ADNOC seeks EU okay under foreign subsidies rules for Covestro deal
BRUSSELS, May 15 (Reuters) - Abu Dhabi state oil giant ADNOC on Thursday sought EU approval under the bloc's foreign subsidies rules for its 14.7-billion-euro ($16.4 billion) acquisition of German chemicals company Covestro (1COVG.DE), opens new tab, according to a filing on the European Commission site.
ADNOC, which last week won the green light under EU merger rules for the deal, is making its biggest ever acquisition, underscoring Middle East countries' diversification of their investments to reduce their dependence on oil.
The EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) takes aim at unfair foreign aid for companies with the goal of reining in competition from non-EU companies subsidised by their governments.
The European Commission, which acts as the antitrust regulator for the 27-country bloc, set a June 24 deadline for its decision.
It can open a full-scale investigation after 25 working days if it has serious concerns. Such a so-called in-depth probe would take 90 working days, which can be extended by 3 weeks if companies offer remedies to address concerns.
Last year, a bid by UAE telecoms group e& (EAND.AD), opens new tab for parts of Czech telecoms company PPF's assets was only cleared after it offered to remove an unlimited state guarantee and agreed not to provide foreign subsidies to the merged entity.
The case was the first full-scale probe under the FSR.
($1 = 0.8945 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer's trade deals FIASCO: 'Win-wins' are just sugar-coated concessions
Keir Starmer has sought to portray his hastily stitched together trade deals with the United States, the European Union and India as unalloyed triumphs. The way he tells it, you'd think he is so persuasive at the negotiating table that he could sell ice to Eskimos and sand to Arabs. But the truth is that a Prime Minister in need of an economic success story to sell to an increasingly disillusioned electorate has sugar-coated the outcomes of these talks and misleadingly presented them as 'win-wins' for UK plc. In fact, he has been bamboozled and outmanoeuvred at every turn by representatives of foreign powers who really do know how to play hardball. Take the French president Emmanuel Macron's outrageous piece of brinkmanship over fishing rights. Aware of how desperate the embattled Starmer was to announce a new trade deal with Brussels, he ambushed him at the 11th hour with a demand that EU fishermen be given further rights to our waters for 12 years. No wonder one member of an influential French fisheries committee later gloated: 'We couldn't have hoped for better.' And what did we get in return? A vague promise to allow British travellers to use e-gates at European airports at some unspecified point in the future. Starmer's willingness to sign agreements that have concessions to the other party baked in – but only airy promises about reciprocal benefits – is a feature of all the deals he has signed to date. The American deal, for example, has more holes than a sieve. Under the terms of the 'US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal', we were told that Britain would be freed from a 25 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium, for example. (A tariff, incidentally, that was later doubled to 50 per cent but is currently on hold until July 9.) The dash for a carbon-free economy means that there is only one UK blast furnace producing vital virgin steel currently operating at full capacity. As a result, the White House is concerned about the prospect of Britain sending cheaper imported steel to the US that has been pressed or rolled in this country. So the US negotiators are insisting that only steel that is 'melted and poured' in the UK (in other words, smelted in a furnace) is covered by the trade deal. All very well, but one of Britain's biggest steel exporters is Tata Steel. It shut down its blast furnaces at Port Talbot in South Wales last year, so must currently import raw steel from the Netherlands and India – both subject to American tariffs. This is a knotty problem – and the clock is ticking. Unless an agreement can be reached by July 9 when the new tariff rates kick in, Britain's steel exports will be hit by that punitive 50 per cent rate. So much for the US deal. The EU one is even worse. While Starmer surrendered to Macron's ultimatum over fishing, Brussels remained characteristically obdurate when it came to its €150 billion (£125 billion) defence fund. Despite the growing threat from Russia, the US's coolness towards Nato and Britain's leadership in high-tech warfare – not to mention our control of the Eurofighter Typhoon platform – Starmer extracted only the woolliest of commitments from the EU. The bloc merely said the new deal 'will pave the way' for Britain's defence industry to participate in the EU's fund. There were similarly weasel words when it came to the use of e-gates by British travellers to the Continent. Under the terms of the deal, access would be given as 'soon as possible', yet we could be queuing for years to come. Even the recently agreed trade deal with India has its critics. It included an extension from one to three years to a scheme that offered Indian workers employed here on a temporary basis an exemption from National Insurance Contributions – a totally toxic clause given Chancellor Rachel Reeves' now notorious October Budget, which raised Employer National Insurance Contributions. What is particularly shameful is the dishonest way in which the Government has presented the deals to the British people as if they are a big win for everyone. Tell that to the working men and women and fishing crews whose livelihoods are threatened by the weakness and incompetence of the man at No 10.
