'Absurdity' of UK position on Israel while still supplying arms called out
Speaking in the House of Commons, Brendan O'Hara MP pointed out that ministers have accepted Israel is in "flagrant breach of international law" but is still supplying them with components for F35 fighter jets.
It comes after the UK Government imposed sanctions against extremist Israeli politicians Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, alongside four other countries.
Ben-Gvir, Israel's security minister, and Smotrich, finance minister, will have their assets frozen and travel bans imposed by the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway.
READ MORE: Independent Scotland would break ties with Israel, says Stephen Flynn
Following the announcement, Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer gave a statement in the House of Commons where he said: 'The gravity of this situation demands further action. The reality is that these human rights abuses, incitement to violence, extremist rhetoric comes … from individuals who are ministers in this Israeli government.'
O'Hara, MP for Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber, told MPs that the UK Government needed to go 'much, much further'.
He continued: 'Today's announcement highlights the absurdity of the Government's position, because the Foreign Secretary recently described those views as being 'repellent and monstrous', and today's statement accepts that Israel is guilty of human rights abuses and is in flagrant breach of international law.
'So on what basis, legal or moral, can the Government continue to supply F 35 components, knowing that the end user will be a regime that they themselves have condemned for espousing 'repellent and monstrous' views, and who they now accept are guilty of human rights violations and are in flagrant breach of international law.'
Falconer responded that he would 'for the purposes of time' wouldn't address the legal question as it was being considered by a judicial review.
'We are confident that the limited carve out that we have done in order to maintain the functioning of the F 35 program, vital to our national security and that of so many of our allies, is both legal and proportionate and moral, and we will continue to fight that case in the court,' he said.
It comes after human rights groups called on the UK Government to suspend all arms sales to Israel following the sanctions announcement.
Earlier, Falconer told MPs that imposing sanctions did not 'diminish our support for the security of Israel and the Israeli people'.
'The agendas of these two men are not even supported by a majority of Israelis.'
Ben-Gvir, Israel's security minister, and Smotrich, finance minister, are two hard-line ministers who are key allies of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his current government.
Smotrich approved the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and campaigned against allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza.
READ MORE: David Lammy urged to intervene as Madleen seized by Israel
Ben-Gvir resigned from Netanyahu's cabinet during the ceasefire in January, rejoining in March when fighting resumed. He said allowing aid deliveries into Gaza was a 'serious and grave mistake' and has advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza.
Falconer told MPs that settler expansion had increased hugely in recent years and last year had seen the worst settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank on record. He added this year is on track to be just as violent and that 'this an attempt to entrench a one-state reality'.
'The gravity of this situation demands further action,' he said.
'The reality is that these human rights abuses, incitement to violence, extremist rhetoric comes … from individuals who are ministers in this Israeli government.'
Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said the situation in the Middle East is 'serious and completely intolerable'. She said that the previous Conservative government also considered sanctioning these Israeli ministers, but did not.
'We all want to see a better future for the Israeli and Palestinian people, and the UK must continue to play a leading role in achieving this,' she said.
'To do this, the UK needs to have a constructive set of channels of communication open with all our partners in the region and working towards peace and ending this conflict, including dialogue with Israel.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
UK 'currently' training Israel soldiers on UK soil, Labour admit
The news came in response to a written question at Westminster, put in by Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell. Maskell asked 'when the last time was that a member of the Israel Defense Forces was trained by the UK armed forces'. In a response published on Wednesday, Armed Forces Minister Luke Pollard admitted that the UK was 'currently' training IDF soldiers in the UK. READ MORE: David Pratt: Donald Trump is reshaping democracy for authoritarians at a rapid pace Pollard said: 'As part of routine defence engagement with Israel, the UK is currently training a limited number of Israel Defense Forces personnel on UK-based training courses.' The news comes despite the Labour Government sanctioning two Israeli ministers – Itamar Ben-Gvir, the security minister, and Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister. The UK Government has also continued to send military equipment to Israel, and has declined to block exports of parts for F-35 fighter jets despite evidence that they have been used in Gaza. Further, the UK has continued sending spy plane flights over Gaza in missions they say are run to provide Israel with information that could help to recover hostages held by Hamas. READ MORE: David Pratt: Israel's arming of Gaza's crime gangs is sure to backfire Maskell also brought up the flights with the UK Government. She asked: 'When the last time was that his Department provided the (a) Israeli government and (b) Israel Defense Forces with surveillance data of Gaza from Royal Air Force planes.' Pollard in his response referred only to previous answers in which he said: 'The UK controls what information is passed to Israeli authorities. 'Surveillance information of Gaza is passed to the relevant Israeli authorities only where it relates to hostage rescue and where we are satisfied that it will be used in accordance with international humanitarian law. 'I am unable to comment further on detailed intelligence matters.' Israel is credibly accused of committing genocide in Palestine with its now 19-month assault on Gaza. On Thursday, the Gaza Health Ministry said the number of Palestinians killed by Israel had passed 55,000. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is wanted for arrest for alleged war crimes (Image: PA) The ministry does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, but has said that women and children make up more than half the dead. The ministry says 55,104 people have been killed since the start of the war and 127,394 wounded. Many more are believed to be buried under the rubble or in areas that are inaccessible to local medics. Israeli forces have destroyed vast areas of Gaza, displaced about 90% of its population and in recent weeks have transformed more than half of the coastal territory into a military buffer zone that includes the now mostly uninhabited southern city of Rafah. A two-and-a-half-month blockade imposed by Israel when it ended a ceasefire with Hamas raised fears of famine and was slightly eased in May. The launch of a new Israeli and US-backed aid system has been marred by chaos and violence, and the UN says it has struggled to bring in food because of Israeli restrictions, a breakdown of law and order, and widespread looting. Israel accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid, but the UN and aid groups deny there is any systematic diversion of aid to militants.
