logo
What's on the ballot? In Wisconsin, your future is at stake in April 1 election.

What's on the ballot? In Wisconsin, your future is at stake in April 1 election.

Yahoo25-03-2025

Maturity is being able to admit when you might have gotten it wrong. And, in this case, I actually really hope I was.
Recently, I lamented the fact that the latest Marquette Law School poll found a lot of Wisconsinites still didn't know much about the Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford.
I chalked it up to Trump-era attention-suck — the way his administration has been eating up every headline, every chyron, every algorithmic inch of our feeds. I couldn't help but compare it to the 2023 state Supreme Court race, which felt all consuming at the time and ended with record-shattering spring turnout.
In turn, I privately predicted this year's turnout would be lower.
But if early voting numbers are any indication of what's to come between now and when polls close on April 1, color me dead wrong.
As of March 20, the number of early ballots cast — including both in-person and returned absentee — was nearly double what it was at this same point in 2023.
Yes, it's only a couple days into early voting. But still – this matters.
It's a promising sign that the Wisconsin electorate has not shrunk in the face of overwhelming, exhausting barrage of news and ads surrounding yet another pivotal race.
If you haven't voted yet — or if you're still unsure what's even on your ballot — here's a quick rundown. The marquee race pits former Gov. Scott Walker-appointed conservative Waukesha judge and former Attorney General Brad Schimel against liberal Dane County judge Susan Crawford, first elected to the bench in 2018. The winner will shape the ideological balance of the court — which flipped 4-3 liberal in 2023 when Justice Janet Protasiewicz defeated Dan Kelly.
The 2023 race broke national spending records, and 2025 has already topped that. There's big money on both sides, but Elon Musk and his Super PAC have spent more than $10 million.
Voters will also choose the next Superintendent of Public Instruction — the person who oversees everything from teacher licensing to budgeting for Wisconsin's 421 public school districts. Should the Trump administration fully dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, the Wisconsin DPI Superintendent will have an unmatched degree of control and power over the trajectory of public education in the Badger State.
The incumbent, Jill Underly, is backed by Democrats and teacher unions. She's a longtime public educator who supports more school funding, better teacher pay and stronger local control.
Her critics would say she's dropped the ball on overseeing MPS and have also denounced her overhaul of school achievement standards last year.
Her challenger, Brittany Kinser, is an education consultant and charter school executive who once led a pro-voucher nonprofit. While she calls herself a 'Blue Dog Democrat,' her campaign is backed by the Wisconsin GOP and a number of figures in Wisconsin's right-wing media ecosystem. Her critics argue she would expand private school voucher programs that drain resources from public schools.
And what's a Wisconsin election without a statewide referendum? This year's statewide referendum asks whether Wisconsin's existing photo ID law — already among the strictest in the country — should be added to the state constitution.
Editorial: Elon Musk's despicable disinformation tampers with WI Supreme Court election
You already need an ID to vote in Wisconsin. This change would just make that rule nearly impossible to repeal or adjust, even if future courts or lawmakers tried.
Supporters say it protects election integrity. Critics say it's voter suppression wrapped in constitutional permanence. Also? Again … it's already a law.
Your ballot may also include local races — city council, school board, circuit judges — and referendums for things like school funding. You can preview your full ballot at myvote.wi.gov.
So, maybe the story of this election won't be low turnout. Maybe it'll be that — once again — Wisconsinites showed up. In the face of billionaire meddling, disinformation and constitutional sleight-of-hand, maybe we proved (again) that we're paying attention. That we still believe in public schools. In fair courts. In our own ability to shape what comes next.
Maybe this election is another reminder that democracy doesn't work unless we work it. And the good news? We still can. So, let's finish strong. Vote early. Vote informed. Vote like your future is on the ballot.
Kristin Brey is the "My Take" columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin spring elections will determine our future | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Blasts LA Protests in Late-Night Truth Social Rant
Trump Blasts LA Protests in Late-Night Truth Social Rant

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Blasts LA Protests in Late-Night Truth Social Rant

President Donald Trump slammed protesters in Los Angeles challenging the administration's roundup of immigrants by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Violence erupted Friday afternoon when police arrested dozens of protesters outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, where immigrants had been detained following ICE raids across the city earlier in the day. The Trump administration dispatched an estimated 2,000 National Guard personnel to quell the ongoing demonstrations. 'Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes, and unrest,' the president wrote in the early-morning hours Sunday morning. Trump baselessly claimed that the 'Radical Left protests' had been carried out by 'paid troublemakers,' saying the unrest 'will NOT BE TOLERATED.' The president also took aim on Sunday at California Democrats Governor Gavin Newsom, whom Trump has called 'Newscum,' and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass for being 'unable to to [sic] handle the task' of keeping the peace in the city. His comments echo earlier remarks by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, who on Saturday firmly laid the blame for the ongoing unrest at the Democratic Party's feet. Noem has earned the nickname 'ICE Barbie' for dolling up for ICE raids and taking photos in front of detained migrants, among other publicity stunts. 'What do we do when we have guys like Hakeem Jeffries standing up in front of the world and saying it's ok to write 'Kill ICE', it's ok to throw things at law enforcement officers? It's not ok, not in America,' Noem said in an interview with Fox News. It follows after Jeffries publicly called for the ICE agents who 'physically accosted' Democratic representatives outside a detention center in Newark last month to be identified and held to account over the incident. Trump also railed against the use of face masks to shield from identification. 'From now on, MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests,' Trump posted, although presumably in reference to demonstrators rather than the ICE and Department of Homeland Security agents who routinely do so in order to conceal their faces from the public. 'What do these people have to hide, and why???' Trump raged.

