Kunes Family Foundation to donate 200k meals across the Midwest
The lobby inside Kunes Nissan in Davenport looked a bit different Monday morning.
'It means a lot to us giving back to the community,' said Austin Dougherty, a Kunes Auto Group sales manager.
Kunes Auto Group staff members took part in boxing up food to give to local food banks.
'(The Quad Cities) do it a lot to us, so it's very impactful that we can give back when we have the opportunity to give back here,' Dougherty said.
It's a part of the Kunes Family Foundation's goal to donate more than 200,000 meals across the Midwest.
Locally, the bags will go to the River Bend Food Bank, which helps several food pantries.
One of the food pantries that River Bend Food Bank works with is at Friendly House in Davenport. They said that these donations are coming at a critical time.
'Anybody that donates even a single item is doing a wonderful thing,' said Emilie Dibbern, Friendly House's family and senior services supervisor. 'This is kind of a lower part of the year. People tend to donate more around holiday times. Recently there has been more people that need to access the food pantry because of the SNAP benefits being decreased, and also food pantries having less items in them.'
Friendly House receives food once a week from River Bend Food Bank.
'People are here right before we open the window,' Dibbern said. 'Having a healthy, happy community, and having people with their needs met is the most important thing about being a food pantry.'
Kunes Nissan said it's all about assisting neighbors in the Quad Cities one bag of food at a time.
'(It's a) lot of meals to help a full family out,' Dougherty said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
SNAP Benefits Bonus Available For 580,000 Americans
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. SNAP recipients in Colorado can get extra benefits this summer providing they make healthy purchases, state officials have announced. Why It Matters Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, commonly known as food stamps, are provided to low- and no-income families across the U.S. to help them with the cost of groceries. Colorado has around 584,000 SNAP recipients —10 percent of its population — all of whom are eligible for the boost. SNAP recipients in Colorado can get extra benefits this summer providing they make healthy purchases, state officials have said. SNAP recipients in Colorado can get extra benefits this summer providing they make healthy purchases, state officials have said. GETTY What To Know SNAP participants can get up to $60 per month via a dollar-for-dollar match on fruits and vegetables bought from participating retailers as part of the Colorado SNAP Produce Bonus program. Last summer, the Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS), in collaboration with Nourish Colorado, launched a pilot of the electronic Healthy Incentive Program to make nutritious food more affordable for families. Since its debut, more than 99 percent of the bonus benefits have been successfully redeemed. To participate, SNAP users just need to purchase eligible fruits and vegetables at a participating retailer. They will automatically receive a dollar-for-dollar match added to their electronic benefit transfer card, which can be used at any SNAP-authorized location. You can earn up to $60 in bonus funds each month, which can then be spent on any SNAP-eligible items at any authorized retailer. There are around 30 retailers participating in the program, with some in populous areas like Boulder, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Loveland, as well as smaller towns like Mancos and Hotchkiss. Bricks and mortar retailers are not the only businesses participating, with farm stands and markets in numerous locations also taking part. What People Are Saying Abby McClelland, director of CDHS's Food and Energy Assistance Division, said in a statement: "The Colorado SNAP Produce Bonus program helps families stretch their food budget and access fruits and vegetables that they may not have bought without this incentive program. This is especially important with the increase in grocery prices that we have seen recently." Emma Kottenstette, founder of retailer Farm Runners, said: "Most people that come in know about the program and are stoked and then just keep coming back. Once they find out about the program one time, it's like they don't need any convincing." What Happens Next The program comes at a time when various states have succeeded in limiting SNAP purchases for unhealthy foods like soda and candy, with more expected to have waivers approved in the coming weeks and months. Nebraska, Iowa and Indiana have recently had waivers approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which funds the program, to eliminate certain purchases being made with SNAP benefits in a push to promote healthy eating.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 2026 Budget Proposal: 4 Things Retirees Need To Know
President Donald Trump's 2026 budget proposal, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' introduces significant changes to federal spending and tax policies. Read Next: Try This: While aiming to reduce non-defense discretionary spending and extend tax cuts, the proposal has raised concerns about its potential impact on retirees who rely on federal programs for income, healthcare and essential services. 'These potential shifts could slow benefit growth, raise Medicare premiums or target higher earners with stricter eligibility or tax rules,' said Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital. 