Spectator
32 minutes ago
- Spectator
Is Israel preparing to strike Iran?
While much of the Western debate remains trapped in tired slogans and false moral narratives, events on the ground in the Middle East have taken a decisive turn. In the past 24 hours, U.S. embassies have begun evacuating non-essential staff. Military dependents are being authorised to leave key bases. Multiple reports say U.S. officials have been told Israel is fully ready to launch an operation against Iran if required, and Washington expects possible Iranian retaliation on American sites in Iraq. The U.S. anticipates that Iranian retaliation against U.S. assets in Iraq could follow any Israeli strike The trigger is Iran's growing stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium, its preparations for potential retaliation against any Israeli strike, and the breakdown of progress in nuclear talks. Meanwhile, in Gaza, as Western commentators obsess over supposed Israeli crimes, Hamas deliberately attacked a convoy of humanitarian aid workers, killing and injuring those delivering life-saving relief, according to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The region is moving to dangerous thresholds while too many in the West cling to delusional narratives and moral theatre that can no longer disguise the facts. U.S. embassies across the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and North Africa have been ordered to convene emergency action committees and report their risk mitigation measures to Washington. This directive, as reported by the Washington Post, led to Secretary of State Marco Rubio's decision on Wednesday to authorise the departure of nonessential personnel in Iraq. 'We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies,' a State Department official said. 'Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq.' A senior diplomat in the region put the mood in stark terms: 'We are watching and worried. We think it's more serious than any other time in the past.' Military preparations are also accelerating. Naval Support Activity Bahrain, home to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, has been placed on high alert. In Iraq's Al-Anbar province, increased military air activity has been observed. The U.S. anticipates that Iranian retaliation against U.S. assets in Iraq could follow any Israeli strike. This concern contributed to Washington's decision to advise some Americans to leave the region earlier on Wednesday. Iran's posture is evolving in parallel. The New York Times reports that Iranian military and government officials have already met to discuss their response to a potential Israeli strike. A senior Iranian official told the paper that Tehran has prepared a response plan involving an immediate counterstrike on Israel with hundreds of ballistic missiles. The catalyst behind these developments remains Iran's advancing nuclear programme. According to a recent confidential IAEA report cited by Reuters, Iran has amassed about 408.6 kg of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, a quantity sufficient for nearly one nuclear weapon if further refined. Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, have signalled they are ready to trigger UN 'snapback' provisions to reapply sanctions on Iran if its nuclear programme continues unchecked, with some Western diplomats suggesting such action could come as early as August. Diplomatic efforts continue, but seem increasingly futile. A sixth round of direct talks between U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is scheduled for the coming days. Two U.S. officials confirmed to CBS News that Witkoff still plans to attend. Yet Witkoff's public remarks last night underscore the gravity of the challenge. Speaking at a United Hatzalah event, he said: 'A nuclear Iran represents an existential threat to Israel as does an Iran with a large amount of missiles. That is as big an existential threat as the nuclear threat. And this is an existential threat to the United States and the free world and the entire GCC. We must stand resolute and united against this danger and ensure that Iran never attains the means to achieve its deadly ambitions no matter what the cost.' Markets have responded sharply. Oil prices rose more than 4 per cent on Wednesday, reaching their highest level in two months, amid fears that Persian Gulf shipping lanes could be affected by military escalation. Alongside these developments, a separate gruesome attack demands clear moral response. On Wednesday night at approximately 10 p.m. local time, a bus carrying over two dozen members of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation team (local Palestinian aid workers working alongside the U.S. GHF team) was attacked by Hamas terrorists as it travelled to a distribution centre west of Khan Younis. The GHF's statement leaves no doubt: 'At least five fatalities, multiple injuries, and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage. We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms.' The GHF reports that Hamas had openly threatened its team and the civilians they serve in recent days, while Western news outlets ran cover for them by constantly suggesting Israel was shooting at civilians seeking aid. The attack represents a direct assault on humanitarian principles and the integrity of civil society. 'These were aid workers,' the GHF statement continues, 'Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons, and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others.' When Israel mistakenly killed World Central Kitchen aid workers after terrorists knowingly endangered them, the world reacted with outrage. Now we will see whether politicians and the media speak out on this deliberate targeting of aid workers by Hamas. Until now, Hamas's threats against the humanitarian efforts were met with silence from those who should have condemned them. The UK was busy sanctioning Israeli cabinet ministers. That silence must end, with the international community unequivocally denouncing Hamas for this atrocity. Despite these developments in the Gaza Strip and across the entire region, the complex humanitarian effort to feed Gaza's citizens continues, as do the diplomatic efforts to address Iran's nuclear programme – even as military preparations advance on multiple fronts, and the possibility of kidnapped American humanitarian workers is being investigated. There is a hard reality that many in the West have chosen not to confront. From Paris, London, and Ottawa to the BBC and other Western media outlets, public debate has too often been trapped in abstract talking points: the fantasy of a viable Palestinian state led by terrorist factions, the ritualised condemnation of Israel, and the refusal to acknowledge the scale of Iranian and Hamas aggression. But events on the ground are indifferent to such illusions. Iran's nuclear and missile posture is advancing. Hamas is murdering aid workers. The region is moving toward dangerous thresholds while too many in the West cling to a moral fable of putative Israeli bloodlust and deliberate starvation – a narrative that no longer fits the facts. The question now is whether Western leaders are prepared to face this reality with the clarity and resolve it demands, or whether they will persist in narratives that leave them powerless as others reshape the strategic landscape of the Middle East.