Trump sends in troops in make-or-break moment for his immigration crackdown
Trump sends in troops in make-or-break moment for his immigration crackdown

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump sends in troops in make-or-break moment for his immigration crackdown

Donald Trump's first presidency ended with city centres turned to blackened ghost towns. They looked not unlike Los Angeles on Sunday morning, where rioters had left graffiti and the ashes of burned cars in protest Five years ago it was a different cause. The US endured a long, hot summer of riots after police murdered George Floyd in Minneapolis, kneeling on his neck as he protested that he could not breathe. 'Looks so familiar,' Matt Schlapp, chairman of the Conservative Political Action Conference and a confidant of the US president, posted on social media. 'It's almost as if we saw the same tactics with a different radical topic and diff logo wear.' In 2020, Mr Trump threatened to take matters into his own hands if the country's governors did not stamp out violence, promising to deploy armed forces to quell the violence. Several states took heed and used their own authority to deploy their National Guard forces. This time around, as his immigration service takes a new, tougher tack in rounding up illegal immigrants, the president has not waited. With Los Angeles on fire, and protests growing in New York, he issued his presidential memorandum on Saturday night, in an effort to snuff out the violence before it could spread further. 'In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens,' is how Karoline Leavitt, Mr Trump's press secretary announced it. 'That is why President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester.' One of the difficulties in 2020 was navigating the legal limits on presidents deploying troops on their own soil. Then Mr Trump floated using the nuclear option and invoking the Insurrection Act. It was last used in 1992, when George HW Bush used it to send troops into Los Angeles to control rioting at the request of California's governor after four white police officers were acquitted of beating up Rodney King, a black motorist. Using it without the consent of the state governor brings a whole other level of political jeopardy. Trump 2.0 has had time to find alternative tools. For four years his lawyers and advisers have planned for their return to power, legal-proofing policies that came unstuck in the courts first time round. So on Saturday night, they apparently used a different course of action and a little-known provision with Title 10 of the US Code on Armed Forces. It allows the deployment of National Guard forces if 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States.' It has not been used since 1965. The stakes this time are high. Mr Trump's opponents have struggled to cope with his 'flood the zone' strategy, unleashing executive orders, presidential proclamations and Truth Social posts at a torrential rate. The result is that Democrats in Congress and on the street have failed to coalesce into a united opposition. That could be changing with raids on factories, food trucks and the parking lots where foreign workers congregate to pick up a day's work on building sites. They offer a focal point in an already febrile debate over immigration, the freedom to protest, and the limits of presidential power. Los Angeles was calm overnight on Saturday, but more protests are expected on Sunday afternoon. Immigration groups in New York also have events lined up on Sunday and Monday. Against that backdrop, Mr Trump and his government of loyalists is gambling that sending in troops will end the trouble before it can spread and prevent months of riots, not create an even bigger conflagration. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DNC chair unloads on David Hogg in Zoom call: ‘It's really frustrating'
DNC chair unloads on David Hogg in Zoom call: ‘It's really frustrating'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

DNC chair unloads on David Hogg in Zoom call: ‘It's really frustrating'

Democratic Party chair Ken Martin said Sunday that he wasn't stepping down from the job after Politico obtained audio of a meeting at which Martin expressed doubts about his ability and willingness to unify the party. In the audio recording, Martin lays the blame on the party's continued infighting at the feet of one of his youngest colleagues, March for our Lives co-founder David Hogg, and claimed that Hogg had 'destroyed' his ability to lead the party out of an electoral abyss it found itself in after 2024. 'I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating,' Martin told Hogg on the Zoom call, according to Politico, after stating:'No one knows who the hell I am, right?' 'I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,' claimed the chair on the call. On the same Zoom, Martin would go on to make a frank admission: that he'd faced his first doubts about his desire to hold his job any longer. 'I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' said Martin on the May 15 call. The Independent reached out to the Democratic National Committee for comment. A spokesperson for the party released a statement from Martin to Politico, in which Martin said he was 'not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' said the chair, according to Politico. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Martin's gripes are at least somewhat grounded in reality. The relatively unknown Minnesota Democrat-Farmer-Labor party chair was selected to lead the party after 2024 over several other candidates including at least one with arguably better name recognition: Ben Wikler of neighboring Wisconsin's Democratic Party. Since his election, Martin has not been timid from news cameras but has still struggled to step out of the shadow of Hogg, whose activism in the wake of the Parkland school shooting propelled him to national prominence long before Martin. Hogg, as well, continues to generate headlines — further complicating Martin's position. The brash, young DNC vice chair vowed earlier this year to support primary challenges against the party's graying electeds in Congress, drawing immediate and visceral anger from the party's chastened yet still powerful establishment. Hogg and Martin personally clashed over this issue, and have apparently not reached an amicable compromise. There's also the issue of the party's overall brand, which is in tatters after the 2024 election. A botched campaign season saw former President Joe Biden, wracked by physical and mental decline, run for re-election until the summer, well past any viable point for his party to hold a primary to select his replacement. He then was unceremoniously jettisoned from the Democratic ticket in favor of his former running mate, Kamala Harris, after he appeared lost and confused onstage during a debate with Donald Trump — who'd go on to win the general election. Martin and others face questions about why those closest to Biden, including Martin's predecessor, insisted for months (years, even) that Biden's decline was a right-wing conspiracy and a result of journalists ginning up a fake story. Harris's defeat in 2024 also saw the party fail to make gains in the House while losing multiple seats in the Senate, ending a Democratic Senate majority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store