A timeline of the rise and fall of Sean 'Diddy' Combs
For more than two decades, Sean 'Diddy' Combs was one of one of hip-hop's most opportunistic entrepreneurs, spinning his hitmaking talents into a broad business empire that included a record label, a fashion brand, a TV network, deals with liquor companies and a key role in a reality TV show.
But U.S. prosecutors say that behind the scenes, Combs was coercing and abusing women with help from a network of associates who helped silence victims through blackmail and violence.
Combs has pleaded not guilty and denied the allegations. Jury selection for his trial starts Monday.
Here is a timeline of major events in his rise and fall:
1990: Combs, then a student at Howard University, gets his start in the music business with an internship at Uptown Records in New York.
Dec. 28, 1991: Nine people die at a celebrity basketball game promoted by Combs and the rapper Heavy D when thousands of fans try to get into a gym at the City College of New York. A mayoral report lays part of the blame for the catastrophe on poor planning by Combs.
1992: Combs is one of the executive producers on 'What's the 411?,' the debut album by Mary J. Blige.
1993: After being fired by Uptown, Combs establishes his own label, Bad Boy, which quickly cuts a lucrative deal with Arista Records.
1994: Bad Boy releases Notorious B.I.G.'s album 'Ready to Die.' Two months later, Tupac Shakur survives a shooting in New York and accuses Combs and Biggie of having prior knowledge of the attack, which they deny. Shakur was later killed in a 1996 shooting in Las Vegas.
1996: Combs is convicted of criminal mischief after he allegedly threatened a photographer with a gun.
1997: Biggie is killed in Los Angeles. Combs, then known as Puff Daddy, releases 'I'll be Missing You' in honor of his slain star.
1998: Combs wins two Grammys, one for best rap album for his debut 'No Way Out' and another for best rap performance by a duo or group for 'I'll Be Missing You' with Faith Evans. Also that year, Combs' Sean John fashion line is founded.
April 16, 1999: Combs and his bodyguards are charged with attacking Interscope Records music executive Steve Stoute in his New York office in a dispute over a music video. Combs is sentenced to an anger management course.
Dec. 27, 1999: Combs is arrested on gun possession charges after he and his girlfriend at the time, Jennifer Lopez, fled a shooting that wounded three people at a New York City nightclub. Some witnesses tell police Combs was among the people shooting in the club. He is later charged with offering his driver $50,000 to claim ownership of the 9 mm handgun found in his car.
March 17, 2001: Combs is acquitted of all charges related to the nightclub shooting. One of his rap proteges, Jamal 'Shyne' Barrows, is convicted in the shooting and serves nearly nine years in prison. Two weeks after the trial, Combs announces he wants to be known as P. Diddy.
2002: Combs becomes the producer and star of 'Making the Band,' a talent-search TV show.
Feb. 1, 2004: Combs performs at the Super Bowl halftime show along with Janet Jackson, Justin Timberlake and others. A week later, Combs, Nelly and Murphy Lee win a Grammy for best rap performance by a duo or group for 'Shake Ya Tailfeather.'
April, 2004: Combs makes his Broadway acting debut in 'A Raisin in the Sun.'
2005: Combs announces he is changing his stage name to Diddy, getting rid of the P.
March, 2008: Combs settles a lawsuit brought by a man who claims Combs punched him after a post-Oscar party outside a Hollywood hotel the previous year. In May, Combs is honored with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
2015: Combs is arrested after a confrontation at UCLA in Los Angeles, where one of his sons played football. Assault charges are later dropped.
2016: Combs launches the Capital Preparatory School charter school in Harlem. Also that year, he announces he is donating $1 million to Howard University.
2017: Combs is named the top earner on Forbes' list of the 100 highest-paid celebrities, which says he brought in $130 million in a single year.
2018: Kim Porter, Combs' former girlfriend and mother of three of his children, dies from pneumonia at age 47.
2022: Combs receives a lifetime honor at the BET Awards.
September, 2023: Combs releases 'The Love Album — Off the Grid,' his first solo studio project since 2006's chart-topping 'Press Play.'
Nov. 16, 2023: R&B singer Cassie sues Combs, alleging he subjected her to years of abuse, including beatings and rape. A day later, the lawsuit is settled under undisclosed terms. Combs, through his attorney, denies the accusations.
