
How Crime-As-A-Service Turned Hacking Into A Subscription Business
Recent cyberattacks on major UK retailers like Marks and Spencer cost hundreds of millions, ... More revealing how criminals now bypass advanced security systems by targeting employees instead of technology.
A number of devastating and widely reported cyber attacks against UK retailers in recent weeks have once again exposed the fact that the impact of cybercrime on our lives is growing.
As of writing, Marks and Spencer hasn't processed online orders for several weeks, following an attack in April estimated to have cost it $400 million. And the Co-Op group of over 2,500 stores is recovering from an attack in which customer data was stolen, and shelves were left bare.
There are a few reasons retailers are often easy prey for cybercriminals. They handle lots of sensitive customer data, and they're very sensitive to supply chain disruption, meaning their operations can be brought to a costly halt by disrupting suppliers.
On top of that, their infrastructure sprawls across online retail, mobile apps, and the point-of-sale terminals, tills and tablets of bricks 'n' mortar, giving criminals lots of potential ways in.
With politicians raising fears that the escalation of this activity could result in serious threats to the food supply chain, it's becoming urgent to understand the factors behind the rise in these attacks.
One thing that's becoming increasingly clear is that cybersecurity is no longer simply about making sure IT departments keep our firewalls and anti-malware up-to-date.
I believe that these attacks tell us that cybersecurity is becoming less about technology and more about people. And this means that the way we defend ourselves has to change, too.
Not too long ago, at least a small amount of technical know-how was needed by anyone who wanted to launch a cyberattack and disrupt the operations of a business.
Today, though, an underground economy exists where anyone with the funds can access tools and expertise that can bring businesses to the ground.
Referred to by security experts as crime-as-a-service, this involves the developers of hacker tools and apps charging via a subscription model, like any other software developer.
Effectively, this means that just about anyone sitting behind a VPN can carry out a crime anonymously anywhere in the world. It's a 'democratization' of cybercrime.
The motivation is usually money. Two of the most common attacks are ransomware attacks, where data is encrypted and a ransom is paid to have it returned, and denial-of-service attacks, which flood systems with data, causing them to stop working properly.
The increasing accessibility of these tools is a factor in the growing number of attacks. The hacker group suspected of carrying out the Marks and Spencer attack is reported to have used a CaaS platform known as DragonForce.
But another factor is a change in strategy. Increasingly, rather than targeting technology, criminals are striking directly at the weakest link in the cybersecurity chain, which is usually us humans.
Although the details haven't been released and investigations are still ongoing, it's strongly suspected that the Marks and Spencer cyber attack was carried out through social engineering.
With modern cloud security infrastructure being relatively robust, humans, who can be lazy, forgetful and tired, are generally the weakest link. Why would a hacker spend the vast amount of computing power and resources it would take to brute-force into a system and steal or encrypt data when they can just trick or bribe a human into letting them in?
Surveys suggest that email and social media phishing were a factor in more than half of 2024's ransomware attacks and that 67% of people believe the rise of generative AI has increased their fear of ransomware.
As well as human incompetence and our trusting nature, cybercriminals are increasingly exploiting our greed. In fact, 53 percent of organizations reported cybercrime by insiders in 2024. One high-profile recent example is the $20 million attempted extortion of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, where support staff are accused of taking bribes in exchange for giving criminals access.
Criminals believe that retailers are big, rich targets that move slowly to respond to threats and are likely to comply with ransom demands rather than suffer business disruption.
By targeting people with permission to access their systems, then all that IT spending on cyber security infrastructure—firewalls, secure email gateways, network security, access control, security tools—becomes irrelevant, and their criminal activities become a lot simpler.
So, how can businesses, and we as professionals, employees and individuals, most effectively respond to this change?
The first step could be to think about adopting a more human-centric security strategy. This means developing a culture of cyber-awareness that's active at all levels, from the boardroom to the shop floor.
By understanding what criminals look for, how they try to gain access, and what's at stake if they succeed, everyone's awareness increases.
Particular attention should be paid to ensuring everyone understands the growing threat of generative AI-powered deepfake crime.
