
‘Makes me want to pull my hair out': This $12 billion company boss says he's frustrated with Gen Z employees-but…
When
Charlie Noyes
, then a 19-year-old MIT dropout, showed up five hours late to his first morning meeting at
Paradigm
, most employers might have sent him packing. Instead, the $12 billion San Francisco-based crypto investment firm saw something others didn't. Today, Noyes is a general partner at the company at just 25.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Nuclear Power! How India and Pakistan's arsenals stack up
Does America have a plan to capture Pakistan's nuclear weapons?
Airspace blockade: India plots a flight path to skip Pakistan
'From his messages, I thought he was a 40-year-old with a beard, very cynical and craggy,' said
Matt Huang
, co-founder of Paradigm, recalling their first interaction in a Telegram chat about Bitcoin Cash forks. 'When he showed up to dinner, I was really surprised he was 19.'
That first impression was only the beginning. Noyes had already been steeped in crypto since the age of 12, discovering Bitcoin through gaming forums. He'd published research in crypto applications and won Intel's science competition twice — before ever stepping foot in a university. After briefly attending MIT, he dropped out to join Paradigm.
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Villas In Dubai | Search Ads
View Deals
Undo
At first, the workplace wasn't quite what Noyes expected. 'He thought opining on pitch decks over email and coming to the office once a week was normal,' Huang told Colossus. But once expectations were made clear, Noyes thrived. By 2020, he had already identified MEV (Miner Extractable Value) as a critical issue in blockchain architecture, leading Paradigm to invest in Flashbots — a key player now shaping Ethereum's $450 billion ecosystem.
Unconventional minds, powerful impact
But Noyes is just one example in Paradigm's line-up of unconventional hires. The firm's Chief Technology Officer, Georgios Konstantopoulos, joined two years after graduating college in 2018 and is now regarded as one of the most prolific engineers in the crypto world. Then there's a developer known only by his Discord handle, transmissions11, reportedly discovered by the firm while still in school.
Live Events
'They create an absurd amount of chaos sometimes and you want to pull your hair out,' said Huang. 'But then you see what they can do and it's like, holy crap. Nobody else in the world could do that.'
In fact, Huang likens his job to something out of a comic book: 'Sometimes I feel like I'm running the
X-Men Academy
.'
A broader trend across industries
Paradigm is not alone in betting on younger, unfiltered talent. Gen Z, born between the late 1990s and early 2010s, has a growing reputation for clashing with traditional office culture. Late arrivals, refusal to work unpaid overtime, and demands for quick promotions are some of the common complaints.
According to a survey by Intelligent, one in six companies hesitates to hire Gen Z workers. Even some Gen Zers admit their generation is the hardest to work with.
Still, the very qualities that make Gen Z challenging also give them an edge in fast-moving industries. 'They bring a unique blend of talent and bold ideas that can rejuvenate any workforce,' said Geoffrey Scott, senior hiring manager at Resume Genius. 'Gen Zers might have a bad rep, but they have the power to transform workplaces for the better.'
Adapt or be left behind
Psychologist Tobba Vigfusdottir, who heads the workplace wellness platform Kara Connect, warns that companies unwilling to adapt may fall behind. 'Companies really need to wake up and smell the coffee,' she told Fortune. 'The companies that will survive are listening and letting them in, because they're changing things.'
According to Vigfusdottir, organisations should offer more flexible working policies, environmentally conscious practices, and jobs with clear purpose if they want to attract and retain Gen Z talent — especially as baby boomers exit the workforce.
Other big names betting on Gen Z
Matt Huang isn't the only one making bold bets on Gen Z. Thrive Capital founder Josh Kushner, who launched his firm at 26, says he prefers hiring people with less than four years of experience. At the time, he knew older industry veterans wouldn't want to work for someone so young, so he instead hired 'the smartest people that we knew who were our ages.'
That approach led Thrive Capital to early investments in major companies — including OpenAI, now valued at over $300 billion. Even today, Kushner continues to favour younger hires. 'I'd still rather find that young, hungry person who's willing to run through walls like we were ten years ago.'
Will.i.am, best known for fronting the Black Eyed Peas, is another high-profile Gen Z backer. A seasoned tech investor who got in early on Tesla, OpenAI, and Pinterest, he believes the next wave of breakthroughs will come from young minds at institutions like MIT and Stanford. 'They're young kids, and they're native to this,' Will.i.am told Fortune. 'So you want to hunt for that. That's the only thing I'm focused on.'
While many employers may still be cautious around Gen Z, leaders like Huang, Kushner, and Will.i.am are embracing their creativity, curiosity, and disruptive energy. The chaos they bring may be maddening, but it's also fuelling the next generation of transformative innovation.