Nov. 23, 2023: Two more women accuse Combs of sexual abuse in lawsuits. Combs' attorneys call the allegations false. Dozens of additional lawsuits follow by women and men who accuse Combs of rape, sexual assault and other attacks. Plaintiffs include singer Dawn Richard, a 'Making the Band' contestant who alleged years of psychological and physical abuse. Combs denies all the allegations.
March 25, 2024: Federal agents search Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami Beach, Florida.
May 17, 2024: CNN airs video that shows Combs attacking and beating Cassie in a hotel hallway in Los Angeles in 2016. Two days later, Combs posts videos on social media apologizing for the assault.
Sept. 16, 2024: Combs is arrested at his Manhattan hotel. A sex trafficking and racketeering indictment unsealed the next day accuses him of using his business empire to coerce women into participating in sexual performances. Combs denies the allegations. His attorney calls it an unjust prosecution of an 'imperfect person.'
May 5, 2025: Jury selection is scheduled to begin for Combs' trial.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2025 Emmys Animated Series Predictions
Variety Awards Circuit section is the home for all awards news and related content throughout the year, featuring the following: the official predictions for the upcoming Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and Tony Awards ceremonies, curated by Variety chief awards editor Clayton Davis. The prediction pages reflect the current standings in the race and do not reflect personal preferences for any individual contender. As other formal (and informal) polls suggest, competitions are fluid and subject to change based on buzz and events. Predictions are updated every Thursday. More from Variety 'There Is No Feud': Walton Goggins and Aimee Lou Wood Tell All on Their 'White Lotus' Connection, a Cut Love Scene and Yes, Why He Unfollowed Her on Instagram 'The Boys' Mocks 'The Last of Us,' 'House of The Dragon' and 'The Bear' in 'Superclass' FYC Clip (EXCLUSIVE) Could AI Help the Emmys? Why the TV Community Is 'Curious, but Not Yet Committed' Outstanding Animated Program Commentary (Updated: June 5, 2025): After seven acclaimed seasons and more than 50 Emmy nominations, 'Big Mouth' could finally claim the trophy for Outstanding Animated Program with its eighth and final installment. Since its 2017 debut on Netflix, the irreverent adult comedy has pushed boundaries with its bold mix of raunchy humor and heartfelt exploration of puberty, identity and growing up. With Maya Rudolph already a four-time Emmy winner for her role as Connie the Hormone Monstress and a voice cast that includes 222 star-studded guests, the show has become a cultural force in animation. Nick Kroll has also been making the rounds, giving heartfelt interviews that have garnered headlines and increased awareness for the show. Netflix is also juggling the former winner, 'Arcane,' and the new series 'Devil May Cry,' which could also break through and dominate the category. The last time a network or studio picked up three nominations in this category in the same year was 2012 — Fox's 'American Dad!,' 'Bob's Burgers,' and 'The Simpsons' — which all lost to Nickelodeon's 'The Penguins of Madagascar.' Speaking of Fox, they'll have the record-breaking 'The Simpsons' in the mix, which holds the record for most nominations (33) and wins (12) in this category, that could come in and take it home once more. There's also a pathway for Paramount's 'Star Trek: Lower Decks' to also nab a spot, which has been close on a few times, but hasn't received recognition yet. The Emmys eligibility period ends on May 31. Nomination voting runs from June 12 to June 23, with official nominations set to be announced July 15. Awards Circuit: Emmys!function(){'use strict'; 0!== e= t in r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if( d= !function(){'use strict'; 0!== e= t in r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if( d= !function(){'use strict'; 0!== e= t in r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if( d= The Primetime Emmy Awards, commonly known as the Emmys, are awarded by the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (ATAS). Established in 1949, these celebrate outstanding achievements in American primetime television. The Emmys are categorized into three divisions: the Primetime Emmy Awards for performance and production excellence; the Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards, recognizing achievements in artistry and craftsmanship; and the Primetime Engineering Emmy Awards, which honor significant engineering and technological advancements. The eligibility period typically extends from June 1 to May 31 each year. The Television Academy hosts the Emmys and has over 20,000 members across 30 professional peer groups, including performers, directors, producers, art directors, artisans and executives. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: With One Week Until Voting Opens, Declining Submissions Create Tight Acting and Series Races 2025 Tony Winners Predictions: A Starry, Stacked Broadway Season Sets the Stage for an Unpredictable Ceremony
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Can you really separate the art from the artist? Science says you can't, but a new poll suggests the answer is complicated.