When it comes to this, as well as understanding the wider picture of where threats might exist in an organization, it's human skills that will be most valuable.
This means that effectively communicating the importance of cyber vigilance, achieving buy-in, and understanding what makes us vulnerable to bribery and corruption are critical skills in the cybersecurity toolbox.
Critically, when implementing these changes, the focus should be on limiting opportunities for threat actors to cause damage rather than monitoring the activities of individuals in a way that damages trust. Balancing this also requires skilled human judgment.
Make no mistake, with 43% of UK companies reporting an attempted cyber attack last year, the threat is greater than ever, and the penalties for making mistakes are severe.
But by switching to understanding, predicting and improving the behavior of humans rather than just technology, all businesses can reduce their chances of becoming victims.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Giant Eagle releases another list of stores taking over Rite Aid prescriptions
Rite Aid customers want to know next steps as Giant Eagle takes over some prescriptions Rite Aid customers want to know next steps as Giant Eagle takes over some prescriptions Rite Aid customers want to know next steps as Giant Eagle takes over some prescriptions Giant Eagle has released another list of locations that will take over prescriptions from closing Rite Aid stores. Giant Eagle in May announced that it will take customer prescriptions from nearly 80 Rite Aid locations, which are closing after the drugstore chain filed for bankruptcy again. The plan was to roll the information out in "waves," with the first and second already announced. On Friday, Giant Eagle released the names of 21 additional Rite Aid locations that will have their prescriptions transferred to Giant Eagle pharmacies. The changes will take effect later this month. Giant Eagle said prescriptions will automatically be sent to the closest stores, and Rite Aid customers will be told about the change. Rite Aid customers who want to go to a different Giant Eagle location can. Customers who don't want to use Giant Eagle can transfer to another retailer, either before the effective transfer date through Rite Aid or after through Giant Eagle. "Their prescription information that they house in those stores, due to regulatory reasons, has to have another designated home," Giant Eagle spokesperson Jannah Drexler explained in May. These Giant Eagles are taking Rite Aid prescriptions next Rite Aid Giant Eagle Giant Eagle address Effective date 1799 Third Street, Beaver, PA 15009 Rochester Giant Eagle Pharmacy 111 West Madison Street, Rochester, PA 15074 June 17, 2025 4185 Washington Road, McMurray, PA 15317 Donaldson's Crossroads Giant Eagle Pharmacy 4007 Washington Road, McMurray, PA 15317-2520 June 17, 2025 601 West Pike Street, Canonsburg, PA 15317 Donaldson's Crossroads Giant Eagle Pharmacy 4007 Washington Road, McMurray, PA 15317-2520 June 17, 2025 3200 Oregon Drive, Lower Burrell, PA 15068 Lower Burrell Community Market Pharmacy 3220 Leechburg Road, Lower Burrell, PA 15068 June 17, 2025 925 West Erie Plaza, Erie, PA 16505 Yorktown Centre Giant Eagle Pharmacy 2501 West 12th Street, Erie, PA 16505 June 17, 2025 847 Midland Avenue, Midland, PA 15059 Rochester Giant Eagle Pharmacy 111 West Madison Street, Rochester, PA 15074 June 17, 2025 111 North Plaza, Apollo, PA 15613 Lower Burrell Community Market Pharmacy 3220 Leechburg Road, Lower Burrell, PA 15068 June 17, 2025 412 Broadway Street, Coraopolis, PA 15108 Moon Township Giant Eagle Pharmacy 5990 University Boulevard, Suite 4, Coraopolis, PA 15108 June 18, 2025 431 Commons Drive, DuBois, PA 15801 DuBois Giant Eagle Pharmacy 100 N Main Street, DuBois, PA 15801 June 18, 2025 4155 Ewalt Road, Gibsonia, PA 15044 Gibsonia Giant Eagle Pharmacy 400 Northtowne Square, Gibsonia, PA 15044 June 18, 2025 7345 Saltsburg Road, Penn Hills, PA 15235 Verona Community Market Pharmacy 1117 Milltown Road, Verona, PA 15147 June 18, 2025 201 West Mahoning Street, Punxsutawney, PA 15767 DuBois Giant Eagle Pharmacy 100 N Main Street, DuBois, PA 15801 June 18, 2025 3730 Brighton Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 Brighton Road Giant Eagle Pharmacy 4110 Brighton Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 June 19, 2025 3331 Pleasant Valley Boulevard, Altoona, PA 16602 Altoona Giant Eagle Pharmacy 181 Sophira Lane, Logan Town center, Altoona, PA 16602 June 19, 2025 802 Pennsylvania Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15233 