As Matt Huang put it plainly: 'Nobody else in the world could do that.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
After losses in FTX, which went bankrupt in 2022, Temasek slashes early-stage startup investments by 88%
Conservative Approach Replaces High-Risk Betting Live Events Temasek's Shift After FTX Fallout A Broader Trend Across Venture Capital FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel After the collapse of crypto exchange FTX , Singapore's state-owned investment firm Temasek has significantly scaled back its involvement in early-stage startups, cutting investments by 88% over three years, as per a which is one of the world's biggest investors, has changed its strategy to focus more on conservative investments as it now makes bigger commitments to a smaller number of companies that are closer to going public, as per the Financial investment group pointed out that it has reduced its early-stage investments to 6% of its portfolio in 2021 because it is 'cognisant of the risks and challenges early-stage companies face,' as quoted in the READ: Ray Dalio joins Jamie Dimon in warning U.S. debt nearing point of no return, approaching death spiral Temasek said, 'We have seen a market pullback in investment flows into early-stage investing since 2022 and, as a result, have adopted a more cautious approach to new investments,' quoted Financial firm's investments in early-stage startup companies declined to $509 million in 2024 from $4.4 billion in 2021 and this year, Temasek has committed $70 million to these companies, reported Financial Singapore-based company's strategy changed after it had to write off its $275 million investment in FTX, which went bankrupt in 2022, according to the this has become a trend as the number of active US venture capital investors has fallen since 2021, which was a peak year for the VCs, according to Pymnts per data from PitchBook, the number of VCs investing in US-based companies fell from 8,315 in 2021 to 6,175 in 2024, reported the Financial 88% over three years. It dropped from $4.4 billion in 2021 to just $509 million in conservative investments. It's putting more money into fewer companies that are more stable and closer to going public.


Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump signs order to double steel, aluminium import tariffs to 50%
New Delhi: A 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports into the United States went into effect on Wednesday, doubling the previous rate as President Donald Trump cited national security concerns for the dramatic escalation in trade protections. The new tariff rates, increased from an earlier 25% rate, were announced by Trump in a statement on Tuesday. The president claimed legal authority to impose the tariffs through Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to address national security risks arising from imports. 'In my judgement, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminium industries,' read Trump's statement released by the White House. Trump said the earlier 25% tariff rates, first announced in February and implemented on March 12, had helped America's steel industry but had not enabled companies to maintain the capacity needed to meet national defence needs. 'I have determined that increasing the previously imposed tariffs will provide greater support to these industries and reduce or eliminate the national security threat posed by imports of steel and aluminium articles and their derivative articles,' Trump said. The tariff increase comes amid broader trade disputes at the World Trade Organisation. Several countries, including India, have formally challenged the US measures, characterising them as 'safeguard measures' that violate WTO rules and threaten retaliatory action. In May, India formally notified the WTO that it viewed America's tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures and indicated it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' given to the US and that it retains the right to enforce retaliatory measures. On May 22, America rejected India's characterisation of the tariffs as safeguard measures and refused to engage in talks on the matter. The introduction of tariffs has proven controversial within the US. The America Iron and Steel Institute, an industry group, has welcomed the increased tariffs as a necessary measure to protect domestic producers from cheaper foreign competition. However, manufacturers using steel as input for production have publicly raised concerns that more expensive steel will impact competitiveness across other domestic industries. For India specifically, the consequences are direct and substantial. According to the Global Trade Research Institute (GTRI), a New Delhi-based research group, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US in FY2025, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. 'These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' the GTRI said in a brief.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Profit takes a backseat for birds at this adventure park
Vadodara: It all started with a flutter of feathers on a 50-foot bungee platform. A few summers ago, Bandish Shah, a Vadodara-based businessman and nature enthusiast, spotted an Indian pitta — a small, vibrantly colored bird — nesting atop a popular ride in the adventure zone of his resort in Dabhoi. Most people would've ignored it. But Shah did something unexpected: he shut the ride down. "The adventure zone was bustling during the summer holidays, but I couldn't let thrill rides endanger nesting birds," recalls Shah. That one incident changed everything. Soon, he discovered that this wasn't a one-time occurrence. The dense green canopy surrounding the adventure zone had become a seasonal refuge for several birds — from Indian pittas and Asian paradise flycatchers to fork-tailed drongos and orange-headed thrushes. Many of these species, including migratory ones, return year after year to nest during summer — coinciding with the peak tourist season. Faced with a choice between ecology and economy, Shah chose the birds. Since then, he has made it a rule: if a bird nests too close to any ride, that activity is shut down — regardless of footfall or profits. "If hundreds of visitors use the rides daily, it disturbs the birds. And they may never return," Shah told TOI. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo "So I decided their safety comes first." The decision comes at a cost. Shah estimates that he loses lakhs of rupees annually by keeping the adventure zone partially or fully closed during nesting periods. Yet, he remains unfazed. "I am a nature enthusiast. Disturbing other living beings for entertainment is the last thing I'd want. Revenue can be recovered. Lost wildlife, once gone, doesn't return," he says. It isn't just the rides that have been adjusted. Once echoing with loud DJ music, the zone now embraces silence. All artificial lights are turned off at night. The goal: create a space where birds feel safe — not threatened — by human presence. Shah's resort, spread across 120 acres, is a green sanctuary by design. Only 10% of the land has construction — mostly using natural materials. The rest is a vibrant forest of native trees, nurtured over the past 15 years as part of his eco-tourism vision. Today, the area hosts over 155 species of birds, some of which return annually to breed. "We also plant thousands of indigenous saplings every year in and around the property," Shah adds. "It's about long-term conservation, not short-term gain."