Sean 'Diddy' Combs was once one of the biggest names in American pop culture. For a time, his presence was almost inescapable. Not only did he have several hits of his own, under his former stage name Puff Daddy, but his record label, Bad Boy Entertainment, produced some of the iconic hip-hop albums of the 1990s and 2000s. He also founded a TV network, launched a successful clothing company, became the face of a popular liquor brand and threw parties that some of the world's biggest celebrities rearranged their calendars to attend. Today, though, his public persona has been overwhelmed by allegations of Today, though, his public persona has been overwhelmed by allegations of how he has conducted his private life. Combs is currently standing trial in Manhattan on five criminal counts, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. Federal prosecutors have accused him of carrying out an extended campaign of abuse against women that included coercing them to participate in marathon sex parties, while using threats of violence and the power of his business empire to cover up his misdeeds. If convicted, he could end up spending the rest of his life in prison. Combs is far from the first celebrity to face allegations of horrific personal conduct. Whenever such claims arise, they force us to reconsider a beloved artist's work in light of their alleged behavior. Just how much do charges of misconduct affect how people view an artist's creative output? Can we really 'separate the art from the artist,' or does one's personal behavior inevitably tarnish their creative legacy? These questions have existed for a long time. Some of history's greatest artists have been accused of doing truly awful things. But the debate has become more pointed in recent years, in the wake of the #MeToo movement and the backlash against cancel culture. Combs's case shows how complicated these situations can be. When the allegations against him first came to light, streaming numbers for his music plummeted, but they actually increased in the wake of his arrest. A new Yahoo News/YouGov poll offers a glimpse into how Americans make sense of celebrities' behavior and how it influences their entertainment decisions. Rather than providing a definitive picture, the survey of 1,560 adults shows just how complicated these considerations can be and how divided we are in how we respond when the artists we love are accused of conduct we abhor. In the survey, which was conducted May 22-27, an overwhelming majority of people said that an artist's personal behavior can influence their choice of whether to watch their movies, listen to their music or otherwise engage with their art. That doesn't mean that they write off the work of any celebrity who faces allegations of misconduct, though. For most people, the specific circumstances are what matter. Sixty-seven percent of respondents said their choices depend on the artist and what they're accused of. Only 21% said that they will automatically abandon artists who do things they don't approve of 'because you can't separate the artist from the art.' Just 12% believe an artist's personal behavior doesn't matter at all 'because the art and the artist are separate things.' While it's clear that an artist's actions inform how most people view their work, that doesn't necessarily mean they will avoid it entirely if they disapprove of their behavior. Less than half of respondents (47%) said they have personally stopped consuming at least one artist's work because of things they have done. Nearly the same number (45%) said they have not. The nature of allegations matters as well. Sexual assault involving children was unsurprisingly the top reason respondents listed for why they stopped consuming an artist's work. Extreme political views, sexual assault involving adults, racism and domestic violence also ranked high on the list of 'cancelable' offenses. While all of these various factors appear to matter to some degree, it's not clear which one carries the most weight when it comes to specific artists. For example, sexual assault against children is viewed as the most egregious offense, but just 11% of people in the survey said they had stopped listening to music from Michael Jackson — who was accused of molesting multiple children during his lifetime. Three times as many people (33%) said they had stopped consuming R. Kelly's work in light of a string of sexual abuse claims involving minors that he has faced. Recency, familiarity, age and politics play a role here too. When given a list of celebrities who have faced high-profile allegations of wrongdoing, more respondents said they had stopped consuming Combs's art than any of the other options, possibly because reminders of those accusations are all over the news right now. Generational differences showed up in the results as well. Americans over 65 were more forgiving across every type of allegation — with the exception of drug use or excessive drinking, which they viewed as disqualifying at a higher rate than any other age group. Older people were also more likely to say they had stopped consuming work from Bill Cosby, who was a massive star in their generation before being accused of sexual assault by dozens of women. Despite Gen Z's purported reputation for hypersensitivity, younger people were either equally likely or less