Cedar Avenue Giant Eagle Pharmacy 318-320 Cedar Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 June 19, 2025 975 Market Street, Meadville, PA 16335 Meadville Giant Eagle Pharmacy 18511 Smock Highway, Meadville, PA 16335 June 19, 2025 100 South Third Street, P.O. Box 276, Conneaut Lake, PA 16316 Meadville Giant Eagle Pharmacy 18511 Smock Highway, Meadville, PA 16335 June 19, 2025 410 Cooke Lane, Pittsburgh, PA 15234 Village Square Market District Pharmacy 7000 Oxford Drive, Village Square, Bethel Park, PA 15102 June 20, 2025 201 Devine Drive, Wexford, PA 15090 Township of Pine Market District Pharmacy 155 Town Center Drive, Wexford, PA 15090 June 20, 2025 94 June Drive, Roaring Spring, PA 16673 Roaring Spring Giant Eagle Pharmacy 510 S Route 36, Roaring Spring, PA 16673-1629 June 20, 2025 200 Greater Butler Mart, Butler, PA 16001 Moraine Point Giant Eagle Pharmacy 700 Moraine Pointe Plaza, Butler, PA 16001 June 20, 2025


The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Posted Jun 13, 2025 at 10:13 AM EDT 1 Comment / 1 New
Amazon and Walmart are reportedly considering getting into stablecoins. The retail giants are looking into ways they could use or issue stablecoins — a cryptocurrency pegged to the US dollar or another asset, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal. As noted by the WSJ, the move could allow Amazon and Walmart to receive payments faster, while avoiding fees from credit card transactions.


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
US-China Trade Talks: The Limits Of Diplomacy
Delegations of China and the U.S. pose for a group photo prior to the first meeting of the ... More China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism in London, Britain, June 9, 2025. The meeting opened here on Monday. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, attended the meeting with U.S. representatives. (Photo by Li Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images) In early June 2025, officials from the U.S. and China convened in an attempt to to prevent salvage economic ties from spiraling out of control and causing significant damage to both economies. Talks took place in London's historic Lancaster House, as they sought to rescue an earlier negotiated tariff truce and defuse escalating export controls. The negotiations aimed to extend the 90-day pause on punitive tariffs agreed in Geneva, revive cross-border trade flows, and hammer out a framework on rare-earth minerals and high-end technology exports. However, the talks ultimately accomplished few tangible benefits that President Trump sought to originally gain from the implementation of these tariffs, namely to stem the flow of fentanyl, motivate companies to reshore to the US, and close the trade deficit. Instead, he temporarily paused these measures by both sides and returned to the dynamics prior to his 'Liberation Day' and the imposition of tariffs globally. The June 9 to 10 London talks — led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and USTR Jamieson Greer from the U.S. and China's Vice Premier He Lifeng and Commerce Minister Wang Wentao — were convened against a backdrop of deep mutual distrust. Since 2018, the two sides have imposed tit-for-tat duties, with U.S. tariffs on Chinese exports staying around 19-21% from the end of Trump's first term until the beginning of his second, and Beijing following suit with…. After Liberation Day, US tariffs reached a high of 145% before decreasing to 30%, while Beijing imposed a retaliatory tariff of 125% before settling at its current level of 10%.These actions have stifled more than $600 billion in bilateral trade and rattled global markets. At the same time, The Trumps' administration's erratic and inconsistent messaging has also allowed for Wall Street to start pricing in volatility. Moreover a new TACO theory emerged, 'TACO or Trump Always Chickens Out.' This asserts that despite Trumps tough trade policy rhetoric, when markets become too volatile Trump will always reverse course. US Reliance on Critical Rare Earth Metals US Reliance on Rare Earth Imports from China In April 2025, China further escalated tensions by instituting a requirement of export licenses for critical rare-earth minerals, resulting in a 20% year-on-year decrease in shipments to the U.S. and Europe. Due to China's dominance in rare earth exports to the US, this triggered alarms in various industries, most notably in the electric vehicle and aerospace sector. Meanwhile, Washington broadened its export curbs on advanced semiconductors, chip-making equipment, and aerospace components, with a particular