Daily Record
39 minutes ago
- Daily Record
New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
Around 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Earlier this week the UK Government announced Winter Fuel Payments will be reinstated for over 9 million pensioners later this year. The U-turn and Chancellor Rachel Reeves Spending Review on Wednesday have prompted calls from the 'End Frozen Pensions Campaign' for the annual State Pension uprating to be reinstated for around 453,000 retirees living in countries which do not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. The campaign said it would cost the UK Government just under £60 million per year to end this 'historic wrong'. The policy, which prevents State Pensions from being increased annually - to counteract the impact of inflation for UK pensioners living in certain countries - means some are receiving as little as £60 per week, far below the current £176.45 rate for the Basic State Pension for those living in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. John Duguid, Chair of the End Frozen Pensions Campaign, said: "The Government's U-turn on Winter Fuel Payments shows there is a common consensus that the most vulnerable in our society rely on such payments as essential lifelines during times of need. 'Victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal, who receive only a fraction of their full UK State Pension because they live in some countries overseas, should not be excluded from this rationale. Yet the Government's continued refusal to address this longstanding discrimination means they continue to suffer from often negligible levels of state support. 'These British pensioners, many of whom spent their working lives in the UK, receive on average just £60 per week compared to the more than £170 per week they would be entitled to in the UK, or a non-frozen country.' He added: 'Ending this historic wrong would cost just under £60 million per year. This would barely register in the overall State Pension budget. But this isn't only about cost, it is about the principle of treating British state pensioners fairly and equally. 'Similar to the Government's decision to reinstate Winter Fuel Payments, ending this scandal is the correct and morally just action to take. The Government should do right by those who paid fairly into the system, and ensure they have dignity in their retirement.' Last month, cross-party MPs united to intensify pressure on the UK Government over its refusal to reform the so-called 'frozen pensions' policy. Only British overseas pensioners living in specific countries - mostly within the Commonwealth - are impacted, in what Rebecca Smith MP described as "the ultimate postcode lottery'. Those in the USA see the same annual increase as British pensioners living in the UK or France, while those in Australia or Canada, see their State Pension remain 'frozen' and effectively fall in value. For example, 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, who lived and worked in the UK until the age of 76 and served in all three of the RAF, Navy and the Army, has received just £72.50 per week since 2001, the year she moved to Canada to be nearer her daughter. Jim Shannon MP similarly questioned the logic of the policy applying in only some countries and not others, arguing 'the arbitrary distinction between countries with and without an operating agreement lacks logic and smacks of red tape and bureaucracy gone mad." The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, was mostly notably challenged on the estimated cost of ending the policy, which is estimated at £60m per year - 0.04 per cent of the annual State Pension budget - rather than the £950m per year quoted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The difference explained by the fact the DWP are quoting for uprating and backdating payments to account for the years affected pensioners have been frozen. However, campaigners are instead asking to receive the annual increase from this point onwards. Douglas McAllister MP stressed that campaigners and supportive MPs are 'not seeking a full backdating, but for the Government to introduce some form of yearly indexing to answer that injustice'. Longterm critic of the policy Sir Roger Gale MP argued the policy is 'not a matter of cost. It is a matter of moral responsibility and duty.' The Minister was also reminded by a number of MPs that 'the vast majority of impacted pensioners still report having no knowledge of the policy's existence prior to moving overseas'. State Pension payments 2025/26 Full New State Pension Weekly payment: £230.25 Fortnightly payment: £460.50 Four-weekly payment: £921 Annual amount: £11,973 Full Basic State Pension Weekly payment: £176.45 Fortnightly payment: £352.90 Four-weekly payment: £705.80 Annual amount: £9,175 Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5% Article continues below Recent analysis released by Royal London revealed only around half of people receiving the New State Pension last year were getting the full weekly amount - and around 150,000 were on less than £100 per week.