likely than millennials or Gen X-ers to say that they would stop consuming an artist's work across all different types of allegations — including anti-LGBTQ statements and sexism. At first glance, politics doesn't seem to be that big of a factor, but its influence really starts to show when you zoom in a bit. Democrats, Republicans and independents were equally likely to say they had abandoned an artist because of their behavior. Which artists and the kind of behavior varies dramatically, though. Just 5% of Republicans said that anti-LGBTQ statements had caused them to stop consuming an artist's work, compared with 34% of Democrats. GOP voters were also less likely to cite racism, sexism, domestic violence and sexual assault involving adults as reasons to give up an artist. The same is true when it comes to most individual artists, with particularly large gaps for celebrities who have expressly aligned themselves with President Trump. For example, seven times as many Democrats (30%) as Republicans (4%) said that they have stopped watching films starring Mel Gibson, who has faced various accusations of making antisemitic and racist comments statements over the years and whom Trump named as a 'special ambassador' to Hollywood in the early days of his second term. Researchers have been studying whether humans can separate art from artists for decades. For the most part, they have found that we can't. Studies consistently show that our moral judgments on individuals influence how we view things that are associated with them. Part of that is the result of high-level thinking, where we carefully weigh our appreciation of the art against our distaste for the artist's actions. But the process also happens at a more visceral, unconscious level. In one famous experiment from the 1990s, most test subjects refused to put on a sweater after being told to imagine that it belonged to Adolf Hitler, under the illogical belief that they would somehow be contaminated by his evil if they did. 'If a person does something that I find to be really repugnant, morally speaking, then I will have an unconscious sense that close, intimate contact with things they've created may affect or corrupt me in some vague, hard to specify manner,' James Harold, a professor of philosophy at Mount Holyoke College and the author of the book Dangerous Art, told Yahoo News. Thanks to technological advances, we can now see this process at work on a biological level. Researchers in Germany recently found that people instinctively viewed classical paintings as lower in quality when they were told about bad things the artists had done in their lives. 'These artworks are processed differently at the neural level. ... This shift in brain activity happens very quickly, during the early stages of perception and emotional processing,' Hannah Kaube, a doctoral candidate at the Humboldt University of Berlin who helped lead the study, told Yahoo News. 'This suggests that the effect is not just conscious, but occurs spontaneously and automatically.' Brain scans showed that the unflattering information caused an instant emotional change in the subjects, reflecting that they now viewed the work more negatively. Interestingly, though, those same scans found that work by 'bad' artists was also more arousing. Brain activity that's typically associated with more thoughtful, deliberate thinking was not triggered by the information. 'People may not even realize their feelings about the artwork are being shaped by what they know about the artist — but their brain shows that it is,' Kaube said. So if nearly all of us carry our judgments of an artist's behavior with us when we consume their art, why are some people able to still enjoy it while others feel obligated to give it up? 'The concept of 'separating art from the artist' can be considered along two interconnected dimensions: whether people should separate the two (an ethical question), and whether they actually do (a psychological one),' said Kaube, who only focuses on the second dimension in her research. Some of the explanations are straightforward. It's a lot easier to shun an artist if you're not a fan of their work in the first place or if you're of an age where they weren't really a big star to your generation. It's probably not a big ask for the average 20-year-old to stop watching Woody Allen movies over his adopted daughter's claim that he sexually abused her, for example. There's also the fact that a lot of people simply don't believe that the allegations against a celebrity are true or don't think that what they're accused of is that big of a deal. Some celebrities have very successfully turned public opinion in their favor after being targeted with allegations of misconduct. Our reactions are also a reflection of how we see ourselves, Harold argues. 'Much of the separating the art from the artist is expressive behavior,' he said. 'It has to do with a person's self-conception, who they think they are. ... We associate art as expressing something about the humanity of the person who made it, and so then you don't want to be affiliated with that human being.' External factors can also play a big role. Shared fandom can be a potent source of community in the digital age. So when allegations come out, fan groups often process the news collectively, which can influence any individual member's decisions. 