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The staggering amount Florian Wirtz will be paid a WEEK if he completes Liverpool move - with German set to earn more than Virgil van Dijk
Florian Wirtz is set to earn a staggering salary if he completes a move to Liverpool this summer. Arne Slot is looking to splash out to improve an already impressive squad after they won the Premier League and a deal for German playmaker Wirtz is edging closer. They would have to break the Premier League transfer record to secure Wirtz's signature after Bayer Leverkusen priced the 22-year-old at £120million. Liverpool have offered £100m plus an extra £13m in add ons but the German side are holding out on a fee which would overtake the £115m which Chelsea paid Brighton for Moses Caicedo. The attacking midfielder has made it clear that Liverpool are his choice and a move is reportedly 'considered a done deal'. The Reds will also spend big on Wirtz's salary, with the German set to be handed a five-year contract worth £355,000-a-week, according to Bild. The enormous salary would make him Liverpool's second highest paid player, above the £350,000-a-week Virgil van Dijk earns, but just below Mohamed Salah's weekly £400,000 earnings. Although Liverpool will have to break the bank for Wirtz, he previously admitted he is not motivated by money. 'I don't even care about how much money I have in my account or what I might earn in the future,' he told Sports Illustrated Germany this year. 'Of course, you should make sure you get a good contract. But for me, the sporting perspective is much more important than the money. 'And I think my parents would be angry if I were too fixated on money. After I moved to Leverkusen at 16, my parents managed my salary and sent me €150 (£126) a month. 'That shaped me. It was important to my parents that I didn't do anything stupid with my salary.' The German star is edging closer to an Anfield switch and has been convinced by Slot's clear plan of where he will play in Liverpool's set-up as a No 10. And on Wednesday, Wirtz appeared to nod when asked by MailSport if he was 'excited for Liverpool ' after Germany's Nations League defeat by Portugal. Wirtz would become Liverpool's third signing of the summer, and their second from Leverkusen after the champions scooped Jeremie Frimpong for £29.5m. The right wing back penned a five-year contract at Anfield last week after completing his medical last month.
Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
Latam-Caribbean development bank doubles oceans funding to $2.5 billion
BRUSSELS, June 7 (Reuters) - The Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean (CAF) will double to $2.5 billion its investments in protecting the oceans and supporting sustainable marine economic activities, it said on Saturday. The bank has already exceeded its existing oceans funding commitment, of $1.25 billion over 2022-2026, with investments including strengthening marine protected areas and supporting small-scale fisheries. The extra $2.5 billion, which will be rolled out over 2025-2030, will target areas including low-carbon maritime transport, restoration of damaged ocean ecosystems and sustainable tourism, the bank said. It comes on top of the $1.3 billion CAF invested in oceans over the last three years. "This commitment reflects our transformative agenda, that is, to embed the health of the ocean in our development ambition," CAF executive vice-president Gianpiero Leoncini told a conference on oceans financing in Monaco. A U.N. Oceans conference next week in Nice, France, will attempt to rally stronger commitments from countries to protect and invest in oceans - including by ratifying a global treaty to protect ocean biodiversity, which most of the 116 countries that signed it have still not done. Oceans are crucial to trade, food and employment for coastal communities, and maintaining global climate systems. But funding to protect these functions has fallen far short. Investments in ocean health totalled just $10 billion from 2015-2019 - far below the $175 billion per year needed, the U.N. has said. CAF's existing oceans funding includes managing illegal fishing, providing loans to wastewater treatment plants and storm drainage systems to reduce damage from floods. Oceans also provide a vital buffer against climate change, by absorbing around 30% of planet-heating CO2 emissions. But as the oceans heat up, hotter waters are destroying marine ecosystems and threatening the oceans' ability to absorb CO2.