'The biggest concern is uncertainty right now, and retirees rely on predictability, so even these small changes can have a big impact on them.' Here are four things retirees need to know about Trump's 2026 budget proposal. According to Congressional Budget Office analysis, if Trump's budget proposal, currently being debated in Congress, raises the federal deficit by $2.3 trillion over the next decade, it would automatically trigger spending cuts, including a projected $500 billion cut to Medicare. Such cuts may lead to reduced payments to providers, potentially affecting seniors' access to healthcare services. An analysis by the Medicare Rights Center, an advocacy organization, found that the 'bill would undermine access to long-term care by shifting costs to states, likely resulting in cuts to HCBS (Home-and Community-Based Services). It would also make it harder for people to qualify for Medicaid coverage and avoid gaps in care.' Find Out: Key programs under the Older Americans Act, such as nutrition services and caregiver support, are at risk of significant funding reductions or elimination. For example, the National Council on Aging found that the Trump administration proposes to move the Aging Network Support program to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and reduce the program's funding by over 40%. The program allows seniors to live independently in their homes. This matters for individuals saving for retirement, because adult children often incur significant costs for caring for their parents. According to an AARP study, 'On average, caregivers spend 26% of their personal income on caregiving expenses. One in three dips into their personal savings, like bank accounts, to cover costs, and 12% take out a loan or borrow from family or friends.' The budget proposes substantial cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which could disproportionately affect low-income seniors who depend on these programs for healthcare and food security. According to NPR, 'If approved, starting in fiscal year 2028, states would be required to pay between 5% and 25% of food benefit costs for the first time. … In addition, states would receive less federal support to administer SNAP. The proposed changes would decrease the federal reimbursement rate for administrative costs to run SNAP from 50% to 25%.' An analysis of the Medicaid and SNAP cuts by The Commonwealth Fund found that these changes create ripple effects that affect the economies of entire communities, not just low-income households. 'For example, some of the food purchased in Georgia may have been grown in Kansas or processed in Tennessee, so lower grocery purchases in one state may cause losses in other states,' the Commonwealth report stated. 'A nurse who loses her job at a Louisiana clinic might reside in Texas; thus, a job lost in one state could create economic losses in another.' While the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' proposes extending tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, it does not include provisions to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, contrary to some expectations. The bill does introduce a new $4,000 standard deduction for seniors aged 65 and older, providing tax relief for individuals with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 and couples with incomes of $150,000 annually. However, the substantial tax cuts and increased spending outlined in the proposal are projected to add approximately $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. This significant increase in the deficit raises concerns among financial experts about potential future tax hikes to address the fiscal imbalance. 'If the proposal is passed, it could increase taxes on retirement income, making Roth conversions and smart withdrawal strategies more important than ever,' Cirksena said. 'The best move right now is do not wait. Review incomes, run scenarios and add some flexibility into your plan. Better to adjust early than react late.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money This article originally appeared on Trump's 2026 Budget Proposal: 4 Things Retirees Need To Know Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Problems proliferate in Senate for Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Problems are multiplying for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and other Senate negotiators in their bid to pass legislation to enact President Trump's agenda by July 4. Some Republican senators are barraging leadership with concerns about spending cuts for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while budget hawks are demanding more deficit reduction and railing against a House compromise to lift the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. The latest headache for Thune and other Senate negotiators is a proposal being pushed by fiscal conservatives to root out more than $200 billion in what they're calling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare — a controversial prospect giving the program's popularity. There are also differences between senators and the Trump White House about making permanent corporate tax cuts, such as 100 percent bonus depreciation for short-term investments and immediate expensing for research and development. Senate Republicans control 53 seats and can only afford three defections on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he will vote 'no' because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. And Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) says he's a 'hard no' on the House-passed bill because it doesn't do enough to bring the nation back to a pre-pandemic level of spending. Here are the issues that threaten to derail the Senate bill. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) are threatening to vote against the bill if it reduces Medicaid benefits to constituents, and they have yet to see what language the Senate Finance Committee will roll out on the issue. Senate and House GOP leaders insist the legislation won't cut Medicaid benefits, but the Congressional Budget Office released a report Wednesday projecting 10.9 million Americans will lose health insurance if the bill passes due to changes to Medicaid and Affordable Care Act coverage. 