic staff to students, you are in financial trouble and they are low," she said. Simmonds said a number of polytechnics were "incredibly damaged by the last four or five years under Te Pūkenga". She said they had lost domestic enrolments, failed to rebuild international enrolments quickly, and had not responded quickly to changes. Simmonds said Te Pūkenga should have addressed staff surpluses at loss-making polytechnics more quickly. She said it had not become financially sustainable, even though it recorded a financial surplus last year. Simmonds and Universities Minister Shane Reti insisted government funding for tertiary education was increasing as a result of the Budget. Committee member and Labour Party MP Shanan Halbert said Budget figures showed total tertiary funding would drop $124m in the 2025/26 financial year to $3.79b. Tertiary Education Commission officials said the drop was due to the end of the previous government's temporary, two-year funding boost and moving the fees free policy to the final year of students' study. Simmonds said the government ended equity funding for Māori and Pacific students because it wanted to target extra funding to needs not ethnicity. She said if a Māori student who was dux of their school enrolled in a polytechnic qualification, their enrolment would attract the equity weighting, even though they had no need of additional support, which she said did not make sense. Tertiary Education Commission chief executive Tim Fowler told the committee enrolments had grown so much that institutions were asking for permission to enrol more students this year than they had agreed with the commission in the investment plans that determined their funding. "We've had most of the universities come to us and ask to exceed their investment plan allocation... over 105 percent this year. In previous years, I think we might have had one in the past decade, so unprecedented levels of enrolments," he said. Fowler said it was the commission's job to balance that growth, favouring government priorities such as STEM subject enrolments and removing funding from under-enrolled courses. "We're continually adjusting in-flight what that investment looks like and where we see areas where there is demand that we want to support we try and move money to it. Where there's areas of under-delivery, we try and take that out as quickly as we possibly can so it doesn't fly back to the centre - we want to reinvest it elsewhere," he said. "The challenge for us this year, there are far fewer areas of under-delivery than there is over-delivery." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Former ACT Party president Tim Jago appeals sexual abuse conviction and sentence
Tim Jago was found guilty of sexually abusing two teenage boys in the 1990s. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro A court has heard former ACT Party president Tim Jago's appeal against his sexual abuse conviction and sentence. Jago was found guilty of sexually abusing two teenage boys in the 1990s after a jury trial last year. One of the boys was under 16 years old, and the other was over 16 years old. Jago sought to have his conviction overturned as a miscarriage of justice, arguing the jury had reached an unreasonable verdict and that the judge's summary was unbalanced. Jago appeared remotely from custody at the Court of Appeal in Auckland today as he served his two and a half year sentence. His lawyer Ian Brookie explained the two-pronged appeal. Brookie first argued that Jago's conviction was unreasonable and that the jury should have entertained reasonable doubt. Central to his argument was that Paul Oliver - a survivor who waived his name suppression - was uncertain of the timing and location of the assault when questioned during the trial. "What we say is the evidence and the issues with evidence with reliability… There's just no way a jury could have fairly convicted this man," Brookie said. "Our submission is that evidence was so unreliable the jury should have entertained reasonable doubt." Brookie also took issue with the judge's summary before sending the jury to deliberate. The judge had advised the jury that the historic nature of the complaint, which came more than two decades after the assault, did not mean it was necessarily untrue. Brookie argued the judge should have balanced this statement with the defence's argument that the complaint could have been false. "The concern here is the jury is effectively being told by the judge that a delayed complaint is not untrue," he said. However, Crown lawyer Robin McCoubrey disagreed. "The very purpose [of the judge's statement] is to provide balance to correct the misconception that [a delayed complaint is more likely to be false]," McCoubrey argued. The second part of the appeal was that Jago's sentence was too harsh and that he should have been sentenced to home detention instead of imprisonment. Brookie argued it was wrong to characterise the offending on the whole as "sexual offending against children," because only one of the two complainants was under the age of sixteen at the time. He also said Jago should have been given a bigger discount for community contributions, though the Crown argued the discount he received was adequate. "The only just and considered response should have been home detention," Brookie said. "Ultimately, there was just a plain wrong decision not to impose home detention here. It was not appropriate to say deterrence required imprisonment." The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision for a later date. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
'China's vision of its future is not as a new overlord'
Zichen Wang of the Center for China and Globalization, speaking today in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / Phil Pennington China is not interested in becoming "a new overlord", a researcher at a Beijing thinktank has told a conference in Wellington. Christopher Luxon has travelled to China in his first trip as prime minister , where he will meet China's top three leaders, including President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang. Zichen Wang - from the Center for China and Globalization - told the Institute of International Affairs conference in Wellington on Tuesday the sheer size of China has led to Washington being worried, but Beijing's foreign policy was focused ono preventing conflicts. "Many people worry about a stronger China will inevitable seek hegemony. "But Beijing has made it clear - and I think most Chinese... agree - that China's vision of its future is not as a new overlord." Luxon's trip to China was a "great start," Wang told the conference. He added that while officials in the Trump administration were hawkish on China, the US president himself did not appear to be ideologically driven. A New Zealand-based researcher said more Chinese researchers and policymakers had begun asking about New Zealand's strategic posture. Dr Jason Young of the NZ Contemporary China Research Centre told the institute's conference that on his trip to China last week he saw a "noticeable shift" in how New Zealand was being talked about. This focused on the bilateral ties and "what does New Zealand want?", he said. But the Chinese he talked to also had a strategic question. "I think there's what I would consider a very unrealistic expectation in China for New Zealand to have more strategic clarity and strategic autonomy in what has become a very open, contested relationship between the United States and China," said Young. The rationalisation he heard was the China was a great power and a "global good", so it was natural that its economic growth would extend into providing security. China would also reciprocate when it came to military activity by other countries that got close to its territory. The Chinese navy taskforce in the Tasman Sea in February "really reflects a new reality for New Zealand", Young said. The live exercises dominated NZ-China talks earlier in the year. That had fed into a "quite distressing" shift up in threat perception of New Zealanders towards China, Young said. A newly-released survey by the Asia New Zealand Foundation - carried out in March - found China was considered both a 'friend' and a 'threat', with "recent events causing a spike in threat perception". The question was would this be a trend or a blip, Young said. The US was now perceived as less of a friend than a year ago. "Trust in the US to act responsibly was at an all-time low, the survey found . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