'Refusing to engage with the work of somebody who you recently learned has done something bad can be a way of expressing your concern for other members of the group,' Harold said. Those dynamics can work in the other direction too, pushing members to keep engaging with a maligned artist in order to avoid losing a community they care about. Institutions can also influence our responses. When a museum, studio or entertainment venue announces that they will no longer work with a certain artist, that sends a broad message that their actions are disqualifying. If that doesn't happen, it can create the implication that the artist's behavior might not be so bad. One of the nation's most powerful institutions, the legal system, still hasn't registered its final judgment on Combs, which could prove to be the most important factor in how the public ultimately views his music. The accusations have already affected his standing. Nearly half of the respondents in our poll (47%) said the allegations had changed the way they view him as an artist. In the end, though, it's reasonable to expect that a guilty verdict would cause even more people to question whether his songs really deserve a spot on their playlists.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Diddy Trial: Forensic Video Expert and Cassie Ventura's Best Friend Bolster and Hinder Prosecution's Case
A forensic audio and video editor and a longtime close friend of Cassie Ventura, the ex-partner of Sean 'Diddy' Combs and his alleged longtime victim, who is central to federal prosecutor's case against the fallen rap world superstar, testified in court Wednesday. The former testified that he reviewed cell phone video, surveillance footage and 'sex videos' while working for the feds on the case, and the latter spoke about the moment she said she was dangled from a balcony by an enraged Combs. Combs has pleaded not guilty and vehemently denied wrongdoing as he faces a five-count indictment that includes sex trafficking and racketeering. More from The Hollywood Reporter Zurich Festival Lifetime Achievement Honor for Oscar-Winning Composer Hildur Gudnadóttir Billy Joel Doc Makers Lament Ailing Subject Couldn't Make Tribeca Opening Night but Insist "He's Going to Be Fine" 'Lee Soo Man: King of K-Pop' Director and Subject Talk New Prime Video Documentary Frank Piazza is an expert witness who testified that he was unaware of the Combs sex trafficking and racketeering case; he said that he reviewed cellphone video, surveillance footage from the infamous attack by Diddy on Ventura at the Intercontinental Hotel in L.A. and 'sex videos.' The possible modification of the tape, a notion floated by the defense ahead of the trial, was refuted by Piazza, who assured the court that the footage was not manually altered, saying that he'd slowed the footage to real time because a technical file converting video process inadvertently sped up. At the request of the government (at a rate of $295/hour), Piazza compiled video clips of the footage to 'track the movement of individuals inside the events'; signs of tampering were not present and the video, which was again shown to the jury for the eighth time since the trial began, were reliable depictions of what occurred in December 2016 in that hotel hallway. He also analyzed 10 'sex videos' recorded between 2012 and 2014 pulled from the 'Frank Black' user profile — a Combs pseudonym — and the laptop Ventura submitted to investigators. During cross-examination, Piazza told the court that the time stamps are not inaccurate, but that motion-activated cameras only update time stamps with distinct movement, saying that motion triggers a time stamp change in this camera system. Heading into the afternoon, the jury heard testimony from Bryana Bongolan, whose alleged ordeal was briefly discussed earlier in the trial. She testified about a fight with Combs in 2016 when the powerful mogul 'held her over a 17-story balcony.' Bongolan said Combs 'threw (her) onto the balcony furniture,' and she sustained injuries. Bongolan testified that she still suffers from 'night terrors and paranoia.' She did not report the myriad instances of violence, one of which included Combs tossing a knife into a wall, but she was terrified of Combs and his massive power. At one point, Combs threatened her life when she was accompanying Ventura on a 2016 beach photo shoot. 'He came up really close to my face and said something around the lines of, 'I'm the devil and I could kill you,'' Bongolan said. Bongolan and Ventura's rampant drug use together over their long-term friendship was another topic on Wednesday. In cross-examination, she was grilled about doing drugs with Ventura, selling them to her and giving them to her for free. The two would take cocaine, Percocet and Cocoa Puffs — marijuana blunts laced with Ketamine. The court adjourned after 4 p.m. Wednesday and will resume with defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland's grilling cross-examination of Bongolan, but not until 11 a.m. Thursday. Finally, the defense team had a long-awaited win Wednesday when Judge Arun Subramanian allowed them to meet with Combs in the court until 6 p.m. to strategize about the case. The team has been pushing for this extra time from the judge for weeks. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More