'I hope not benefit cuts, that's my bottom line,' Hawley said Thursday afternoon. GOP senators have raised concerns about proposals to limit states' ability to use health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding and to require people earning between 100 percent and 138 percent of the federal poverty level to pay higher co-pays for Medical services. Several Senate Republicans are also raising concerns over a projected $267 billion in spending cuts to the SNAP, including Collins and Moran. The Senate Agriculture Committee is hoping to roll out text for its portion of the budget reconciliation bill next week but Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-Ark.) says the issue remains unresolved. 'We're still working on it,' Boozman told The Hill, adding, 'I wish it was' resolved.' Collins says she's concerned about language in the bill that would shift many of the burdens of administering the programs onto the states and penalize those states that have older systems for monitoring benefits. A growing number of Republicans are joining budget hawk Sen. Ron Johnson's (R-Wis.) call for more spending cuts in the bill, which Republicans project will reduce spending by roughly $1.6 trillion over the next decade. GOP senators, including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the chairman of the Budget Committee, are calling for bigger cuts. 'I think the bill needs to be more fiscally responsible,' he told reporters Thursday afternoon. Some Republicans are now looking at a proposal to root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in the Medicare Advantage program and are rallying around a proposal sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) to crack down on insurance companies 'upcoding' diagnoses to collect more Medicare reimbursement money. But the idea is dividing GOP senators. Hawley on Thursday said it would be 'insane' to start cutting Medicare, even though proponents of Cassidy's bill say it would be strictly targeted to waste, fraud and abuse and note that Democrats such as Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) support it. Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, are digging in their heels over language in the House-passed bill to auction off government-owned spectrum, which they fear could impede the Defense Department's use of those frequencies for radar and communications. Rounds said the House language is a 'deal breaker' and urging that negotiators add language in the bill to protect spectrum frequencies used by the Pentagon for as long as the auction period lasts. 'It has to be modified,' he said. 'They've indicated that they would protect the spectrum [for defense] for the first round of auction items but one day after [the first round of auction] it's not protected,' he said. 'If they're serious about protecting that particular part of the spectrum, they just simply protect it until the auction authority expires in 2034,' he said. 'I've talked to the leadership here in the Senate.' The newest flashpoint in the negotiations is language in the bill that would restrict states' ability to regulate artificial intelligence for 10 years. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) says she would have voted against the House bill had she known that it 'strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years.' Other conservatives are flagging the provision as a major problem. 'I have a lot of concern about normal people who want to keep their job, want to protect their personal information. So we're just going to say for a decade that nobody can protect people? That's just nuts to me,' Hawley told reporters Thursday. Senate Republicans and Trump White House officials disagree over making corporate tax breaks, such as bonus depreciation and research and development expensing, permanent. The House bill phases out some of the most popular corporate tax cuts after 2029, and White House officials see an advantage in letting them expire after Trump's term in office, say GOP senators familiar with the negotiations. Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee made a pitch to Trump and his economic team at the White House Thursday to make the business tax proposals permanent, but the issue remains unresolved. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said that members of the Finance panel expressed their desire to make those tax provisions permanent, but he's not sure they moved the needle with Trump. 'I'm not convinced that we moved the needle. I think he certainly realizes how important it is to us, and I think he will go back and revisit it with his people,' he said. Republican senators say they're going to rewrite the deal Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) reached with House Republicans from New York, New Jersey, and other high-cost Blue States to raise the cap on SALT deductions from $10,000 to $40,000 for households earning up to $500,000 a year. The House-crafted SALT deal is projected to cost $350 billion over 10 years, and Republican senators aren't happy about it. GOP senators believe they can lower the cap somewhere between $10,000 and $40,000 — or find another way to substantially reduce the cost of the provision — and still get the bill through the House. 'It is too high,' Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) of the $40,000 cap on SALT deductions. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who is pushing for deficit reduction in the bill, called the SALT compromise a giveaway to 'an exceptionally wealthy, exceptionally small group of really high-income earners from a small handful of very highly taxed states.' 'We're subsidizing those states that impose high taxes,' he said. He said an 'overwhelming share of Republican senators' don't support the $40,000 cap level. 'There's a lot of support for setting that back down to some lower number, perhaps back down to $10,000,' Lee noted. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has warned Senate Republicans that they risk imperiling passage of the bill if they blow up the SALT deal. If the Senate modifies the legislation, it would need to pass the House again before heading to Trump's desk.