intensification after the two countries' Geneva talks, amplifying China's sense of economic siege. Despite the high stakes, negotiators emerged from London with only a modest 'interim framework' rather than a sweeping accord. However, Trump still claimed in a Truth Social post that 'the relationship is excellent.' The enthusiasm from the president is in large part due to China agreeing to temporarily grant export licenses for rare-earth magnets and related components, enabling U.S. automakers such as Ford, GM, and Stellantis to replenish inventories after April's curbs. At the same time, the U.S. stopped short of lifting its tech export restrictions on AI chips and aerospace tools. Commerce Secretary Lutnick characterized the outcome as 'putting meat on the bones' of the May Geneva deal, while Ministry of Commerce spokesperson He Yidong stated the two sides reached a consensus framework to 'implement the important understandings' reached during the June 5 phone call between Trump and Xi. From an economic perspective, the London agreement delivered a short-lived reprieve. Following reports of the rare-earth license concession, global equity markets ticked higher, echoing relief seen after the Geneva truce. Yet core barriers remain firmly in place: U.S. base tariffs on Chinese goods remain near 30%, China's on U.S. exports linger around 10%, and neither side agreed to roll back its export-control regimes. Without a detailed enforcement mechanism or significant new commitments, the framework may merely defer a return to pre-Geneva duties once the 90-day window lapses in August. Current versus pre-Geneva Tariff Levels Geopolitical undercurrents will also further limit any long-term détente. In Washington, a bipartisan consensus has emerged around the need to 'de‐risk' critical supply chains, not merely as a commercial maneuver but as a national security imperative. Policymakers and industry leaders alike fear that overdependence on China for semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, rare‐earth minerals, and even basic manufacturing capacity leaves the United States dangerously exposed to coercive economic pressure or abrupt supply shocks. This conviction has translated into a suite of domestic incentives—ranging from the CHIPS and Science Act to expanded Defense Production Act authorities—designed to shore up American production of key inputs and diversify procurement to 'trusted' partners. On the other side of the Pacific, Chinese leadership interprets these U.S. measures as part of a long-standing containment strategy. Official rhetoric in Beijing routinely casts de-risking initiatives as destabilizing 'decoupling' efforts that threaten China's development model and tarnish the mutually beneficial aspects of economic integration. State media and senior diplomats argue that a sovereign nation, particularly one bearing the mantle of a developing‐country status, must safeguard its industrial base against foreign interference. Despite the rhetoric on economic self-reliance, both the U.S. and China have much to lose from a prolonged trade war. According to the military think tank RAND, 'roughly 40 percent of China's exports to the United States fall into categories where China supplies more than half of America's total imports.' Meanwhile, China is eager to gain access to GPUs and CPUs from American companies like NVIDIA and AMD to power its growing AI infrastructure. Even knowing this, leaders on both sides remain committed to showing strength and independence. Trump administration officials are wary of ceding control to China, while Beijing officials do not want to appear weak on the global stage. The talks, while cordial, still have not permanently de-escalated the trade war, with 30% and 10% baseline tariffs remaining on the American and Chinese sides, respectively. Furthermore, China has only agreed to a six-month license for American companies seeking to import rare earth minerals and magnets. Beyond the economic impact, the visa statuses of Chinese students in US universities will continue to remain uncertain as long as the trade war remains unresolved. As the two economic superpowers prepare for the current deadline on a comprehensive trade deal by August 10, the London talks underscore both the value and the limits of diplomacy: they bought time, but a durable resolution remains elusive. Special thanks to Jonah Kim, and Nathaniel Schochet, for their exceptional thought leadership, research, and editorial contributions to this article. Special thanks to Hanah Kim and Artem Valyaev Kunisky for assisting in providing info-graphics.